\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Theory: "Notes and Questions" sections deliberately obfuscate

They fill the space between the cases with stuff that just n...
Green Resort
  12/23/09
well you gotta justify charging 200 for caselaw reprints som...
Vivacious Spruce Church Ape
  12/23/09
If it weren't for the fact that the cases are usually heavil...
Green Resort
  12/23/09
credited strategy is buying prior edition on amazon for $15....
Vivacious Spruce Church Ape
  12/23/09
Oh, word? That sounds like a fucking plan. Books are expensi...
Green Resort
  12/23/09
Do the page #s tend to change much? I assume I can just find...
Green Resort
  12/23/09
Some profs dig into the N and Q sections, gotta know "w...
orange sick set
  12/23/09
Or just print out the headnotes.
buff pisswyrm garrison
  12/23/09
titmfcr
spectacular chrome station cumskin
  12/23/09
Ugh. FUCK ASPEN!
Vibrant elastic band
  12/23/09
the cases cited in those sections are always relevant; you'r...
copper 180 step-uncle's house sex offender
  12/23/09
This is correct. I can't tell if it's a racket or if it's s...
Charismatic umber theater
  12/23/09
total racket. if they didn't obfuscate we'd see how shallow...
thriller macaca
  12/23/09
"charge huge prices for public domain materials" ...
razzmatazz white field
  12/23/09
because it's futile: only a professor can force students to ...
thriller macaca
  12/23/09
the worst is in a class like admin or fed courts where a cas...
razzmatazz white field
  12/23/09
even if they felt the need to play traditional hide the ball...
thriller macaca
  12/23/09
the other thing i hate is when the main case in a section is...
Glassy people who are hurt messiness
  12/23/09
srsly, this is how law school should be taught. law school i...
big-titted irradiated plaza trump supporter
  12/24/09
Yeah, my LS friends stopped going to Admin because the profe...
underhanded arrogant idiot
  12/24/09
math books do the same thing-the goal is to help you start t...
ocher jew meetinghouse
  12/23/09
I kind of like the way it's set up; you have to work a bit t...
stirring insane hell dog poop
  12/23/09
agreed, dukeminier's property book is the shit. i can't spea...
at-the-ready soul-stirring twinkling uncleanness multi-billionaire
  12/24/09
Yeah, Dukeminier is unfuckwithable. Loved that book, got an ...
Green Resort
  12/24/09
Well, the point of legal education isn't to teach you the bl...
ultramarine curious love of her life
  12/23/09
you sound like a faggot.
slimy galvanic school
  12/23/09
"legal deduction" Is deduction REALLY the word ...
Cruel-hearted Crotch
  12/24/09
replace deduction with hermeneutics and credit this
orange sick set
  12/25/09
I concur with this most fascinating theory.
Stimulating kitty
  12/23/09
For 1L, this is absolutely true. Some 2L/3L casebooks I'v...
slimy galvanic school
  12/23/09
I haven't bought books since 1L year. I westlaw everything ...
underhanded arrogant idiot
  12/24/09


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 12:44 PM
Author: Green Resort

They fill the space between the cases with stuff that just needlessly confuses you, at which point you will feel the need to buy an UNDERSTANDING or E&E type book (likely made by the same publisher) to clarify things again. But imagine if they just removed all the "notes and questions" and instead inserted the material from the fucking UNDERSTANDING book.

In my more gunnerish moments, I have taken the time to actually go through those N&Q questions in some chapters and even look up the case results that they leave hanging - as often as not I find myself saying "Wow, that's actually irrelevant" or "this case isn't really on point at all."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631223)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 12:46 PM
Author: Vivacious Spruce Church Ape

well you gotta justify charging 200 for caselaw reprints somehow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631238)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 12:48 PM
Author: Green Resort

If it weren't for the fact that the cases are usually heavily edited, it'd make good sense to just print all the cases from WL and put them in a couple binders. But you'd waste a lot of time reading stuff you don't need to read.

TBF SOME casebooks actually seem to put useful shit in between cases instead of just useless N&Qs. The red Aspen books seem to be the worst offender in this regard.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631262)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 12:50 PM
Author: Vivacious Spruce Church Ape

credited strategy is buying prior edition on amazon for $15. the maybe two extra cases you can WL.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631278)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 12:51 PM
Author: Green Resort

Oh, word? That sounds like a fucking plan. Books are expensive as HELL this semester. TY friend.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631287)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 12:52 PM
Author: Green Resort

Do the page #s tend to change much? I assume I can just find a friend and check against his books.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631293)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 1:15 PM
Author: orange sick set

Some profs dig into the N and Q sections, gotta know "what up" with that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631447)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 1:03 PM
Author: buff pisswyrm garrison

Or just print out the headnotes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631372)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 7:26 PM
Author: spectacular chrome station cumskin

titmfcr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13633642)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 9:52 PM
Author: Vibrant elastic band

Ugh. FUCK ASPEN!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13634572)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 2:42 PM
Author: copper 180 step-uncle's house sex offender

the cases cited in those sections are always relevant; you're just not smart enough to understand why.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631944)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 1:09 PM
Author: Charismatic umber theater

This is correct. I can't tell if it's a racket or if it's stupidity.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631413)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 1:25 PM
Author: thriller macaca

total racket. if they didn't obfuscate we'd see how shallow law school teaching is. and then they charge huge prices for public domain materials simply because they can force us to buy the materials. few of them give a fuck about students. (my estimate: about 20% do.)

and when they come calling over the years, asking for money from me, i will remind them that i was overcharged for learning contracts from a professor who does know shit about real contracts and for learning property from a professor who doesn't know shit about land ownership.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631498)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 1:28 PM
Author: razzmatazz white field

"charge huge prices for public domain materials"

lol why dont you try to write a legal textbook then

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631521)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 1:30 PM
Author: thriller macaca

because it's futile: only a professor can force students to buy one.

but as for difficulty, it would be easy for any field i knew well.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631526)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 1:26 PM
Author: razzmatazz white field

the worst is in a class like admin or fed courts where a case is pretty complicated, and then the notes and questions pose a lot of important questions without answering them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631512)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 1:29 PM
Author: thriller macaca

even if they felt the need to play traditional hide the ball shit for 1L classes, classes like admin law are so dense that they should teach us like they'd teach busy professionals any dense material. give us the outline. discuss the key issues. identify the thorny issues.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631522)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 6:08 PM
Author: Glassy people who are hurt messiness

the other thing i hate is when the main case in a section is some stupid case from 1850, and then the more important recent cases are stuck in notes after the case

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13633281)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:24 AM
Author: big-titted irradiated plaza trump supporter

srsly, this is how law school should be taught. law school is such a fucking scam.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13635827)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:25 AM
Author: underhanded arrogant idiot

Yeah, my LS friends stopped going to Admin because the professor just confused them. He had a PhD. in Political Science and went out of his way to wonk.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13635838)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 2:44 PM
Author: ocher jew meetinghouse

math books do the same thing-the goal is to help you start teaching yourself shit.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631972)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 6:13 PM
Author: stirring insane hell dog poop

I kind of like the way it's set up; you have to work a bit to get some of the law. Dukeminier's notes and qs allowed me to utterly destroy our curve, breaking the next highest score by 16 points and probably costing 3-4 classmates an A.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13633311)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:56 AM
Author: at-the-ready soul-stirring twinkling uncleanness multi-billionaire

agreed, dukeminier's property book is the shit. i can't speak to the quality of other aspen books, but the notes & qs in that one are tits.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13636017)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 1:22 AM
Author: Green Resort

Yeah, Dukeminier is unfuckwithable. Loved that book, got an A in Property.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13636139)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 9:44 PM
Author: ultramarine curious love of her life

Well, the point of legal education isn't to teach you the blackletter law. Anyone can read a summary of the law. It is to teach you legal thinking, legal reasoning, legal deduction.

So you're right that the notes would be crappy if they were intended to teach you the blackletter law. But that's not their intent.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13634507)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 9:54 PM
Author: slimy galvanic school

you sound like a faggot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13634584)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 1:15 AM
Author: Cruel-hearted Crotch

"legal deduction"

Is deduction REALLY the word you're looking for?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13636117)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 3:08 AM
Author: orange sick set

replace deduction with hermeneutics and credit this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13642980)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 9:50 PM
Author: Stimulating kitty

I concur with this most fascinating theory.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13634561)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 9:52 PM
Author: slimy galvanic school

For 1L, this is absolutely true.

Some 2L/3L casebooks I've had give you a random, ridiculous "principal case" and then just tell you what the law is in the notes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13634574)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:20 AM
Author: underhanded arrogant idiot

I haven't bought books since 1L year. I westlaw everything and study off old outlines.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13635803)