https://pacer-documents.s3.amazonaws.com/207/20-05143/01208238928.pdf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40485627)

Author: Rudolph

LOL at the Reagan judge. Her clerk must have worked her over post argument. Might as well burn down this country and start again.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=#)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40485671)

Author: Rudolph

Are you a fucking maniac?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=#)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40485699)

Author: Rudolph

So, what's it going to be? 1 page mandamus denial filed later today?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4558257&forum_id=2#40403256)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40485726)

TalkingRobot

@TalkingRobot_

·

41m

Replying to

@kadhim

So you can just commit perjury now? Awesome.

In 2020? Really?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40485874)

"fucking kavanaugh is a GANG RAPIST, lock him UP *haha ironically but seriously this time*"

*kav defends himself*

UGH WHY DO IDIOT TRUMPERS LIKE KAV SO MUCH just like nominate someone else

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40486010)

Dickey Simpkins, ur response?

libs?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40490519)

Silver lining? Flynn can now be charged with ALL crimes come January, including the other felonies he admitted to in the Statement of Offenses in this case AND the prosecutors will not have to fight to undo a corrupt Trump pardon (and no 6-month cap). https://t.co/0Q6NGn1iMG

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40485927)

These black “judges” should be disbarred and removed

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40486040)

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/no-black-judges-among-trumps-appeals-court-confirmations

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40486057)

More white on black violence

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40486119)

Also Democrats: Rioters and looters should be permitted to burn police stations, tear down statues, and generally deface public property without repercussions.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40486203)

argue that another citizen should be deprived of his liberty

regardless of whether the Executive Branch is willing to pursue

the charges. Although no decision has yet been made on the

motion to dismiss, the district court’s judicial supervision,

detailed supra 7–8, “threatens to chill law enforcement by

subjecting the prosecutor’s motives and decisionmaking to

outside inquiry.” Wayte v. United States, 470 U.S. 598, 607–08

(1985). As explained above, we have held such “interference

with the internal deliberations” of the Executive Branch to be

a quintessential irreparable injury giving rise to mandamus.

Cobell, 334 F.3d at 1140–43.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40486387)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40487983)

(2) I think the charges against flynn are bullshit, although this is a systemic issue that the feds do all the time, and it is almost certainly true that flynn's dismissal constitutes special treatment (albeit the treatment that everyone should get) based on his profile if not his connections to the administration.

(3) I think this opinion is bullshit in what it stands for, which is yet another preemptive brushback against district judges who dare to even *inquire* about why the Executive is exercising its prosecutorial discretion in the way that it is. Obviously this case is one where a DJ is trying to hold up a dismissal, which is fucked up, but this situation arises far more frequently when the Government *is* bringing charges / continuing to pursue them / overcharging / declining concessions / treating the instant defendant more harshly than other similarly situated ones / etc., and the DJ wants to know why. Title 18 is a shit pure shit document written by retards (most state criminal codes are better), and its literal terms allows the Government to lock up any citizen selected from the population at random -- the whole point is that it's a blank check from congress to the USAOs, evincing the former's trust in the latter to (a) be competent and (b) do the right thing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40488087)

The "problem" here was that because he lacks discretion to ever grant the motion under any conceivable circumstances, he lacks the authority to do much of any factfinding about whether it should be granted (because that's a foregone conclusion) or, more honestly, why the motion was made. And as a straightforward "Yeah Rule 48(a) says 'leave of the court', but when the motion's unopposed you sign off on it, faggot" ruling, I think it's perfectly fine, probably right (apparently that interpretation wasn't what the Rules Committee had in mind, but they're all lawprofs who've at least 'dabbled' in gay sex), and normatively desirable.

My irritation with the decision is that it's also a continuation of a decently long line of cases (certainly longer than the venerable "Rule 48(a)" line of precedent) smacking down DJs who dare to ask shit like (e.g.): "the gov't *never* tacks on a separate 924(c) stacking 5-year mandatory minimums for every single one of the 25 guns they find at a drug dealer's house; why are they doing it to this white nationalist; is it maybe political?" or "hey I notice that 92% of our cocaine prosecutions are against blackies, and I also notice that Skip Pennington's kid was in here last week and got a No Pros; I also read the other day that Idaho's only .5% black; I've been thinking about it, and I'd like to see a brief on why that is before I sentence Mr. Washington to the 97-121 months at FCI Sheridan you're requesting"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40490464)

https://twitter.com/jacq_thomsen/status/1300463143068536832?s=21

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40845128)

Griffith concurrence seems to he thinks case should be dismissed but Sullivan should get first crack.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4568930&forum_id=2#40845141)