Theory: "Notes and Questions" sections deliberately obfuscate
| Green Resort | 12/23/09 | | Vivacious Spruce Church Ape | 12/23/09 | | Green Resort | 12/23/09 | | Vivacious Spruce Church Ape | 12/23/09 | | Green Resort | 12/23/09 | | Green Resort | 12/23/09 | | orange sick set | 12/23/09 | | buff pisswyrm garrison | 12/23/09 | | spectacular chrome station cumskin | 12/23/09 | | Vibrant elastic band | 12/23/09 | | copper 180 step-uncle's house sex offender | 12/23/09 | | Charismatic umber theater | 12/23/09 | | thriller macaca | 12/23/09 | | razzmatazz white field | 12/23/09 | | thriller macaca | 12/23/09 | | razzmatazz white field | 12/23/09 | | thriller macaca | 12/23/09 | | Glassy people who are hurt messiness | 12/23/09 | | big-titted irradiated plaza trump supporter | 12/24/09 | | underhanded arrogant idiot | 12/24/09 | | ocher jew meetinghouse | 12/23/09 | | stirring insane hell dog poop | 12/23/09 | | at-the-ready soul-stirring twinkling uncleanness multi-billionaire | 12/24/09 | | Green Resort | 12/24/09 | | ultramarine curious love of her life | 12/23/09 | | slimy galvanic school | 12/23/09 | | Cruel-hearted Crotch | 12/24/09 | | orange sick set | 12/25/09 | | Stimulating kitty | 12/23/09 | | slimy galvanic school | 12/23/09 | | underhanded arrogant idiot | 12/24/09 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 23rd, 2009 12:44 PM Author: Green Resort
They fill the space between the cases with stuff that just needlessly confuses you, at which point you will feel the need to buy an UNDERSTANDING or E&E type book (likely made by the same publisher) to clarify things again. But imagine if they just removed all the "notes and questions" and instead inserted the material from the fucking UNDERSTANDING book.
In my more gunnerish moments, I have taken the time to actually go through those N&Q questions in some chapters and even look up the case results that they leave hanging - as often as not I find myself saying "Wow, that's actually irrelevant" or "this case isn't really on point at all."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13631223) |
Date: December 23rd, 2009 9:44 PM Author: ultramarine curious love of her life
Well, the point of legal education isn't to teach you the blackletter law. Anyone can read a summary of the law. It is to teach you legal thinking, legal reasoning, legal deduction.
So you're right that the notes would be crappy if they were intended to teach you the blackletter law. But that's not their intent.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13634507) |
Date: December 23rd, 2009 9:52 PM Author: slimy galvanic school
For 1L, this is absolutely true.
Some 2L/3L casebooks I've had give you a random, ridiculous "principal case" and then just tell you what the law is in the notes.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172428&forum_id=2#13634574) |
|
|