serious ?: why is rape that bad?
| godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | Fuchsia dysfunction lodge | 09/15/15 | | pearly frum ladyboy | 09/15/15 | | Silver theatre | 09/15/15 | | crimson judgmental son of senegal messiness | 09/15/15 | | odious black woman alpha | 09/15/15 | | obsidian flickering corn cake double fault | 09/16/15 | | curious bearded blood rage azn | 09/15/15 | | sooty address knife | 09/15/15 | | Spruce State | 09/15/15 | | insecure rose international law enforcement agency pisswyrm | 09/15/15 | | mahogany marvelous office toaster | 09/16/15 | | excitant parlor | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | snowy library dingle berry | 09/15/15 | | Transparent Mother | 09/15/15 | | Swashbuckling elite idea he suggested | 09/15/15 | | offensive base | 09/15/15 | | tantric diverse main people turdskin | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | Misunderstood Philosopher-king | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | Swashbuckling elite idea he suggested | 09/15/15 | | brass shrine roast beef | 09/15/15 | | Jet chad people who are hurt | 09/15/15 | | Concupiscible Sinister Cuckoldry Sneaky Criminal | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | chestnut razzmatazz native | 09/15/15 | | Concupiscible Sinister Cuckoldry Sneaky Criminal | 09/15/15 | | Geriatric Den Toilet Seat | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | brass shrine roast beef | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | Geriatric Den Toilet Seat | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | Geriatric Den Toilet Seat | 09/15/15 | | Geriatric Den Toilet Seat | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | Geriatric Den Toilet Seat | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | Geriatric Den Toilet Seat | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | Geriatric Den Toilet Seat | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | Geriatric Den Toilet Seat | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | Geriatric Den Toilet Seat | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | Geriatric Den Toilet Seat | 09/15/15 | | offensive base | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | Fuchsia dysfunction lodge | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | Fuchsia dysfunction lodge | 09/15/15 | | snowy library dingle berry | 09/15/15 | | Geriatric Den Toilet Seat | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | snowy library dingle berry | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | godawful keepsake machete | 09/15/15 | | Drunken multi-colored brethren | 09/15/15 | | Fuchsia dysfunction lodge | 09/15/15 | | Concupiscible Sinister Cuckoldry Sneaky Criminal | 09/15/15 | | chestnut razzmatazz native | 09/15/15 | | Supple useless meetinghouse | 09/15/15 | | offensive base | 09/15/15 | | Geriatric Den Toilet Seat | 09/15/15 | | blathering volcanic crater pozpig | 09/15/15 | | snowy library dingle berry | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | Geriatric Den Toilet Seat | 09/15/15 | | Heady gay wizard | 09/15/15 | | Unhinged clear hall digit ratio | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | Supple useless meetinghouse | 09/15/15 | | Citrine Laughsome House | 09/16/15 | | Bateful Flushed Famous Landscape Painting | 09/15/15 | | pale high-end market | 09/15/15 | | mint gunner | 09/15/15 | | charismatic fanboi | 09/15/15 | | Glittery Hell | 09/15/15 | | brilliant pontificating generalized bond weed whacker | 09/15/15 | | Glittery Hell | 09/15/15 | | Glassy stock car marketing idea | 09/15/15 | | Violent nursing home | 09/15/15 | | sooty address knife | 09/16/15 | | brass shrine roast beef | 09/16/15 | | hyperventilating circlehead | 09/16/15 | | brass shrine roast beef | 09/16/15 | | hyperventilating circlehead | 09/16/15 | | brass shrine roast beef | 09/16/15 | | hyperventilating circlehead | 09/16/15 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 15th, 2015 1:01 PM Author: godawful keepsake machete
from a guy's perspective, it's the same as physical assault. i'd rather be raped than knocked out or beaten for any amount of time.
i really don't understand why women think it's just below murder, or worse.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28759902) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 1:25 PM Author: godawful keepsake machete
"it's a more personal invasion"
i feel like this is so subjective though, and it appeals to all those antiquated sex-negative attitudes that liberals are supposed to be against.
i feel like getting clocked by a gang of "youths" playing the knockout game, for apparently no reason and with no warning, is more humiliating than getting raped. it would fuck with my psychology a lot more given that i would be afraid to walk around in public.
should we have a special category for that too?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28760065) |
Date: September 15th, 2015 1:14 PM Author: brass shrine roast beef
if feminists really want women to be treated like men they shld treat it just as a violent assault on a man... the fact society treats it almost like murder clearly is sexist, a way for society to put a higher value on a woman's sexuality than on a man's, feminists shld not need special protections for their vag, that in of itself is sexist
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28759996)
|
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 1:34 PM Author: godawful keepsake machete
reminds me of an article i read a while ago by someone who worked with survivors of child sex abuse. she argued that most of the trauma that survivors feel is created many years after the fact, after they've understood what happened and have internalized society's message as to how traumatized they "should" feel.
obviously not talking about really violent kinds of abuse, but e.g. daddy showing you his peepee and touching yours is going to be more confusing than anything else. not much trauma there.
but all the outrage about how traumatizing sex abuse necessarily IS, creates the trauma in survivors' minds because they think that's how they should feel. and this unnecessarily ruins many survivors' lives when they could have been a lot happier without society inundating them with this message.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28760129) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 4:02 PM Author: Concupiscible Sinister Cuckoldry Sneaky Criminal
cr.
it's entirely circular: we insist on making a big deal of rape---> consequently, rape is a big deal.
the truth is that a woman can be 'raped' and suffer absolutely no physical/emotional harm (indeed, she is likely to enjoy herself). so, to claim that rape is in any way categorically similar to 'murder', or injurious assault, is ludicrous.
we 'socially construct' the harm, by insisting that it exists.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28761210) |
Date: September 15th, 2015 1:31 PM Author: mint gunner
feels liek a flame question but
rape is a huge deal for women because children are fucking costly as hell. theres a substantial chance that you will die because of the kid, and even if you don't, you essentially lose a huge chunk of your life and nutrition to the thing.
you might say that in a world of abortion this is not a big deal, but you're asking why something is emotionally terrible, and there is an evolutionary answer at play. getting dressed down and humiliated by your asshole boss every day shouldn't be a problem at all, it only bothers you because there are tens of thousands of years of human evolution telling you that that situation is life threatening and you need to either fight back or get the fuck away.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28760106) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 1:50 PM Author: mint gunner
marriage is to recent of a thing to be a strong evolutionary pressure
the point is that mate selectivity improves offspring fitness. the more selective you are, all things equal, the better off your line will be. there's no real evolutionary "limit" to how unenthusiastic a woman should be about getting fucked by a wizard, so it makes sense that over time the preferred lines have been women for whom the thought of having sex with a wizard causes them to enter a catatonic state.
the fact that "rapes still happen" doesn't do anything to undermine this point. the point is that the amount of rape that happens is significantly lower than it could have been, because women are naturally vigilant and risk-averse. women who exercise control of their breeding have stronger, chaddier offspring. and women who end up getting raped end up raising a brood of XO posters.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28760293) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 1:54 PM Author: mint gunner
well thats exactly my point. once you establish a strong stigma around rape, then you have actually created a selective pressure that changes who actually gets to successfully rape. wizards don't not-rape because they are kind empathetic souls. they don't rape because they don't have the opportunity or ability, and this is a result of the behavior of women and the rules of society.
since rape is not socially acceptable, a larger than "natural" amount of it tends to happen in the context of military conquest or warfare. this makes the rapists chaddier than you'd otherwise expect, for example
even quasi-chad "date rape" can be viewed as a rape strategy that evolved in a system of rape stigma. date rape by definition means that the woman is "dating" or otherwise willing to tolerate the presence of the guy, which means he has already demonstrated some minimum level of fitness.
as you point out, wizards can't date rape girls because girls won't even be around wizards in the first place. but that's my point. wizards can't rape girls precisely because of anti-wizard mating strategies that emerged a million years ago
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28760331) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 2:01 PM Author: godawful keepsake machete
so why is rape bad?
millions of years of women thinking "Rape = CHADS!"
hasn't produced a "RAPE = GOOD" evolutionary hard-wired link in their heads?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28760390) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 2:18 PM Author: mint gunner
i didn't say rapists were chads. i said that stigma against rape means that the quality of dudes that tend to pull it off becomes slightly pushed towards the chad direction. as in they have operational legs and the physical strength necessary to carry a backpack.
given two otherwise identical girls, one that will fuck whoever and one that is conventionally picky by western standards, girl #2 is going to very likely end up with a better evolutionary outcome. even if you are pushing the quality of rapists slightly more towards fitness (by making them go pass basic training first), there's still no reason why the aversion to rape should suddenly reverse.
just think about it this way. lets assume there is a girl with the mutation that you propose. she has 0 fear of rape and so takes no precautions against it. any dude that makes a pass at her she simply accepts and lets him fuck her.
what do you expect will be the IQ of her first child?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28760498) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 3:47 PM Author: godawful keepsake machete
so 1 act of betraying her evolutionary impulses = RAPE TRAUMA
but 10 years of going against her evolutionary impulses = NBD
got it
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28761081) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 3:53 PM Author: mint gunner
you seem to not grasp the idea that evolution creates natural impulses, but not actual strategic thinking.
the impulse is to have sex with fit mates. a woman who spends her 20s "chasing cock" by fucking chads and avoiding virgin losers like you is perfectly consistent with my theory.
similarly, guys seem to be perfectly happy having sex with girls who are not ovulating. this isn't inconsistent with the claim that the male sex drive serves an evolutionary function.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28761133) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 3:58 PM Author: godawful keepsake machete
well okay, um, i have my OWN evolutionary theories.
women should abhor single rapes because it could possibly be a low-status loser doing the raping.
but women should LOVE public group rapes because this most likely signifies a changing of the societal power structure, wherein the men of her society are conquered through war and another group of men take her as their sexual property.
so, because wars and the rapes that ensued from them played a large role in human evolutionary history, i have come to these trenchant conclusions.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28761178) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 3:51 PM Author: Geriatric Den Toilet Seat
EVOLUTIONARILY WOMEN NEEDED MEN TO HELP THEM RAISE THEIR KIDS YOU IDIOT.
If it was just about popping out kids every women could easily find enough sex to remain pregnant from 12 to 50. Evolutionarily, the female imperative isn't just to get knocked up, but to get knocked up by a high quality male who will help her care for their kids.
Do you understand why being knocked over the head and fucked by some strange dude before he runs off is not evolutionarily advantageous for a woman?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28761110) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 3:58 PM Author: mint gunner
people don't operate under "evolutionary imperatives"
people act based on impulses
impulses that increase offspring fitness spread.
those impulses become seemingly default behavior
that behavior continues even when changes to the environment are created, because evolution is slow.
over the next 100,000 years, i think you will see the stigma against date rape relax slightly. which is great news for your future rape-conceived progeny, OP.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28761177) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 4:05 PM Author: godawful keepsake machete
and yet, the most extreme xo poster wouldn't advocate going back to the way things were done in pre-modern times.
and as far as i know, trauma from rape has INCREASED from the past when rape, minus the social stigma, was not as damaging to one's psychology.
the point is that evolutionary theories are an interesting, dull background noise, but LOL at anyone who automatically reaches for them in a conversation such as this.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28761231) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 4:04 PM Author: mint gunner
they don't have an impulse to reproduce. they have an impulse to have sex and, if possible, mate-pair with jacked alpha studs.
historically, high-fitness children were going to be an unavoidable consequence of that.
a few decades ago the connection between the behavior and the children was eliminated. but it will take a long time for the impulse to change.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28761228)
|
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 4:17 PM Author: godawful keepsake machete
so "impulse" covers having anonymous sex with good looking men.
it does not cover making sure these men are actually high quality in other respects.
it does not cover making sure these men are compatible as future mates in other respects.
it does not cover seeking out mates and wanting to settle down.
it does not cover... etc.
well, by your definition of what an evolutionary impulse is, your theory totally explains everything!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28761320) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 5:56 PM Author: mint gunner
i don't think i suggested that. you seem to be mostly interested in proving something like "modern feminists hold inconsistent views on sex"
thats cool, but thats not the discussion we are having.
afaik, the vast vast majority of women aren't especially interested in anonymous sex. they are mostly interested in long-term relationships with high-value males.
some 30 year old women affect a disinterest in relationships and a love of cheap sex, but when you look at who is typically doing it, it seems very reminiscent of how rappers brag about loving the street life. nobody actually opts into that life, but some people do try to turn lemons into lemonade.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28761903) |
Date: September 15th, 2015 1:41 PM Author: godawful keepsake machete
well, no convincing explanations so far.
guess i'll go with they're being gas-lit by society into feeling this way.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28760199) |
 |
Date: September 15th, 2015 3:38 PM Author: mint gunner
how do i know your pain from being kicked in the balls is real? how do i know you're not just a histrionic little faggot? what methods do i use?
well one of them is i measure the observable consequences. (we do that with rape victims)
then i come up with "non-falsifiable evolutionary 'arguments'" for why it probably isn't so surprising that you respond negatively to testicular damage.
sorry that i came into your thread and fucked up your "rape is nbd" thesis. i'll let you carry on being a dipshit.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28760997) |
Date: September 15th, 2015 1:53 PM Author: Drunken multi-colored brethren
its an anachronism, historically a raped chick was literally worthless and might as well killself
nowadays, it really couldn't matter less, it's like contracting a mild case of mental illness that is easily treated
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28760327) |
Date: September 15th, 2015 1:57 PM Author: Fuchsia dysfunction lodge
http://i.imgur.com/uDUVPEw.jpg
Rape is just a social construction.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28760352) |
Date: September 15th, 2015 2:19 PM Author: chestnut razzmatazz native
Risk of disease/child without a father/ruins reputation for finding a good man/fear of physical injury or abuse.
I'd rather have my teeth knocked in than sit on some fag's aids cock without lube and if you disagree you're probably gay.
"Drunk" rape isn't nearly as bad. It's like waking up next to a fat chick.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28760503) |
Date: September 15th, 2015 3:23 PM Author: Bateful Flushed Famous Landscape Painting
ITT: aspie virgin males discuss how rape is nbd
but seriously, if its nbd, why do women dislike it so much and why has society made laws against it?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28760867) |
Date: September 15th, 2015 7:54 PM Author: Glittery Hell
you know, I have always kinda felt that feminism should try to get away from the rape is the worst thing in the world stuff
It's born out of the Puritan belief that a woman's chastity is her most important trait...
i guess it mainly bothers feminists though because they are so concerned with women's right to bodily autonomy
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28762763) |
Date: September 15th, 2015 10:06 PM Author: Violent nursing home
Because womens' power in society comes from their decision givr or withhold sex.
Mens' power comes from their intellect and physical attributes.
Raping a woman takes away all her power. It is the same thing as beating a man until he is retarded or maiming him
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2990212&forum_id=2#28763860) |
|
|