2. You will believe it.

3. The reason you will believe it is b/c Trump said it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48015235)

he should stick to arguing in front of 100iq juries imo.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48015249)

Any thoughts on whether the 2024 election will be stole like the 2020 election was stole?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48015269)

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2658428&forum_id=2#48017233

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48017227)

[edit, she cried misogyny and i can't find her playing the race card on this issue.]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48015290)

Also, now that I read that, I might be misremembering -- was there ever an admission/proof that she had access to *CNN's topics/questions, or was she just saying: "Here's what they're gonna ask you about:" (something that anyone with a 100+ IQ could easily brainstorm on their own, and be right about with 80% accuracy)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48015994)

Same reason it isn’t really “cheating” if you were to give a kid all of the questions on the SAT he’ll be sitting for in advance, it’s all math and logical reasoning anyway and he already knows that’s what he’ll be tested on so who cares if he’s given the “exact” questions or whatever

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48016221)

====

Sharing debate questions with Clinton campaign

A WikiLeaks e-mail dump revealed that Brazile sent an e-mail message on March 5, 2016, to John Podesta and Jennifer Palmieri with the title: "One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash." The message continued, "her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint."[26] At the next event in Flint, Clinton was delivered a similar question from audience member Mikki Wade, whose family was affected by the poisoned water.[27]

On October 11, 2016, a WikiLeaks e-mail dump included an e-mail Brazile sent on March 12, 2016 to Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri with the subject header: "From time to time I get questions in advance."[28] In the e-mail, Brazile discussed her concern about Clinton's ability to field a question regarding the death penalty, and in a CNN town hall debate the following day, Clinton received a similar question about the death penalty.[26][29] According to tech blog Errata Security, the e-mail in question was verified using an everyday verification program and the DKIM system.[30]

Brazile at first vehemently denied receiving or furnishing the Clinton campaign with any town hall questions and dismissed the Wikileaks organization as "these sad ass whipper leakers try to slow my groove".[31] She accused TYT Politics reporter Jordan Chariton of "badgering a woman."[32] Questioned by Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly, Brazile said, "As a Christian woman, I understand persecution. I will not sit here and be persecuted because your information is totally false."[33]

Jake Tapper, a former colleague of Brazile's at CNN, provided his perspective on the leak of a question to a Presidential candidate, calling it "very, very upsetting" and added that "journalistically, it's horrifying". Brazile, however, said that her conscience was "very clear".[34][35] She later commented: "If I had to do it all over again, I would know a hell of a lot more about cybersecurity."[36]

In a talk at the College of Journalism and Mass Communications on the University of Nebraska–Lincoln campus on October 12, 2016, Brazile condemned the leaks, which intelligence officials said came from Russia,[37] and said they were intended to "manipulate an election, disrupt or discredit or destroy our democracy" and ultimately try to "produce an outcome more favorable to them and their interests."[38]

On October 31, 2016, The New York Times reported: "CNN has severed ties with the Democratic strategist Donna Brazile, after hacked e-mails from WikiLeaks showed that she shared questions for CNN-sponsored candidate events in advance with friends on Hillary Clinton's campaign."[39] CNN said it had accepted her formal resignation on October 14, adding: "We are completely uncomfortable with what we have learned about her interactions with the Clinton campaign while she was a CNN contributor."[40]

On November 1, 2016, an internal call about the collusion was initiated by CNN President Jeff Zucker. Zucker informed his staff that, while the instances have been fully investigated and the perpetrators dealt with, the perception that campaigns received questions in advance "hurts all of us," adding that, "I have no tolerance for her behavior or that kind of behavior," going on to describe former network commentator Brazile's interactions with the Clinton campaign as "unethical" and "disgusting."[41]

On March 17, 2017, Brazile admitted to forwarding debate questions to Clinton's campaign during the 2016 Democratic primary, while she was Vice Chair of the DNC and working as a CNN commentator.[42][43][44] In an essay she wrote for Time magazine, she said, "Then in October, a subsequent release of e-mails revealed that among the many things I did in my role as a Democratic operative and D.N.C. Vice Chair prior to assuming the interim D.N.C. Chair position was to share potential town hall topics with the Clinton campaign." Brazile went on to explain: "My job was to make all our Democratic candidates look good, and I worked closely with both campaigns to make that happen. But sending those e-mails was a mistake I will forever regret."[44]

In her 2017 memoir Hacks, Brazile wrote about her "alleged leaking of the questions."[45]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48016266)

you are espousing your opinion on what will happen with Kamala Harris' run for POTUS

how is that anything other than a political opinion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48015282)

And it was about politics.

If that isn't a political opinion, tell me what it was.

Or are you just arguing the semantics of what constitutes an opinion about politics for the semantics of it? to derail the topic, because you are ashamed of what you have done?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48015314)

https://abcnews.go.com/US/2nd-radio-host-questions-ahead-biden-interview/story?id=111718228

Or after Biden was caught multiple times sing cheat sheets in hsi press conferences?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48015916)

So IYO, in the hypo that you posed in the OP Trumpkins would be totally reasonable and rational to *strongly suspect* that this happened, but laughably gay and retarded to be *convinced* that it happened?

Wow, that's such a smart and trenchant observation, this really changes everything -- and here we all were foolishly thinking that you are a self-impressed middle aged midwit man with a junkie nigger wife and trannie mulatto kids who spends his time drawing stupid and incredibly pedantic little lines in the sand to pathetically try and “win” political arguments against total strangers on the Internet!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48016215)

The real problem is that the ((DNC)) gave Kamala all of the answers in advance.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48017382)

While there is evidence that parties who were employed by media networks responsible for the questions had corresponded with members of the Harris campaign, including sending emails in which the questions were listed, there is no evidence that the questions were provided by network personnel in their capacity as such, nor that the campaign personnel who received the questions were doing so as campaign employees. A review of other emails from personnel both sides of the exchange suggests they also periodically used their work email accounts for personal communications. The widespread publication of these question sharing allegations, and the widespread, uncritical acceptance by the public, underscores the necessity of restricting the dissemination of misinformation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5584121&forum_id=2#48017466)