The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
I actually don't have a problem with Sean Hannity
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:08 AM Author: godawful roommate I take back everything I said. He seems like a fine and intelligent person.
There's far too much divisiveness in the world today, and we need to love each other more if we're going to survive. |
 |
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:08 AM Author: Histrionic adulterous garrison stop starting threads bearing my name. i don't like the attention. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377230) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:09 AM Author: Copper Territorial Step-uncle's House Shitlib http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298272&mc=11&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377235) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:09 AM Author: godawful roommate Will do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377240) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:11 AM Author: Titillating point foreskin Stop responding to posts designed to bait you. If you want to post, I suggest you shed your current moniker and quietly come back as someone new. And don't take this board so seriously, dude. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377251) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:14 AM Author: Histrionic adulterous garrison 1) i rarely if ever respond to these attack threads. i'm not &# or whatever the fuck her name is.
2) "And don't take this board so seriously, dude." you must be new here. |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:20 AM Author: Titillating point foreskin I'm about 45% certain you're a schtick. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377340) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:22 AM Author: Histrionic adulterous garrison people have accused me of being shtick, flame, blah blah blah. this "45% certainty" nonsense is new, though; congrats. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377355) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:23 AM Author: Titillating point foreskin 65% (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377367) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:26 AM Author: Histrionic adulterous garrison why does anyone even care? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377391) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:36 AM Author: Copper Territorial Step-uncle's House Shitlib What thread was that where you claimed liberals didn't support unions? I am trying to find it to add to your archive of humiliation. Thanks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377453) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:39 AM Author: Titillating point foreskin I suspect it's the conservative posters like you who are getting PWNed by this infuriating schtick. I just read some of his posts -- he can't be real. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377473) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:42 AM Author: Histrionic adulterous garrison 45%, 65%. does this mean you're at 80% now? 90%? dare i say, ONE HUNDRED? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377493) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:43 AM Author: Titillating point foreskin Yep. Keep up the good work. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377499) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:42 AM Author: Histrionic adulterous garrison the self pwn@g3 here is astonishing. here's the thread: http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&mc=73&forum_id=2. now prove to me (and your homosexual legion of idiot posters) where I "claimed liberals didn't support unions"
i hate beating you into the ground like this, felix, but you always ask for it.
|
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:44 AM Author: Copper Territorial Step-uncle's House Shitlib Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:24 AM Author: Sean Hannity
hmmm, so unionization is part of the liberal agenda?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355321)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:26 AM Author: felix167
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:24 AM
Author: Sean Hannity
hmmm, so unionization is part of the liberal agenda?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355321)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355330)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:29 AM Author: RedScalitox7
holy shit
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355348)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:30 AM Author: felix167
Witness the legend. He is something to behold, isn't he?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355357)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:31 AM Author: Sean Hannity
answer the question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355363)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:37 AM Author: RedScalitox7
who, do you suppose, do unions align themselves with?
notice arnie's recent assault on unions?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355388)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:49 AM Author: Sean Hannity
yeah, ok. i always thought unionization was a device designed to increase the bargaining power of workers who often found themselves on the pwn3d end of the bargaining table. that "they align themselves with" liberals, in general, doesn't necessarily indicate that unionization is a part of the liberal agenda; all it demonstrates is that liberals hold highly treating workers fairly.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355428) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:46 AM Author: Histrionic adulterous garrison nice try. having trouble answering simple questions now, eh? once again, where's the claim? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377519) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:49 AM Author: Copper Territorial Step-uncle's House Shitlib Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:26 AM
Author: felix167
Date: November 22nd, 2005 3:24 AM
Author: Sean Hannity
hmmm, so unionization is part of the liberal agenda?
...that "they align themselves with" liberals, in general, doesn't necessarily indicate that unionization is a part of the liberal agenda; all it demonstrates is that liberals hold highly treating workers fairly. |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:52 AM Author: Histrionic adulterous garrison i'm not 100% sure about this, but i don't think "questions" and "claims" mean the same thing. again, i'm not 100% sure, but i have a hunch, as they say.
next time, remember who you're fucking with.
good night. |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:53 AM Author: Copper Territorial Step-uncle's House Shitlib So you agree that unionization is part of the liberal agenda?
edit: waiting for your answer..... |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 3:13 AM Author: Copper Territorial Step-uncle's House Shitlib ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4377668) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 8:30 PM Author: Histrionic adulterous garrison oh, the stupidity.
first, you start with this insane proposition: "What thread was that where you claimed liberals didn't support unions?"
L-O-L
had you even read that thread (or, better yet, if you actually knew how to read), you would have remembered this: ------------------------------------------------- Date: November 22nd, 2005 4:02 AM Author: Sean Hannity
you apparently suffer from the same intellectual defect that felix does; you tend to mischaracterize my points in order to prove yours. making impossible inferences and assuming the existence of nonexistent assumptions/non existent statements is no way to debate. never did i say or imply liberals don't believe in unionization.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=303758&forum_id=2#4355491) ---------------------------------------------------
in pertinent part: "never did i say or imply liberals don't believe in unionization."
like i said before, your posts consistently exhibit, on your part, a very pronounced difficulty ascertaining the basic meanings of words and phrases and the logical inferences that flow from them. to compound on this very pathetic mental disability, you apparently hate logic. this is what our debates usually amount to: often, i can dispose of your stupid ass arguments/points/heresy with one simple sentence. here, i'll do it now:
means are not ends.
saying that unionization is a part of the liberal agenda is either deliberately daft or intellectually dishonest. shit, that'd be akin to saying that war mongering is a part of the conservative agenda. you're a dishonest fucking idiot. |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 8:42 PM Author: Copper Territorial Step-uncle's House Shitlib "saying that unionization is a part of the liberal agenda is either deliberately daft or intellectually dishonest. shit, that'd be akin to saying that war mongering is a part of the conservative agenda. you're a dishonest fucking idiot."
So unionization is NOT part of the liberal agenda? And claiming that it is makes one a "dishonest fucking idiot."
You have now conceded this after insisting multiple times on multiple threads that you never even so much as IMPLIED this. Now you admit this is what you think.
PWN3D!!! |
Date: November 25th, 2005 2:12 PM Author: Copper Territorial Step-uncle's House Shitlib (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=305542&forum_id=2#4379318) |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 8:41 PM Author: Bright Kitty Cat "assuming the existence of nonexistent assumptions/non existent statements"
this is great comedy. |
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 8:44 PM Author: beta stock car locus Bashing this TTT is starting to eat into my studying time, but it's just too entertaining to resist:
Date: November 12th, 2005 3:29 PM
Author: Sean Hannity
first, what the fuck is "the academy"?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=297195&forum_id=2#4275450)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 7th, 2005 2:57 AM
Author: Sean Hannity
The idea that liberals "approve" of or "excuse" Muslims is nonsense for several very simple reasons. First, no one in their right minds, liberal or not, condones the sort of treachery we've seen various Muslim fundamentalists perpetrate in the last several days with the french riots and in the last several years with 9/11 and the chaos in Iraq. Saying or implying that libs do such things is indicative of the sort of disingenuous politics conservatives seem to have built their party on. liberals don't do that. second, conservatives seem to believe that everything happens in a vacuum. Not so. people don't riot for no reason. the riots and other upheavals are simply manifestations of a marginalized people's discontentment with their socio-political situations; situaions they feel powerless to change.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=293604&forum_id=2#4232683)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298143&forum_id=2#4286055)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: November 13th, 2005 11:28 PM
Author: Sean Hannity
FIRST, WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU?
Second, read this: Again, I find nothing satisfying about teaching you the meanings of basic English words. You seem to be having extreme difficulty discerning the intent and meaning of particular phrases and the logical inferences that flow from them. In this particular instance, you've confused a "justification" for an "explanation." They have distinctly different meanings and are not interchangeable (or synonymous). An "excuse" implies that there exists an objective measure the reference to which must be undertaken in determining the blameworthiness of the act or thing in question; and, by reference to that particular objective measure, the act or thing is excusable. An "explanation," on the other hand, does not purport to remove the thing being explained from blameworthiness; rather, it attempts to "give" "reasons" why the particular thing occurred or illuminate the logical path that the particular act or event took to reach effectuation.
3rd, STOP FUCKING PLAYING GAMES. There's no reason for this. I AM FUCKING READY, PAL. YOUR "STAFFORD EDUCATIONAL" LOANS FOR NEXT YEAR = MINE.
|
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 8:45 PM Author: beta stock car locus Date: November 13th, 2005 11:37 PM Author: Sean Hannity
i have NO fucking idea what the hell is wrong with you people. you've made my blood pressure fucking spike within the last hour by fucking posting a bunch of bullcrap and fucking lying about me. justice alito/BAFF ARE US won't fucking talk to me because the rest of you are fucking egging him on to fucking quote and re-quote random, past posts of mine (all brilliant and logically impenetrable, by the way. ASK FELIX). i'm fucking going to bed because i have to get up fucking early tomorrow and take care of some biz. when i return (if ever), don't get in my fucking way you fucking pieces of shit.
READ THE TITLE OF THIS THREAD AGAIN; and ponder pensively its hidden meanings.
FUCK YOU.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=298189&forum_id=2#4286165)
|
|
Date: November 25th, 2005 9:26 PM Author: drab swashbuckling wrinkle sorry if I have not read all the Sean Hannity compilations, nor do I have time to read some of these long threads, but this quote keeps coming up. What is the "academy" referred to?
Date: November 12th, 2005 3:29 PM
Author: Sean Hannity
first, what the fuck is "the academy"?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=297195&forum_id=2#4275450) |