ITT: list the top 4 heroic female xoxo posters
| Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | bronze demanding boistinker | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | bronze demanding boistinker | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | slap-happy racy knife | 02/01/10 | | stimulating brindle psychic weed whacker | 02/18/10 | | rose jewess roast beef | 02/01/10 | | Canary Hall | 07/14/10 | | vigorous digit ratio heaven | 07/15/10 | | learning disabled cuck market | 02/01/11 | | marvelous theater stage really tough guy | 02/01/10 | | contagious anal ceo | 02/01/10 | | lake submissive stage | 02/01/10 | | cerebral rough-skinned school cafeteria ladyboy | 02/01/10 | | lake submissive stage | 02/01/10 | | cerebral rough-skinned school cafeteria ladyboy | 02/01/10 | | lake submissive stage | 02/01/10 | | cerebral rough-skinned school cafeteria ladyboy | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | lake submissive stage | 02/01/10 | | Iridescent Laughsome Haunted Graveyard | 02/01/10 | | Stirring Buck-toothed Masturbator Rehab | 02/01/11 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/11 | | green high-end home | 02/01/11 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | lake submissive stage | 02/01/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | Sienna Locus | 02/01/10 | | lake submissive stage | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/02/10 | | Startling principal's office | 02/02/10 | | Exhilarant Charcoal Turdskin | 02/02/10 | | Startling principal's office | 02/02/10 | | orange stain lay | 07/14/10 | | beady-eyed faggot firefighter telephone | 07/14/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | lake submissive stage | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Thirsty tripping ticket booth party of the first part | 02/01/10 | | Walnut pit sandwich | 02/01/10 | | bronze demanding boistinker | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Arousing regret den | 02/01/10 | | irradiated bisexual set | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Yellow coldplay fan fat ankles | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | bronze demanding boistinker | 02/01/10 | | Arousing regret den | 02/01/10 | | Poppy Idiot Native | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | irate henna area | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Iridescent Laughsome Haunted Graveyard | 02/01/10 | | irate henna area | 02/01/10 | | appetizing school crotch | 02/01/10 | | Poppy Idiot Native | 02/01/10 | | flatulent house bbw | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Exhilarant Charcoal Turdskin | 02/01/10 | | Passionate cream athletic conference | 02/01/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/10 | | Passionate cream athletic conference | 02/01/10 | | Arousing regret den | 02/01/10 | | Passionate cream athletic conference | 02/01/10 | | Arousing regret den | 02/01/10 | | Supple honey-headed field | 02/02/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/02/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Razzmatazz drab corner double fault | 02/18/10 | | gaped theatre electric furnace | 02/18/10 | | Razzmatazz drab corner double fault | 02/18/10 | | gaped theatre electric furnace | 02/18/10 | | Razzmatazz drab corner double fault | 02/18/10 | | Clear angry menage | 02/18/10 | | Razzmatazz drab corner double fault | 02/18/10 | | Clear angry menage | 02/18/10 | | Razzmatazz drab corner double fault | 02/18/10 | | Clear angry menage | 02/18/10 | | Razzmatazz drab corner double fault | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | Razzmatazz drab corner double fault | 02/18/10 | | Clear angry menage | 02/18/10 | | Soul-stirring karate | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | gaped theatre electric furnace | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | gaped theatre electric furnace | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Wild Chapel Cuckoldry | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | gaped theatre electric furnace | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | gaped theatre electric furnace | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Confused factory reset button | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Stirring Buck-toothed Masturbator Rehab | 02/01/11 | | overrated thriller potus trump supporter | 02/01/11 | | Zombie-like orchestra pit | 02/18/10 | | swashbuckling lodge goyim | 02/18/10 | | provocative hairless gaping old irish cottage | 04/28/10 | | Glittery ivory senate | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | gaped theatre electric furnace | 02/18/10 | | Walnut pit sandwich | 02/18/10 | | gaped theatre electric furnace | 02/18/10 | | slap-happy racy knife | 02/18/10 | | Trip medicated sound barrier dilemma | 02/18/10 | | slap-happy racy knife | 02/18/10 | | Trip medicated sound barrier dilemma | 02/18/10 | | slap-happy racy knife | 02/18/10 | | Jade genital piercing sanctuary | 02/18/10 | | Stubborn stag film | 02/18/10 | | Trip medicated sound barrier dilemma | 02/18/10 | | Jade genital piercing sanctuary | 02/18/10 | | dashing ruby nursing home gunner | 10/01/11 | | Lime blood rage kitchen | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 02/18/10 | | Lime blood rage kitchen | 02/18/10 | | Unhinged mood | 02/18/10 | | Arrogant stead | 04/28/10 | | Multi-colored sneaky criminal church | 04/28/10 | | Arrogant stead | 04/28/10 | | Multi-colored sneaky criminal church | 04/28/10 | | Arrogant stead | 04/28/10 | | Amber floppy roommate | 04/28/10 | | Scarlet round eye site | 04/28/10 | | Poppy Idiot Native | 04/28/10 | | Indigo laser beams | 07/14/10 | | mint marketing idea | 07/14/10 | | overrated thriller potus trump supporter | 07/15/10 | | Soul-stirring karate | 02/01/11 | | overrated thriller potus trump supporter | 02/01/11 | | galvanic bawdyhouse friendly grandma | 02/01/11 | | Arrogant stead | 02/01/11 | | overrated thriller potus trump supporter | 02/01/11 | | Apoplectic Box Office | 02/01/11 | | dashing ruby nursing home gunner | 02/06/11 | | green high-end home | 02/06/11 | | dashing ruby nursing home gunner | 02/06/11 | | green high-end home | 02/06/11 | | dashing ruby nursing home gunner | 02/06/11 | | Soul-stirring karate | 02/06/11 | | green high-end home | 02/06/11 | | dashing ruby nursing home gunner | 02/06/11 | | Soul-stirring karate | 02/06/11 | | green high-end home | 02/06/11 | | dashing ruby nursing home gunner | 02/06/11 | | excitant emerald lettuce | 02/06/11 | | green high-end home | 02/06/11 | | dashing ruby nursing home gunner | 02/06/11 | | green high-end home | 02/06/11 | | Soul-stirring karate | 02/06/11 | | dashing ruby nursing home gunner | 02/07/11 | | Exhilarant Charcoal Turdskin | 02/07/11 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:11 PM Author: bronze demanding boistinker
CAC
Clarissa
world wary
terrain
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981112) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:47 PM Author: cerebral rough-skinned school cafeteria ladyboy
Aw, sorry man. You know me, still same ol' G. Heroic as ever.
(Minus the religious stuff.)
(And not from a prestigious family.)
(And not educated from a prestigious university.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981363) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 2:51 PM Author: Wild Chapel Cuckoldry
Although pensive does seem to hold himself to the same standards, he's only ever used the term to describe women. Moreover, he theoretically judges women's heroism not only by their sexual conduct, but by the quality of the men they're involved with. This does not appear to extend to men, as pensive has dated several women who he acknowledges were unheroic and poor choices, but that does not seem to taint his vision of himself as a good dating partner.
The way his standards are applied in practice are also troubling. The actual examples he's chosen tend to be female celebrities whose presence he admires and women he's met IRL who have responded favorably to him. In many cases, he knows little about the woman in question and nothing of her sexual history. A heroic woman is, in short, a woman who likes pensive or who reminds pensive of other women who have liked him in the past. Making such far reaching character judgments based on individual sexual chemistry strikes me as vaguely sexist, though it's primarily egotistical, of course.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981417) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:31 PM Author: Wild Chapel Cuckoldry
Yet somehow we've never seen one mentioned, even in his political trolling, and somehow no one else here ever applies the term to men.
I don't think that posters here have an idea of it beyond pensive's personal sexual obsessions, although he seems to claim the concept is larger without ever elaborating on it.
In any case, others may of course continue to use the term and/or subscribe to the ideas behind it. I reject its use in relation to me, as I think it's the product of sexist thought on the part of someone who I believe is mentally disturbed.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981850) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:47 PM Author: Arrogant stead
"I don't think that posters here have an idea of it beyond pensive's personal sexual obsessions"
So disingenuous. You were the one to tacitly acknowledge (what you perceive to be) the board-wide definition of "heroic": "The board itself values women with little sexual experience and the capacity to be loyal and loving, of course."
Although I would define it somewhat differently, that's the basic concept invoked when poasters use the term. Virtually no one uses it to mean "would pensive like this woman?" (besides pensive, of course, who may do so unwittingly).
"others may ... subscribe to the ideas behind it"
Here you acknowledge that the term in xoxo parlance has a conceptual foundation; it is more than a test of whether pensive likes a woman. But you have not acknowledged that you acknowledge it, which is awkward, because you have also denied it.
"I reject its use in relation to me, as I think it's the product of sexist thought on the part of someone who I believe is mentally disturbed."
That's an entirely different question. Maybe you don't want a term applied to you because you don't like something that the person who coined the term thinks, but it's dishonest to misdefine the term in an attempt to defeat it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981995) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:02 PM Author: Wild Chapel Cuckoldry
I think you're ignoring the extent to which the term relates to pensive's obsession with black women and foreign women. The board has other ways it describes chaste women that aren't similarly loaded.
Besides, if the idea of heroism does have independent meaning on the board, it's even more clearly sexist, since no one other than pensive has even acknowledged the existence of heroic men.
I don't like it because it's sexist, because I don't like being wrapped up in another poster's sexual fetishes (and I don't think it's sufficiently distinct from pensive to avoid that), and because I generally dislike judging people as worthy or unworthy in a binary way (I also dislike "broken").
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982123) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:19 PM Author: Arrogant stead
"I think you're ignoring the extent to which the term relates to pensive's obsession with black women and foreign women"
The term "heroic" preexisted pensive's turn to dwelling on black/foreign women, and already had a meaning independent of pensive by then. No one thinks that the term has a specific relation to black/foreign women--unless maybe pensive is involved.
"The board has other ways it describes chaste women that aren't similarly loaded."
Any term used to described "chaste" women--including "chaste" itself--is loaded. The nice thing about "heroic" is that it provides a modern counterpoint to "slut," etc.
"it's even more clearly sexist, since no one other than pensive has even acknowledged the existence of heroic men"
I reject the idea that a term can be sexist. Perhaps the use of a term can be sexist, but who is at fault for that? Perhaps the women of xoxo should be faulted for not using the term enough to describe heroic men. Anyway, the bare term "sexist" without further explanation means almost nothing. Since men and women are different in some ways, everything is sexist from one perspective or another: either because it doesn't acknowledge the differences or because it does.
"I don't like being wrapped up in another poster's sexual fetishes (and I don't think it's sufficiently distinct from pensive to avoid that)"
Again, it has currency beyond pensive. The distaste you feel because pensive coined the term has no bearing on the term itself outside your personal sphere.
"I generally dislike judging people as worthy or unworthy in a binary way"
This is also a dishonest reason to misdefine a term. But anyway, there's room in the conceptual space of "heroic" for a sliding scale--"more heroic" or "less heroic"--just as someone can be taller or shorter but we still may refer to him as "tall" if he passes a certain threshold.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982311) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:38 PM Author: Wild Chapel Cuckoldry
It's a set of standards for how women can behave, and that can be sexist. I reject the claim that men and women are different in this particular way, and am not generally fond of traits defining women into categories based on their sexual behavior.
It's still deeply tied to an individual's particular sexual tastes and fantasies. However reaching you claim it is, it's basically pensive's term, which is used by a handful of other people as well.
No one here has used it as a sliding scale, least of all pensive. Above, you even admitted that a woman who has had casual sex once does not qualify as heroic.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982492) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:49 PM Author: Arrogant stead
"and that can be sexist"
As I said above, everything is sexist in the sense it will either treat the sexes differently or fail to account for their differences. To limit sexism, you must claim that something is also harmful (or more harmful than good) which is ultimately going to be a cultural value judgment. So you might as well articulate the particular value judgment rather than using the smokescreen of "sexism."
"I reject the claim that men and women are different in this particular way."
You're wrong; men applying the term to women but not vice versa shows different aggregate preferences regarding heroism in the opposite sex.
"it's basically pensive's term"
This is an empty assertion after our foregoing discussion. He coined the term but you provided a pensive-independent definition for it. If a term that can be defined without reference to pensive is "basically pensive's term" because he coined it, and if a term being "basically pensive's" means that "it's...deeply tied to [his] particular sexual tastes and fantasies," then you may be onto something. Otherwise, you're at a dead end here.
"No one here has used it as a sliding scale, least of all pensive."
Wrong. Here's an example from pensive himself: http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=1058634&forum_id=#12454202
"Above, you even admitted that a woman who has had casual sex once does not qualify as heroic."
Wrong. I said "a woman who pursues casual sex is not heroic," not "a woman who has had casual sex once is not heroic."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982563) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 4:58 PM Author: Wild Chapel Cuckoldry
No, something is not sexist if it properly treats people the same in areas where they are the same, and differently in areas where they are different. This means there will always be discussion of whether things are sexist, but not that the label is useless. I think it's fairly obvious that I think that men's and women's sexual behavior should be treated equally and that a wide range of behavior should be accepted, but can articulate it if you wish.
Not all preferences are equally morally acceptable. I believe men and women are much the same in their sexual behavior and sex drive, and that preferences are the result of ideas about controlling women from periods where they were viewed as chattel and when access to birth control was limited. Your beliefs may differ.
Note that his only exception is a man, himself. Do you have a link where he applies it to the primary target of the judgment?
What about a woman who has pursued casual sex once? What if she is currently pursuing it, then marries and is faithful to her husband? Do you think the fact that the originator of the theory would roundly condemn both women is irrelevant?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982650) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:18 PM Author: Arrogant stead
"properly"
That's the rub. Whatever cultural values underlie "properly" are what's really at stake.
"but not that the label is useless"
Only because "sexism" communicates the domain of concern that you're talking about. It is next to useless as an analytical tool from that point on.
"I believe men and women are much the same in their sexual behavior"
"Not all preferences are equally morally acceptable. I believe men and women are much the same in their sexual behavior"
A tacit acknowledgement that preferences differ between the sexes immediately followed by a claim that their respective behavior is "much the same." But the behavior is different. A preference for a heroic partner will translate into the behavior of seeking a heroic partner.
"preferences are the result of ideas about controlling women from periods where they were viewed as chattel and when access to birth control was limited"
This doesn't explain why women have any sexual preferences regarding their partner's sexual attitudes, activities, preferences, or histories.
"Note that his only exception is a man, himself. Do you have a link where he applies it to the primary target of the judgment?"
LOL. You went from "no one, least of all pensive, has never applied it to a man" and "no one has used it as a sliding scale--least of all pensive" to pretending that this proves your point. But I do have a link of pensive applying the sliding scale model to a woman: http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=1058634&forum_id=#12454202
That's right--the same link! Pensive is comparing his heroism to J.'s heroism on a sliding scale. And J. is the primary target of his judgment in that comment.
"What about a woman who has pursued casual sex once? What if she is currently pursuing it, then marries and is faithful to her husband?"
What if, what if? Heroism is difficult to define so strictly, and different poasters are bound to take different views, including pensive.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982857) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:23 PM Author: Wild Chapel Cuckoldry
I'm not talking about mate preferences. Women's participation in casual sex differs little from men's. There's no reason society should support attitudes that reward one gender's participation and condemn another's.
Women's sexual preferences were also formed during those times, when they were compelled to seek out men to protect them. Many of these preferences are also archaic and unfair, and we should work towards discarding them.
What I'm asking for is a case where you have labeled a woman as medium heroic, not differentiations where a woman is unheroic and you (because you are special) are only slightly unheroic.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982907) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:38 PM Author: Arrogant stead
"There's no reason society should support attitudes"
This isn't about enforcing societal norms. People are interested in heroism to find a good individual match. But, as you mention below, you want to re-engineer their individual preferences.
"Women's sexual preferences were also formed during those times, when they were compelled to seek out men to protect them. Many of these preferences are also archaic and unfair, and we should work towards discarding them."
You want to revert sexual preferences to what--a certain time period? A "natural" state? The genders' sexual preferences have developed through both culture and evolution. You could engineer people's sexual preferences to create your shitty utopia, but you can't revert them to some Garden of Eden state.
"labeled a woman as medium heroic"
LOL.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13983068) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:34 PM Author: Arrogant stead
Remember, in Rowan's world:
* the second Google result = "odd access to things that should be hard to find"
* using extensive quotations when dealing with a dumbfuck revisionist illogical poster who can't follow a line of argument gives away a uniquely identifiable writing style
* "quibbling about the inane forever" is something that others do, not Rowan
LOL
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13983019) |
 |
Date: February 2nd, 2010 1:07 PM Author: Arrogant stead
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:31 PM
Author: Joelle Van Dyne
You have an odd access to things that should be hard to find, plus you write just like him, plus you have his tendency to quibble about the inane forever.
Good afternoon.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982988)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13991008) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:31 PM Author: Arrogant stead
Date: February 1st, 2010 5:01 PM
Author: Joelle Van Dyne
Wait, why the fuck do you have a bunch of links to that freak's posts? If this is pensive, I think the conversation is over.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982668)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13982993) |
 |
Date: February 1st, 2010 3:30 PM Author: Arrogant stead
"innocent oral sex"
lol @ the 90s
HEROIC WOMEN DON'T PARTICIPATE IN RAINBOW PARTIES
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13981838) |
Date: February 1st, 2010 7:19 PM Author: irate henna area
Bottlecap seems heroic from what I read about her poasts.
I'd nominate myself if I wasn't so much of a materialistic, worthless cunt.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13984154) |
Date: February 1st, 2010 7:29 PM Author: Exhilarant Charcoal Turdskin
Mandy
Medea
LauraM
TexASS
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13984269) |
Date: February 1st, 2010 9:29 PM Author: Passionate cream athletic conference
h. ryder
five alive!
clevergirl
chicagoadchick / shiveringjenny
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13985510) |
Date: February 2nd, 2010 3:31 AM Author: Supple honey-headed field
Mandy x4
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#13989564)
|
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:14 PM Author: Razzmatazz drab corner double fault
Dr. Troy
Shivering Jenny
Clarissa
BlondieLaw
Bel
Law433
That's 6, but I'm fat so whatever.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162296) |
 |
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:36 PM Author: gaped theatre electric furnace
- when we got to my dorm room, told me that i had a choice: either i could give myself to him completely or he'd leave. he wouldn't let me kiss him as i stalled, asking if he'd respect that i don't want to lose my virginity.
- eventually promised that he wouldn't fuck me yet (beta?) and asked if i wanted to suck his dick. wrapped his belt around my neck and choked me as i... yeah you don't need details. there are marks on my neck from the buckle lol. also spit on me periodically, which got eye makeup in one of my eyes and made it all red and irritated. i didn't think he noticed but he later said that it was hot.
- took a video of me leaning back to choke myself, with eyeliner streaming down my face from when i cried from gagging.
- came in my mouth/on my face.
- makes me call him "daddy".
- says i'm "JAPpy and annoying". BUT he promised that he liked me as a person. i was like, "you just like me b/c i'm young and submissive. would you hang out with me if i were a guy?" and he laughed and said "no, that'd be weird" and i said "okay how about if i were a lesbian?" and he said "yeah, i would. i'd text you. i don't have friends."
- his "number" is 34. he had chlamydia at one point and thinks he has HPV.
- says he never uses a condom and that he's really good at pulling out. i was like "WTF HAVE YOU HEARD OF PRECUM?" and he was all, "that's not worth worrying about."
****NOT HEROIC*****
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162465) |
 |
Date: February 18th, 2010 4:42 PM Author: Confused factory reset button
It's kind of annoying that people are implicitly (and explicitly) calling me slutty.
Compare me to most girls in my peer group. Let's look at my friends, who are normal, bright, nice girls. They hook up with strangers at frat parties regularly; for example, at the party at which I got drunk and ended up at the ER, one of them made out hardcore with 2-3 guys on the dance floor, then slept in the last one's room (not sure if they had sex). Another not only made out with some guy on the dance floor, but let him pull down her shirt and suck on her tits. In a corner, sure, but out in the open. These girls engage in these activities regularly.
In addition, I'm one of few virgins in my group of close female friends (and one is a lesbian, so she doesn't count).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14162516) |
 |
Date: February 18th, 2010 6:04 PM Author: slap-happy racy knife
You do realize I was kidding, right?
And, if I'm listed as heroic, maybe I'm not good looking.
Also, I like your moniker.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#14163285) |
 |
Date: February 6th, 2011 3:25 AM Author: green high-end home
holy fuck 180 neg
girl's got some mad negging skills
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1209089&forum_id=2#17222271)
|
|
|