\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Obama's Health Care Bill Is Racist Against White People

FROM: Carbozo, B.A., J.D., Esq. TO: XO RE: Obama's Tax...
scarlet travel guidebook
  12/25/09
Even if I accept your argument, why would the whole bill be ...
Histrionic umber partner
  12/25/09
Nonseverability.
scarlet travel guidebook
  12/25/09
Explain why it's nonseverable.
Histrionic umber partner
  12/25/09
can you stop being a faggot? this is a light-hearted dumb th...
Doobsian ruddy chapel
  12/25/09
lol
scarlet travel guidebook
  12/25/09
That explains why you're light-heartedly wigging out.
Histrionic umber partner
  12/25/09
you cite no case law or statutes. F- if you went to a bet...
Doobsian ruddy chapel
  12/25/09


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 4:30 PM
Author: scarlet travel guidebook

FROM: Carbozo, B.A., J.D., Esq.

TO: XO

RE: Obama's Taxation of White People Who Want Tans

DATE: December 25, 2009

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

Obama's socialist health care bill includes a tax increase on artificial tans. At least two of Obama advisors, Treasury Secretary Tim Geitner (a.k.a. "Tax Cheat Timmy") and former South Dakota Senator Tom Dasshole, have cheated on their taxes. Obama has previously called his own grandmother a typical white person.

II. QUESTION PRESENTED

Is taxing artificial tans the least racially discriminatory way to raise taxes where the President of the United States employs advisors who have cheated on their taxes?

III. ANALYSIS

A. Is There a Classification?

The first issue is whether Obama's health care bill has a racial classification.

A racial classification exists if there is a discriminatory impact and purpose.

Here, taxing tans has a disparate impact on whites. Recent studies show that 99.999% of people who get fake tans are white.

Moreover, taxing tans has a discriminatory purpose. There is no question that Obama harbors a deep animus towards whites - witness his comment that his grandmother was a "typical white person."

In sum, Obama's health care bill contains an invidious racial classification.

B. What Is the Appropriate Level of Scrutiny?

The second issue is what the appropriate level of scrutiny is.

A law that contains a racial classification is subject to strict scrutiny - i.e., the law must be necessary to achieve a compelling government interest.

Here, there is a less discriminatory means of generating tax revenue than taxing tans. For example, Obama could demand that Tim Geithner and Tom Daschle pay their taxes. Thus, the health care bill fails strict scrutiny.

IV. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, the health care bill is racist and unconstitutional.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1173804&forum_id=2#13644798)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 4:31 PM
Author: Histrionic umber partner

Even if I accept your argument, why would the whole bill be unconstitutional.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1173804&forum_id=2#13644801)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 4:32 PM
Author: scarlet travel guidebook

Nonseverability.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1173804&forum_id=2#13644806)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 4:33 PM
Author: Histrionic umber partner

Explain why it's nonseverable.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1173804&forum_id=2#13644814)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 4:34 PM
Author: Doobsian ruddy chapel

can you stop being a faggot? this is a light-hearted dumb thread, not some fucking law school study group discussion you fucking faggot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1173804&forum_id=2#13644822)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 4:35 PM
Author: scarlet travel guidebook

lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1173804&forum_id=2#13644831)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 4:38 PM
Author: Histrionic umber partner

That explains why you're light-heartedly wigging out.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1173804&forum_id=2#13644841)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 25th, 2009 4:32 PM
Author: Doobsian ruddy chapel

you cite no case law or statutes. F-

if you went to a better school you'd have gotten a better grade. HTFH.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1173804&forum_id=2#13644807)