alpha/beta
| Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | tantric curious nowag | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | Sapphire hall toaster | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | tantric curious nowag | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | tantric curious nowag | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | tantric curious nowag | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | Crystalline Shaky Queen Of The Night Gas Station | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | magical set hunting ground | 08/31/09 | | Sapphire hall toaster | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | magical set hunting ground | 08/31/09 | | Mauve exhilarant principal's office | 08/31/09 | | magical set hunting ground | 08/31/09 | | bateful voyeur | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | bateful voyeur | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | multi-colored native gaping | 08/31/09 | | multi-colored native gaping | 08/31/09 | | Razzmatazz naked step-uncle's house | 08/31/09 | | tantric curious nowag | 08/31/09 | | Razzmatazz naked step-uncle's house | 08/31/09 | | tantric curious nowag | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | stimulating round eye center | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | stimulating round eye center | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | Jet coldplay fan parlour | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | Jet coldplay fan parlour | 08/31/09 | | Jet coldplay fan parlour | 08/31/09 | | Jet coldplay fan parlour | 08/31/09 | | Jet coldplay fan parlour | 08/31/09 | | spruce bat shit crazy university | 08/31/09 | | Crystalline Shaky Queen Of The Night Gas Station | 08/31/09 | | spruce bat shit crazy university | 08/31/09 | | bateful voyeur | 08/31/09 | | Jet coldplay fan parlour | 08/31/09 | | Jet coldplay fan parlour | 08/31/09 | | Mauve exhilarant principal's office | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | Mauve exhilarant principal's office | 08/31/09 | | Sapphire hall toaster | 08/31/09 | | Mauve exhilarant principal's office | 08/31/09 | | Angry point | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | bronze fanboi | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | Titillating community account | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | vermilion tanning salon | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | Pearl costumed trailer park | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | Pearl costumed trailer park | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | Pearl costumed trailer park | 08/31/09 | | bateful voyeur | 08/31/09 | | Disgusting pocket flask | 08/31/09 | | bateful voyeur | 08/31/09 | | Fragrant duck-like sanctuary international law enforcement agency | 09/28/11 | | maniacal clear incel | 09/28/11 | | Amethyst abode | 09/28/11 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 31st, 2009 2:54 AM Author: Disgusting pocket flask
Who among you takes this shit deadly seriously?
Granted the terms "alpha" and "beta" approximate, in various ways, two polar ends of a continuum of male behavior (within a very limited universe of considered behaviors). Certain behaviors appear correlated with others that tend to cluster around one or the other poles.
However, there are at least three problems that I see with the overuse of these terms both on this board and the larger tubes.
First and most obviously, people - even men - are more complex than this. This isn't necessarily damning, because, like homo economicus, "alpha" and "beta" seem to be used largely as theoretical objects for the purpose of prediction rather than description. Or, at least, they would if properly used.
But the second problem is that they're never used this way. The terms are stretched far, far beyond their explanatory utility. "Alpha" and "beta" are used to provide reasons for literally every realm of male behavior, and they're usually unargued. If the terms were truly meaningful enough to account for the profligate modes of male behavior they'd be, well, more numerous. There would be shades of "alpha" and shades of "beta." But there aren't. There is one binary division. This isn't altogether fatal, either, but it certainly would seem to undermine the project. "Alpha" and "beta" should be used, if at all, as gesturing toward familial resemblances in behaviors, rather than as strict boundaries. But they're used in the second manner, and are now threadbare from overuse.
Probably the worst thing about these terms is that, not only is there no consensus, but there is vociferous opposition on what "alpha" and "beta" actually mean. Precious few behaviors will garner a supermajority of "180 alpha!" or "lol beta!" Each "alpha" comment invites a "beta" rejoinder, and an argument as to why the OP is, actually, beta to think that so-and-so is alpha. There is no principled way to decide, of course, since everyone who uses these terms seriously is an avowed MFE and alpha himself.
inb4 "lol beta"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12636970) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2009 2:59 AM Author: Disgusting pocket flask
This is typical of why I find these terms so maddening. Not because of what you've said - I agree, to the extent possible with these words, that there is a such thing as "situational alphaness" - but rather that someone, whether they bother to or not, will think "NO, YOU'RE EITHER ALPHA OR YOU'RE NOT."
Who is to say who is misusing the word? Maybe this is a problem with all incipient colloquialisms, but it's frustrating enough to me to shunt it totally.
Plus, I have to say, another big reason I can't stand to see them used is because the person delivering them is usually a puffed-up blowhard who calls himself "alpha" and is, actually, stupid and a douche. And if an "alpha" brags on the internet, well, common sense tells me to doubt him.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12636983) |
 |
Date: August 31st, 2009 3:06 AM Author: tantric curious nowag
Date: August 31st, 2009 2:54 AM
Author: askav
Who among you takes this shit deadly seriously?
Granted the terms "alpha" and "beta" approximate, in various ways, two polar ends of a continuum of male behavior (within a very limited universe of considered behaviors). Certain behaviors appear correlated with others that tend to cluster around one or the other poles.
However, there are at least three problems that I see with the overuse of these terms both on this board and the larger tubes.
First and most obviously, people - even men - are more complex than this. This isn't necessarily damning, because, like homo economicus, "alpha" and "beta" seem to be used largely as theoretical objects for the purpose of prediction rather than description. Or, at least, they would if properly used.
But the second problem is that they're never used this way. The terms are stretched far, far beyond their explanatory utility. "Alpha" and "beta" are used to provide reasons for literally every realm of male behavior, and they're usually unargued. If the terms were truly meaningful enough to account for the profligate modes of male behavior they'd be, well, more numerous. There would be shades of "alpha" and shades of "beta." But there aren't. There is one binary division. This isn't altogether fatal, either, but it certainly would seem to undermine the project. "Alpha" and "beta" should be used, if at all, as gesturing toward familial resemblances in behaviors, rather than as strict boundaries. But they're used in the second manner, and are now threadbare from overuse.
Probably the worst thing about these terms is that, not only is there no consensus, but there is vociferous opposition on what "alpha" and "beta" actually mean. Precious few behaviors will garner a supermajority of "180 alpha!" or "lol beta!" Each "alpha" comment invites a "beta" rejoinder, and an argument as to why the OP is, actually, beta to think that so-and-so is alpha. There is no principled way to decide, of course, since everyone who uses these terms seriously is an avowed MFE and alpha himself.
inb4 "lol beta"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12636970
Date: August 31st, 2009 2:59 AM
Author: askav
This is typical of why I find these terms so maddening. Not because of what you've said - I agree, to the extent possible with these words, that there is a such thing as "situational alphaness" - but rather that someone, whether they bother to or not, will think "NO, YOU'RE EITHER ALPHA OR YOU'RE NOT."
Who is to say who is misusing the word? Maybe this is a problem with all incipient colloquialisms, but it's frustrating enough to me to shunt it totally.
Plus, I have to say, another big reason I can't stand to see them used is because the person delivering them is usually a puffed-up blowhard who calls himself "alpha" and is, actually, stupid and a douche. And if an "alpha" brags on the internet, well, common sense tells me to doubt him.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12636983)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12637009)
|
 |
Date: August 31st, 2009 3:11 AM Author: Disgusting pocket flask
Okay. But I'm not worked up.
I think, and kindly grant this, that any questioning of the "alpha/beta" distinction - even on grounds of use of the words rather than the value of the distinction - invites policing from the "alpha/beta" orthodoxy.
It is the questioning itself that must be called "beta," in order that the queen is protected from idle drones.
You've served your role. Well done.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12637023) |
Date: August 31st, 2009 11:33 AM Author: bateful voyeur
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AI-VY5cC2jk
summary: panties get wet at alpha display of violent power
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#12637655) |
Date: September 28th, 2011 1:49 PM Author: maniacal clear incel
it makes sense in the strictest sense, i.e., that if civilization were wiped out and we all broke off into bands of primitive hunter gatherers, the protypical "alpha" would emerge, mate with all the women, etc.
but that doesn't mean much, because we live in a complex social environment completely removed from such a situation.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1075328&forum_id=2#19060253) |
|
|