Date: December 26th, 2014 1:11 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
T20 law grad. Ivy UG in Econ. Didn't get Biglaw offer after 2L and considered dropping out.. but got a tech consulting gig before graduation via networking.
Worked at a large tech consulting firm for several years, doing tech implementation consulting. Recently got a job as a data analyst at a large tech firm, doing tasks such as analyzing data using SQL queries, Excel VBA, etc.
As a law grad working in a very non-law related field, I'm willing to take any questions.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:34 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
I do have a lot of respect for strategy consultants, especially at top firms such as MBB, Oliver, or LEK.
Some of the smartest guys I've ever met are strategy consultants.
I really wanted to do Strat consulting real bad, and considered doing top10 MBA to break in, but thought the cost of doing it, especially after wasting my early 20's on crap JD, was a little too much trouble.
That being said, my current job is not too bad, compared to what I did before. I literally thought I was going brain DEAD being an IT consultant. You go travel to random places, talk with morons (clients) to get requirements, set IT up, test, and repeat. Worst job ever.
Now I actually get to do some type of 'analysis' - pulling & manipulating data using SQL, join tables, automate spreadsheet using Excel VBA, derive insights from the data I analyzed, present my work to the firm's partners & directors. I feel reborn. Goes to show that the first job out of school doesn't define your career.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:55 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
Good for you man. I REALLY wanted to do strategy consulting work.
I hate being a back office office drone with no grasp of corp strategy. Should I consider doing a top MBA? I considered doing it but thought it was too expensive...
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:58 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
I tried to get into Mgmt Consulting division of my old firm, to no avail. Even Deloitte S&O (Mgmt Consulting arm) has very strict recruiting channel: they still only recruit from top MBA's.
I guess it's better to remain in my job and keep working rather than going to top 10 MBA full price for a shot at MBB / Strategy Consulting?
Date: December 26th, 2014 2:01 AM Author: self-centered mental disorder
doesn't Deloitte tech division sponsor MBAs? It's a shitty gamble going to a full pay top MBA (landing with massive debt) and shooting for a non-guaranteed MBB position. Maybe aim for a cheaper top masters else where. Stanford Management Science and engineering masters for instance.
Date: December 26th, 2014 2:09 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
Good point. Yeah, I think I should console myself with the notion that the boat for doing Strategy-type work has sailed. Going 200k in debt for that MBA just to break into MBB.. just too risky.
Even if I get MBB after MBA, the pay is like 160k. I make 135k now, so going the MBA route will set me back big time in term of finances...
I guess I should console myself with the idea that I got out of that shit job known as IT consulting.
Date: June 1st, 2016 10:23 AM Author: Sable titillating address love of her life
cr, sounds like he should stay for now. i know top MBA grads who didn't have a clear idea of what they wanted to do and would have been in a better spot had they just stayed at their previous job, done a part time degree, or hustled for something else.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:37 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
I was just lazy in college. My high school was super easy and handed out A's like they hand out candies on Halloween. I just thought college was an extension of high school and I got screwed.
Date: December 26th, 2014 2:34 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
Haha, no. I just turned 30, so it's not like I graduated from college ages ago.
I played lots of sports in high school. Varsity basketball captain at my school. (point guard) Varsity baseball team captain. (3rd base)
Plus, I did a bunch of bullshit community service, soup kitchens, you name it. I guess all of these helped me get into my UG.
That being said, an IVY UG is no good at all unless you get 3.7+ GPA, if you major in Econ / social sciences. Top jobs (finance, mgmt consulting, etc) only go to the top kids. Most others settle for mediocre jobs or go to grad school, which isn't much of an improvement from lower-ranked colleges.
Date: December 26th, 2014 2:58 AM Author: Heady Brunch
30 is old man. the activities you listed tell me how far removed you are from current college application pools. ivys don't even care for sports/ECs unless you're recognized on at least a state level. i was varsity football captain, had a bunch of meaningless offices (student council, national honor society, latin honor society, etc) and bullshit ECs with a 1520 SAT and i got dingfagged everywhere. didn't apply to cornell or PEnn tho. had no HOOK
Date: December 26th, 2014 11:07 AM Author: Heady Brunch
you've confused jjc with me, jjc trolls for grad school admissions and thinks UG admissions are a joke. but anyone who's been thru it recently knows how capricious ug admissions are
Date: December 26th, 2014 10:01 PM Author: Indigo twinkling uncleanness
I was college 03-04 cycle, so roughly his, and my friends and I mostly had 1460+ SATs, 760-800 SAT IIs, and 3.5ish UW GPAs and only about half of us made it to an ivy, it was not that easy.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:15 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
135k base. My boss told me I would get up to 15-20% bonus off my base salary depending on my annual review, but I haven't verified that claim yet since I've been here less than a year.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:17 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
Coming out of college, I didn't have any legit job offer lined up. I was just extremely lazy, didn't really study, and didn't make any effort to line up internships while in college.
I just figured going to a decent ranked law school would get me onto a high-paying career with least resistance.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:25 AM Author: Comical smoky ticket booth
thats what i shouldve done instead of med school. i'd be dressed like a champ right now, going on winter vacation with a dime piece from russia. instead i have to spend an ER shift with subhumans. and i dont even get paid for it.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:40 AM Author: infuriating pit rigpig
Anything where you have to travel is the literal worst fucking job ever. If you disagree, you're a friendless loser who will die alone and no one will be at your funeral.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:41 AM Author: self-centered mental disorder
wow man, your life fucking sucks ass. Not all consulting is travel once you've made the requisite level. It was enjoyable to travel the globe though with accumulated points.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:42 AM Author: infuriating pit rigpig
No. My life is fucking 180 because I don't have to travel all the time. I'm just trying to share the gospel with people who don't have any legit life experience because they spend all their time chasing money.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:48 AM Author: infuriating pit rigpig
I think you're confusing me with someone else. I'm not a doctor.
That being said, consulting for hospitals sounds awful. Enjoy doctors refusing to treat you one day in the town you settle in since they all know you helped their friends get fired.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:33 AM Author: Comical smoky ticket booth
false. i am already older than u, and probably aged like someone who worked twice as long. i'll never catch up with someone who was making $100k starting at 21. with that salary u could potentially move out of the u.s. and "consult" by the time u're 30. essentially retire. i'll still be making less $$ than a fucking nurse for the next 5+ yrs of residency.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:39 AM Author: Comical smoky ticket booth
u sound like a dumb filippino. every residency is different length. the real fact of the matter is that most med people are married before they start and definitely before they finish residency. so it's basically some filipino or a fellow med student. they dont get to have normal friends, hang out with normal ivyleague grads, or even travel to europe and find someone on your own level. medicine is a lifestyle like orthodox jewry. u at some point realize that u fucked up by joining the club, but then it's too late to exit.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:36 AM Author: Comical smoky ticket booth
u know if i ask my parents to buy me a bmw at my graduation they'll tell me "but we paid for your school and we drive more modest cars, why do u need a bmw?" , so i cant even get a bmw. fucking personal trainers have a bmw by the time they are my age. and when u become a computer programmer or whatever profession u become, it's so u dont have to interact with low-lives like some cop. but as a dr, i get to interact with low lives even more than a cop.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:41 AM Author: Comical smoky ticket booth
of course my parents can afford it. but theyre cheap. they dont even like to spend money on themselves. i think my mom is depressed or disturbed and so their social development over the past 10yrs has halted and went into senile decline. anybody who makes even $50k/yr can buy a bmw after a few years.
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:43 AM Author: self-centered mental disorder
I'm talking about "fucking personal trainers have a bmw by the time they are my age"
Disclosure, I just bought a bimmer and it took me a while to save up for one (comfortably). It was something I wanted for a while though (not a POS entry one)
Date: December 26th, 2014 1:43 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
I actually think that working as a lawyer is worse than working as a technical analyst at a large company.
Lawyer = you read some shit, and write endless memos / drafts about petty shit. You learn no skill from working at a law firm, except how to write, hence, have low job stability.
As a data analyst with skills in Excel, SQL, R, etc, I get recruiter calls at least twice a week begging me to interview with other firms.
Date: December 26th, 2014 11:12 AM Author: Lime plaza electric furnace
come on bro, any baby can write Excel and SQL scripts and i doubt you're actually building systems in R. those are TTT as fuck "skills" and i'd be embarrassed to put "excel" on my resume.
Date: December 26th, 2014 11:24 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
No you're wrong. When I was interviewing for this job, I had two rounds of SQL on-site exams and I passed. It wasn't joke. My boss told me only 20% or so of the first round interview invitees passed the exams.
Writing simple sql query is a world of difference from understanding database structures and being able to manipulate data via complex t-sql queries in sql server or oracle.
Same deal with excel. I met a ton of corporate people who can't even do index / match function properly or make an appropriate pivot table.
But hey, if you feel so confident in your abilities, why not go out and get one of these data analyst gigs yourself? The work is much more interesting than working as a doc-review slave (lawyer) and the pay is no slouch either.
Date: December 26th, 2014 11:33 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
Haha. That sucks man. I don't sell anything at my job. Since you think you are capable, may I suggest a career change for you. Software sales is pure dead end, my friend.
My job is about 60% data analysis (excel, R, SaaS, sql)
40% meetings / presentations with the directors / partners at the firm
It's actually really intersting gig where I get to build a mix of technical and soft skills. Much better than my old job.
Date: June 1st, 2016 10:43 AM Author: Sable titillating address love of her life
actually being good/fast with excel and knowing some sort of programming language aren't as common as you'd think. i was unemployed a few years ago and was surprised how easy it would have been to get some sort of 60k job with those skills alone.
Date: December 26th, 2014 11:19 AM Author: yapping chocolate parlour
That seems surprising. Either way, still seems like a depressing existence where you end up hating life, unless your thrive on that hamster wheel shit.
Date: December 26th, 2014 11:41 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
Don't really care for my IQ. I'd rather get compliments on my looks (which I get plenty of). My life priority is to make good money, do intersting-enough work, and slay hot chicks left and right.
I wasn't exactly the brightest guy in college. But hey, I'm now making 135k base despite my lowly IQ!!
Anyone thinking a job as a data analyst @ F500 tech firm is a boring monkey work is delusional. I worked as an IT consultant at Deloitte / Accenture / IBM before and the work I do now is 100 times more interesting / challenging than my last job. On my last job, I didn't even get to use excel much at all. Most people I worked with at my last job wouldn't even know how to write IF statemtents in Excel, much less being able to write high end VBA codes. A lot of the corporate clients that I worked with from my consulting days were even more technically illiterate than that. (Hence the reason they hired us to do work for them)
All I'm saying is 90% of corporate jobs out there are bullshit gigs that just need warm bodies to handle mindless, garbage-level work, where you have no hope of doing anything interesting / challenging, or actually getting to use your brain.
I realized my last job as IT consultant was dead end and began to learn skills on my own. (Excel, sql, R) Then I did side projects where I used these skills, to gain hands on experience. Then I networked, got an interview, and conquered.
My message to the bros stuck in mindless, boring, shitty jobs: work on building a marketable skill-set and get some experience in those areas, then get the fuck out ASAP. Believe me, I feel 10 times happier working at a more interesting job now compared to before.
Data analyst at a large reputable firm - the focus is not on 'programming', rather, it's 'leveraging technology' to acquire, assemble, analyze data relevant to the company's bottom line. 40% of my job entails meeting with directors / partners at my firm from different department, where I help them with ad hoc data analysis and thus help them shape corporate strategy.
If your heart and passion lie within 'building things' then go become a software engineer.
If you are more business-minded person that enjoys setting up corporate strategy using data analysis, being a data analyst would be a good choice.
I didn't bother with any certs. They're not really helpful when you don't have the relevant work experience.
I learned basic crap about Excel, SQL, and R using on-line guides as well as text books, and practicing them with sample data when I had free time. I continued this cycle for about a year.
I got into touch with multiple head-hunters in my city and had coffee chats on my desire to change careers. Then a couple of opportunity came up where I could work for a start-up as a part-time data analysis employee, after my regular work hours on weekdays, and on weekends. I worked for free for first several months on this 'side project', and treated it as more or less a year-around off-cycle internship. I did this for about 8 months, then got the interview at the company I'm at now, and jumped ship.
Employers are very hesitant to even give you a first round interview unless you have hands-on experience on the skills you are selling. You can be the technical-skill-set master of the world, but if you don't have the work experience to show for it, employers won't care to read into your resume. I recommend just taking baby steps, where you learn skills that interest you and then trying to do some side projects, even for free.
Date: December 26th, 2014 2:58 PM Author: yapping chocolate parlour
Your flame about a cubicle spreadsheet job being interesting jumped the shark with this post, brother. You need to walk a fine line between keeping it believable and pretending that it's fun.
The sad reality as I point out above is that the vast majority of corporate jobs out there, especially ones available for fresh grads, are dog-shit gigs where using your brain is frowned upon.
Your anti-spreadsheet sentiment is troubling; since most of legitimate corporate jobs rely heavily on your ability to use Excel like a champion. Last time I heard, my college friends working in BB IBD or Hedge fund in NYC told me that like 80% of their job is 'modeling data in Excel'.
At any rate, everything is relative, my friend. I realize people that work in MBB consulting or equity research at a hedge fund do more interesting / challenging / financially awarding work than I do. But, hell man, my job beats the shit out of my last job, or the majority of 'regular-joe' corp jobs out there, in terms of caliber of work, skill-set growth, and comp.
I used to be angry and depressed at my last job, since it was boring as shit where the most interesting part of the job was talking to moron clients to get their 'requirements' and write shit up in MS Word. One time my coworker called me out after work and asked why I looked so depressed. My reply: "This job fucking sucks." Thankfully, I quit just 2 months after I said that.
Just how a 'lawyer' can do different job from other 'lawyers', depending on where the person works at (Biglaw, Shit-law, F500 In-house, government), the same holds true for the majority of other jobs.
'Financial Analyst', 'Data Analyst', 'Business Analyst', 'Consultant', whatever mean very different jobs / skills / experience, depending on the organization that you work at.
Thus, the necessity to really pay attention to the whole job description, not just the job title when considering an offer.
Date: December 26th, 2014 4:36 PM Author: yapping chocolate parlour
Yes, I've worked a job. I'm. Lawyer, and I hate it. I feel like a cog in a machine. But then I read your job description and actually feel better because I'm less of a cog than you and at least sometimes what I do SOUNDS interesting to other people.
What I am trying to address is that gaining 'essential' 'foundational' skills, such as even Excel, is VERY important for the majority of legit corp. jobs.
Some people here refuse to believe it, but hey whatever I don't care.
I'm comparing my current job with my old job and coming up with the bold claim that you shouldn't stick with a shitty job you hate. If you hate your job for whatever reason, pick up some skills and get the fuck out, is what I'm trying to say.
If you don't like reading my comments in this thread, get the fuck out now. No one is forcing you to read it.
My boss's title is 'Data Analytics Manager'. His boss's job title is 'Director, Business Operations & Analytics'
I also get LinkedIn recruiter mails once in a while for opportunity to interview for F500 'in-house consulting' or 'in-house strategy analyst' type positions.
Proven work experience in analyzing data and presenting such data to the firm's leadership (directors & above), IMO, is a marketable selling-point for various types of positions, from my experience.
I notice how many posters here look down at Excel-related skills. But hey, I would argue that being able to use Excel is arguably the most important fundamental skill for like 99% of corporate jobs out there. So good luck if you hate using Excel.
Date: June 1st, 2016 10:54 AM Author: Sable titillating address love of her life
there's a difference between knowing the logic of different formulas and being able to do fairly complicated stuff quickly and setting up workbooks in a way such that they can be easily reproduced/handed off to people. it's hard to get those skills without actually being in a job that requires you to do it.
It really depends. I feel like law grads have such a wide range of outcomes, in terms of career success and general happiness.
The most successful dude from my law school did Shitlaw -> some type of attorney / agent at an insurance branch (selling insurance & taking care of legal matters) -> opened up his own branch selling insurance of all types. Last time I met him, he bought himself a 5-bedroom house worth over $1M, all with his own cash, and a brand-new BMW M3. He seems to be living up for sure.
Some other dude did Biglaw litigation for 3 years -> Midlaw for 2 years -> and now works at a small law firm. Don't know the compensation, but he didn't really seem very happy with his career. He told me that he feels constant pressure to get shit done on time on behalf of clients, feels uneasy about job stability whenever shit gets 'slow', and feels like there is very little room for upward mobility.
I'd say the biggest drawback of working at a law firm (biglaw, small law, mid law, shit law, etc) is that you're either an associate or you become a partner. There is very few middle ground. Unless you are a superstar, you eventually get canned and move around from one gig to the other. Such is not the case with other corporate careers. For example, at F500, I could theoretically coast being in the position I'm in for next 10 years without getting any promotion, and nobody would force me out of the company. There is really no 'up or out' system, unlike the law firm gigs.
One last thing I'd note is that it seems that based on the law school bros I knew, people who did corp at Biglaw seemed to have better exit options and better overall career trajectory than the litigators, who seemed to have very narrow exit options.
Date: December 27th, 2014 1:25 AM Author: 180 sanctuary water buffalo
I'm also a data analyst, though not also a lolschool grad. I pretty much do the same stuff that the OP describes, but for a bit less money in a (probably) smaller market.
I love it, I recognize most brehs here would not. Probably 90% of the population would find it boring as hell. But I actually enjoy writing SQL and R scripts and making swe3t data visualizations, and I get to direct a lot of A/B tests for our ops teams to conduct and measure the results and tell the execs what they should do, which is fun.
You can be the greatest poker player in the world, but if you can't get the right table at the right competition, it doesn't count for much.
Likewise, unless you have proven work experience demonstrating your skills in data analysis using the skills you are selling, you won't even get an interview at any legit place.
With that being said, Biglaw pays fresh law grads 160k starting out, and most of these kids don't have any work experience nor any technical skills.
Date: December 27th, 2014 11:44 PM Author: Abusive faggotry set
you were an IT consultant before, doing routine testing bullshit with apu and rajeev, so you had no relevant experience. and no one is paying 135k for that skillset.
Try to read some shit above before posting garbage, you dick head. I explained how I jumped to this gig from my last gig in detail. Not interested in wasting my time.
Date: December 28th, 2014 12:15 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
Feel free to console your sorry ass thinking others better off than you are flame.
Losers will hate.
fyi - you don't get gigs like this just with 'basic IT skills'. You need to be good at office politics, have good communication skills (tons of presentations), and have good education credentials.
If I see a piece of shit resume from guys like you with shit experience for a gig at my company, it's going straight to garbage can...
Date: December 28th, 2014 12:26 AM Author: Abusive faggotry set
so irate over your shitty flame, LJL
at some level compensation reflects the scarcity of the skills required. why are you paid champagne money for work within the grasp of any intelligent graduate?
Date: December 28th, 2014 12:43 AM Author: violet galvanic police squad mad-dog skullcap
ok. since I'm bored as shit now, I will try to dumb it down for you, you fucking piece of shit retard.
The 'technical skills' are just base line requirement to do my job.
My company looks for strong analytical skills. This job is basically telling the company's execs what to do, based on data analysis. Hence, when you are doing ad-hoc analysis for a director in product strategy, for example, you tell him that there are x,y,z scenarios, with A,B,C % chance of gaining certain level of market share given each scenario, with different constraints when launching a product into a new market, or a combination of products. I then justify my recommendations using data put together and get feedbacks after meetings, tweak the numbers if need be until the product manager finds the 'comfort' spot, after which the business decision is made.
or, you do some type of ad-hoc analysis for the directors in sales department, where you analyze different scenarios involving combination of diff. sales managers selling diff. products, and come up with a strategy or recommendation as to what the ideal product match with each sales manager is, based on past sales performance, activity count of each sales manager, etc etc.
these are some of just very basic high-level examples. I won't go into very specific detail of my typical projects, since it is VERY specific and people reading this will be able to know who I am.
My company wouldn't care if you somehow got to gain some laughable baseline piece of shit set of skills in excel or R, they wouldn't even give you an interview absent an evidence of strong analytical skills & strong 'branding' (quality job experience and good educational credentials), since you need to have some smarts to learn the company's data, products, competition in the market, market trends, etc etc to derive INSIGHTS from the shit you're doing, much less the fact that you are the face of the department in front of the firm's directors and partners from all sorts of departments.
For me - the fact that I went to an IVY UG with ECON helped me demonstrate my analytical skills.
And, I sold myself saying that having worked as a consultant, facing different types of clients, would position me well for presentation-facing role, which is essentially 40% of my job.
In summary, you don't get paid $135K just to do some monkey work with Excel, SQL, and R. You need to demonstrate you are capable of deriving key INSIGHTS using these tools, and being able to use these tools is just a basic requirement to even get the interview.
I am done wasting my time. Hope your fragile mind is able to absorb the above information.
Date: December 28th, 2014 12:35 PM Author: Twisted Casino
sounds like... monkey work to me bro.
"ok. since I'm bored as shit now, I will try to dumb it down for you, you fucking piece of shit retard.
The 'technical skills' are just base line requirement to do my job.
My company looks for strong analytical skills. This job is basically telling the company's execs what to do, based on data analysis. Hence, when you are doing ad-hoc analysis for a director in product strategy, for example, you tell him that there are x,y,z scenarios, with A,B,C % chance of gaining certain level of market share given each scenario, with different constraints when launching a product into a new market, or a combination of products. I then justify my recommendations using data put together and get feedbacks after meetings, tweak the numbers if need be until the product manager finds the 'comfort' spot, after which the business decision is made.
or, you do some type of ad-hoc analysis for the directors in sales department, where you analyze different scenarios involving combination of diff. sales managers selling diff. products, and come up with a strategy or recommendation as to what the ideal product match with each sales manager is, based on past sales performance, activity count of each sales manager, etc etc.
these are some of just very basic high-level examples. I won't go into very specific detail of my typical projects, since it is VERY specific and people reading this will be able to know who I am.
My company wouldn't care if you somehow got to gain some laughable baseline piece of shit set of skills in excel or R, they wouldn't even give you an interview absent an evidence of strong analytical skills & strong 'branding' (quality job experience and good educational credentials), since you need to have some smarts to learn the company's data, products, competition in the market, market trends, etc etc to derive INSIGHTS from the shit you're doing, much less the fact that you are the face of the department in front of the firm's directors and partners from all sorts of departments.
For me - the fact that I went to an IVY UG with ECON helped me demonstrate my analytical skills.
And, I sold myself saying that having worked as a consultant, facing different types of clients, would position me well for presentation-facing role, which is essentially 40% of my job.
In summary, you don't get paid $135K just to do some monkey work with Excel, SQL, and R. You need to demonstrate you are capable of deriving key INSIGHTS using these tools, and being able to use these tools is just a basic requirement to even get the interview.
I am done wasting my time. Hope your fragile mind is able to absorb the above information.
Date: December 28th, 2014 12:40 PM Author: Abusive faggotry set
ahahhahahahahahahaha
you were an IT consultant before, by your own admission a toilet job, so basically any chump with professional experience is a viable candidate.
the analytical element of the job sounds every bit as trivial as i imagined, shitting out *insight* i.e spurious charts on demand for peanut brain managers, yet you clearly think that excel/sql combo makes you a boss.
pls tell me about your super prestigious ECON degree. oh, what rigour! oh, such insight!
Date: June 1st, 2016 9:38 PM Author: transparent stead half-breed
he is right, and the OP is right also. he just spins his work as difficult and interesting at a certain level, while you correctly point out its just monkeying around with data. its either sad and pathetic or interesting and challenging depending on your perspective.
In the end, I make six fig salary doing interesting work, with a shit TON of job stability. I win. You faggots lose.
Lol @ internet tough faggots from shitty state U's trying to muster up every bit of self-pity by labeling others more successful as flame.
Btw, even at my shitty last job at the IT consulting company, I was already making low six figure. (around $100k, to be exact)
If you are decently smart and have good work experience / skills, you can easily top $100k. It's just that, you guys have such shitty careers with 2-digit IQ that such is unthinkable.
Try to stop sucking at life and wasting your time on the internet. Try to go out there and actually try to make some money. Don't you need to work a 2nd shift job at a yogurt shop, given your shitty salary at a garbage gig?
Haha. I'm enjoying this. Mindless interaction with shitty internet warriors.
Date: December 28th, 2014 2:16 PM Author: razzmatazz useless windowlicker
I actually think this is all plausible. His total pay is in-line with what data scientists make today and his job responsibilities are quite similar. Excel is really an important tool, although I don't know people who do any VBA scripting since the people I know can write Python, which is much better than writing VBA. He's also right that going to a good school is important for these types of jobs when you don't have much previous work experience--the employer has to take a chance that you're smart and your UG school is the best proxy they have.
His skill-set is on the low end of most data scientists; I highly recommend the OP learn python (esp. the pandas library, which basically replicates R's core functionality) and start learning about Hadoop.
Date: June 1st, 2016 1:05 AM Author: electric wrinkle multi-billionaire
how'd you network to the first gig? i'm confused, was the first gig IT consulting or data analytics? what skills did you have? how do you find startups looking for some inexperienced lawyer to do data analytics/IT consulting?
Date: June 1st, 2016 11:34 AM Author: Sable titillating address love of her life
you guys zeroing in way too narrowly on the technical skills required for his role. nobody gets these jobs because they took a python course on coursera and played around with vlookups on their own. it's like saying "any monkey can use MS word and lexis nexis!" sure, but nobody moves up at a law firm or gets an in house gig just because they can do research and format a document.
to get your foot in the door at the OP's job you need to have demonstrated that you've actually used these tools at work on in school, doing some reasonably complex analysis.
to advance more and make 135k you need to develop a track record at your current place and have developed the requisite soft skills (managing people/presenting to clients, which many people in corporate america are terrible at) which it sounds like the OP has.
places like CapitalOne are loaded with people making low 6 figures who do stuff similar to what the OP describes. it's not like they're all programming experts or something.
Date: June 1st, 2016 8:41 PM Author: Vivacious Ceo Nibblets
Old thread but the OP is correct if aspie. If you come from a decent school and are halfway intelligent you can get a 150k data scientist type job relatively quickly in places like SF. They do seem dull, however. And 100k is nothing in a major city.