The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Sim Glitch: New York last state to allow No Fault divorce in 2010
| coral menage idiot | 02/27/24 |
| Talking Quadroon People Who Are Hurt | 02/27/24 |
| coral menage idiot | 02/27/24 |
| Internet-worthy 180 Deer Antler Jap | 02/27/24 |
| coral menage idiot | 02/27/24 |
| hot stage newt | 02/27/24 |
| coral menage idiot | 02/27/24 |
| hot stage newt | 02/27/24 |
| beady-eyed unholy stag film | 02/27/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 27th, 2024 1:47 AM Author: coral menage idiot First was California in 1969, signed into law by Ronald Reagan (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5496447&forum_id=2#47442506) |
 |
Date: February 27th, 2024 10:13 AM Author: Talking Quadroon People Who Are Hurt real conservahero that guy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5496447&forum_id=2#47443146) |
|
Date: February 27th, 2024 10:14 AM Author: coral menage idiot Apparently he did it because HE needed to get divorced lmao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5496447&forum_id=2#47443150) |
Date: February 27th, 2024 2:07 AM Author: Internet-worthy 180 Deer Antler Jap As I recall, the reason it took so long was because feminist groups kept attacking every no fault divorce proposal in the legislature, saying that they were not "pro-woman" enough. I forget the details on what they wanted changed, but I do remember that opposition to no fault divorce in NY came almost entirely from the left. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5496447&forum_id=2#47442517) |
|
Date: February 27th, 2024 10:11 AM Author: coral menage idiot LOLOLOLOL
What could they possibly have been advocating for? What is more left wing than no fault divorce??!!
I need to know. Did they want MAN FAULT divorce? |
|
Date: February 27th, 2024 10:12 AM Author: hot stage newt they probably assumed it meant less alimony (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5496447&forum_id=2#47443141) |
|
Date: February 27th, 2024 10:14 AM Author: coral menage idiot Right so they wanted NY divorce law to specifically blame the man every time. Man-Fault Divorce. No fault implies it's not the man's fault. In fact it's a mysogenistic law. Because it doesn't blame men enough for things. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5496447&forum_id=2#47443147) |
|
Date: February 27th, 2024 10:15 AM Author: hot stage newt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5496447&forum_id=2#47443151) |
|
Date: February 27th, 2024 10:15 AM Author: beady-eyed unholy stag film I think matrimonial attorneys had lobbied against it too. The low-level ones that dealt with divorces with no real assets involved could charge more because the process was a little more elaborate (1 year of separation under an agreement before you could file). With no-fault divorces you started seeing billboards advertising $300 divorces. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5496447&forum_id=2#47443152) |