Tom Goldstein: "most significant SCOTUS cases of all time
| sooty corner pozpig | 11/30/12 | | Demanding Gold Brunch Preventive Strike | 12/01/12 | | brindle toaster center | 12/01/12 | | greedy persian tanning salon | 12/01/12 | | brindle toaster center | 12/01/12 | | sooty corner pozpig | 12/01/12 | | Demanding Gold Brunch Preventive Strike | 12/03/12 | | Demanding Gold Brunch Preventive Strike | 12/03/12 | | Vibrant Balding Trust Fund | 12/03/12 | | Demanding Gold Brunch Preventive Strike | 12/03/12 | | sooty corner pozpig | 12/07/12 | | sooty corner pozpig | 03/02/13 | | Beady-eyed Hilarious Dragon Wrinkle | 03/02/13 | | cracking well-lubricated cruise ship | 03/02/13 | | 180 parlour associate | 05/20/13 | | indigo fortuitous meteor | 03/02/13 | | sooty corner pozpig | 05/20/13 | | sooty corner pozpig | 06/26/13 | | dashing tan ticket booth | 06/26/13 | | orange curious azn | 06/26/13 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 30th, 2012 9:24 AM Author: sooty corner pozpig
"is whether some people who put dicks in each other's assholes will be allowed in most states to get a piece of paper that says it's defined as marriage, something they can already get in a few states, and behavior that isn't criminalized anywhere."
http://www.scotusblog.com/2012/11/history/
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2126175&forum_id=2#22140135) |
Date: December 3rd, 2012 8:20 PM Author: Vibrant Balding Trust Fund
180 credited OP
I seriously thought this article was being sarcastic for the first couple of paragraphs but then the other shoe never dropped and I was like wtfffffffff
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2126175&forum_id=2#22161278) |
Date: March 2nd, 2013 1:48 PM Author: cracking well-lubricated cruise ship
To be fair,
This is one of the most painfully stupid articles that I have ever read. Jesus Christ.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2126175&forum_id=2#22740743) |
Date: March 2nd, 2013 1:50 PM Author: indigo fortuitous meteor
"most significant case of all time" =/= "these are the most significant cases these nine Justices have ever considered, and probably that they will ever decide"
If they create a new class of people who fall into strict scrutiny then, yeah, that's pretty fucking significant.
Healthcare is close.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2126175&forum_id=2#22740765) |
Date: June 26th, 2013 10:06 AM Author: dashing tan ticket booth
That's what it really boils down to. This society has lost its head. There is no compelling moral reason to protect those who CHOOSE to engage in the conduct that gives rise to discrimination. Laws against homosexual marriage are no worse than laws against sibling marriage. The biggest irony of all is that states aren't discriminating against homosexuals at all because no law stops them from marrying the opposite sex. Conversely, the law prohibits two heterosexuals of the same sex from marrying each other, and that can't possibly be "discrimination." But the Supreme Court has banned states from "legislating morality" - at least whenever the law would offend liberals. Liberals are still free to discriminate against white people in the name of "diversity," use tax revenue to pay for abortions, force children to attend sex ed, ban soda, popcorn, plastic bags, paper bags, guns, bullets, etc., etc.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2126175&forum_id=2#23478296) |
|
|