https://www.totalprosports.com/nfl/sophie-rain-reveals-updates-amount-of-money-made-onlyfans/

IDK I guess it's NBD

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737542&forum_id=2#49013704)

Did they make as much as “Sophie Rain”? No. But did Joe DiMaggio make as much as Albert Belle? Not even close. It’s just timing at the top that fucked those other chicks.

What is fucking over society is that in 2005 you could meet a “mid” chick who was as hot as Tawnee Stone who just liked to chill and would look at these internet models and shrug and say I’m fine being with a balding fireman from my hometown and make kids and live a happy life.

Now that same mid chick will be walking around Beverly Hills or Washington Square Park aggressively in those workout outfits with her photographer trying to get her the perfect “reel” to get her over 100k followers which is equivalent to $70. If you mention a guy under 6’7 she will pause then hysterically laugh at you. She’s never going to get married ever because no one will meet her requirements. That’s the problem and there’s no way to fix it. They want their “nougat and eat it too.”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737542&forum_id=2#49013798)

The goal was to get a set of videos that could be sent as though they were plausibly being filmed live. People would send out the first video en masse; a certain percentage of subscribers would respond, and then you'd say sexy things and then send out the second video, for a certain trivial price (typically $3 or so) to unlock. A certain percentage of those subscribers would pay to unlock the video; then you sext a bit with them, then send out the next video in the series, usually for a slightly increased price. Eventually you work your way up to the final video, typically a climax, which could be just 30 seconds in length but often sold for $20-30.

I asked a manager once if he typically had girls film multiple drips at different times of day, because if you have light pouring through a window for a girl who supposedly lives in a place that's dark, it'll be a dead giveaway that it's not live.

He said no, it doesn't matter. The men basically never notice or care.

At one point, trying to understand agencies more, I created an account as a horny man, attached a credit card, bought access to a high-earning girl I knew was run by chatters, and bought through a drip series.

It was shockingly bad. She texted me something like "hey babe you horny", and I was like 'yes," and she said "let me show you what i'm doing" and then sent me a video of her in what was clearly a well-lit studio, she was wearing stilettos and dressed in a skimpy santa outfit, with perfectly curled hair and heavy makeup, bending down to show off her ass in a performative pose.

There was no way she had just filmed that. It was insane. But it didn't matter.

It took a long time for me to come to terms with the fact that for most men, they don't care about reality when it comes to their supposedly connective porn. They aren't tracking you for signs of genuine enjoyment; to them, your personality is simply a vessel with which to certify that your breasts are genuine. I know a girl who was typically very warm and direct, made personal connections with the men who subbed to her. She experimented by making a free page (a type of OF where you don't have to subscribe, but instead charge higher money for access to individual stuff on the feed), and on this she hired a real trashy chatter, who would spam men nonstop with stuff like 'HEY BB U UP? MY PUSSY HORNY XOXO LOOK AT ME WET NOW'. And yeah - her income shot up.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737542&forum_id=2#49015887)