yeah so? were they outted and googlebombed or something?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#14348672)

http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/Reputation_Defender

http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/AutoAdmit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#19216290)

so the two girls were posters and then what? or they weren't? or they were and got outted? what the hell

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#14348772)

Among the most outraged was Brian Leiter, then a professor at the University of Texas Law School. In early 2005, he counted 250 threads with the word nigger in them and 350 more with Jews or Jew, including “Are Jews smarter or just craftier?”

i think this article could have done a better job of selecting an anti-semitic thread

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#14348797)

#2 google search for "jew bitches blowjobs" lulz.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#14354277)

MFE

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#14348819)

edit: oh they weren't posters what the hell im confused still

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#14348803)

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Reputation_Defender#.22Lying_Bitch.22_Brittan_Heller_.22Big_Tittied.22_Heide_Iravani

Heller and Iravani weren't posters here.

Back in 2005, "StanfordTroll" tried to warn peeps that Brittan Heller, who was going to Yale Law that fall, was a stupid bitch. He poasted the thread, "Stupid Bitch to Attend Yale Law"

At the end of 2006, same poster posted that Brittan Heller got a 159 on her LSATs. He poasted a thread saying such.

Early in 2007, someone discovered that Yale Law student Heide Iravani had huge fucking tits--he posted links to her Facebook pics here. (Back then, FB was moar open than they are now, recall.)

Early in 2007, Brittan and Heide threatened Rach if he didn't take down the threads. Rach told them to go piss up a rope until they could learn to "ask nicely"

Shortly thereafter, Michael Fertik of "Reputation Defender" got in the game. He saw a chance to use Heide and Brittan for free publicity for his piece of shit startup company. Fertik threatened Rach, demanding he take down the Heide/Brittan threads. Rach told him to go piss up a rope.

http://www.autoadmit.com/challenge.to.reputation.defender.html

Fertik bamboozled the Washington Post and Good Morning America to run hit pieces on XO about the Heide and Brittan stories (without naming them). In the articles, Brittan Heller and Heide lied about getting "no-offered" for summers. (They blamed the XO threads for that, in the hit pieces.)

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=590006&mc=95&forum_id=2

XO retaliated against these hit pieces by upping the googleboming. Someone also unearthed that Heide Iravani's father was a convicted felon (for embezzling from the World Bank to buy ponies (srs!))

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P2-916057.html

A poster named Lonelyvirgin sent a letter to deans at Yale Law, apprising them of Heide's felon father.

http://encyclopediadramatica.com/File:Lonelyvirginletter.JPG

In short, Fertik's "media strategy" to "clean up Autoadmit" was fail. lulz.

Fucked, Fertik asked his buddy at Reputation Defender, Ross Chanin, to tap his daddy (a partner) at Keker, Van Nest, to file a lolsuit against various XO posters. Also, they filed suit against GTO (in an attempt to get leverage over Rach to remove threads about Heide's big tits and Brittan's being a lying bitch).

The lead lawyer for Heide/Brittan, David Rosen, actually served notice on XO. lulz.

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=643868&forum_id=2

The case languished for around 6 months, with Keker Van Nest just filing for extensions.

Lonelyvirgin sent another letter about Heide, her felon father, and the lolsuit...this time cc'd to a bunch of top Vault 200 firms.

In November 2007, KVN filed for expedited discovery. They sent out a bunch of subpoenas. They got bupkis.

KVN depo'd GTO, who'd IM'd with various defendants. Under subpoena, GTO handed over the IM records he had on file. This nabs 20% of the defendants by name.

All of them settle for very paltry sums.

Oh, and then GTO sued Heide Iravani, Brittan Heller, Ross Chanin, and the rest of those dicks for Abuse of Process.

http://averess5.wordpress.com/2009/04/22/yale-law-students-heide-iravani-brittan-heller-get-sued/

Brittan Heller fled to Korea, effectively dodging service of process. Heide Iravani went to some NY firm. GTO settled his lawsuit with them; he's never told us how much he got.

HTH

Anyhow, them's the basics. I've left out various lulz-epicycles, like:

0) T14talent site, PaulieWalnuts, etc.

1) Brittan, Heide, and Ross Chanin start a harassment email campaign which cost GTO his job-offer. (See GTO's lawsuit complaint for details.)

2) AK-47. Big lulz here.

3) "Patrick Bateman" figures out where Heide got a summer job. He emails the firm about things.

3) "NewYorkBarExamGod" and his/her attempt to convince defendants to "flip" on each other

4) "A Horse Walks Into a Bar" is outed. His terrible crime? He fantasized about turning Heide Iravani into a sundae. (I shit you not.)

5) Brittan mentions XO in her New York Times wedding announcement to Nathaniel Gleicher (srs!) http://encyclopediadramatica.com/File:BrittanHeller.JPG

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#14353765)

also, "Lonelyvirgin sent another letter about Heide, her felon father, and the lolsuit...this time cc'd to a bunch of top Vault 200 firms."

jesus christ

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#14354320)

Yeah, the Lonelyvirgin letters were pretty cruel. Most poasters did NOT support this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#14354362)

RIP

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#14354674)

This line made me lol hard

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#19216436)

I've been advised to protect myself from Brittan Heller, Heide Iravani, and their cadre of elite lawyers by using the Internet. Thus, I am currently in the process of creating a website that I will use to track the litigation, step by step, until its resolution. The website wil detail all the allegations and allegedly harmful comments in the case, and will feature the actual names of Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani as well as information pertaining to why they are suing me, and so on. Since none of the allegations, accusations, or allegedly harmful comments have been tested yet in court or otherwise proven false, I will ask for comments on whether such allegedly harmful comments are true or have any merit. The website will be publicly viewable, obviously, and in order to reach a maximally large audience, I will send a link to Yale students as well as other university students. A link to the site will also be posted on Autoadmit.com, the site that stared this whole mess. A mirror site will be created, too, as is customary when a site achieves too much traffic.

(Autoadmit's mirror site is Xoxohth.com.) A blog will also be established for the site. As any person familiar with the operation and creation of web sites will attest, blogs are very easy to create and maintain, and there are hundreds of free blog providers and free website providers for persons interested in airing their views to the public. Two obvious provides are Google, which provides GooglePages (which, incidentally, is where certain posters attacked Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani on the "T14 contest" site, which led Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani to fie this suit - note that the website I intend to create will not intentionally disparage Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani in any way, but wil rather ask the public for comment into whether any of the comments posted by the anonymous defendants are true or have any merit, as well as accept general comments and opinions of the girls from classmates, friends, and other observers in an effort to build any possible defense to Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani, and

blogger.com, which provides a free blog-creation service. Again, I was not involved in any way with the websites or emails created or sent by the anonymous defendants.

Creating and managing the site is well within my First Amendment rights. Any action to silence, harass or coerce me into taking the site down will be met by an appropriate anti-SLAPP motion which, as I'm sure you know, protects speakers from "strategic" suits designed to silence criticism and/or public speech. The protections provided by the anti-SLAPP laws are especially strong where the speech pertains to a matter currently under review in a judicial proceeding, and thus applies to speech pertaining to suit brought by Heide Iravani and Brittan Heller. Such a motion also entitles me to attorney's fees incured in the process. An anti-SLAPP suit may also be pursued to recover attorney's

fees already incurred as a result of this suit. As you know, Connecticut doesn't currently have Anti-SLAPP legislation, but Californa - i.e., where the Subpoena was executed does, as do many other states. To date, this horrible case has cost me several thousand dollars in legal fees and related costs.

My intent is not to further harm Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani. As I stated above, I recognize that these women have experienced some emotional difficulty as a result of their lives being publicly scrutinized and criticized on Autoadmit.com and other websites. However, if I am going to be sued by these young women for making a frivolous, non-threatening, nonactionable, innocuous and constitutionally protected comment on a website -- i.e.,

"Women named Jill and Heide should be raped," then I think it fair to create a site that details all the claims put fort against me and my co-defendants. I have no way of

knowing whether the anonymous defendants' comments concerning Heide's criminality and sexual deviancy are accurate, and a site that details all the allegations and

accepts comments from persons that know Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani would be a good place to examine those comments.

There is also another reason for the site. Since Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani's suit puts forth all sorts of extraordinary claims, and since I have no idea whether Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani are as sexually loose or bigoted as the anonymous Defendants' claimed on the site, I wil need evidence to support a "truth" defense to Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani's allegations. And since, apparently, it is extraordinarily easy to obtain a subpoena, I will be pursuing the following subpoenas (note that one or more of the following items can easily be obtained through an alternative discovery tool):

1) A subpoena for information pertaining to the size of Heide Iravani's breasts and whether such breasts, as alleged by one Defendant, are "fake"

2) Information pertaining to whether Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani are indeed "universally hated" by their peers

3) Information pertaining to whether Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani have any sexually transmitted diseases, including Herpes

4) Information pertaining to the law firms that interviewed Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani, and why such firms decided not to hire Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani

5) Information pertaining to whether Brittan Heller did indeed achieve a score of 159 on the LSAT

6) Information pertaining to Heide Iravani's religion - i.e., Islam - and information from any Muslim peers that may be able to shed any light on this case (this information may be a bit difficult to get, but local mosques would be a good place to send information requests or, if necessary, subpoenas)

The above information requests and subpoenas wil be sent to YLS students, faculty, friends and family of Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani to the extent they are able to be located, as well as anyone else who knows Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani and would be able to provide such information. Whenever I make an information request, I will state exactly what the request is for, whom it concerns, and why I am seeking it. I will use Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani's true names, for without their true names, the information requests will be completely useless. As I

stated above, my purpose here is not to hurt Brittan Heller or Heide Iravani; my purpose is to defend myself. However, I think it safe to say some of the information would be harmful to Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani. This brings to mind the unfortunate situation that Robert Steinbuch

found himself in - i.e., having to deal with numerous embarrassing revelations - when he brought a defamation lawsuit against one Jessica Cutler not too long ago.

The critical question, I think, for Brittan Heller and Heide Iravani to consider is whether having to deal with such a site and blog is wort "uncovering" the identity of a person who merely said that he thinks "Women named Jill and Heide should be raped." It is especially unfortunate that these words were the only negative words I ever wrote concerning either ¡DOE III or (DOE II . Again, I am not a lawyer, and due to my lack of legal expertise, these subpoenas and other discovery tools are the only things I believe I can do to defend myself against this lawsuit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#19216442)

how have i never seen this before?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#19216851)

i always had the impression that it was only a few bad apples that instigated everything, while most posters disapproved. but i'm not sure anymore.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#19216720)

if you aren't willing to do that, stfu.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1246410&forum_id=2#19216749)