Date: June 1st, 2014 11:14 PM Author: demanding parlour
if im in decent shape at 45 I (and most guys) should pwn 22 year old "men", who will be way less confident, have less money/status and will have been shitlibified post-millennial cis-twinks. most women sexually prefer men over women.
Date: June 1st, 2014 11:17 PM Author: Ebony provocative deer antler church
The men I know in their 40s who can pull girls in their 20s and earlier 30s are still in the same physical shape as they were in their 20s/30s. They also haven't gone fully gray, and they have a lot of younger friends so they don't act old.
Physical shape is key. A lot of girls don't give a shit about age if the guy doesn't act and look like a middle-aged office jockey. However, how many of us will actually continue to devote time to fitness while our careers get more demanding?
Date: June 1st, 2014 11:24 PM Author: Ebony provocative deer antler church
It doesn't, but there are a lot of doods who don't care that much about working out. It's a lifestyle choice, and many people stop regularly exercising after college. I've seen this happen to many friends of mine who start demanding jobs.
Well then you're totally fucked and need to lock down whatever girl will have you ASAP. On a side not enjoy your demanding job induced heart attack you fat capitalist sack of shit
Date: June 1st, 2014 11:16 PM Author: Ebony provocative deer antler church
I think most people start to look like shit as they age. There are some doods that look better with some salt-and-pepper or full-on gray, but these doods have kept their full head of hair and have also stayed in good shape.
It's not fair comparing normal, average Joes to movie stars.
Most middle aged men are closer to George Costanza, not George Clooney. Nor do they have the power of a Bill Clinton. Money, fame, and power will cause a man to never age. But how many of us will be able to say that about ourselves when we're balding and droopy?
Date: June 1st, 2014 11:13 PM Author: Ebony provocative deer antler church
Depends on whether you want kids. I want to be an active father to any children I have, especially sons. This means that I'd want to have kids by probably 40, latest 45. I also want to enjoy a fair amount of time when the kids are grown and out of the house.
I know that I don't feel as much biological and social pressure to couple up as women do, but I would ideally want to be a father who can still do cool things with his sons without being the "old dad". And yes, this all necessitates getting married.
Date: June 2nd, 2014 10:29 AM Author: Titillating meetinghouse
These threads are always lulzy because of the delusional circle jerks that take place within them. Normal men aren't single at 45 and the ones who are aren't dating 20-something women. If a guy wants a fertile woman to start a family with he needs to lock one down way before then.
Date: June 2nd, 2014 10:57 AM Author: Mind-boggling Underhanded Dysfunction Bawdyhouse
true more in the past; now there are more single guys mid 30s and beyond who are not losers. but you're right in that the best marriages are those who coupled in their 20s. by 30s, the marriage risks being a lifeless, pragmatic relationship.
Date: June 2nd, 2014 7:33 PM Author: Ebony provocative deer antler church
Yeah, this. I don't want to have toddlers when I'm in my early 50s. I know that very many doods can continue to slay 20something pussy way up into their 40s, but that lifestyle gets old. Just because you can doesn't mean you should, or that it's good for you.
Women are lucky in a sense - their biological clocks and "market value" force them to think about settling down way before men need to really start thinking about settling down. I know a lot of men who will be in their 50s when they have toddlers or small children, but I know like no women who can say the same.
if he isn't fat, bald, makes good money, and is socially normal, probably mid 40s.
if you're missing any of that, then start projecting downward. your chips aren't going up as you age unless you have massive increases in income and wealth. a short, tubby ortho surgeon pulling $550K a year with high social status can bone attractive younger women for the rest of his life and quality women will line up to marry him. a schlubby former-big-4-now-in-house accountant making $93K is going to need to be pretty fucking open-minded when it comes to women as he coasts into his 40s.
of course, take the same accountant and make him tall, fit, and good looking, and suddenly he's back in the black. that guy can find a high quality wife until he starts to fall apart physically.
Date: June 2nd, 2014 7:36 PM Author: Ebony provocative deer antler church
Agreed.
A guy with a 99-percenter salary who is getting fat and bald by age 31 can't expect to be slaying 20something poon well into his 40s. His best case scenario is to lock down an attractive, nice, kinda desperate girl before his body goes to shit.
An attractive, tall, fit accountant will still do well with younger girls up into his 40s. Not all younger girls are into an age gap, but enough are to give him a fair selection.
The objective for men is to keep in shape. You can't do much about baldness, but you can do a lot about physical fitness. I know an average-looking, fully bald 50 year old who makes maybe between $100k-$300k/year (good money but not gold digger money), and his last girlfriend was 34. He works out a ton and abstains from alcohol, so he is incredibly fit.
"An attractive, tall, fit accountant will still do well with younger girls up into his 40s. Not all younger girls are into an age gap, but enough are to give him a fair selection."
this is the #1 thing on here that XO women refuse to acknowledge. not all women are into older men. but plenty are. you just have to remain appealing.