The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
NY Bar - No Contracts, No PR, No NY Practice. Fuckin Weird
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:22 PM Author: bright flirting nursing home And what the hell was the driving while intoxicated question? I must have missed the issue, that made no sense. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617312) |
 |
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:25 PM Author: Lavender Hominid honestly, those essays were easy as hell. and i'm not saying it to be a hardass or anything because i barely scratched the surface on NY topics and felt like i had a good feel for what was going on in every question.
i feel like we really dodged a bullet. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:27 PM Author: bright flirting nursing home Agreed, thought morning was very easy. Did you think the DUI one was honestly just asking about the elements of a DUI? Like crim law? That's it? Kept thinking I was missing something (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617333) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:28 PM Author: wild very tactful place of business box office Rule on illegal conduct preventing recovery in negligence ftw (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617339) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:29 PM Author: bright flirting nursing home haha yup missed that. talked about negligence per se in the other prompt and how it wouldn't apply. wtf a lot of people must have missed that (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617346) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:32 PM Author: wild very tactful place of business box office Yeah, I wrote the whole thing and then realized what I missed and went back, luckily the MPT does not require 90 mins (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617352) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:32 PM Author: Lavender Hominid it was negligence per se and also no fault insurance. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617354) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:33 PM Author: bright flirting nursing home NICE i did mention no fault insurance, at least in the part where it asked about damages.
But what about the DUI part? "Could he be convicted" |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:35 PM Author: Lavender Hominid idk, that question was a jumbled mess.
i felt like i had 5 things to say (issues to spot) and they couldve fit into any of the prompts.
like--- 1. will X recover and will his damages be reduced? 2. does X's conduct reduce damages?
wtf was that?! but i dont think the graders will take off points if you have the wrong stuff in the wrong spot |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:43 PM Author: Greedy Excitant Stage Persian fuck, thank god someone else got tripped up by this. i wrote out an answer for 1a, then looked at 1b, and realized i'd basically just answered that question instead... moved my answer down, wrote some new shit in the first part about no-fault insurance (which i knew nothing about ). the result was a fucking mess. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617409) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:53 PM Author: bright flirting nursing home Dude don't worry it seemed like #4 was asking the same question 3 different times. So wherever you put the stuff, it doesn't matter. Sure everyone was confused by it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617463) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:53 PM Author: chocolate thriller den It wasn't. And it wasn't confusing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619336) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:54 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619351) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 10:15 PM Author: Bonkers cheese-eating crackhouse dui (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619534) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:55 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm Same here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617470) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:34 PM Author: wild very tactful place of business box office I thought it was no fault at first, but it since it never said anything about them having insurance, I doubt that is correct. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617369) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:35 PM Author: Lavender Hominid everyone has no fault insurance in NY, it's mandatory. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617374) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:39 PM Author: wild very tactful place of business box office It's mandatory to have it but people drive unisured all the time and are thus not covered. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617392) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:42 PM Author: bright flirting nursing home I just threw it in because an exception to no fault is drunk drivers, so the guy wouldn't have recovered under his no fault.
You're right it wasn't totally related but prob worth 1/2 point |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:46 PM Author: wild very tactful place of business box office Won't hurt. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617422) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:51 PM Author: shivering insanely creepy heaven MVAIC. HTH. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617449) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:54 PM Author: wild very tactful place of business box office It doesn't. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617467) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:56 PM Author: shivering insanely creepy heaven Cover victims of uninsured motorists? Sure it does. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617475) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:30 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617712) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:36 PM Author: crimson gaped lay cr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617751) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:47 PM Author: chocolate thriller den titcr. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619286) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:43 PM Author: jet spectacular private investor really tough guy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617408) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:45 PM Author: bright flirting nursing home Incorrect. Drunk drivers are automatically excluded. And it's NO FAULT insurance, doesn't matter who caused what (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617417) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:47 PM Author: jet spectacular private investor really tough guy Bzzzzzzt. Sorry pieper says different. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617425) |
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:36 PM Author: Lavender Hominid what about the other questions?
wtf was the deal with the bank's liability? that's prob the only question i got 0 points on. also, wtf @ "can he be charged with possession of check" why the fuck couldnt he? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:40 PM Author: bright flirting nursing home I read that one as simply being: did he have the actus reus and mens rea to commit the crime. Also threw in the definition of possession in there. That's why the DUI one threw me off, because it seemed like 2 questions were simply asking about the elements of a crime and whether they were satisfied.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:43 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm I think the issue with the forged check charge was whether they had provided evidence of his knowledge that the checks were forged. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617410) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:46 PM Author: bright flirting nursing home Yea exactly, whether or not the evidence matched with the elements of the crime (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617420) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:48 PM Author: shivering insanely creepy heaven wait isnt the NY bad check law strict liability like if you are the drawer of the check you are presumed to know and then you have 30 days after you get written notice of he defect in the check to remedy or be PWND? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617430) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:52 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm I think that's true. But in this case, the crime wasn't writing a bad check, it was possession of forged instruments with intent to do bad stuff. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617453) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:52 PM Author: bright flirting nursing home (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617455) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:25 PM Author: Misunderstood dingle berry issue is whether bank is holder in due course and thus takes the check free of personal defenses (fraud in the inducement).
Regarding criminal possession of check. i thought the issue was whether the checks are forged instrument. Forgery has a specific meaning. The instrument itself has to be false, not just the content within the instrument. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:40 PM Author: Bonkers cheese-eating crackhouse sort of. the rule issue was the negligence exception/employer exception of article 3. seriously, though, commercial paper on the past 3-4 bar exams. barbri needs to take note. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618760) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:52 PM Author: Misunderstood dingle berry damn. i thought i got it right. oh well. most people don't even know comm. papers. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618861) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:56 PM Author: Bonkers cheese-eating crackhouse dude you got points for doing that, i'm 100 percent sure. i sort of didn't go through the HDC thing bc it was a red herring (barbri had an essay about stolen checks from the employer). But for serious, people need to start not blowing off commercial paper. fucking annoying. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618901) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:57 PM Author: Misunderstood dingle berry what do you think the criminal possession of checks issue was? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618911) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:59 PM Author: Bonkers cheese-eating crackhouse they had proof that he knew it was stolen but not that they were forged? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618924) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:01 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618931) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:03 PM Author: Bonkers cheese-eating crackhouse nah dude he said "i'm sorry i have these stolen checks!" right? that's only enough to know he had stolen prop, not forged prop, though i admit i'm not sure what the knowing modified anymore. and we know the checks were actually forged bc the people swear they didn't request them or indorse them (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618945) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:03 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618949) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:08 PM Author: Bonkers cheese-eating crackhouse that is a good point which i didn't put down. i'm sure i'll get some of those points though! i could see getting a couple 7s and a couple 3s. average out to THOSE 5s! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618984) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:00 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618928) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:40 PM Author: jet spectacular private investor really tough guy Pieper was dead on (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617394) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:47 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm Thought the whole first 1/2 of the test was pretty easy. Even the MC questions weren't as bad as the barbri practice questions. I mean I'm sure I missed like 40-50% of them, but I was expecting much worse.
The second 1/2 was definitely harder, imo. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:52 PM Author: Greedy Excitant Stage Persian honestly feel like i failed that portion. somehow that test managed to not touch on the subjects i knew most about (contracts, evidence) and hit a bunch of shit i didn't know. found myself simply making up law way more than i wanted to. practically guessed on the whole mc's. fuuuck. better slay tomorrow. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617456) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:54 PM Author: shivering insanely creepy heaven Threads like this make me ALMOST wish I could retake the bar every year just for the intellectual challenge. I get so bored doing the same shit over and over again in practice. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617469) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:09 PM Author: Mentally Impaired Nighttime Range LOL @ you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618457) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:56 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm Also love that we're not allowed to take these paper bracelets off. wtf is up with that? Are paper bracelets so expensive that we must encourage people to forego proper bathing? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617476) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 5:57 PM Author: shivering insanely creepy heaven What color is the bracelet this year? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617481) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:01 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm green. are they always this miserly with paper bracelets? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617502) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:03 PM Author: shivering insanely creepy heaven Its the same every year. The bracelets are definitely annoying. I think mine was green too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617513) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:51 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617866) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:52 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm See you in February, bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617871) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:01 PM Author: Greedy Excitant Stage Persian so... the whole 140 raw the MBE = impossible to fail thing. is that true?? man it fucking better to be. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617500) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:10 PM Author: charismatic old irish cottage trailer park Yo, so what is .01 of 1% BAC or whatever it was anyways? I was like, come again? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617564) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:13 PM Author: Fear-inspiring Sepia Pocket Flask lol wow (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617591) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:15 PM Author: charismatic old irish cottage trailer park For real, I didn't get it. I know .08 BAC is illegal, and I couldn't tell if he had .10 or .01. I am idiot, obviously. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617609) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:16 PM Author: Lavender Hominid 0.10 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617619) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:16 PM Author: charismatic old irish cottage trailer park Damn, okay, whatever. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617620) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:14 PM Author: odious foreskin volcanic crater no-fault, comm paper, AND sec trans?
barbri could not have been more fucking wrong. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:17 PM Author: Lavender Hominid meh, the secured transactions one wasn't too bad.
they couldn't take bc they never got a judicial lien, right? prob another point for saying the taking wasnt a breach of the peace too. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:23 PM Author: pontificating set damn bro, they needed a lien? i said they could just take that shit. all i talked about was breach of the peace.
though i did start by saying "the preferred method in ny is an order or replevin" or some shit. oops |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:25 PM Author: bright flirting nursing home No lien needed. Self-help measures OK as long as didn't breach the peace. Why would they need a lien? There's no requirement for that in NY
EDIT: By lien I mean judgment lien. Of course they had a lien, the question said that the car served as collateral. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:32 PM Author: pontificating set phew. thanks, brother (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617722) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:33 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm No judicial lien needed, provided self-help doesn't breach the peace. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617728) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:38 PM Author: crimson gaped lay I think a purchase-money security interest in a car might be automatically perfected, not sure though? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617766) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:57 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm That's what I put, but IIRC that's only for "consumer goods." Wasn't exactly sure how narrow that category is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617909) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:58 PM Author: crimson gaped lay yeah, could not for the life of me remember if a car is a consumer good (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617916) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:16 PM Author: pontificating set why did it matter if it was perfected?? was that part of the Q, or were you just throwing out a bunch of secured transactions shit? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618029) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:27 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm I don't think it matters. Just threw that in there because it was something that could be said. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618090) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:32 PM Author: crimson gaped lay same brother. Honestly not sure if it matters. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618134) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:21 PM Author: brass sick house famous landscape painting Purchase Money Perfection in Automobiles is not governed by Article 9 in NY. Its governed under the UMVTCA. Must record the purchase money lien on the title. No automatic perfection. Sorry bros - 0 points for that one (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618576) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:57 PM Author: crimson gaped lay dayumn (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618910) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:52 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm fuck. well I thought it was a little questionable. nbd (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619328) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 10:12 PM Author: chocolate thriller den nah, probably a 1/2 point. who the fuck outside the DMV and sleazy repo lawyers know that shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619517) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:17 PM Author: Greedy Excitant Stage Persian seriously, this was the test designed to fuck people who'd done even the SLIGHTEST bit of strategic studying, rather than learn every topic cold. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617625) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:21 PM Author: shivering insanely creepy heaven The bar doesnt expect you to know much about NF. Insurance law in general is too hyper technical for them to expect much. All they want you to know is the very basics you would need to know should a car accident case walk through your door. The barbri NF outline is only a couple pages long if I remember right. Nobody is going to put a Mallela question on the bar.
CC and ST only require route memorization of a few black letter rules too. Its laziness to go into the bar and to just discount that shit. You have no one to blame but yourself if you fucked up. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:23 PM Author: Greedy Excitant Stage Persian sure bro. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617669) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:19 PM Author: Saffron nofapping point scourge upon the earth oh shitlaw steve... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619055) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 10:13 PM Author: chocolate thriller den no car accident case is ever fucking walking through my door. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619524) |
|
Date: October 28th, 2011 6:34 AM Author: Submissive indigo fortuitous meteor lol, just lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#19256254) |
|
Date: December 16th, 2011 9:56 PM Author: Submissive indigo fortuitous meteor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#19581521) |
|
Date: January 6th, 2012 8:05 PM Author: Submissive indigo fortuitous meteor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#19724598) |
|
Date: January 17th, 2012 8:48 PM Author: Submissive indigo fortuitous meteor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#19793305) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:23 PM Author: odious foreskin volcanic crater no shit man. still don't think i'm bottom 14%, but still, WTF?! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617666) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:19 PM Author: pontificating set what was the sec trans?? the repo question? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617642) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:26 PM Author: pontificating set shit man, lets post some of the easy shit. i need to know i got at least a few answers right.
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:27 PM Author: Greedy Excitant Stage Persian i was pretty sure i'd nailed the elements of a negligence suit, until i read the second part of the question and then wondered if i even understood wtf it was asking. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617694) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:27 PM Author: Fear-inspiring Sepia Pocket Flask whatd you put for the wills question and the child support question (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617696) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:31 PM Author: pontificating set wills just talked about revocation by physical act, presumption of intent, etc...how revocation of a will won't automatically revive an older one...cant remember what else.
said the trustee was a dope and should have invested like a reasonably prudent person (is that the standard?)
child support i said the dude should be estopped from denying paternity, said it was OK to modify the child support payments due to changed circumstances (made a bunch of shit up for that)... |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:34 PM Author: Fear-inspiring Sepia Pocket Flask yeah i said the same crap. i didnt know the elements for any of this shit though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617735) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:39 PM Author: pontificating set yeah. i think the graders must be pretty liberal with points, though. way more so than barbri graders (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617780) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:23 PM Author: brass sick house famous landscape painting The wills question was designed to discuss Dependent Relative Revocation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618597) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:49 PM Author: poppy french chef yes, dat DRR! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618833) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:34 PM Author: pontificating set lol anyone see that whole row get fucked by a proctor? he handed out the handwriting sample sheets like less than a minute before the test started...then went around around and interrupted people and made them finish (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617731) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:16 PM Author: crimson gaped lay this happened to me. Finished a little early anyway so no biggie, and this was in spite of spending like 30 mins approaching the MPT totally wrong because I missed one sentence. I don't get how the second half is supposed to take up 3 hours. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618026) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:20 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618049) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:23 PM Author: metal national I missed the "three approaches to this" line until about 10 minutes after I started typing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618066) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:24 PM Author: crimson gaped lay lol that was such a dick move on their part. SUCH a dick move. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618074) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:25 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm Was that on the reverse side of the page? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618077) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:27 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618089) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:23 PM Author: crimson gaped lay the thing about there being "three approaches" -- I had to scratch everything and start over. Still didn't have trouble finishing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618067) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:38 PM Author: Greedy Excitant Stage Persian whuut? i saw the 3 approaches thing and got what they were, but didn't even mention them in my answer. wtf ever. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618189) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 10:22 PM Author: chocolate thriller den you're joking right?
lucky for you the mpt is only 10% |
|
Date: July 27th, 2011 12:18 AM Author: Greedy Excitant Stage Persian no. what in the prompt indicated that discussing them was necessary? i saw "3 approaches, guy wants me to advocate why his view is correct, doesn't subscribe to any of the approaches. noted." in the end i tried to come up with some kind of rule that reconciled the two cases, and came out so that the one in question went the way guy preferred. anyway, i got to this with like 20 mins left. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18620443) |
|
Date: July 27th, 2011 6:25 AM Author: chocolate thriller den "From the materials, I have learned that there are three approaches to the Rules. I believe her conduct is unethical under any of them."
Partner wants you to discuss her action under each approach, not make up your own bullshit. I assume you're unemployed, or you'd know this. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:34 PM Author: arousing doobsian kitchen jap Thoughts:
Property Q was really fucking straight forward. If you knew the rules, you were guaranteed at least a 7-8 I think
Crim Pro part of the Q wasnt bad. I think I laid everything out right. Illegal search right? Not enough for terry frisk to search envelope and it couldnt qualify for SITA? Also I thought he couldnt be convicted b/c they never did anything with the intent to defraud aspect of crime. Might be wrong on that though. Completely made up shit for the commercial paper part of the Q.
Domestic Relations was straight forward. Was expecting much worse based on Barbri sample essays. Was just estoppel and change of circumstances, right? Corp. was simple duty of loyalty. And secured was just breach of peace.
Torts/BAC was some weird shit.
Wills was straight forward. Both wills denied probate. And he breached fiduciary duty with no diversified portfolio. And no personal liability for non malpracticing partner in LLP.
MPT was easy as fuck |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:35 PM Author: Fear-inspiring Sepia Pocket Flask property-- they were TIC, right?
i forgot the rest of the Q...something about necessary imrpovements vs. non-necessary improvements and no rent needed because there wasn't an ouster.
also, was that an easement or profit in gross? how did you come out on that? |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:37 PM Author: arousing doobsian kitchen jap TIC definitely.
No easement, license.
Plumbing repairs reimbursement, studio not
And buyer bears risk of loss after execution of contracr |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:38 PM Author: pontificating set i thought seller bears risk in NY until buyer takes possession (or maybe until closing)?
also, you can't get reimbursed for improvements, but you're entitled to the increase in sale price thanks to them |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:40 PM Author: arousing doobsian kitchen jap shit i was going off what i remember from the MBE rule. you might be right. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617781) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:43 PM Author: metal national you're right. one thing that the BarBri mini review helped me out with. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617813) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:47 PM Author: arousing doobsian kitchen jap damn i should have paid $200 for that extra 2 essay points. Or is it only 1 b/c i spotted the issue and applied my incorrect rule effectively (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617833) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:53 PM Author: Bonkers cheese-eating crackhouse I learned this for free by listening to the damn lecture (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618869) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:37 PM Author: pontificating set i said a license (or possibly a profit, if he's taking the fish). def not an easement, though...talked about the ways to create easements. no prescription here, because it wasn;t hostile (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617760) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:42 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617797) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:42 PM Author: arousing doobsian kitchen jap need a writing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617802) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:43 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617807) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:03 PM Author: crimson gaped lay doesn't a profit need to be in writing too? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618941) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:37 PM Author: Greedy Excitant Stage Persian i said it was a license. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617761) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:36 PM Author: pontificating set agreed, brother.
regarding the corps Q: what was with the "can X corp avoid the contract with Y corp? question, though??
i talked about duty of loyalty, obviously, but i didn't think a corporation could get out of a contract. i figured they could only bring a derivative suit against the director |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:38 PM Author: arousing doobsian kitchen jap ur right. I did what u did. he breached duty, but corp couldnt avoid. he could be personally liable though (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617765) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:38 PM Author: pontificating set ok cool. just thought the prompt was weird (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617771) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:39 PM Author: crimson gaped lay what I thought too (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617776) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:40 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617782) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:48 PM Author: crimson gaped lay I thought it wasn't because even though it was market price it wasn't the best price (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617842) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:49 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617848) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:56 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm agree. I thought fairness was the dispositive aspect since the SH & director approval were not informed & could not cure. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617900) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:51 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm Might be wrong, but I think fairness is a defense for self-dealing--that works in DE, and I seem to recall it working in NY. Avoidance is the usual remedy, absent showing of fairness or curative approval. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617863) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:55 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617894) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:59 PM Author: crimson gaped lay but how come the other party to the transaction is punished for the fact that one corp's transaction was improperly approved? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617927) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:00 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617933) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:01 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm Because the other party is presumed to benefit from deal w/interested director. It's like avoiding a contract where the counter party is the interested director with a different hat on. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617936) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:17 PM Author: crimson gaped lay It just said he had a financial stake, it didn't say he was the controlling shareholder or anything.
W/E, I'm sure as long as you somehow addressed this stuff you got some points. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:23 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm I'm just guessing as to the policy behind the rule. But yeah, I really doubt that this one tiny piece of the puzzle amounted to more than 1/2 a point or whatever. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618061) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:01 PM Author: arousing doobsian kitchen jap but he still breached by not disclosing right? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617940) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:04 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm Yes. It was definitely a breach. You can't just go around self-dealing without telling people. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617950) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:39 PM Author: metal national That's what I put. I was like sweet Duty of Loyalty. Then typed up genius, and was like no, that's not what this is asking. I said that they can't rescind a contract they entered because their director is a deadbeat father who can't pay his car payment. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617779) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:40 PM Author: pontificating set lol yeah. i threw both in (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617784) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:38 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617772) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:40 PM Author: arousing doobsian kitchen jap BIC was only for custody i thought. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617786) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:40 PM Author: pontificating set dunno, can't go wrong mentioning BIC. i forgot =( (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617790) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:40 PM Author: Fear-inspiring Sepia Pocket Flask idk it was weird because it said child support for the mom and her... i assumed there was some kind of maintenance included but otherwise just threw the kitchen sink on the page and talked about best interests of kid, changed circumstances, whatever. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617791) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:41 PM Author: metal national I put both. I actually put substantial change in circumstances, because I swear I read something there's a higher standard to modify support in a separation agreements, but I have no fucking clue if that was right. And it didn't merge, or something. That was relevant for a reason. No fucking clue way. But seeing everyone else on basically the same page as me, I feel better. The poor kid next to me didn't finish the 3rd essay or the MPT when time was called. Wasn't close to finishing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617795) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:42 PM Author: pontificating set aw man, that sucks. can't let that happen...gotta at least write some issue statements for all the questions. free points (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617804) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:18 PM Author: crimson gaped lay Yeah, guy next to me was all mad because he said he didn't get to finish the MPT as a result of a proctoring thing. I was honestly thinking "how could you not finish this?" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618040) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:44 PM Author: Lime lettuce codepig Sup Chris R. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617818) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:44 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617819) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:46 PM Author: pontificating set wait so were the three "approaches" homeboy mentioned the strict reading, conduct-based, and status-based.
i just structured my shit like that |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:47 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617835) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:46 PM Author: Fear-inspiring Sepia Pocket Flask wtf its the MPT dude. just write anything and theyll randomly give you points.
i had like 7k words and said the same shit over and over |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:24 PM Author: Greedy Excitant Stage Persian i had like 500 words. mostly because i used up way too much time on the essay before it, trying to remember whether a will cut in 2 was presumed to be a revocation or not (and getting it wrong). fuck. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618072) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:26 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618085) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:28 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm I think so, unless you argued for DRR. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618104) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:33 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618142) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:35 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm I don't think you're supposed to rely on legal jargon too much, so you'll probably do better than people who knew the words but failed to explain (e.g., me). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618165) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:32 PM Author: Greedy Excitant Stage Persian yep. couldn't remember that. all i could recall were short snippets of phrases i'd seen, which led me to guess wrong.
also said the brothers were joint tenants, rather than TIC. another case where i'm sure i'd read the line "ny presumption" in my outlines 40-50 times, but somehow it never clicked, so just had to guess.
thinking more and more that the people who claimed they'd passed just by "reading the CMR/notes a few times though, bro" this past month were total flame. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:35 PM Author: charismatic old irish cottage trailer park It is a flame. Remember law students who lied constantly about how much work they were doing? Yeah, they post here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618163) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:40 PM Author: Greedy Excitant Stage Persian eh. i studied my ass off for the past 3 weeks or so. looking now like i got way more shit wrong than i actually got right. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618214) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:42 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618228) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:51 PM Author: arousing doobsian kitchen jap truth. saw some peeps in buffalo crying their eyes out afterwards (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618304) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:52 PM Author: Angry Dark Theatre Goal In Life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618318) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:03 PM Author: arousing doobsian kitchen jap i dunno. u see that fine ass spanish chick who looked like a 20-something JLo? Gonna try to hit that up after the MBE (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618415) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:05 PM Author: Greedy Excitant Stage Persian yeah. hope so. i'm a pretty smart dude but felt like today owned me harder than anything else i'd ever done. whatevs, 175 raw on the MBE is totally do-able. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618428) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:08 PM Author: Fear-inspiring Sepia Pocket Flask you'll be fine brother. think about it: u only need to beat like 1 out of 10 people. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618447) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 6:49 PM Author: Aphrodisiac messiness stop talking about answers faggots. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18617850) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 7:35 PM Author: Hairless Racy Plaza I heard it was much easier than the MBE on monday (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618162) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:41 PM Author: Bonkers cheese-eating crackhouse curve should be sweet right? except that property question i'll probably get a 2 on bc it was so easy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618771) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:47 PM Author: Fear-inspiring Sepia Pocket Flask what determines the curve? im retarded. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618813) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 8:51 PM Author: Bonkers cheese-eating crackhouse i don't know, probably figure they want a certain % to pass. i think i did good on these essays but everyone is missing the issues left and write. who knows my rule statements probably sucked (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618854) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:00 PM Author: Fear-inspiring Sepia Pocket Flask my rule statements suck too. do we still get points?
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:05 PM Author: Bonkers cheese-eating crackhouse totally. i keep thinking about the people who write shit. The thing is, though, THE TOP 2 SUBJECTS THAT ARE ON EVERY SINGLE BAR EXAM WERE NOT THERE. This was a weird bar exam and tons of people aren't going to know anything about a lot of those issues (though some might be helped from crim appearing twice). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618964) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:33 PM Author: odious foreskin volcanic crater crim twice? not real crim. not the barbri MEMORIZE THESE DISTINCTIONS FOR ROBBERY, 6 DEGREES OF LARCENY, 6 DEGREES OF CONSPIRACY, MURDER, INSANITY, MANSLAUGHTER bullshit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619169) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:37 PM Author: Bonkers cheese-eating crackhouse true, true, but dui is a crime. If the dui crim shit had been all that was there, that would still be more than there was of NY Practice (why'd I even bother learning that?) or contracts. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619194) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:45 PM Author: odious foreskin volcanic crater i think i brought up ny practice once out of spite. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619266) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:48 PM Author: Bonkers cheese-eating crackhouse i was estopping plaintiffs all day (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619298) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:51 PM Author: Fear-inspiring Sepia Pocket Flask youre a retard if you spent time on NY Practice. it hasn't been coming up as much recently and when it does its like 1/3rd of a question (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619314) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:54 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm Barbri's chart had it showing up like 99% of the time, and they stressed how important it was. Also on lots of the practice essays.
At least there were some minor NY prac points on the MC. Makes me feel slightly better for wasting 15+ hours on that retarded shit. |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 10:02 PM Author: Fear-inspiring Sepia Pocket Flask who cares if its 99% when its counting tests from 1984?
it's been a relatively unimportant topic over the last decade or so. i think it's come up 7 out of the last 10 years and 6 of those 7 times it was only on there as a 1/2 or 1/3 of a tort question so you can say "battery has a 1 year SOL in NY".
just like barbi's chart says secured transaction and commercial paper never show up, yet the NY bar has given an essay on those every single year for like 10 years now (alternating between the two and this year both showed up)
|
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 10:05 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm I feel like barbri fucked us on this one. They mentioned frequency (and it is listed as having come up several times over the last 6 administrations) and neglected to mention that it's just the most basic shit that gets tested. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619436) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 10:08 PM Author: Fear-inspiring Sepia Pocket Flask agreed brother, very misleading.
either way, i feel like today's essays were easy compared to the shit in their books |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:55 PM Author: diverse property regret i am going to interplead barbri and the state of new york so they can determine whose ass i am going to kick (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18619355) |
|
Date: July 26th, 2011 9:03 PM Author: jet spectacular private investor really tough guy Half of the people cannot speak Englush (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18618940) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2011 10:47 PM Author: cordovan therapy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18935689) |
|
Date: September 8th, 2011 10:55 PM Author: Multi-colored Theater Stage Pisswyrm It's amazing how much I've forgotten already. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#18935745) |
|
Date: December 16th, 2011 9:54 PM Author: Submissive indigo fortuitous meteor Essay Questions with Sample Candidate Answers
POSTED |
|
Date: January 6th, 2012 9:56 PM Author: swashbuckling prole keepsake machete (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#19725892) |
|
Date: January 18th, 2012 3:55 AM Author: Mauve cocky gaping I failed NY and passed NJ. Fuck me. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1715328&forum_id=2#19795476) |