\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Will Obama care be challenged in the Supreme Court?

I mean if they are forcing people to get health insurance co...
infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point
  12/23/09
1LFAIL
Opaque Theater
  12/23/09
i'll just leave this here. http://online.wsj.com/article/...
Brass school cafeteria
  12/13/10
To answer the title question, probably.
Flesh Big-titted Corner
  12/24/09
LOL, ty for this.
bull headed orchid theatre
  12/23/09
I'm barely reading the news. Just following it on hearsay......
infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point
  12/23/09
"Just following it on 'hearsay.'" STFU faggot
honey-headed floppy sweet tailpipe
  12/23/09
ok
infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point
  12/23/09
not the whole bill. just the mandatory insurance requirement...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
Please enlighten us. What is this "solid argument"...
honey-headed floppy sweet tailpipe
  12/23/09
hi
infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point
  12/23/09
freedom of association. congress is forcing me to enter into...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
They'd just claim you need to "buy the public option&qu...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
ok, but the public option is not in the bill. also, cong...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
Are you certain that the public option isn't in the bill? I...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
well, it's not in the senate bill, and it won't get cloture ...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
Unless it goes back to the house and is revised again and re...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
i just told you, a public option will not be able to gain cl...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
You mean like when your state requires you to have auto insu...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
do you not understand the difference between the limited and...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
Well let me see - yes, yes I do. The federal government ...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
Commerce power has nothing to do with this... or next to not...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
How so? Things with a much more tenuous impact on interstate...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
When you can create and manipulate laws, would you worry abo...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
yes, do go on. complete the analysis.
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
Health insurance and the healthcare industry are interstate ...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
this is pathetic. fail. did you even take con law? explai...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
Jesus fucking christ, did YOU take con law? Have you ever he...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
amusing tendentiousness
maize comical windowlicker
  12/23/09
yes. in wickard v. filburn the farmer was told he couldn't g...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
You're reading into the commerce clause some kind of right t...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
and your reading of the commerce clause gives congress unlim...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
Your examples are exactly the sort of thing that the Supreme...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
EPA regulations come from congressional laws like the clean ...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
You said this: "you will not be able to cite me a singl...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
no, you're misreading what i wrote. the clean air and water ...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
obamamom you won just chill out man. put the gun down. we're...
Harsh Cordovan Stage
  12/25/09
epa regulations prevent people from polluting, or affect act...
drunken church
  12/24/09
You obviously havent taken con law yet. Scotus has found som...
diverse senate reading party
  12/23/09
violence against women act? that was found to be unconstitut...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
Not entirely.
diverse senate reading party
  12/23/09
no, not entirely, but in the context of the commerce clause ...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
The state only requires this if you own a car and wish to dr...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
and only if you wish to drive it on public roads, which are ...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
It's not the best analogy, admittedly. But both the state an...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
Sure they can, our populism loves to be a bunch of passive, ...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
PLEASE PROVIDE A BETTER ANALOGY, WHATEVER THE FUCK ANY ANALO...
stubborn ratface
  12/23/09
Congress can force you to pay taxes and register for selecti...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
WOW. THAT IS EVEN WORSE ANALOGY.
stubborn ratface
  12/24/09
/facepalms are you fucking shitting me? Pay taxes = you m...
violent yapping range potus
  12/24/09
this is wrong. they can MAKE you pay your taxes by sending y...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
They can't make you pay your taxes on $0 gross income, sorry...
violent yapping range potus
  12/24/09
so you're saying congress can't force you to report your inc...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
Did I say that? no... I did say that Congress cannot force y...
violent yapping range potus
  12/24/09
ok, but your explanation relies on an individual's not knowi...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
What in the mother fuck are you talking about holy god. I...
violent yapping range potus
  12/24/09
oh, i see what you're saying. convoluted, but i get it. you ...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
They can't force you to buy health insurance either, they ca...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
Yes they do http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnew...
violent yapping range potus
  12/24/09
That article is so full of incorrect information about the b...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
Yes... the letter on the CBO's website is bull shit. You ...
violent yapping range potus
  12/24/09
well the gov't can't force you to do anything, really, it ca...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
How the fuck is it a capitation tax? It's not a fixed amount...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
what do you mean it isn't? the act says, "either buy he...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
No, it's a percent.
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
even so, it doesn't matter. it's still a direct tax upon the...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
How is a tax that's a percent of your income not a tax on yo...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
because of the 16th amendment and its power to raise and mai...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
And they can do the same with health insurance because of th...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
no, they can't. see our exchange above.
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
Forcing people to pay for something as a "cost to be al...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
that's not a constitutional argument.
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
I don't see how that is unconstitutional honestly, I do thin...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
ok... tell me. why, specifically, is it constitutional. whic...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
You know this isn't how the SCOTUS works. If it did work th...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
this is nonsense. someone will challenge the mandatory insur...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
I'm not saying it isn't sound, but a lot of amazingly sound ...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
The class of people without insurance ARE substantially affe...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
WTF
stubborn ratface
  12/23/09
This has to be the stupidest legal argument I've ever read.
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
it's not stupid. the gov't tried it in morrison, but failed.
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
The government tries a lot of stupid shit... all the fucking...
violent yapping range potus
  12/24/09
It's not Morrison, it's Wickard and Raich. It's actually a L...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
"commercial activity of one group affects overall comme...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
that's an indirect effect and you have to pile inference upo...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
Unlike battered women, the use of medical services and purch...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
this doesn't fit within commerce clause jurisprudence. no on...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
A mandatory rule deals with the same liberty interests as a ...
Harsh Cordovan Stage
  12/25/09
what prevents congress from requiring the purchase of a new ...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/25/09
killing analog transmission is pretty much that
Ruby Flirting Azn Space
  12/25/09
Elections
Harsh Cordovan Stage
  12/25/09
you mean coherent
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
There was nothing difficult to understand about what I said.
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
"This really doesn't have much to do with the 1st amend...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
Sorry about your tiny TTT brain dude. Lemme guess, BC gra...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
Flame or you just didn't mean to type "1st Amendment&qu...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
No... I def meant first amendment
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
And... in what case was the First Amendment used as a basis ...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
Despite the unconstitutionality of this, it won't probably b...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
how about MOTUS?
bull headed orchid theatre
  12/23/09
you don't think it can get 4 votes for review? scalia, thoma...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
probably not...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
oh ok. you make a good point. tyft.
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
If this happened it would be when Obama reached into the hig...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
wgiyaf
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
I don't think anyone knows what that means.
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
it's the moron's acronym for yfwgi
infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point
  12/23/09
ITT: ...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
faggots?
bull headed orchid theatre
  12/23/09
stop being mean to yourself.
infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point
  12/23/09
If you choose to make over X amount (those who do not will b...
Aphrodisiac incel
  12/23/09
That X amount is 50% below the poverty line (and starts at $...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
If you choose to make $1 in the U.S. economy you are subject...
Aphrodisiac incel
  12/23/09
There are people who don't report any income and yet would b...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
thus you are subsidized... what is so hard to understand?
Aphrodisiac incel
  12/24/09
You aren't subsidized... http://www.thenewamerican.com/in...
violent yapping range potus
  12/24/09
Big difference between "not reporting any income" ...
Cyan office
  12/25/09
"you are subject to any taxation the federal govt wishe...
Flesh Big-titted Corner
  12/24/09
[i]That X amount is 50% below the poverty line (and starts a...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/106xx/doc10691/hr3962SubsidiesRangelL...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
Nowhere in that document does it say anything about someone ...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/23/09
Ummmmmm... I'm not eligible for medicaid and I made $0 this ...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
TYTY I was following his posts in this thread with a mix...
stubborn ratface
  12/24/09
14k/yr is not 50% of the poverty line.
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
you're right... it's less than 50%
violent yapping range potus
  12/24/09
um, nope http://liheap.ncat.org/profiles/povertytables/FY...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
Oh yeah, that's setting a great precedent.
infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point
  12/23/09
The faggot OP doesn't realize we're already taxed to pay for...
Opaque Theater
  12/23/09
yea, this
Aphrodisiac incel
  12/23/09
You're profoundly retarded.
infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point
  12/23/09
U MAD?
Opaque Theater
  12/23/09
medicare =/= forcing people to buy health insurance from a p...
infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point
  12/23/09
You can opt out of medicare... hth
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
yes, and if you do not pay the tax, you will go to jail, whi...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
how is it not a tax on income? you dont have to pay it if y...
Aphrodisiac incel
  12/23/09
Yes... you do
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
link or stfu
Aphrodisiac incel
  12/24/09
"In a letter dated November 5, the Joint Committee on T...
violent yapping range potus
  12/24/09
1) If you make below a certain income you won't be subject t...
ungodly chartreuse box office roommate
  12/24/09
you don't understand the difference between an income tax an...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
this is just some nonsense to keep the controversy going so ...
Vibrant base
  12/23/09
they look bad all by themselves. they just ignore the lat...
Ruby Flirting Azn Space
  12/23/09
They are doing plenty to make themselves look bad. http:/...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
the CBO also cleared up the medicare 500 billion fix, tellin...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/23/09
Obama spends more on a stimulus bill that created fewer jobs...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
no i think the war on terror has cost more, but you're not f...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
"Obama spends more on a stimulus bill that created fewe...
Disgusting lime skinny woman public bath
  12/24/09
War --> jobs My mother asked my father about his wish ...
Harsh Cordovan Stage
  12/25/09
It doesn't change the fact that this is just smoke and mirro...
Vibrant base
  12/23/09
Um... they won't have the ammunition when the deficit balloo...
violent yapping range potus
  12/23/09
those are all hypotheticals. they only go so far with the am...
Vibrant base
  12/24/09
They will be a reality in 2010.
violent yapping range potus
  12/24/09
sure thing, chief.
Vibrant base
  12/24/09
7.9% inflation in 2009... the fed reserve is gonna keep inte...
violent yapping range potus
  12/24/09
cash out of their pockets they understand.
Ruby Flirting Azn Space
  12/24/09
ARE COUNTRY.
bull headed orchid theatre
  12/24/09
the penn law review ran a debate on this question: http...
Kink-friendly aromatic university
  12/24/09
this was pretty good. balkin's commerce clause analysis is o...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
see ashcroft v reich (bullshit expansive reading of commerce...
Contagious talking national
  12/24/09
that's more popularly known as gonzales v. raich. i discu...
charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation
  12/24/09
what an annoying post this was.
bull headed orchid theatre
  12/24/09
Can the American people, acting through their democratically...
Henna Arousing Idea He Suggested Headpube
  12/25/09
shut the fuck up faggot.
bull headed orchid theatre
  12/24/09
THE INTERNET IS SERIOUS FUCKING BUSINESS.
Harsh Cordovan Stage
  12/25/09


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:11 PM
Author: infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point

I mean if they are forcing people to get health insurance coverage under penalty of law, such a law would be unconstitutional on its face.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635293)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:13 PM
Author: Opaque Theater

1LFAIL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635310)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 13th, 2010 1:45 PM
Author: Brass school cafeteria

i'll just leave this here.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703727804576017552229615230.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEADNewsCollection

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#16801100)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:58 AM
Author: Flesh Big-titted Corner

To answer the title question, probably.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13636029)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:12 PM
Author: bull headed orchid theatre

LOL, ty for this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635304)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:13 PM
Author: infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point

I'm barely reading the news. Just following it on hearsay... am I missing something?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635309)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:16 PM
Author: honey-headed floppy sweet tailpipe

"Just following it on 'hearsay.'"

STFU faggot

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635318)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:17 PM
Author: infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point

ok

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635323)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:15 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

not the whole bill. just the mandatory insurance requirement. seems like a solid argument that congress has no authority to act and it may violate the first amendment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635317)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:16 PM
Author: honey-headed floppy sweet tailpipe

Please enlighten us. What is this "solid argument" for why it violates the 1st A?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635320)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:17 PM
Author: infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point

hi

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635324)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:18 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

freedom of association. congress is forcing me to enter into contracts with private entities i don't wish to be associated with.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635333)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:19 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

They'd just claim you need to "buy the public option" (without noting it's much more expensive)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635350)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:21 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

ok, but the public option is not in the bill.

also, congress is still without power to have such a requirement.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635364)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:22 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Are you certain that the public option isn't in the bill?

I'm not... I haven't seen the supposedly "revised" bill.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635371)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:23 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

well, it's not in the senate bill, and it won't get cloture if it gets put into the bill in conference. so no, if anything passes, it won't have a public option.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635384)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:25 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Unless it goes back to the house and is revised again and resubmitted than passes anyway.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635403)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:29 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

i just told you, a public option will not be able to gain cloture in the senate. it is opposed by lieberman, landrieu and nelson, at least.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635435)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:19 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

You mean like when your state requires you to have auto insurance?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635352)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:21 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

do you not understand the difference between the limited and enumerated powers of the federal government and the state's plenary powers as limited by the federal constitution? fucking n00b.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635370)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:25 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

Well let me see - yes, yes I do.

The federal government has something called the commerce power.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635408)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:27 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Commerce power has nothing to do with this... or next to nothing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635421)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:30 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

How so? Things with a much more tenuous impact on interstate commerce have been regulated with the commerce power. Do you really thing that a congress full of lawyers and a former HLS law review EIC president didn't even bother to, like, figure out what clause of the constitution to use to justify this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635443)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:33 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

When you can create and manipulate laws, would you worry about the power of your illiterate and populist people to control you?

I sure the fuck wouldn't.

Also interstate commerce has nothing to do with forcing individuals to buy into your policy (just by living) or face imprisonment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635474)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:30 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

yes, do go on. complete the analysis.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635440)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:31 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

Health insurance and the healthcare industry are interstate commerce. The end.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635446)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:34 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

this is pathetic. fail. did you even take con law?

explain to me how the class of people who choose not to buy health insurance affect interstate commerce.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635487)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:37 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

Jesus fucking christ, did YOU take con law? Have you ever heard of Wickard v. Filburn? Gonzales v. Raich?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635517)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:41 PM
Author: maize comical windowlicker

amusing tendentiousness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635550)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:44 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

yes. in wickard v. filburn the farmer was told he couldn't grow wheat even for personal consumption b/c the aggregate amount of his activity and people like him would substantially affect wheat prices nationwide.

in gonzales v. raich a marijuana grower was told he couldn't grow weed because, although illegal, weed sales significantly affected interstate commerce.

notice that, in both cases, congress regulated some activity. in the case of the health insurance, congress would be regulating a LACK of activity. it would be tantamount to forcing farmers to grow wheat in order to bring wheat prices down, or forcing all citizens to purchase fruits in order to accomplish some other governmental goal.

do you see the difference?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635575)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:51 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

You're reading into the commerce clause some kind of right to not be forced to do stuff. It isn't there. There's nothing about the commerce clause or any other clause in the constitution that says "Congress can only tell people NOT to do stuff, not tell them to DO stuff" (see taxes, selective service, etc.).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635634)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:01 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

and your reading of the commerce clause gives congress unlimited power to force citizens to do anything. your two examples are inapposite. income taxes are permissible based on the 16th amendment. selective service is permissible based on congress's power to raise and maintain an army and navy. neither have anything to do with the commerce clause.

in point of fact, you will not be able to cite me a single example of a statute in which congress has used the commerce clause to force people to do anything.

can the supreme court adopt your reading? yes, sure it can. but i really, really doubt it will. if congress can force people to purchase something because it affects interstate commerce, what prevents them from forcing people to lose weight? obesity affects interstate commerce. what prevents congress from forcing you to eat an apple a day? apples travel in interstate commerce. there's no way the supreme court can allow that. it would lead to dictatorial power, and incidentally, it would be making itself useless as a check on govt power. no way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635699)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:08 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

Your examples are exactly the sort of thing that the Supreme Court WOULD strike down following Morrison because the effects on interstate commerce are too tenuous.

The federal government makes all kinds of affirmative mandates - via EPA regulations, for example. If you want one for individuals - how about jury duty?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635750)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:19 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

EPA regulations come from congressional laws like the clean air and water acts, which are allowed by the commerce clause because they regulate industrial activity, which is interstate commerce.

jury duty is enshrined in the constitution, e.g., the sixth amendment, which is why it's allowed. it has nothing to do with the commerce clause.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635796)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:24 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

You said this: "you will not be able to cite me a single example of a statute in which congress has used the commerce clause to force people to do anything."

I cited EPA regulations, which come from congressional statutes.

You responded "well that's interstate commerce." Yeah it's interstate commerce, that's my fucking point. That's why I used it as an example of something creating affirmative duties under the commerce clause.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635833)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:27 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

no, you're misreading what i wrote. the clean air and water acts don't say you have to do something. rather, they say, IF you choose to do something, you must do it in accordance with the law.

would it be clearer if i said you cannot cite a single statute in which the commerce clause is used to force people to do something, as opposed to regulating an activity they are already doing?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635848)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 2:42 AM
Author: Harsh Cordovan Stage

obamamom you won just chill out man. put the gun down. we're all gonna be okay.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13642819)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:30 AM
Author: drunken church

epa regulations prevent people from polluting, or affect activities such as building factories. as for jury duty, the bill of rights guarantees trial by jury in criminal and civil cases. requiring people to serve on juries is within congress' authority under the necessary and proper clause. next.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635860)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:44 PM
Author: diverse senate reading party

You obviously havent taken con law yet. Scotus has found some pretty amazing things to affect interstate commerce. See VAWA for example.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635572)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:45 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

violence against women act? that was found to be unconstitutional. fail. next.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635584)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:47 PM
Author: diverse senate reading party

Not entirely.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635599)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:49 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

no, not entirely, but in the context of the commerce clause the court said that there could not be a federal right of action for violence against women. various other funding was left in place. next.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635619)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:22 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

The state only requires this if you own a car and wish to drive it.

Last time I checked obama wishes to force you to buy insurance if you're alive.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635379)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:24 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

and only if you wish to drive it on public roads, which are owned by the government. if you have a 500 acre ranch you can drive a car on there with no insurance and with no driver's license.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635394)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:35 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

It's not the best analogy, admittedly. But both the state and federal government can require you to do a lot of things.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635501)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:36 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Sure they can, our populism loves to be a bunch of passive, nancy, idiotic fucks.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635510)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:54 PM
Author: stubborn ratface

PLEASE PROVIDE A BETTER ANALOGY, WHATEVER THE FUCK ANY ANALOGY HAS TO DO WITH ANYTHING HERE

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635660)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:57 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

Congress can force you to pay taxes and register for selective service under the relevant respective powers of the constitution. Why don't you think the commerce power could also empower affirmative requirements?



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635676)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:02 AM
Author: stubborn ratface

WOW. THAT IS EVEN WORSE ANALOGY.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635704)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:02 AM
Author: violent yapping range potus

/facepalms are you fucking shitting me?

Pay taxes = you must make and report your income... if you don't they can't MAKE you pay taxes... There is a pre-assumption of some kind of VOLUNTARY participation in the system (no matter how stupidly impossible it would be to live without participation of some kind)

Selective service is voluntary with all KINDS of ways to get around it... not to mention it's free and does not represent a "cost to live"... in fact it's just the opposite. If you were forced to do something, you would be paid by the government to do it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635706)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:04 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

this is wrong. they can MAKE you pay your taxes by sending you to jail if you don't. look up the 16th amendment.

selective service is allowed based on congress's need to be able to maintain an army and navy.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635717)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:05 AM
Author: violent yapping range potus

They can't make you pay your taxes on $0 gross income, sorry.

Reread what I wrote.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635734)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:06 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

so you're saying congress can't force you to report your income? oh ok, good. you try that and let me know how it works out for ya.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635740)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:10 AM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Did I say that? no... I did say that Congress cannot force you to pay money you don't have currently... or even money you do have in savings for obligations you do not have.

However, the healthcare bill is a "cost of life" fine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635762)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:20 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

ok, but your explanation relies on an individual's not knowing what an income tax is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635804)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:21 AM
Author: violent yapping range potus

What in the mother fuck are you talking about holy god.

I said that taxation requires participation... this fine does not.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635812)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:24 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

oh, i see what you're saying. convoluted, but i get it. you could just say it's the difference between an income tax and a capitation tax.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635834)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:09 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

They can't force you to buy health insurance either, they can just penalize you if you don't, just like with taxes. And the penalties also wouldn't apply to someone who makes $0 income.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635759)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:10 AM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Yes they do

http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/health-care/2262-healthcare-bil-pay-for-a-plan-or-go-to-jail

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635763)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:19 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

That article is so full of incorrect information about the bill I don't know where to start. For example this:

"As reported by the Congressional Budget Office, the lowest annual cost of an approved family non-group policy would be approximately $15,000. That is to say, as currently written in the bill under consideration, if a family’s health insurance plan doesn’t cost at least $15,000 a year, then you are breaking the law and will be held accountable."

is basically made up, and I know that in part because of the very CBO letter that I believe YOU linked upthread.

But as for the jail part, going to jail would be for not paying the tax if you DON'T buy health insurance, and you can already go to jail for tax evasion. The article you link misleadingly describes this as the tax code "as amended by the healthcare bill" to make it sound like the healthcare bill somehow makes it easier to go to jail for tax evasion. It further mistakes the word "misdemeanor" for "minor violation" and then assumes that a jail sentence would be applied in the case of any typical non-payor, when in fact jail time in tax evasion is generally reserved for very severe, high level cases of tax evasion. Nothing about this is changed by the healthcare bill, but because the bill amends some parts of the tax code, the article misleadingly makes it sound like the bill creates some kind of new jail sentence for not buying your piddling family premium.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635797)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:21 AM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Yes... the letter on the CBO's website is bull shit.

You have the be the dumbest fuck on this forum. You sound like Alia.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635808)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:23 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

well the gov't can't force you to do anything, really, it can only punish you if you don't. that's a silly argument.

besides, even if the health care fine is a tax, it's a capitation tax, which means it can only be levied equally across the states and in accordance with the census. see article 1, section 9 of the constitution.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635823)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:28 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

How the fuck is it a capitation tax? It's not a fixed amount per person.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635852)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:33 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

what do you mean it isn't? the act says, "either buy health insurance, or pay X amount to the gov't"

the X is the same for everyone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635882)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:40 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

No, it's a percent.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635911)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:57 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

even so, it doesn't matter. it's still a direct tax upon the person, as opposed to a tax on his/her income.

as such, it's a capitation tax and must be levied evenly based on a state's population. that won't work, even if it's tried.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13636019)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 1:03 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

How is a tax that's a percent of your income not a tax on your income?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13636063)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:03 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

because of the 16th amendment and its power to raise and maintain an army and navy. NEXT!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635710)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:10 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

And they can do the same with health insurance because of the commerce power. NEXT!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635764)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:28 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

no, they can't. see our exchange above.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635854)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:19 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Forcing people to pay for something as a "cost to be alive" that they often could not reasonably afford seems like a clear "overstepping" of authority in our system of government... especially since it would lead to prison.

This really doesn't have much to do with the 1st amendment though, but neither did abortion or many other things we regularly claim is a 1st amendment right.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635341)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:19 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

that's not a constitutional argument.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635348)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:20 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

I don't see how that is unconstitutional honestly, I do think it's fucking ridiculous and could be overturned for numerous legal reasons.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635360)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:22 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

ok... tell me. why, specifically, is it constitutional. which provision allows congress to force you to buy insurance.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635377)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:24 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

You know this isn't how the SCOTUS works. If it did work this way medicare and other garbage would have been tossed as well.

The constitution doesn't allocate the federal government to supply or control any sort of entitlement programs. In fact the constitution attempts to limit allocating anything to one group at the detriment of another.

The SCOTUS only cares about its political ideals.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635395)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:28 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

this is nonsense. someone will challenge the mandatory insurance requirement on the grounds that congress is without power to require it. under SCOTUS commerce clause analysis, congress can regulate interstate commerce in one of three ways:

channels of interstate commerce, i.e., roads, railroads, rivers, etc.

instrumentalities of interstate commerce, i.e., planes, trains and automobiles,

and substantial effect on interstate commerce. this is the one congress is using. the argument against it will be that the class of people without health insurance are not substantially affecting interstate commerce.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635433)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:31 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

I'm not saying it isn't sound, but a lot of amazingly sound constitutional arguments aren't even heard by the SCOTUS.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635447)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:53 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

The class of people without insurance ARE substantially affecting interstate commerce - for example, their reliance on free emergency room treatment drives up costs for everyone else.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635647)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:57 PM
Author: stubborn ratface

WTF

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635674)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:59 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

This has to be the stupidest legal argument I've ever read.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635684)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:07 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

it's not stupid. the gov't tried it in morrison, but failed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635743)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:11 AM
Author: violent yapping range potus

The government tries a lot of stupid shit... all the fucking time.

Trying it doesn't make it any less retarded.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635768)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:22 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

It's not Morrison, it's Wickard and Raich. It's actually a LOT like Wickard in a way - commercial activity of one group affects overall commerce.

You can dislike the state of commerce clause jurisprudence all you want - lots of reasonable people do. But don't let that blind you to the fact that the healthcare situation fits pretty nicely within it, and is nothing like the VAWA.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635814)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:31 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

"commercial activity of one group affects overall commerce"

really? how are babies born within the past 2 hours ago affecting overall commerce? nevertheless, they must be insured.

it doesn't fit within it at all. you're confusing the regulation of an activity with the forced doing of an activity you don't want to do in the first place.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635863)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:06 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

that's an indirect effect and you have to pile inference upon inference to make it stick. in US v. Morrison the court refused to do that when the gov't tried to argue that raped and battered women refrained from purchasing things.

try again.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635736)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:25 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

Unlike battered women, the use of medical services and purchasing of insurance is itself interstate commercial activity. You're arguing what you feel, I'm arguing what actually jibes with current commerce clause jurisprudence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635836)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:36 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

this doesn't fit within commerce clause jurisprudence. no one is arguing the fact that use of medical services and purchasing insurance is commercial activity. what i'm saying is that the power to REGULATE interstate commerce is not the same as the power to FORCE interstate commerce.

do you really not get this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635896)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 2:47 AM
Author: Harsh Cordovan Stage

A mandatory rule deals with the same liberty interests as a prohibition, and assuming no fundamental rights are invoked, it gets trucked by the Commerce Clause.

Raich is the law. It is followed whenever the activity relates to a commercial market. When the activity itself is "not commerce," like wife-beating and gun possession, Lopez and Morrison apply. An insurance purchase is commerce.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13642854)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 11:42 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

what prevents congress from requiring the purchase of a new television set? a tv purchase is commerce.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13643658)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 11:48 AM
Author: Ruby Flirting Azn Space

killing analog transmission is pretty much that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13643671)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 2:38 PM
Author: Harsh Cordovan Stage

Elections

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13644239)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:20 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

you mean coherent

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635362)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:21 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

There was nothing difficult to understand about what I said.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635368)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:38 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

"This really doesn't have much to do with the 1st amendment though, but neither did abortion or many other things we regularly claim is a 1st amendment right. "

Flame for sure.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635526)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:40 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Sorry about your tiny TTT brain dude.

Lemme guess, BC grad?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635544)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:56 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

Flame or you just didn't mean to type "1st Amendment" maybe?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635669)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:58 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

No... I def meant first amendment

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635681)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:30 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

And... in what case was the First Amendment used as a basis for allowing abortion?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635861)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:17 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Despite the unconstitutionality of this, it won't probably be looked at by the SCOTUS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635325)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:18 PM
Author: bull headed orchid theatre

how about MOTUS?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635337)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:18 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

you don't think it can get 4 votes for review? scalia, thomas, roberts, alito. they can probably get kennedy to agree. game over.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635338)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:19 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

probably not...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635343)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:20 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

oh ok. you make a good point. tyft.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635353)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:21 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

If this happened it would be when Obama reached into the high 30% approval levels in the next year once Citibank and places start having to "face facts" about their fiscal doom

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635365)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:24 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

wgiyaf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635400)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:25 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

I don't think anyone knows what that means.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635406)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:26 PM
Author: infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point

it's the moron's acronym for yfwgi

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635418)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:21 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

ITT: ...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635366)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:22 PM
Author: bull headed orchid theatre

faggots?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635378)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:26 PM
Author: infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point

stop being mean to yourself.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635411)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:26 PM
Author: Aphrodisiac incel

If you choose to make over X amount (those who do not will be fully subsidized) and do not pay for health insurance, the "penalty" will simply be a tax. OMGz are taxes illegal too?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635413)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:28 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

That X amount is 50% below the poverty line (and starts at $700/yr if you make $17k/yr)

Below that X amount if you are not on medicare then you must still buy insurance.

There could be a rather sound argument that at this poverty level, $17k/yr, it's next to impossible to even survive. Any further obligations forced upon people like that could be seen as enslavement by the state.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635429)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:30 PM
Author: Aphrodisiac incel

If you choose to make $1 in the U.S. economy you are subject to any taxation the federal govt wishes to impose.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635444)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:32 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

There are people who don't report any income and yet would be required to pay upwards of $3000 for insurance per year.

For instance, this year I will report $0 gross income because of ITE.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635459)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:04 AM
Author: Aphrodisiac incel

thus you are subsidized... what is so hard to understand?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635715)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:12 AM
Author: violent yapping range potus

You aren't subsidized...

http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/health-care/2262-healthcare-bil-pay-for-a-plan-or-go-to-jail

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635773)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 12:28 PM
Author: Cyan office

Big difference between "not reporting any income" (we know what that means) and earning zero income. The former will likely have to pay for health insurance while the latter will likely qualify for Medicaid in his state.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13643765)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:59 AM
Author: Flesh Big-titted Corner

"you are subject to any taxation the federal govt wishes to impose."

Really? ANY? Are you sure?



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13636036)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:32 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

[i]That X amount is 50% below the poverty line (and starts at $700/yr if you make $17k/yr) [/i]

lolwhut? Link please?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635467)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:34 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/106xx/doc10691/hr3962SubsidiesRangelLtr.pdf

Page 4

Look at the premiums

a $41k/yr person would have to pay $7000/yr for insurance.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635481)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:48 PM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

Nowhere in that document does it say anything about someone making 50% of the FPL paying, in fact it points out that people making below 150% of the FPL would generally be eligible for medicaid.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635613)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:51 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Ummmmmm... I'm not eligible for medicaid and I made $0 this year.

Also I'd like to point out you're an idiot and can't read charts

you make $14k/yr you pay $700/yr AFTER subsidies for insurance. I hope that helps you stupid fuck

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635631)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:00 AM
Author: stubborn ratface

TYTY

I was following his posts in this thread with a mixture of disgust and amusement. He is an imbecile.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635689)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:02 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

14k/yr is not 50% of the poverty line.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635701)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:03 AM
Author: violent yapping range potus

you're right... it's less than 50%

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635709)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:32 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

um, nope

http://liheap.ncat.org/profiles/povertytables/FY2010/popstate.htm

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635871)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:29 PM
Author: infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point

Oh yeah, that's setting a great precedent.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635434)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:31 PM
Author: Opaque Theater

The faggot OP doesn't realize we're already taxed to pay for a program we can't opt out of: Medicare.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635452)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:31 PM
Author: Aphrodisiac incel

yea, this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635455)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:32 PM
Author: infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point

You're profoundly retarded.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635466)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:34 PM
Author: Opaque Theater

U MAD?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635484)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:36 PM
Author: infuriating obsidian haunted graveyard point

medicare =/= forcing people to buy health insurance from a private company

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635508)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:35 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

You can opt out of medicare... hth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635497)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:32 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

yes, and if you do not pay the tax, you will go to jail, which really means it's a fine.

in any case, the tax is also unconstitutional because it is not a tax on income, but rather on some specific activity, and is thus a capitation tax, which must be equally apportioned among the states. the scheme won't work if it's equally apportioned.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635460)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:49 PM
Author: Aphrodisiac incel

how is it not a tax on income? you dont have to pay it if you make below the cutoff

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635623)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:54 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Yes... you do

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635655)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:05 AM
Author: Aphrodisiac incel

link or stfu

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635723)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:09 AM
Author: violent yapping range potus

"In a letter dated November 5, the Joint Committee on Taxation informed Congressman Camp that there is a broad range of civil and criminal penalties applicable to any American who fails to purchase a health insurance policy that passes legislative muster, or as euphemistically styled in the bill itself: “acceptable health insurance coverage.”"

H.R. 3962 provides that an individual (or a husband and wife in the case of a joint return) who does not, at any time during the taxable year, maintain acceptable health insurance coverage for himself or herself and each of his or her qualifying children is subject to an additional tax.” The “additional tax” amounts to (a) the national average of a family premium as determined by the Secretary of Treasure in cooperation with the legislatively-created Health Choices Commissioner (essentially a “Health Care Czar” empowered as the arbiter for what is or is not acceptable health care coverage for your family), or (b) 2.5% of the person’s adjusted gross income.

Did you read that? If you make below that "certain amount" they just take 2.5% of your raw gross income instead of the fine... if you don't pay that of course, you go to jail.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/health-care/2262-healthcare-bil-pay-for-a-plan-or-go-to-jail

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635758)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:39 AM
Author: ungodly chartreuse box office roommate

1) If you make below a certain income you won't be subject to this regime in the first place

2) You don't automatically go to jail just for not paying the 2.5% - even the bullshit article you linked doesn't say that as distorted as it is. You risk facing penalties for tax evasion. Actual jail time for tax evasion is extremely rare.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635908)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:09 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

you don't understand the difference between an income tax and a tax on activity?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635753)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:39 PM
Author: Vibrant base

this is just some nonsense to keep the controversy going so the Dems continue to look bad.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635538)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:42 PM
Author: Ruby Flirting Azn Space

they look bad all by themselves.

they just ignore the latest cbo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635557)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:43 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

They are doing plenty to make themselves look bad.

http://reason.com/assets/mc/_ATTIC/ngillespie3/budgetdeficits2017.jpg

The CBO is probably way underestimating this since Obama already beat out the 2009 estimates by about $300 billion

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5aAsxFJOeMw/SiS4CK773bI/AAAAAAAACaw/0FnGk8W5EUU/s400/GR2009032100104.gif

Closest estimates and he already beat 2009 again by about $100 billion over these numbers

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635562)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:47 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

the CBO also cleared up the medicare 500 billion fix, telling the dems the only way it can say that it cuts the deficit is by double counting the same amount of money. therefore, obamacare is a budget buster. look for the republicans to make this argument in 2010.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635601)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:49 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Obama spends more on a stimulus bill that created fewer jobs (even by Biden's numbers) than the entire War on Terror cost and employed since 2001.

WTMF

Those numbers aren't even including TARP losses or inflationary devaluation of the dollar

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635622)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:37 AM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

no i think the war on terror has cost more, but you're not far off.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635901)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:42 AM
Author: Disgusting lime skinny woman public bath

"Obama spends more on a stimulus bill that created fewer jobs (even by Biden's numbers) than the entire War on Terror cost and employed since 2001."

incredible

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635923)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 2:51 AM
Author: Harsh Cordovan Stage

War --> jobs

My mother asked my father about his wish as he blew out his birthday candles. "World peace. No - <Defense Contractor>'s stock to double. I know I can't have both."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13642876)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:52 PM
Author: Vibrant base

It doesn't change the fact that this is just smoke and mirrors. The end of this debate is almost upon us and Republicans won't have the ammunition in six months they've had since June.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635641)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 23rd, 2009 11:53 PM
Author: violent yapping range potus

Um... they won't have the ammunition when the deficit balloons so large and taxes increase so much that they can't even service our debt?

How about when inflation devalues the dollar 14% in 2 years?

Or perhaps when Citibank and the like start defaulting on their TARP?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635648)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:03 AM
Author: Vibrant base

those are all hypotheticals. they only go so far with the american public.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635708)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:03 AM
Author: violent yapping range potus

They will be a reality in 2010.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635712)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:04 AM
Author: Vibrant base

sure thing, chief.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635722)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:12 AM
Author: violent yapping range potus

7.9% inflation in 2009... the fed reserve is gonna keep interest rates at 0% until at least fall of 2010... I think 14% in 2 years is actually a very very big understatement of what could happen.

They're already talking about VATs and trying to push through a wide breadth tax increase right now in the House... there was a rather large (7%) tax increase on most middle class families in the healthcare bill.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635770)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:11 AM
Author: Ruby Flirting Azn Space

cash out of their pockets they understand.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635766)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 12:36 AM
Author: bull headed orchid theatre

ARE COUNTRY.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13635898)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 2:09 AM
Author: Kink-friendly aromatic university

the penn law review ran a debate on this question:

http://www.pennumbra.com/debates/debate.php?did=23

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13636370)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 10:07 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

this was pretty good. balkin's commerce clause analysis is off, however. according to him, people who don't buy insurance use over the counter medicines and pay cash to go see doctors, and therefore do affect interstate commerce. that's true. however, what if congress decided that every american had to have a new, american-made car every 3 years? those who don't buy cars affect interstate commerce by using public transportation and hitching rides with friends and family. so they also affect interstate commerce. does this mean congress can force them to purchase cars? i say no. i don't see how the supreme court allows this. if it does, there's almost nothing that the government can't force you to do, so long as it involves money. then again, it could also force you to have children because population growth affects interstate commerce. like i said, no way.

as far as the tax analysis, it's not really my forte, but i'd say the supreme court doesn't allow congress to get away with it either. obama expressly stated it's a fine and not a tax. moreover, if it was a tax on income, congress could call it that. but it didn't. it called it a "shared responsibility amount" or some shit. therefore, it doesn't have to pay the political consequences of hiking taxes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13640998)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 10:29 PM
Author: Contagious talking national

see ashcroft v reich (bullshit expansive reading of commerce clause)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13641146)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 10:41 PM
Author: charcoal fragrant travel guidebook mediation

that's more popularly known as gonzales v. raich.

i discussed that case previously. it regulated an activity, in that case, marijuana growth. but it didn't tell anyone to do anything he/she didn't want to do.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13641218)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 10:42 PM
Author: bull headed orchid theatre

what an annoying post this was.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13641226)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 3:22 PM
Author: Henna Arousing Idea He Suggested Headpube

Can the American people, acting through their democratically elected representatives, require adults to purchase health insurance for themselves and their families as part of a comprehensive health care program?

Yes, we can.

I WANT TO SHOOT THIS GUY IN THE HEAD.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13644450)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 24th, 2009 10:07 PM
Author: bull headed orchid theatre

shut the fuck up faggot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13641004)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 2:49 PM
Author: Harsh Cordovan Stage

THE INTERNET IS SERIOUS FUCKING BUSINESS.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1172797&forum_id=2#13644292)