Please, share more of your knowledge of the African diaspora.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4602050&forum_id=2#40741777)

but she is also black.

but she is also not asian, but black.

but she is not black but asian.

but she is half-asian, half black.

and Obama is black.

but Elizabeth Warren isn't injun.

but AGWWG spawn is not white, but asian.

lol@ cumskins literally having zero sense of racial identity.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4602050&forum_id=2#40742786)

sure, you're not wrong in that statement.

but can you honestly say that Kamala Sexy presents a strong coherent sense of racial identity, esp one that will appeal to the woketards the dems absolutely need to turnout strong in order to win? I'll just leave this here:

https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/f5d2567/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3849x2595+0+0/resize/1486x1002!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F75%2F6c%2F47326f994d4a81011f8860476936%2Fla-na-kamala-india01.JPG

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4602050&forum_id=2#40742809)

lol at your bizarre belief that it matters whether one's father is ethnicity A and mother is ethnicity B, or vice versa. it's the same ancestry/genetics either way.

"koreans" = social club, not ethnic group (korean father/white mother offspring have the same ancestry as white father/korean mother offspring, but only one of those belongs to the social club!)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4602050&forum_id=2#40742901)

bro. your dumb ass literally follows me around in every thread where i point out how sad it is that white people literally do not even claim their own children which is literally the most fundamental part of a race's identity

french people exist. german people exist. etc. "white people" do not exist. similarly, chinese (at least in the han sense) people exist. japanese people exist. korean people exist. "asian" people, do not exist

lets face it bro, you can make up all these hilarious gerrymandered rules about what "white" is and isn't but you don't even exist as a separate "white" ontological unit bro. you are just whatever weird mutt mix your parents ended up being after generations in america, separated from your european past. in fact, id bet you don't even really know what you really are because you are so far removed from your true english, french, or whatever identity. this is obviously true only of european-descedended peoples who live outside of europe as a matter of convenience: europeans lost all their national identities after leaving europe and came up with "white" in its absence. its no different from "asians" in america saying they are "asian" instead of CJK, although to a much lesser degree, as most "asians" in america are only 1 or 2 generations removed from CJK

but then again, thats because "white" ethnicities don't define themselves patrilinearly like we do, which is just plain sad

come on bro we've had this discussion a thousand times already. i can just make a separate thread and bump it for you whenever you want to talk about this instead of creating more subthread wastelands with you

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4602050&forum_id=2#40742918)

equally hilarious is your weird belief that even though "races" are a muddled folk classification without precise biological underpinning... ETHNICITIES, on the other hand, are "ontologically" (lol) precise! they definitely aren't a confused muddled classification in themselves!

do you think "french" people and "german" people were created by god or something? and now they've mixed and lost their purity? those groups had their own long historical processes of mixing and changing and formation over the millennia, same as "whites" now.

most people would be very surprised to find out that the only thing that makes them french, or german, or japanese, or whatever, is not their ancestry or culture or anything like that, but rather, whether or not their dad "claimed" them, whatever the fuck that means. are jews less of an ethnic group because they define themselves matrineally then?

you're trying to make some kind of confused point about whites not "claiming their own children," which i take it is some sort of reference to white/asian hapas being labeled as asian rather than white, but so what? the offspring of white/white couples are certainly "claimed" as white (again, whatever the fuck that means), so whites should fit your criterion for ethnicity-hood.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4602050&forum_id=2#40742965)

https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/f5d2567/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3849x2595+0+0/resize/1486x1002!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F75%2F6c%2F47326f994d4a81011f8860476936%2Fla-na-kamala-india01.JPG

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4602050&forum_id=2#40742798)