The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Sean Hannity: lets bash this TTT
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 13th, 2005 10:55 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef This thread will include a running record of SH's lowest moments.
Date: November 13th, 2005 10:47 PM Author: Sean Hannity
I don't give a flying fuck about all this extraneous machismo anymore. I've been thinking about this and a contract was DEFINITELY formed between us. I have a very compelling argument.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298122&forum_id=2#4285720)
|
 |
Date: November 13th, 2005 10:57 PM Author: doobsian talented persian This fucker thinks a bet is a binding contract? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285794) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 10:58 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface He probably thinks he can sue his crack dealer, too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285803) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 10:59 PM Author: doobsian talented persian lol!!! This asshole's shit is getting better everytime it posts. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285813) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 10:58 PM Author: Frozen iridescent set police squad What are the odds he's never had a real date? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285808) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:01 PM Author: Frozen iridescent set police squad Strong to quite strong? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285829) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:09 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef A good approximation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285897) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:02 PM Author: drunken people who are hurt boltzmann *bash bash bash* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285840) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:06 PM Author: Frozen iridescent set police squad Subject: This might win Date: November 13th, 2005 10:59 PM Author: Sean Hannity
WHAT IN THE FLYING FUCK IS YOUR PROBLEM? DO you know how to fucking speak ENGLISH? Are you that fucking retarded? I have ALL THE FUCKING EVIDENCE NEEDED.
Let me give you a quick lesson in first year contracts, YOU FUCKING POOR PIECE OF SHIT. There are such things as OFFERS and ACCEPTANCES. First, DON'T FUCKING GO MAKING OFFERS because once they're ACCEPTED, a BINDING CONTRACT has been formed between the offeror and offeree. Notwithstanding procedural or substantive defects, such as duress, unconscionability or a failure of consideration, a binding contract between the parties is FORMED at the time of the acceptance. The medium of communication here, the internet, is of no particular significance because 1) many binding and valid internet transactions are conducted daily and 2) the medium has not compromised any of the elements mentioned above. You offered my TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS (quote that, you illiterate fucktard) in order for me to give you the great (seemingly homosexual) satisfaction of knowing the identity of my LS. I accepted. Then, you IMPEDED my binding obligations by willfully impeding YOUR OWN BINDING obligations by not accepting my proposed method of execution. THIS, YOU FUCKING UNPRESTIGOUS, POOR PIECE OF ELEPHANT FECES, CONSTITUTES BREACH. Again, I'll be contacting GTO shortly with a detailed synopsis of yesterday's events and you'll have to take next semester off because I'LL BE GOING AFTER YOUR FINANCIAL AID.
YOUR FAGGOT ASS = MINE. See you in court, BITCH.
quote this, motherfucker.
|
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:26 PM Author: dead light reading party No way...you just made that up. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286054) |
Date: November 13th, 2005 10:57 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Date: November 12th, 2005 3:29 PM Author: Sean Hannity
first, what the fuck is "the academy"?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=297195&forum_id=2#4275450)
|
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:00 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus I've been searching for that excuse quote about the rioters, but I can't find the thread and xoxo is running really fucking slow for some reason.
That 'academy' one is priceless too. |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:01 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Date: November 7th, 2005 2:57 AM Author: Sean Hannity
The idea that liberals "approve" of or "excuse" Muslims is nonsense for several very simple reasons. First, no one in their right minds, liberal or not, condones the sort of treachery we've seen various Muslim fundamentalists perpetrate in the last several days with the french riots and in the last several years with 9/11 and the chaos in Iraq. Saying or implying that libs do such things is indicative of the sort of disingenuous politics conservatives seem to have built their party on. liberals don't do that. second, conservatives seem to believe that everything happens in a vacuum. Not so. people don't riot for no reason. the riots and other upheavals are simply manifestations of a marginalized people's discontentment with their socio-political situations; situaions they feel powerless to change.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232683) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:20 PM Author: Motley Fishy Jap Subject: FOR FELIX: Date: November 10th, 2005 3:06 AM Author: Sean Hannity
Whoa. I just reread this.
"You said they felt "powerless" and were only responding to their preceived socio-economic situation. That is an excuse, bucko."
Wait, so saying that one is "powerless" implies that you are excusing their behavior? If I say, "Tom FELT powerless to stop the invasion of Italy, so he decided to kill the President," am I excusing him of blame? Or am I "giving" the "reason" (that he felt powerless) for his actions? LOL
"If I said a serial murderer was only a murderer because he was beaten as a child, and was sexually deprived, what would you call that? An explanation?"
Oh my.
"The serial murderer wasn't WRONG for killing that girl because, after all, she had a horrible personality." This, "bucko," an EXCUSE. In essence, this is saying that this killer should not be held responsible for killing the woman because the killing was justified.
From the dictionary definition of excuse: "2 : to forgive entirely or disregard as of trivial import : regard as excusable <graciously excused his tardiness." In the second example, the implication is that, although the [he] was indeed tardy, the [professor] decided not to attach to his actions the same level of blame that would be attached to another person's actions in a similar or different situation.
"The serial killer killed that lady because he thought she was a loose woman; and he didn't think loose women should be allowed to live." This is an EXPLANATION. The "reason" "given" here is that his "perception" of the woman (his "perception" of the situation) was that the victim was unfit to live, and, therefore, had to be killed.
Again, I find nothing satisfying about teaching you the meanings of basic English words. You seem to be having extreme difficulty discerning the intent and meaning of particular phrases and the logical inferences that flow from them. In this particular instance, you've confused a "justification" for an "explanation." They have distinctly different meanings and are not interchangeable (or synonymous). An "excuse" implies that there exists an objective measure the reference to which must be undertaken in determining the blameworthiness of the act or thing in question; and, by reference to that particular objective measure, the act or thing is excusable. An "explanation," on the other hand, does not purport to remove the thing being explained from blameworthiness; rather, it attempts to "give" "reasons" why the particular thing occurred or illuminate the logical path that the particular act or event took to reach effectuation.
Read more carefully.
------------------------------------------- give me some time, smart one. i can't be two places at once. anyway, here is the definition of "excuse":
Main Entry: 1ex·cuse
Pronunciation: ik-'skyüz, imperatively often 'skyüz
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): ex·cused; ex·cus·ing
Etymology: Middle English, from Old French excuser, from Latin excusare, from ex- + causa cause, explanation
1 a : to make apology for b : to try to remove blame from
2 : to forgive entirely or disregard as of trivial import : regard as excusable <graciously excused his tardiness>
3 a : to grant exemption or release to <was excused from jury duty> b : to allow to leave <excused the class>
4 : to serve as excuse for : JUSTIFY <nothing can excuse such neglect>
--------------------------------------------
and, explain:
Main Entry: ex·plain
Pronunciation: ik-'splAn
Function: verb
Etymology: Middle English explanen, from Latin explanare, literally, to make level, from ex- + planus level, flat -- more at FLOOR
transitive senses
1 a : to make known b : to make plain or understandable <footnotes that explain the terms>
2 : to give the reason for or cause of
3 : to show the logical development or relationships of
intransitive senses : to make something plain or understandable
- ex·plain·able /-'splA-n&-b&l/ adjective
- ex·plain·er noun
- explain oneself : to clarify one's statements or the reasons for one's conduct
-----------------------------------------------
First, they are not synonyms. Don't conflate them. Second, I did not "justify" the rioter's acts. In fact, all I did was "to give the reason for or cause of" their behaviors.
"people don't riot for no REASON." This statement implies that there *are* REASONS, reasons that the rest of the passage attempts to "give."
THIRD, there was NO "apology" here. Indeed, I made sure to TELL YOU that these acts of "treachery" were NOT free from blame.
"First, no one in their right minds, liberal or not, CONDONES the sort of TREACHERY we've seen various Muslim fundamentalists perpetrate in the last several days with the french riots."
Now, I don't find it exciting or entertaining or particularly productive to sit here and explain to you people what simple English words mean; but I really do hope this helps.
|
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:04 PM Author: doobsian talented persian Date: November 13th, 2005 10:59 PM Author: Sean Hannity
WHAT IN THE FLYING FUCK IS YOUR PROBLEM? DO you know how to fucking speak ENGLISH? Are you that fucking retarded? I have ALL THE FUCKING EVIDENCE NEEDED.
Let me give you a quick lesson in first year contracts, YOU FUCKING POOR PIECE OF SHIT. There are such things as OFFERS and ACCEPTANCES. First, DON'T FUCKING GO MAKING OFFERS because once they're ACCEPTED, a BINDING CONTRACT has been formed between the offeror and offeree. Notwithstanding procedural or substantive defects, such as duress, unconscionability or a failure of consideration, a binding contract between the parties is FORMED at the time of the acceptance.
|
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:06 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus Cool, it's binding. Send me an email from a T14 email addy to confirm.
Edit- Self PWN3D, thought you were S.H. |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:07 PM Author: doobsian talented persian They must have skipped over consideration in his class. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285875) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:08 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus LOL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285884) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:10 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Date: November 13th, 2005 10:59 PM Author: Sean Hannity
WHAT IN THE FLYING FUCK IS YOUR PROBLEM? DO you know how to fucking speak ENGLISH? Are you that fucking retarded? I have ALL THE FUCKING EVIDENCE NEEDED.
Let me give you a quick lesson in first year contracts, YOU FUCKING POOR PIECE OF SHIT. There are such things as OFFERS and ACCEPTANCES. First, DON'T FUCKING GO MAKING OFFERS because once they're ACCEPTED, a BINDING CONTRACT has been formed between the offeror and offeree. Notwithstanding procedural or substantive defects, such as duress, unconscionability or a failure of consideration, a binding contract between the parties is FORMED at the time of the acceptance. The medium of communication here, the internet, is of no particular significance because 1) many binding and valid internet transactions are conducted daily and 2) the medium has not compromised any of the elements mentioned above. You offered my TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS (quote that, you illiterate fucktard) in order for me to give you the great (seemingly homosexual) satisfaction of knowing the identity of my LS. I accepted. Then, you IMPEDED my binding obligations by willfully impeding YOUR OWN BINDING obligations by not accepting my proposed method of execution. THIS, YOU FUCKING UNPRESTIGOUS, POOR PIECE OF ELEPHANT FECES, CONSTITUTES BREACH. Again, I'll be contacting GTO shortly with a detailed synopsis of yesterday's events and you'll have to take next semester off because I'LL BE GOING AFTER YOUR FINANCIAL AID.
YOUR FAGGOT ASS = MINE. See you in court, BITCH.
quote this, motherfucker.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298122&forum_id=2#4285815)
|
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:11 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus I'm likely the only one thinking this, but I'm STILL not convinced this isn't absolutely brilliant schtick. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285914) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:12 PM Author: doobsian talented persian Yeah, I think the threat against your financial aid was over the line. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285924) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:11 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Where'd he go? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285918) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:12 PM Author: startling newt knife he's probably one of you guys, so it's hard to have him be here while you kids are so busy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285927) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:13 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Wait, I thought he was a total badass in that other thread? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285933) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:13 PM Author: startling newt knife i didn't say that. i said he owned a few cons. however, some of these quotes are pretty fucking awful. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285942) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:15 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface There's more, too. Hard to keep track of them all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285959) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:18 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef when you find them, post them here. This is an easy thread to find in order to PW3N his stupid ass in the future. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285983) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:23 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Date: November 7th, 2005 2:57 AM Author: Sean Hannity
The idea that liberals "approve" of or "excuse" Muslims is nonsense for several very simple reasons. First, no one in their right minds, liberal or not, condones the sort of treachery we've seen various Muslim fundamentalists perpetrate in the last several days with the french riots and in the last several years with 9/11 and the chaos in Iraq. Saying or implying that libs do such things is indicative of the sort of disingenuous politics conservatives seem to have built their party on. liberals don't do that. second, conservatives seem to believe that everything happens in a vacuum. Not so. people don't riot for no reason. the riots and other upheavals are simply manifestations of a marginalized people's discontentment with their socio-political situations; situaions they feel powerless to change.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232683)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 7th, 2005 3:00 AM Author: Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
"the riots and other upheavals are simply manifestations of a marginalized people's discontentment with their socio-political situations; situaions they feel powerless to change."
And liberals make excuses like this for murderous thugs.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232691)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 7th, 2005 3:04 AM Author: Sean Hannity
this is not an excuse.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232709)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 7th, 2005 3:05 AM Author: Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
Damn sure looks like one to me.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232710)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 7th, 2005 3:01 AM Author: felix167
The idea that liberals "approve" of or "excuse" Muslims is nonsense for several very simple reasons. SNIP people don't riot for no reason. the riots and other upheavals are simply manifestations of a marginalized people's discontentment with their socio-political situations; situaions they feel powerless to change.
OWNED!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232695)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 7th, 2005 3:03 AM Author: Sean Hannity
i didn't say or imply that I condoned it you sonofabitch. I merely explained it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232705)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 7th, 2005 3:06 AM Author: Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
Rather, you "excused" it.
PWN3D, yet again!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232712)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 7th, 2005 3:07 AM Author: Sean Hannity
wrong, daft punk. it's sort of like what Chris Rock said regarding O.J. Simpson's killing of Nicole: "I'm not saying he should have done it, but I understand."
this is not an excuse.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232720)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 7th, 2005 3:09 AM Author: Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
Well "understand" it, "sympathize" with it, "excuse" it, "explain" it...tomato/tomatoe...same fucking difference.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232724)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 7th, 2005 3:11 AM Author: felix167
"people don't riot for no reason. the riots and other upheavals are simply manifestations of a marginalized people's discontentment with their socio-political situations; situaions they feel powerless to change."
This is a fucking excuse.
EDIT: And it's fucking wrong, too.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232726)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 7th, 2005 3:14 AM Author: Sean Hannity
how the hell is it wrong? it is nothing new that when people riot, they're looking to make a political statement.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232734)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 7th, 2005 3:15 AM Author: Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
No, they're committing a crime, which you are "excusing."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232737)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 7th, 2005 3:18 AM Author: Sean Hannity
no one said they weren't committing a crime. our country was founded on a pretty big crime -- some people like to call it the "Revolution."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232745)
|
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:17 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef Exactly. His tttness transcends our usual bickering over politics or whatever. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285978) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:14 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef Why would we create liberals to argue with? There is an ample supply of them already here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285948) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:19 PM Author: blathering stimulating jewess dysfunction I have reason to believe that SH is felix167. They always post on the same threads, literally minutes apart from each other. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285995) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:24 PM Author: blathering stimulating jewess dysfunction here is conclusive proof that SH is flame:
Date: November 13th, 2005 10:44 PM Author: Sean Hannity
ah, WHO DO WE HAVE HERE? YOU FUCKING OWE ME TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS YOU POOR TRAILER TRASH WELFARE RECIPIENT. You are neither rich nor academically prestigious. YOU ARE A FUCKING LIAR. I have a motherfucking ESCROW AGENT (I spoke to my dad earlier today, and he said this type of arrangement was rather common).
AND YES, WE HAVE A MOTHERFUCKING BINDING CONTRACT. YOU OFFERED, AND I ACCEPTED. I'LL BE CONTACTING GTO TO SEE IF I CAN GET THE RELEVANT INFO AND I'LL SEE YOUR FAGGOT ASS IN COURT, FUCKER.
quote this, bitch.
HTH
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298122&forum_id=2#4285690)
The "I have a motherfucking ESCROW AGENT (I spoke to my dad earlier today, and he said this type of arrangement was rather common)" part is TOTAL FLAME. No one, and I mean one, actually says stuff like this. |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:25 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Sadly, he isn't flame. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286050) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:24 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Date: November 7th, 2005 3:18 AM
Author: Sean Hannity
no one said they weren't committing a crime. our country was founded on a pretty big crime -- some people like to call it the "Revolution."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232745) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:26 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Remember, he isn't making "excuses" merely "explanations." Then he compares their actions to that of the American Revolution. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286059) |
|
Date: December 28th, 2005 3:00 PM Author: Contagious karate Wow...dude, never ever EVER take any shit from this guy again. That was a magnificent, model self-PWNINGs. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4681232) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:28 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus Liberals really do love America...they also support our troops.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v336/freeone3000/sarcasm-o-meter.gif |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:28 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef I laughed out loud at this one. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286082) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:26 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus Date: November 12th, 2005 3:29 PM
Author: Sean Hannity
first, what the fuck is "the academy"?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=297195&forum_id=2#4275450) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: November 7th, 2005 2:57 AM
Author: Sean Hannity
The idea that liberals "approve" of or "excuse" Muslims is nonsense for several very simple reasons. First, no one in their right minds, liberal or not, condones the sort of treachery we've seen various Muslim fundamentalists perpetrate in the last several days with the french riots and in the last several years with 9/11 and the chaos in Iraq. Saying or implying that libs do such things is indicative of the sort of disingenuous politics conservatives seem to have built their party on. liberals don't do that. second, conservatives seem to believe that everything happens in a vacuum. Not so. people don't riot for no reason. the riots and other upheavals are simply manifestations of a marginalized people's discontentment with their socio-political situations; situaions they feel powerless to change.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232683) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:28 PM Author: Motley Fishy Jap FIRST, WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU?
Second, read this: Again, I find nothing satisfying about teaching you the meanings of basic English words. You seem to be having extreme difficulty discerning the intent and meaning of particular phrases and the logical inferences that flow from them. In this particular instance, you've confused a "justification" for an "explanation." They have distinctly different meanings and are not interchangeable (or synonymous). An "excuse" implies that there exists an objective measure the reference to which must be undertaken in determining the blameworthiness of the act or thing in question; and, by reference to that particular objective measure, the act or thing is excusable. An "explanation," on the other hand, does not purport to remove the thing being explained from blameworthiness; rather, it attempts to "give" "reasons" why the particular thing occurred or illuminate the logical path that the particular act or event took to reach effectuation.
3rd, STOP FUCKING PLAYING GAMES. There's no reason for this. I AM FUCKING READY, PAL. YOUR "STAFFORD EDUCATIONAL" LOANS FOR NEXT YEAR = MINE. |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:30 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Date: November 7th, 2005 3:18 AM
Author: Sean Hannity
no one said they weren't committing a crime. our country was founded on a pretty big crime -- some people like to call it the "Revolution."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232745) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:31 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus Are you really 174 incognito? If so, I'll willfully admit you PWN3D me. If you're schtick, you are intellectually a god among men. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286107) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:33 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef 174 is way too prestigious to be on the losing side of this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286129) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:31 PM Author: blathering stimulating jewess dysfunction Alito, add this post to your collection! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286109) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:32 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus Booyakasha!
--------------
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:28 PM Author: Sean Hannity
FIRST, WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU?
Second, read this: Again, I find nothing satisfying about teaching you the meanings of basic English words. You seem to be having extreme difficulty discerning the intent and meaning of particular phrases and the logical inferences that flow from them. In this particular instance, you've confused a "justification" for an "explanation." They have distinctly different meanings and are not interchangeable (or synonymous). An "excuse" implies that there exists an objective measure the reference to which must be undertaken in determining the blameworthiness of the act or thing in question; and, by reference to that particular objective measure, the act or thing is excusable. An "explanation," on the other hand, does not purport to remove the thing being explained from blameworthiness; rather, it attempts to "give" "reasons" why the particular thing occurred or illuminate the logical path that the particular act or event took to reach effectuation.
3rd, STOP FUCKING PLAYING GAMES. There's no reason for this. I AM FUCKING READY, PAL. YOUR "STAFFORD EDUCATIONAL" LOANS FOR NEXT YEAR = MINE.
|
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:32 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef Just. Stop. Already. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286118) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:29 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface "defining for me "academy" might actually help you here." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286096) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:33 PM Author: Shimmering preventive strike he has a square head and no lips (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286124) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:35 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Why is he putting up with this abuse? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286142) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:37 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef I doubt he will return under this moniker. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286163) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:39 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus Yeah, but who would've thought he'd have stayed around this long? Wonder what the over/under on that would've been... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286179) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:36 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus Date: November 13th, 2005 11:13 PM Author: Sean Hannity
First, reread this:
-------------------
WHAT IN THE FLYING FUCK IS YOUR PROBLEM? DO you know how to fucking speak ENGLISH? Are you that fucking retarded? I have ALL THE FUCKING EVIDENCE NEEDED.
Let me give you a quick lesson in first year contracts, YOU FUCKING POOR PIECE OF SHIT. There are such things as OFFERS and ACCEPTANCES. First, DON'T FUCKING GO MAKING OFFERS because once they're ACCEPTED, a BINDING CONTRACT has been formed between the offeror and offeree. Notwithstanding procedural or substantive defects, such as duress, unconscionability or a failure of consideration, a binding contract between the parties is FORMED at the time of the acceptance. The medium of communication here, the internet, is of no particular significance because 1) many binding and valid internet transactions are conducted daily and 2) the medium has not compromised any of the elements mentioned above. You offered my TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS (quote that, you illiterate fucktard) in order for me to give you the great (seemingly homosexual) satisfaction of knowing the identity of my LS. I accepted. Then, you IMPEDED my binding obligations by willfully impeding YOUR OWN BINDING obligations by not accepting my proposed method of execution. THIS, YOU FUCKING UNPRESTIGOUS, POOR PIECE OF ELEPHANT FECES, CONSTITUTES BREACH. Again, I'll be contacting GTO shortly with a detailed synopsis of yesterday's events and you'll have to take next semester off because I'LL BE GOING AFTER YOUR FINANCIAL AID.
YOUR FAGGOT ASS = MINE. See you in court, BITCH.
quote this, motherfucker.
--------------------------
SECOND, your money is constructively in escrow. Start budgeting for next semester YOU POOR PIECE OF SHIT. Your faggot ass pretended you were worth millions (HAHAHAHHAHAHA^10,000,000) and I FUCKING CALLED YOU OUT. Time to pay up, you fucking illiterate, unintelligent hack. I really wish I were beside you right now so I could tie your fucking feet up to your mother's '86 Toyota pick up truck and drag you, face down, across your TTT for everyone to fucking watch.
YOU ARE NOW MY BITCH AND I'M GOING TO MAKE IT MY MISSION TO BANKRUPT YOU.
Welcome to your new life.
|
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:38 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Date: November 13th, 2005 11:37 PM Author: Sean Hannity
i have NO fucking idea what the hell is wrong with you people. you've made my blood pressure fucking spike within the last hour by fucking posting a bunch of bullcrap and fucking lying about me. justice alito/BAFF ARE US won't fucking talk to me because the rest of you are fucking egging him on to fucking quote and re-quote random, past posts of mine (all brilliant and logically impenetrable, by the way. ASK FELIX). i'm fucking going to bed because i have to get up fucking early tomorrow and take care of some biz. when i return (if ever), don't get in my fucking way you fucking pieces of shit.
READ THE TITLE OF THIS THREAD AGAIN; and ponder pensively its hidden meanings.
FUCK YOU. |
|
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:39 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef Date: November 13th, 2005 11:16 PM Author: Sean Hannity
STOP HIDING ON OTHER THREADS, FUCKER. No need. I'm right here and you can attack me or do whatever on this thread. I'M FUCKING INVITING YOU.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298167&forum_id=2#4285971)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:21 PM Author: OralAdvocate
Dood, you need help.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298167&forum_id=2#4286010)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:22 PM Author: Sean Hannity
SHUT THE FUCK UP AND GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE. This doesn't fucking concern you you dumb piece of shit. Please stop disgracing my threads with your posts.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298167&forum_id=2#4286025)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:24 PM Author: OralAdvocate
You have either decided to turn into shtick, or you are about to go on a murderous rampage. Either way, not cool.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298167&forum_id=2#4286044)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:29 PM Author: Sean Hannity
GO AWAY. THANKS. DONE. OK. SHUT UP. Fucking idiot.
|
|
Date: November 14th, 2005 7:32 AM Author: drab depressive A big, fat, 1-8-0. He threatened never to reappear, and I really hope he makes good on that promise. This is a great thread. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4288205) |
|
Date: November 14th, 2005 11:20 AM Author: blathering stimulating jewess dysfunction dood, SH was on fire last night. THere were three threads simultaneously bashing him. Oh, good times. I hope he does NOT go away. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4288515) |
|
Date: November 14th, 2005 5:56 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface I am sure he will be back, even if the moniker is put to rest. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4290859) |
|
Date: November 14th, 2005 11:26 AM Author: Boyish address You fags just posted the same two posts 500 times (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4288530) |
|
Date: November 16th, 2005 10:20 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef bump. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4310916) |
|
Date: November 16th, 2005 10:20 PM Author: dead light reading party heh. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4310924) |
|
Date: November 16th, 2005 10:21 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=300143&mc=31&forum_id=2#4310828
He's baaaaaaaaaack! |
|
Date: November 16th, 2005 10:24 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef I knew he would. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4310974) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 8:11 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=305870&mc=7&forum_id=2#4381469
Back again... |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 8:12 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef ahh, the memories. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4381539) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 8:19 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus Added to the archives:
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:24 AM Author: Sean Hannity
hmmm, so unionization is part of the liberal agenda?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355321)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:26 AM Author: felix167
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:24 AM
Author: Sean Hannity
hmmm, so unionization is part of the liberal agenda?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355321)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355330)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:29 AM Author: RedScalitox7
holy shit
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355348)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:30 AM Author: felix167
Witness the legend. He is something to behold, isn't he?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355357)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:31 AM Author: Sean Hannity
answer the question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355363)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:37 AM Author: RedScalitox7
who, do you suppose, do unions align themselves with?
notice arnie's recent assault on unions?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355388)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:49 AM Author: Sean Hannity
yeah, ok. i always thought unionization was a device designed to increase the bargaining power of workers who often found themselves on the pwn3d end of the bargaining table. that "they align themselves with" liberals, in general, doesn't necessarily indicate that unionization is a part of the liberal agenda; all it demonstrates is that liberals hold highly treating workers fairly.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355428)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:51 AM Author: Buckingham
I can agree with this point. However, I do think that Democrats purposefully align themselves w/ union leaders to gain constituents that way. After all, there are tons of unions in this USA.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355437)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:56 AM Author: Sean Hannity
sure, but the objective is not simply to gain constituents. that conclusion is political one designed, in my opinion, to shift the blame for lost jobs/relentless outcourcing/generally bad economic management from CEOs and economic policy fabricators to liberals and employees who'd rather not get taken advantage of, all by virtue of there being a positive correlation between union membership and membership in the democratic party. convenient scapegoating.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355455)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:59 AM Author: Buckingham
Give me a break. I am as liberal as one comes, but it is clear that politicians aligning with unions are making calculated political decisions for votes.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355470)
|
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 8:25 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:49 AM Author: Sean Hannity
yeah, ok. i always thought unionization was a device designed to increase the bargaining power of workers who often found themselves on the pwn3d end of the bargaining table. that "they align themselves with" liberals, in general, doesn't necessarily indicate that unionization is a part of the liberal agenda; all it demonstrates is that liberals hold highly treating workers fairly.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355428)
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:53 AM Author: RedScalitox7
give me a fucking break.
"isn't necessarily indicative that unionization is a part of the liberal agenda; all it demonstrates is that liberals hold highly treating workers fairly."
so liberals don't believe in unionization. they believe in fair treatment, which they equate with unionization. but they don't believe in unionization. my fucking god.
anyway, 30,000 today found out why unionization is bad.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355444)
Date: November 22nd, 2005 4:02 AM Author: Sean Hannity
you apparently suffer from the same intellectual defect that felix does; you tend to mischaracterize my points in order to prove yours. making impossible inferences and assuming the existence of nonexistent assumptions/non existent statements is no way to debate. never did i say or imply liberals don't believe in unionization.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355491)
|
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 8:41 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=305870&mc=30&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4381708) |
|
Date: November 30th, 2005 4:37 AM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4418647) |
|
Date: December 1st, 2005 1:56 AM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface bump (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4426893) |
|
Date: December 3rd, 2005 9:41 PM Author: Swashbuckling costumed locus More priceless antics, courtesy of SH:
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=311368&mc=24&forum_id=2
HTH |
|
Date: December 3rd, 2005 9:49 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef He doesnt learn, does he. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4453429) |
|
Date: December 3rd, 2005 9:57 PM Author: Big French Station He accused me of "stalking." I don't think I've ever talked to him/posted on one of his threads until today. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4453502) |
|
Date: December 3rd, 2005 9:59 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef even if it were true, he should be honored to have you as a stalker. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4453522) |
|
Date: December 3rd, 2005 10:09 PM Author: Big French Station Seriously. He's acting like a fat bitch on her period as he stresses over exams while I occasionally ponder if I allowed the right Vault 5 to pay me 2400 per week this summer. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4453622) |
|
Date: December 3rd, 2005 9:55 PM Author: Deep sooty point wow, four conservative kikes/crackers repost two stupid comments and start an online orgy. No one cares you fucking cunts. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4453482) |
|
Date: December 3rd, 2005 9:57 PM Author: aqua appetizing french chef Do you feel empowered when you use racial slurs?
We rule this board now. Deal with it. If you dont like it, go to the grad board where you belong. |
|
Date: December 5th, 2005 4:24 AM Author: Motley Fishy Jap LOL conservatives rule this board? Yeah motherfucking right. Do you know who I am? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4466281) |
|
Date: December 28th, 2005 3:01 PM Author: Balding electric nowag ticket booth Some douchebag? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4681237) |
|
Date: December 12th, 2005 11:01 PM Author: Ebony lettuce i generally reserve this sort of thing for guadalupe, but this bump's for u, sean. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4543640) |
|
Date: December 12th, 2005 11:59 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface What'd he do now? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4544233) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2005 12:00 AM Author: Ebony lettuce i don't remember. he came out of nowhere and called me stupid or something. i was like "who r u?"
BUMP! |
|
Date: December 13th, 2005 12:04 AM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Wow, I never read this one before. Classic.
Date: December 3rd, 2005 9:31 PM
Author: Sean Hannity
I swear on my father's life that I'd fucking slap your silly ass if I smelled your stinking breath within 8 miles of me. Don't ever fucking threaten me in your pathetic super-geek life you little megaposter message board dork megageek. I'm fucking stressed out of my mind right now studying for these TTT exams and I'd fucking love nothing more than to fucking make you my new real life project. What, you think I'm that stupid bitch &#? Who the fuck do you think you are?
(http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=#)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=311368&forum_id=2#4453234)
|
|
Date: December 13th, 2005 12:05 AM Author: Ebony lettuce someone has The Anger Management problems (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4544298) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2005 12:09 AM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface i have NO fucking idea what the hell is wrong with you people. you've made my blood pressure fucking spike within the last hour by fucking posting a bunch of bullcrap and fucking lying about me. justice alito/BAFF ARE US won't fucking talk to me because the rest of you are fucking egging him on to fucking quote and re-quote random, past posts of mine (all brilliant and logically impenetrable, by the way. ASK FELIX). i'm fucking going to bed because i have to get up fucking early tomorrow and take care of some biz. when i return (if ever), don't get in my fucking way you fucking pieces of shit.
READ THE TITLE OF THIS THREAD AGAIN; and ponder pensively its hidden meanings.
FUCK YOU.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298189&forum_id=2#4286165) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2005 12:10 AM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Date: November 13th, 2005 10:59 PM
Author: Sean Hannity
WHAT IN THE FLYING FUCK IS YOUR PROBLEM? DO you know how to fucking speak ENGLISH? Are you that fucking retarded? I have ALL THE FUCKING EVIDENCE NEEDED.
Let me give you a quick lesson in first year contracts, YOU FUCKING POOR PIECE OF SHIT. There are such things as OFFERS and ACCEPTANCES. First, DON'T FUCKING GO MAKING OFFERS because once they're ACCEPTED, a BINDING CONTRACT has been formed between the offeror and offeree. Notwithstanding procedural or substantive defects, such as duress, unconscionability or a failure of consideration, a binding contract between the parties is FORMED at the time of the acceptance. The medium of communication here, the internet, is of no particular significance because 1) many binding and valid internet transactions are conducted daily and 2) the medium has not compromised any of the elements mentioned above. You offered my TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS (quote that, you illiterate fucktard) in order for me to give you the great (seemingly homosexual) satisfaction of knowing the identity of my LS. I accepted. Then, you IMPEDED my binding obligations by willfully impeding YOUR OWN BINDING obligations by not accepting my proposed method of execution. THIS, YOU FUCKING UNPRESTIGOUS, POOR PIECE OF ELEPHANT FECES, CONSTITUTES BREACH. Again, I'll be contacting GTO shortly with a detailed synopsis of yesterday's events and you'll have to take next semester off because I'LL BE GOING AFTER YOUR FINANCIAL AID.
YOUR FAGGOT ASS = MINE. See you in court, BITCH.
quote this, motherfucker.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4285872)
|
|
Date: December 28th, 2005 2:11 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4681002) |
|
Date: January 12th, 2006 3:01 AM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Bump. Note that Sean Hannity=Schadenfreude. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4795974) |
|
Date: January 22nd, 2006 1:15 AM Author: Glittery heaven Sean Hannity is not me, but may be you. He seems to pop up a lot when you're making an ass out of yourself. Given your penchant for changing the subject when you're losing an argument, he'd be a natural creation for you.
The sad thing is, I can't get back at you by claiming that you're someone else. There's nobody dumber than you to compare you to...you're already acknowledged as XOXO's "STUPIDEST political poster."
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=330394&mc=35&forum_id=2 |
|
Date: January 22nd, 2006 12:24 AM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Sean Hannity=SH (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4879885) |
|
Date: January 22nd, 2006 1:14 AM Author: Glittery heaven re-posted above. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4880353) |
|
Date: April 16th, 2006 12:27 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface Date: January 22nd, 2006 2:02 AM Author: SH
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH THE GUY DOESN'T EVEN FUCKING KNOW WHAT THE NAME OF THE CASE IS. WHO THE FUCK IS THIS NASC MOTHERFUCKER?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?
Date: January 22nd, 2006 1:45 AM Author: SH
Oh shit I think I just found out why you're confused. By "Marshall" I meant "Marbury v. Madison" (Marshall authored the opinion.) Is this what this is all about?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=343915&forum_id=2#4880754)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: January 22nd, 2006 1:48 AM Author: NASC (http://www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?user=nascjacket)
wtf? by that naming marshall would refer to gibbons as well as 2398702456234 other landmark cases. You really are dumb.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=343915&forum_id=2#4880805)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: January 22nd, 2006 1:53 AM Author: SH
Whew!! *sigh of relief*
Ok, I guess we're cool now. Where I typed "Marshall," I should have typed "Marbury" or "Marbury v. Madison." (It's peculiar, though, that you weren't able to immediately pick up on this mistake. Kinda makes you wonder, no? Check out my earlier posts where I referenced "Marbury v. Madison." LOL)
So, I guess we're now in agreement. I've been talking about Marbury v. Madison this whole time, and you've been talking about some mysterious case named "Marshall" (but again, you were confused by my earlier error; an error which immediately brought into your mind this mystical "Marshall" case. An innocent error, though; and I don't blame you.)
Are we cool? Or, as my little brother might say, "are we COO?"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=343915&forum_id=2#4880846) |
|
Date: April 17th, 2006 8:17 PM Author: Orchid cerebral ratface bump (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#5600604) |