The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Republican primary turnout at pathetic levels
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:32 AM Author: thirsty garrison http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2012/feb/04/economic-woes-anti-obama-sentiment-fail-draw-large/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19899970) |
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:34 AM Author: Aqua zombie-like parlor lol they are failing to match 2008 levels in every fucking state (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19899985) |
 |
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:36 AM Author: thirsty garrison except South Carolina.
Newt has a point that Romney is just winning by suppressing base turnout. |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:38 AM Author: ruby heady elastic band uh, maybe if Newt could "inspire base turnout" he'd win (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900005) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:39 AM Author: thirsty garrison yes, he is. the republican base is in the south. he is winning all the "southern counties" - look at the Florida and South Carolina maps. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900017) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:36 AM Author: Canary patrolman school http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/31/romney-wins-but-turnout-lags/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19899993) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:37 AM Author: ruby heady elastic band the article says they surpassed it in 3 of 5 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19899997) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:38 AM Author: Aqua zombie-like parlor LOL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900009) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:38 AM Author: ruby heady elastic band Did I read it wrong? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900011) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:39 AM Author: thirsty garrison read the whole fucking article. turnout among republicans is down. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900013) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:39 AM Author: ruby heady elastic band what post was I responding to, Hizz?
This one: "turnout down in every state" |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:40 AM Author: rebellious national security agency this guy is an illiterate trolling fanboi, don't fucking bother (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900027) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:41 AM Author: thirsty garrison This coming from the faggot who mispredicted 2/3 primaries. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900036) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 11:41 AM Author: thirsty garrison the obvious point of this thread is that "REPUBLICAN" turnout is down. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900033) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:05 PM Author: Motley Startled House uhhh, when you know someone is going to win the nomination, I don't see the point in going to vote in a primary (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900222) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:05 PM Author: rebellious national security agency (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900225) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:06 PM Author: Unhinged violent stag film place of business (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900229) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:07 PM Author: Glassy titillating cumskin romney was hardly the front runner. there was a new "frontrunner" who was going to beat romney and unite the base every week. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900237) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:07 PM Author: rebellious national security agency (desperate media) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900243) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:11 PM Author: Motley Startled House anyone with half a brain knew this wasn't the case, Romney was always going to win despite what libtards wanted to dream about (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900282) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:11 PM Author: Unhinged violent stag film place of business cp (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900287) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:22 PM Author: Glassy titillating cumskin lol libtards want romney to win. the repub base in 2010 was driven by anger over obamacare and now they nominate a guy who endorsed obamacare. plus romney's the perfect mix of career politician and soulless banker. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900382) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:22 PM Author: Unhinged violent stag film place of business nah. libtards want newt to win. romney isnt a perfect candidate but he's a fuckload more likely to pwn the nigger socialist than anybody else in are sps field. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900393) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:25 PM Author: Motley Startled House wishing something is true doesn't make it true. The retarded idea that Newt is more electable than Romney is a libtard wet dream (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900413) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:35 PM Author: slimy temple LOL no. libs salivate at the idea of Newt winning. sorta like republicans did with Howard Dean. unfortunately, Romney is probably Kerry. more electable than Newt, but will likely still fail. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900503) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:40 PM Author: Aqua zombie-like parlor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900594) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:47 PM Author: Unhinged violent stag film place of business lol kerry was a fucking anti-US turd. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900686) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:15 PM Author: Electric casino bullshit, no-one knew who was going to win Iowa, so why was Republican turnout down there?
Why was it down in SC, FL? |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:24 PM Author: Motley Startled House up in south carolina, romney had a double digit lead in polls in florida before the primary. why the fuck would you go out to vote with that. Go away libtard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900402) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:33 PM Author: carnelian naked idiot forum Gingrich had a double digit lead in South Carolina and yet turnout was way up. Face it Romney can't turnout the base. 2012 turnout is no better than it was in '08 and it's seriously lagging 08 dem turnout numbers. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900488) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:35 PM Author: Motley Startled House LOL, did someone turn on the libtard bat signal. You got here so quick. Romney will do fine, people will turn out because he has great credentials and because they hate obama. No one gives a shit what the dem turnout was in 2008, it was a race against lesbian feminists and white guilt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900507) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:43 PM Author: carnelian naked idiot forum http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/31/romney-wins-but-turnout-lags/
Turnout among self-described Republicans is way down in every state outside of South Carolina. |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:50 PM Author: Motley Startled House I can't believe it lagged in florida, nevada, and new hampshire. The race was so close in those states (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900707) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:52 PM Author: Aqua zombie-like parlor LOL @ you (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900722) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:54 PM Author: carnelian naked idiot forum Self-described republican turnout was down in Iowa as well yet way up in south Carolina where Gingrich had a double digit lead in the polls. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900734) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:27 PM Author: Lascivious greedy gaping he said NOMINATION (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900438) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:51 PM Author: magenta hissy fit Most Republicans don't like Mitt Romney very much. I don't see how that statement is in any way controversial. That said, given the current state of the economy and Obama's low popularity, Romney still has a 25-40% chance against Obama. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900711) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 12:52 PM Author: Motley Startled House you should go make some money on intrade dude (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900723) |
|
Date: February 5th, 2012 1:07 PM Author: magenta hissy fit I already have money on Obama's re-election at 54.5% (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1865732&forum_id=2#19900836) |