The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Easty to get 3.9+ gpa at Harvard ug?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 27th, 2012 8:16 PM Author: Dashing internet-worthy den sweet tailpipe 10% of the class get 3.93+ gpa. sick grade inflation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20777650) |
Date: May 27th, 2012 8:26 PM Author: irate headpube pistol link?
seems like no way this could be true |
 |
Date: May 27th, 2012 8:27 PM Author: Dashing internet-worthy den sweet tailpipe http://www.registrar.fas.harvard.edu/fasro/ugrad/index.jsp?cat=ugrad&subcat=information (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20777705) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 8:29 PM Author: brass big shitlib I remember reading that ~10% of the class at CalTech gets >=4.0.
http://www.yaledailynews.com/news/2011/sep/30/latin-honors-cutoffs-rise/ |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 8:29 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle flushed church building lulzy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20777718) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 8:33 PM Author: multi-colored milky heaven international law enforcement agency It's a school filled with super strivers who've never been denied an A in their lives. What else would you expect? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20777745) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 8:42 PM Author: Dashing internet-worthy den sweet tailpipe when 10% of the class is getting 3.93+ it means that there is massive grade inflation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20777809) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 10:31 PM Author: multi-colored milky heaven international law enforcement agency No. It doesn't mean that at all. Maybe the students are just that good. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20778398) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2012 3:16 AM Author: cocky swashbuckling tanning salon Imagine being a lowly TA trying to tell some super entitled super striving freshmen with well connected alumni parents that the kid is going to receive a B- grade in your class. Imagine how much grief that TA expects to suffer by delivering that B- grade in this context. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20779706) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 8:50 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle flushed church building *graduate HUG with 3.90 GPA* *gets a 162 on the LSAT* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20777857) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 8:52 PM Author: Dashing internet-worthy den sweet tailpipe lol. HUG is a joke. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20777865) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 10:35 PM Author: Vibrant startling trailer park when I was at Y, the cutoff for summa (top 5%) was something like 3.93 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20778435) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 10:38 PM Author: multi-colored milky heaven international law enforcement agency At my flagship public, summa is top 1% only. Only top 8% get Latin honors. Top 5 for summa is pretty absurd (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20778452) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 10:41 PM Author: soggy indian lodge dragon The students at H/Y are smarter though. You shouldn't be penalized for going to a good school with smart kids. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20778477) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 10:45 PM Author: multi-colored milky heaven international law enforcement agency The fact that the kids at HYP are smarter is why the high average gpa at those schools does not necessarily indicate grade inflation.
However, Latin honors are based on your performance relative to your class. So yes, top 5% for summa is silly. |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 10:50 PM Author: Vigorous indirect expression hunting ground Lots of schools give summa to top 5%. I don't see why your shitstate college should be the measuring stick. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20778520) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 10:53 PM Author: multi-colored milky heaven international law enforcement agency I dont think this is true. Also, u suck my cock boy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20778527) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 11:47 PM Author: Magenta indecent halford theater Greetings, If summa is 5%, magna is presumably 10, so what is just cum laude? 20%?!? |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 11:32 PM Author: dark mexican brunch 3.7 in computer science from berkeley or illinois is MUCH more difficult than 3.95 econ at harvard. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20778771) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 11:36 PM Author: Vibrant startling trailer park patently false. 3.95+ from HYP is incredibly difficult/impressive. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20778807) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2012 11:41 PM Author: dark mexican brunch basically no one at berkeley/illinois gets 3.7+ from CS because there is a brutal bell curve. at big state schools the professors don't give out A's and A-'s like fucking candy. one of my good friends did EECS and business at berkeley, and he was one of only 2 people in EECS who got 3.7+ his year. and that department is stacked with smart asian strivers.
top 5% at HUG get 3.96+. that's a fucking joke. |
|
Date: May 28th, 2012 12:01 AM Author: Purple Institution 3.9 kids at Harvard would get 4.0 (or higher if there's an A+) at ANY COLLEGE IN THE COUNTRY you delusional fucks hth |
|
Date: May 28th, 2012 12:20 AM Author: dark mexican brunch depends on the major. a 3.9 harvard math major? probably. but a 3.9 history major at harvard would get destroyed in berkeley, carnegie mellon, illinois CS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20779024) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2012 12:20 AM Author: Purple Institution "depends on the major. a 3.9 harvard math major? probably. but a 3.9 history major at harvard would get destroyed in berkeley, carnegie mellon, illinois CS."
are you retarded in the SAME major |
|
Date: May 28th, 2012 12:24 AM Author: Purple Institution how was UIUC you Illinois trolling fuck (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20779050) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2012 12:26 AM Author: dark mexican brunch didn't go there. but my CS friends who did illinois are making great money at tech firms and high-frequency trading shops. they're making more than probably 95% of harvard alums their age. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20779059) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2012 12:26 AM Author: Purple Institution (JJC) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20779062) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2012 3:07 AM Author: dead legal warrant plaza pretty sure vast majority of the people in the top 10% are non-stem majors. also, you guys seem to be forgetting that the top 10% at HUG (roughly 160 students) are probably the smartest, most ambitious, and hardest working college students in America. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20779683) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2012 10:23 PM Author: Obsidian concupiscible school cafeteria major in non-stem, and 3.9+ at harvard is pretty easy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1958052&forum_id=2#20783265) |