\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Hey, gawker.com totally PWNED lying cunt Brittan Heller!

doods, how did we miss this? http://gawker.com/5333523/cu...
Yapping purple brunch prole
  11/07/10
cool
cheese-eating beady-eyed jew kitchen
  11/07/10
remember her pussywhipped husband's stupid law review articl...
honey-headed concupiscible half-breed parlour
  11/07/10
you mean that shit published under plagiarist nathaniel glei...
Yapping purple brunch prole
  11/07/10
The ability to speak anonymously is critical to the openness...
Big Carnelian Private Investor
  06/09/11
Is this Brittan K. Heller? The lying perjurer who got SUED i...
bronze pisswyrm
  06/08/11
Among other claims, yes.
Spectacular persian
  06/08/11
...
Big Carnelian Private Investor
  06/09/11
...
Spectacular persian
  06/09/11
...
bronze pisswyrm
  06/22/11
...
Ruddy ticket booth becky
  01/04/12


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 7th, 2010 5:13 PM
Author: Yapping purple brunch prole

doods, how did we miss this?

http://gawker.com/5333523/cult+officiated-weddings-are-sweaty-pickled-affairs

Hey look, another pair who went the Universal Life route! (I am obsessed.) Brittan Heller attended Yale Law, where she met Nathaniel Gleicher during a boring series of semi-flirtatious encounters, which the Times recounts in tedious detail, at information sessions for prospective students. In one conversation, Gleicher (fresh off a stint in St. Vincent and the Grenadines) defended his Peace Corps cred: "Everyone thought it was a cushy assignment on a Caribbean beach," he said. But in reality, he told her, in his two years there he found poverty and AIDS, and wrestled with the area's odd inconsistencies. (People had cellphones and flat-screen televisions, he said, but often no running water.)"

Hmm. Sounds like … a cushy assignment on a Caribbean beach!

Anyway, a gentle question for Heller: girl, didn't your long national nightmare as one of the two Yale Law students who sued the AutoAdmit trolls teach you better than to weave your tragic tale into your Times wedding announcement? Just wondering, because I did not know your name before, but now that you piqued my interest I sure do!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1473234&forum_id=2#16491475)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 7th, 2010 5:15 PM
Author: cheese-eating beady-eyed jew kitchen

cool

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1473234&forum_id=2#16491483)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 7th, 2010 5:22 PM
Author: honey-headed concupiscible half-breed parlour

remember her pussywhipped husband's stupid law review article? what a bitchmade faggot: http://www.yalelawjournal.org/the-yale-law-journal/content-pages/john-doe-subpoenas:-toward-a-consistent-legal-standard/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1473234&forum_id=2#16491519)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 7th, 2010 5:25 PM
Author: Yapping purple brunch prole

you mean that shit published under plagiarist nathaniel gleicher's name?

no wonder those tools fled to korea and afghanistan

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1473234&forum_id=2#16491531)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 9th, 2011 3:09 PM
Author: Big Carnelian Private Investor

The ability to speak anonymously is critical to the openness of the Internet.

The loss of the right to anonymous speech online would be a grave blow to the

vibrancy of the public sphere. At the same time, however, anonymity can foster

vicious attacks, especially those that would be socially unacceptable in

traditional public discourse. This phenomenon cannot be erased entirely—

indeed, it should not be. The wholesale elimination of such unpleasant speech

would necessarily encompass valuable, protected speech in its sweep.

Nevertheless, the increasing complexity of the online environment demands

standards that govern online speech with increasing nuance. By distinguishing

between speech targeted at private and public figures, and by distinguishing

speech on public controversies, the standard that this Note proposes would

ensure heightened protection for the speech that is most beneficial to the public

sphere while simultaneously providing the targets of anonymous harassment a

balanced opportunity to unmask their attackers.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1473234&forum_id=2#18205781)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 8th, 2011 8:14 PM
Author: bronze pisswyrm

Is this Brittan K. Heller? The lying perjurer who got SUED in FEDERAL COURT for libel, slander, and abuse of process?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1473234&forum_id=2#18200179)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 8th, 2011 8:38 PM
Author: Spectacular persian

Among other claims, yes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1473234&forum_id=2#18200415)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 9th, 2011 3:04 PM
Author: Big Carnelian Private Investor



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1473234&forum_id=2#18205760)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 9th, 2011 2:53 PM
Author: Spectacular persian



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1473234&forum_id=2#18205709)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 22nd, 2011 2:33 PM
Author: bronze pisswyrm



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1473234&forum_id=2#18317229)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 4th, 2012 3:49 PM
Author: Ruddy ticket booth becky



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1473234&forum_id=2#19706111)