The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
I'm the Hastings "tattle-tale"- Taking your fucking qu
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 18th, 2007 10:58 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Subject: *questions Yes, I am the copy-and-paster of the original threat (OT) and the first person to have notified the law school.
It seems some people at XOXO are willing to assume Trustafarian wasn't seriously planning to kill based on one or more of these inferences:
1. "Since he had no history of flame at XOXO, Trustafarian's threat should have been dismissed as bad flame."
2. "Since he edited his original threat to read 'wgwag', he elucidated his intent to convey a joke."
3. "Since he turned himself in, this demonstrated that his threat was in fact an empty one, for which he was sorry."
4. "Since it turns out he was a Boalt student, it is clear that he had no motive."
Does anyone else see the flaw in assuming someone is not legitimately homicidal based on these reasons alone?
Indulge this HYPO:
A blood thirsty copycat-wannabe logs on to XOXO as Trustafarian. Sure, he's had no history of flame in the past, but for once, he cannot contain his secret-- his plan to murder people on the campus of Hastings, where his ex-girlfriend attends. He posts the threat, but as soon as it seems that people are unexpectedly going to take him seriously and potentially report him to the authorities, he makes a last-ditch effort to save his ass by editing the threat. As cries for his investigation pile up on the board, he realizes he is fucked. Even if he wanted to go through with the shooting now, he couldn't because he still hasn't bought a gun. He believes the FBI will catch up with him soon, and in an attempt to seek lenience, he "turns himself in."
Is it not somewhat plausible that this or something similar was the case? If so, why would anyone be willing to risk lives by not reporting him?
|
 |
Date: April 18th, 2007 10:59 PM Author: glassy vivacious dingle berry hairy legs Date: April 18th, 2007 10:58 PM Author: How many WGs could a WGWAG WG if a WGWAG could... Subject: *questions
Yes, I'm the guy who copied and pasted the OP. And yes, I'm actually also the first person to have called the law school about the matter.
The bottom line here is that you shouldn't have any questions for me. At least not ones like this:
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616215&forum_id=2#7956323
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616215&forum_id=2#7959836
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616215&forum_id=2#7959891
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616457&forum_id=2#7959791
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616569&forum_id=2#7959815
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616569&forum_id=2#7959906
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616569&mc=66&forum_id=2#7959874
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616569&mc=66&forum_id=2#7959874
(And these criticisms are just from one person! PS: Get off my nuts, fag.)
The guy's OP, which edited after approximately 10 minutes, indicated that he would consider shooting people at Hastings tomorrow if it wasn't raining. I COULD NOT IN GOOD CONSCIENCE GAMBLE WITH PUBLIC SAFETY BY ASSUMING THIS WAS FLAME. It sucks that it actually did end up just being flame, and I feel somewhat bad for the guy, but the bottom line is that there was a perceivable threat. And if you don't agree, fuck you, I will fucking shoot your asses.
HTH
(http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=#)
HOLY SHIT. Preserved. |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:02 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Dude, lay off. It's pretty clear that my copy and paste wasn't fabricated. The guy admitted to it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960139) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:04 PM Author: Mauve gaped voyeur faggot firefighter (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960162) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:01 PM Author: Coral meetinghouse you're a fucking faggot, hth. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960133) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:03 PM Author: Godawful step-uncle's house haunted graveyard Agreed, I don't think you deserve the sort of shit you're getting from some people. Think about those girls who didn't press charges against Cho back in 2005 and how they must feel right now. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960146) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:05 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Thanks, GTO. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960165) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:06 PM Author: Coral meetinghouse you're a blithering fucking idiot. "those girls who didnt press charges" did not have a context within which to judge cho's actions--they did not have, like the retard who started this thread did, the chance to google search trustafarian's name to see what sort of history he had on this board or the opportunity to understand the context in whcih the post was made, namely one of the most ridiculously filthy and deranged fucking message boards anywhere. one would figure you'd know this considering how ardently you defended free speech and how you refused to moderate this board and all. of course now this poor guy, who, judging by the google history, is in the top 95% of normal, sane posters on this board, will have to deal with who knows what with the FBI, who knows what sort of disciplinary sanctions at his school and who knows what sort of C&F implications. but yeah, the OP is a fucking hero. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960178) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:11 PM Author: Deep Sanctuary he apparently authored normal posts right, and then all of a sudden a thread about murder-suicide...if he posted flame all the time it'd be less worrisome. the fact that there was a context of normal posting then this, that gives more of a reason to alert the school. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960202) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:13 PM Author: razzle orchestra pit bah. give me a break. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960215) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:14 PM Author: Godawful step-uncle's house haunted graveyard Free speech doesn't cover murder-suicide threats. Was he kidding? Probably 99% likely. But if it was your school, would you take that 1% chance after seeing what happened at Virginia Tech? I probably wouldn't.
As for moderation, that was never my choice. I never ran the board or had any control over those decisions, and I have frequently advised rachmiel to do something about some of the threads on here, sometimes with success, sometimes without success. |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:19 PM Author: Coral meetinghouse there have been COUNTLESS threads on xoxo saying things like "i'm about go go and slaughter a village full of niggers" and "i'm about to rape and kill a nigger bitch"...... if those arent murder threats, then what the fuck are they? oh, they're FLAME, right? how do you distinguish THAT flame from the hastings guy's flame? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960275) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:22 PM Author: Deep Sanctuary I'm sure if they named a specific person they were going to kill or a specific place where they were going to kill someone, cops would have been notified. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960298) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:29 PM Author: razzle orchestra pit Like the people who talk about raping Jill F? She doesn't even take it seriously. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960369) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:36 AM Author: bull headed filthy church in fairness, the people who post about raping jill F are 100 lb gay men with AIDS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960782) |
|
Date: April 11th, 2008 3:08 PM Author: Free-loading useless brakes hominid ? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#9612249) |
|
Date: April 11th, 2008 3:21 PM Author: Canary base cuck excellent. i hope all the documentarians have this post on their list. it's amazing how much good material ak47 generated to justify every future employer ever in firing him. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#9612314) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:53 PM Author: Emerald charismatic digit ratio you have to take those within the context of what was going on. the regular nonsense that goes on here is far different than someone making a (I assume) specific threat to a specific location the day after a similarly tragic event. Heightened scrutiny based on the circumstances that occurred just now. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960527) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:57 PM Author: Coral meetinghouse should someone have called the FBI about azn's countless "ALL WHITE GIRLS WILL BE SHOT IF THEY DONT FUCK US" threads? surely heightened scrutiny applies in that case too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960555) |
|
Date: April 27th, 2007 6:00 PM Author: scarlet passionate rehab Actually someone should report some of these posts. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#8018796) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2007 8:59 AM Author: sticky carmine shrine Mike Church used to regularly say he'd have specific posters "put down" and claim that he knew who they really were, then talk about what "the street price on a hit" was. That seems like much more a direct threat, to me at least. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7974825) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:09 AM Author: Slate bateful crotch Girls get stalked all the fucking time. It's only a big deal when it's a big deal. It's dissimilar to what is going on here. And if the rat had followed your advice to get perspective on trustafarian's good character he would have found out that the fucking loser idiot lived in the same town where he made the threat. That would have justified doing something right there. At the very least, it does not help your position. |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:11 PM Author: Multi-colored bespoke forum I don't know if I really buy this. I can understand calling the school or calling the cops, if you really wanted to be safe. But what would be accomplished by copying and pasting the original post? As well as keeping it preserved after it's been established as a (poor) joke?
It's wrong to yell "fire!" in a crowded cinema. But I don't see how it's justified to record the original threat and play it over and over again (as it were).
|
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:13 PM Author: arousing outnumbered dilemma Exactly. I don't buy it either. I'd fully understand if some outsider stumbled upon the thread, found it frightening and reported it to the school. But this guy strikes me as just a typical xoxo-asshole who gets his jollies solely out of stirring shit up. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960220) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 7:53 AM Author: Vermilion location skinny woman "I'd fully understand if some outsider stumbled upon the thread, found it frightening and reported it to the school. But this guy strikes me as just a typical xoxo-asshole who gets his jollies solely out of stirring shit up."
Worth repeating. |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:14 PM Author: razzle orchestra pit because he wanted to a cool guy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960221) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:16 PM Author: Spectacular Temple Idea He Suggested he saw the real heroes on cnn and started drooling over the possibilities. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960247) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:23 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Check the edit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960305) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:25 PM Author: Multi-colored bespoke forum Check the edit of what? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960331) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:26 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre The OP. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960341) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:29 PM Author: Multi-colored bespoke forum Okay, here's a sincere question. How long have you been on this board? Did you recognize Trustafarian's moniker? Did you really think that he could be a real threat?
Quite frankly, it's hard to accept the sincerity of a poster with the moniker "How many WGs could a WGWAG WG if a WGWAG could..." |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:32 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre A few months. And no, I didn't recognize the moniker.
I still googled for his past posts before calling. I didn't find anything to lead me to believe he was a full-time joker that would be capable of such extraordinary flame. Even if I had, I'm still not sure I could have assumed with good conscience that it was flame, given the especially acidic nature of the threat. |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:34 PM Author: razzle orchestra pit extraordinary flame? get over yourself n00b. acidic nature?
it was a clear joke and I make it clear to you on the threat thread. |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:46 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre The creators of this site, the majority of posters, the administration and student body of a Tier 1 law school, and the FBI all disagree with you. Give it a fucking rest. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960483) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:48 PM Author: razzle orchestra pit majority of posters my ass.
|
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:49 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Oh ok, strike that one from the list then. You're the one in the right now. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960502) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:11 AM Author: Slate bateful crotch make a poll thread.
|
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:51 PM Author: Spectacular Temple Idea He Suggested sorry buddy. your intentions may have seemed somewhat noble if you had just quietly called the cops after seeing it, rather than copy and pasting, fanning the flames, and generally being an attention-whoring douchebag up until and including now. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960518) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 2:25 AM Author: awkward depressive ouch, that must cut straight to the bone (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7961513) |
|
Date: April 27th, 2007 7:08 PM Author: electric honey-headed box office ceo The student body of Boalt? I have heard the exact opposite but have no first hand knowledge. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#8019355) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:32 PM Author: razzle orchestra pit and honestly reposting posts has no credibility since you can change them at will.
|
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:00 AM Author: Slate bateful crotch How do you think those girls feel right now? How do you think they should feel? |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:28 PM Author: Adulterous Transparent Pit Degenerate Subject: Thank you As a Hastings student, I wanted to say thanks for alerting our school today. Although this may have turned out to be a sick joke... On the off chance that this guy was serious, it's nice to know that there are people out there who will take action during times like this. I have a hard time believing that if someone had made a threat like this at one of your schools, that you would have thought it was humorous. We, like all of you, are in the process of studying for finals that start in 2 weeks.. it's a shame that someone's sick sense of humor had to increase everyone's anxiety in what is already a very stressful time. Again, thanks for looking out.. I hope all of you who thought this was just a "joke" will do the same when things like this happen in the future. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960363) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:34 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre No problem. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960424) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 2:33 AM Author: awkward depressive i think it's retarded to believe that anything posted on xoxo would be serious. =(
Even if the situation warranted caution, i bet this guy didn't go to the cops saying, "there's a guy that posted a semi-threat on a messageboard but the messageboard is full of bad-taste humor, so please make the call that you think should be made"
he probably just went straight for the kill: "THERE'S A GUY CLAIMING TO SHOOT HASTINGS IF IT RAINS TOMORROW"
!!!!!!
=( |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:18 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre =******( (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962509) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:21 PM Author: Learning disabled aquamarine lodge HILITER (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962946) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:32 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre CHO SEUNG-HUI (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7963000) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2007 7:58 AM Author: Yellow office Subject: * don't feed the trolls * seems pretty obvious that "How many WGs could a WGWAG WG if a WGWAG could..." is a troll:
1. look at the moniker: unless I'm mistaken, it's directly responsive to Trustarian's edit and clearly indicates the intent of the author in reposting the original message ~ in other words, it sounds a bit flippant for someone who really took the original post seriously...
2. even if one were legitimately concerned about the original post, reposting the message didn't make anyone safer and was completely unnecessary: s/he could have just forwarded the message to the appropriate authorities and left the thread alone
as it is, WCWAG's getting a lot of attention on this thread... and apparently spending a lot of time and having a lot of fun responding to these posts...
trolls live for attention ~ don't feed the trolls... |
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:00 PM Author: fiercely-loyal hissy fit you had a boner when you called the cops, didn't you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960129) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 9:38 AM Author: sadistic ticket booth 180. And probably fucking true. Seriously, this was obviously fucking flame. But the whole, hey, better safe than sorry schtick would cover your worthless act and you could do something that actually fucks someone's life under the cover of the VT tragedy.
Your attention whoring confirms it. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 10:43 AM Author: Fishy kitchen credited (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962346) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 10:53 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Attention whoring? I'm just fending off unfounded, inflammatory criticisms like yours. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962398) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 10:58 AM Author: Useless native Attention whoring?
Copied and pasted the edited OP? Check
Take full credit on the anonymous message board for the 'heroic' deed? Check
Create an entirely new thread under the guise to 'defend against unwarranted criticism' for his toolish behavior? Check
Yeah, seems like a pretty open-and-shut case to me. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:05 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Oh, is that checklist taken from the manual of the Official XOXO Anti-Attention Whoring Committee? I guess I never got my copy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962443) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:06 AM Author: Useless native This was an unbelievably lame attempt to deny the obvious. Try again. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962446) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:10 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre "Try Again."
I'll consult the manual of the Official XOXO Pro-Attention Whoring Committee for any recommended strategies for defending attention whoredom and will do so. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:10 AM Author: sadistic ticket booth Notice I didn't post until you created your attention whoring little thread. There would not have been a post to fend off if you hadn't, at least from me. If you really think you did the right thing you wouldn't care about criticisms in different individual threads, and you wouldn't take credit for reporting the flame.
Knowing there are people like you on this board has the most chilling effect on speech. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:14 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre "Knowing there are people like you on this board has the most chilling effect on speech."
Oh, darn. Perhaps some charitiable organization can find you and others like you who have had your ability to utter threatening speech "chilled" some spare coats. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:53 AM Author: sadistic ticket booth The whole point is that it was supposed to be a joke. While his post wasn't hilarious it sure was funnier than your lame attempts, such as saying we should have coats.
Moreover, that "charitable organization" was this board. Everyone realized that in addition to information about law school, this was a board that was not moderated, so you could post edgy shit. Some of the shit falls on its face but other stuff is funny. That's why people post here.
Well, I guess some people post here to attention-whore, but that's another matter. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:08 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre The whole point is that intent isn't the overriding consideration in this type of speech.
Moreover, free speech isn't absolute. If you perceived XOXO as a protected microcosm, you were not only wrong but completely ignorant of the law, thus demonstrating that you shouldn't even be posting here in the first place.
I'll be looking for your retirement thread to be up by the end of the day. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:45 PM Author: sadistic ticket booth You're an idiot.
I was not talking about whether you had a RIGHT to report him or whether OP had a RIGHT, according to law, to say what he said. So this is not a law question douche. I was making an analogy, obviously.
First of all, OP probably did have a RIGHT, in the sense that he probably didn't violate any laws and won't be arrested. Did you do the right thing? Probably not, in the sense that you did it for the purpose of attention whoring. And the fact that there are people who will cause a ruckus and invite the FBI upon jokers out there BECAUSE they want to attention whore will chill the speech on this board. Because if it was just limited to reporting credible threats then speech wouldnt be chilled as much as when you are worried that people will report you to attention-whore. This is not a LAW argument, this is an argument about how to best interact in a messageboard environment. STFU please. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 2:05 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre 1. I was not overly cautious. My response was the only correct one. I was not going to gamble the public safety by "assuming flame" like someone such as your stupid ass, who would rather glorify the context of XOXO than err on the side of the lives of Hastings students.
2. Even if I was attention whoring after the fact, this doesn't disprove that I originally perceived a threat. Your reasoning here is simply fallacious. Did you get better than 10% on the arguments section of the LSAT? I'd be shocked.
3. Throwing out a generic term like "chilling effects" doesn't necessarily demonstrate you "know your free speech law". If you knew the law, you would respect my decision, regardless of any "attention-whoring" I may or may not be guilty of.
4. The motherfucker yelled "fire." You're the kind of overly-trusting son of a bitch who wouldn't budge in the movie theatre.
5. WGWAG, you fucking cunt! |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 2:10 PM Author: sadistic ticket booth Sorry to insult a LEGEND. JEEEESE, I didn't know who I was talking to.
2. Even if you were attention whoring it doesn't disprove that you perceived a threat. No, the two could go together, it just makes it suspicious. If you weren't attention whoring, would you have reported it? Possibly. But your attention whoring muddles this fact. Did A cause him to report, or B? We can't know, all we know is that attention whoring was certainly a factor. And when attention whoring becomes a factor, it becomes more likely that people will report stupid jokes.
Again, maybe your overly cautious self would have reported it anyway. But, it is suspicious.
STFU LEGEND. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 2:19 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre I love it when idiot trolls backtrack when they face superior argumentation. First you said attention whoring "PROVES" I didn't perceive a threat. Now you say it "doesn't disprove." Now you're just "suspicious."
Oh noes~! Suspicion!
PS: If you want to call me a legend, that's your perogative. But I don't know what you're trying to get at. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 2:30 PM Author: sadistic ticket booth You called yourself a legend before you edited your post. It too clearly showed your attention whoring self, so you edited. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7963702) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:14 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre ??????????????? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964533) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 2:42 PM Author: self-centered candlestick maker electric furnace "chilling effect" is a generic term? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7963774) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:20 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Pretty much anyone with basic knowledge of the history of free speech in the Court knows the term. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964580) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:19 PM Author: doobsian business firm ti,oc,tcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964575) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:02 PM Author: arousing outnumbered dilemma Keep up the good work, aznazn! You're a hero! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960144) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:03 PM Author: Beady-eyed Pale Nursing Home Brethren "It sucks that it actually did end up just being flame"
As opposed to a credible threat, which would be been totally bitchin'
/sarcasm (for the Feds) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:03 PM Author: drunken menage messiness Time for a new moniker! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960149) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:04 PM Author: Deep Sanctuary (I <3 FBI Agents)
lolz |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:04 PM Author: charcoal startled set Subject: *****NOTE I DID NOT WRITE THIS ITS A COPY/PASTE JOB***** Reply
Date: April 18th, 2007 10:58 PM Author: How many WGs could a WGWAG WG if a WGWAG could... Subject: *questions
Yes, I'm the guy who copied and pasted the OP, calling for the guy to be investigated. And yes, I'm actually also the first person to have called the law school about the matter.
The bottom line here is that you shouldn't have any questions for me. At least not ones like this:
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616215&forum_id=2#7956323
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616215&forum_id=2#7959836
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616215&forum_id=2#7959891
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616457&forum_id=2#7959791
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616569&forum_id=2#7959815
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616569&forum_id=2#7959906
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616569&mc=66&forum_id=2#7959874
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616569&mc=66&forum_id=2#7959874
(And these criticisms are just from one person. PS: Get off my nuts, fag.)
The guy's OP, which edited after approximately 10 minutes, indicated that he would consider shooting people at Hastings tomorrow if it wasn't raining. I could not in good conscience gambe with public safety by assuming this was flame.
It sucks that it actually did end up just being flame, and I feel somewhat bad for the guy, but the bottom line is that there was a perceivable threat. And if you don't agree, you can kiss my ass.
HTH
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960109)
|
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:06 PM Author: razzle orchestra pit it was more like 2 minutes.
and then you started 5 threads about it.
hope you are enjoying the attention mr. hero.
douche. |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:08 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre 5 threads? Links?
I started one thread asking others to call the authorities, since I was in class at the time. Since no one responded within a few minutes, I went ahead and called myself, and that was the end of it. No other threads, besides this one.
Get off my nuts you fucking faggot. |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:13 PM Author: Mildly Autistic Institution Love Of Her Life Asians are a very cold people. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960217) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:15 PM Author: Spectacular Temple Idea He Suggested lol you are such a loser. can't wait for you to get outted in the sf chronicle and immortalized on wikipedia. dipshit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960235) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:15 PM Author: razzle orchestra pit And why repost it after he edited it? because you needed evidence for the cops after he had second thoughts about the joke?
No, because you are a goddamn attention seeking troll like the rest of them. |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:38 PM Author: Useless native titcr. It's one thing to take the threat seriously and, in addition, take other precautions to preserve the safety of your classmates.
It's another matter to 'play the hero' and repost the original message. The fact that Trustafarian EDITED THE POST is indication that it was a joke in extremely poor taste, and if the OP of this thread was really interested in saving evidence for the FBI he could have just as easily archived the thread. |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:19 PM Author: burgundy cruel-hearted stead dragon your an idiot and a loser (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960271) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:29 PM Author: Provocative gold parlour (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960366) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:29 PM Author: Contagious cyan pocket flask locale You did the right thing. Actions have consequences. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960370) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:48 PM Author: burgundy cruel-hearted stead dragon stfu (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960495) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:50 PM Author: Contagious cyan pocket flask locale Are you dumb enough to have posted that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960508) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 10:45 AM Author: Fishy kitchen Are you dumb enough to have posted that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962359) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 10:53 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Are you dumb enough to have posted that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962392) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:52 PM Author: motley becky anyone who thinks that these threats should have been laughed off and ignored is retarded. What kind of crazy asshole posts things like this 36 hours after the most vicious school shooting in US history?
I mean it looks like it's turning out that it was just flame or whatever, but still, the onus rests on the guy who originally posted the threat. How can you all be so self righteous about it all? It's demented.
|
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:54 PM Author: Spectacular Temple Idea He Suggested "anyone who thinks that these threats should have been laughed off and ignored is retarded."
so it's retarded to be correct?
"What kind of crazy asshole posts things like this 36 hours after the most vicious school shooting in US history?"
apparently someone who wasn't that crazy. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:00 AM Author: motley becky "so it's retarded to be correct?"
HA. Is the man who gambles all his money on a roulette table and wins not still guilty of making a really dumb decision? You make choices based on the information you have available.
"apparently someone who wasn't that crazy." obviously he was, as he posted fucking murderous intentions on a message message board that's widely read by the demographic he was threatening. This is absolutely stupid no matter what way you look at it.
Now, that said, I don't know either poster, so as far as I know Trustafarian or whatever is a great guy who just made a really stupid choice. People do that all the time. But don't demonize the OP for making the best call with the info he had.
|
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:04 AM Author: razzle orchestra pit the point is he is not being honest in this thread. he is a trouble making troll who wanted to teach trustafarian a lesson and it got out of hand.
if you read the "threat" its not really a threat in any meaningful way. In fact, its written carefully so that it avoids making a direct threat - which a good flame artist knows. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:07 AM Author: motley becky "the point is he is not being honest in this thread. he is a trouble making troll who wanted to teach trustafarian a lesson and it got out of hand. "
well you'll have to forgive me, because unlike you I cannot apparently see straight into the hearts of men.
I suggest you consider forgiving OP the same shortcoming. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:10 AM Author: Spectacular Temple Idea He Suggested i dunno, it seems pretty fucking likely that if a mass murderer WAS going to go on a serial rampage, he wouldn't alert the feds ahead of time. maybe that's just me though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960637) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:14 AM Author: motley becky He didn't alert the Feds, he posted something on xoxo.
People do things like that all the time. That's why threats are taken seriously.
regardless, it was hastings' call to make. OP didn't call the FBI or whatever, i don't think. but even if he did, it's then the FBI's prerogative to assess the threat and act. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:17 AM Author: Spectacular Temple Idea He Suggested "People do things like that all the time. That's why threats are taken seriously."
link? |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:42 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre The V-Tech shooter did. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960812) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:45 AM Author: Spectacular Temple Idea He Suggested lol!!! comparing a guy posting on an internet board FULL OF FLAME that he's NOT GOING TO KILL ANYONE to a murderer sending a videotape of himself to NBC in the MIDDLE OF A KILLING SPREE! LOL you're really desperate to look good here! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960831) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:50 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre He posted a death threat on a V-Tech related message board as well. The comparison works. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960864) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:01 AM Author: Spectacular Temple Idea He Suggested http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/04/chos_last_inter.html
PWN3D YOU STUPID FUCK |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:38 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Hindsight is 20/20. At the time of the OP, I was under the impression that the V-Tech shooter had demonstrated similar behavior.
(Note: This isn't to say that I would change the way I responded.) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:47 AM Author: Dull seedy newt doctorate Date: April 19th, 2007 12:42 AM Author: How many WGs could a WGWAG WG if a WGWAG could...
The V-Tech shooter did.
omfg this is the absolute worst post ever on xoxo |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:59 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre If by "this" post you mean your own, then you are correct. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960918) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:13 AM Author: Useless native What kind of "I know you are but what am I" retort is this?
Your post (and the reasoning it contained) was atrocious. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:22 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Atrocious? Explain. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7961114) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:05 AM Author: Spectacular Temple Idea He Suggested that analogy was so shittastic i didn't bother reading the rest of your tripe. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960610) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:23 AM Author: motley becky it illustrates the point that just because unknown variables didn't turn out the way you feared doesn't mean the decision was a bad one.
It's like saying I shouldn't have worn a seatbealt the last time I was in a car because I didn't get into an accident. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:30 AM Author: Spectacular Temple Idea He Suggested except there are negative repercussions from acknowledging a fake threat, e.g. loss of $$$ and resources, increased likelihood of other dumbasses making fake threats to get school cancelled, and the loss of brain cells from all this stupid coverage this crap is going to get. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960740) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:37 AM Author: Coral meetinghouse it also fails to acknowledge that a simple, "hey this is a serious matter, you should edit that out, say you were kidding and ask GTO to delete this or else boalt and the FBI might be up your ass and you might get fined an enormous amount and sent to jail and you might get expelled and never be able to pass C&F" might have been the proper course of action to take before calling hastings. not a single word of warning about the dangerous ground on which he was treading. not a single post encouraging the poster to take back what he said. nope... instant red alert.
|
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:44 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre You can't just "take back" a death threat.
The adult world isn't a playground. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:52 AM Author: Sick pervert titmfcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960875) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:06 AM Author: Multi-colored bespoke forum You know, it's posts like this that suggest that your motive was not safety, but to punish a poster who you thought had crossed a line and said something in bad taste. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960967) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:13 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre This post is partly meant to elucidate why I stood firm in initiating an investigation of the poster despite his "wgwag" edit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7961024) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 2:07 AM Author: Multi-colored bespoke forum So in other words, you are admitting
(a) You knew that it was a flame when you started the investigation, and (b) You started an investigation because you thought the OP had crossed the line. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 10:43 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre How on earth do you decypher that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962345) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:50 PM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort Did someone appoint WGWAG director of the FBI when I wasn't looking? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7963129) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:55 PM Author: Contagious cyan pocket flask locale I agree. There were some threads in horrible taste regarding VTECH, but none went as far as to warrant an alert. Naming 'hastings' is what did him in, especially considering the number of incidents today around the country. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960538) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:55 PM Author: Canary base cuck credited. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960541) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:56 PM Author: razzle orchestra pit um there were jokes about the killings and about launching a genocide against asians while it was still going on. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960549) |
|
Date: April 18th, 2007 11:57 PM Author: Contagious cyan pocket flask locale Nobody named locations or people, dumbass. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960552) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:01 AM Author: razzle orchestra pit how about "Jill looks like she wants to be raped." - or whatever the threads about her say.
the point is you can justify the douche's actions if you want, but it was obviously a joke - especially when the OP thought over it and edited 2 minutes later. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:11 AM Author: motley becky ok, again with the non sequitar. Just because someone should have alerted Jill to the fact that she's receiving threats or whatever on this board does not mean someone should NOT have alerted Hastings about this one.
Truth be told, Jill probably knows all about these threats as, if i'm not mistaken, she blogs about them all the time. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:17 AM Author: Useless native Lol, doesn't your last comment pretty much admit that the 'threats' shouldn't be taken seriously in the first place? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960675) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:27 AM Author: motley becky no. This is saying that alerting Jill to the threat would be pointless, as she's already aware. If SHE wants to call the police, I wouldn't blame her. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960726) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:28 AM Author: Useless native Can you more obviously miss the point? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960732) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 9:50 AM Author: motley becky you are saying that because the threats about jill are widely taken as joking, so should the threat about hastings.
This is a logical fallacy. Please grow a few braincells. Your future clients will appreciate it.
|
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:04 AM Author: motley becky http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur_%28absurdism%29 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960608) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:06 AM Author: razzle orchestra pit you ask what kind of person makes jokes 36 hours later - everyone. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960616) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:04 AM Author: Odious jet nibblets den I think the guy who originally posted the thread acted as he should have, editing and making it obvious that he was not serious. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960604) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:06 AM Author: Coral meetinghouse if there was legitimate concern, why didnt someone say, "DUDE, YOU WILL GET INTO BIG TROUBLE FOR SAYING THAT...." and explain the situation to the poster? at that point, he could have explained it was a joke, contacted GTO to request it be taken down, etc. etc. etc.
instead, some attn whore wants to be a "hero", wastes hastings and the FBI's time and is going to cause that dude a SHITLOAD of aggravation. if said attn whore had said "you really should not be joking about this stuff... people will take it seriously" and engaged in a dialogue with the guy (and cross check with a google search of his posting history) to ensure it was flame, then all of that could be avoided. if the poster did NOT respond to the attn. whore's entreaties, at that point it certainly would have been warranted for the attn. whore to contact someone. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:13 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre you= Seung-hui Cho's Prestigious Aimbot
Stop fucking trolling. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:18 AM Author: razzle orchestra pit keep talking out of your ass, n00b. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960686) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:30 AM Author: motley becky again, demented. The point was not that the thread was up (as you seem to suggest by saying the thread cold be taken down) the point was that the threat was made. Also, as pointed out elsewhere, a google search revealed this guy was in the same city as hastings. Just more cause to take the threat seriously.
|
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:16 AM Author: Slate bateful crotch Your initial reaction was justifiable. Thinking you need to make a thread like this to explain yourself to xoxo makes you seem sorta pathetic. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:16 AM Author: Coral meetinghouse you = self-important douchebag
|
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:25 AM Author: Slate bateful crotch let me make a new thread explaining myself, friend (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960714) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:33 AM Author: Coral meetinghouse that was meant to be a response to the OP. this shit board misplaced it, as usual. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960756) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:30 AM Author: Sick pervert Reporting this to the authorities was the 100% correct thing to do. If you're actually a law student, IMO, it was the only ethical thing you could've done anyway and shame on anyone who thinks that it should be blown over. The threat was downright creepy, and following Monday, I don't think anyone who professes to want to be an officer of the court should take such things lightly. HTFH. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960743) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:34 AM Author: Useless native 85% of the douchiest posts on xoxo have the phrase 'officer of the court' in them.
It's not the alerting the police that's bothersome - it's the blatant attention-whoring attitude of the self-proclaimed hero. The false bravado, the strutting smugness... it all points the fact that the OP of this thread realizes that the 'threat' was a joke and just wants to take credit for what happened. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:35 AM Author: Contagious cyan pocket flask locale What if the OP is flaming? What if he is taking credit for reporting it even though he didn't? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960774) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:37 AM Author: Sick pervert I don't want to get into the reporter's behavior after reporting it. I don't care about that, whatever. I am merely saying he did the right thing.
As far as the 'officer of the court' part - deal with it. There's some times when you have to be serious, and I think this is one of them. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:38 AM Author: Spectacular Temple Idea He Suggested oh you don't care about it? well good thing you showed up and clarified that. thread over now since don imus says he doesn't care! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960792) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:49 AM Author: Sick pervert Don Imus doesn't care about black people, okay?
But anyway, I don't care about whether he's gloating about turning the dude in. All I care about is whether he was morally justified in turning him in, and I was simply responded to what seemed like a reaction against that. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:40 AM Author: Useless native Thank heavens you've explained to us that you don't care about the OPs behavior - I'm glad I can finally rest easy tonight. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960801) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:39 AM Author: glassy vivacious dingle berry hairy legs wgwag (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960793) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:43 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre 1. I never proclaimed that I was brave or a hero. 2. What you perceive to be smugness, I would argue is defensiveness in response to hateful criticism (see: links in OP). |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 2:03 AM Author: french range factory reset button "85% of the douchiest posts on xoxo have the phrase 'officer of the court' in them."
exactly right. and the OP's inflated self-importance -- talking about being "unable to gamble with public safety" breaks new douchebaggery ground. In concert with GTO seixing every opportunity to be an advocate for the "responsibility" attendant to free speech and presenting obvious examples of unprotected speech as if they are trenchant first amendment analysis makes this a fairly puke-inducing thread. when people start talking about their "duty" it's generally going to go badly. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 2:06 AM Author: french range factory reset button "85% of the douchiest posts on xoxo have the phrase 'officer of the court' in them."
exactly right. and the OP's inflated self-importance -- talking about being "unable to gamble with public safety" breaks new douchebaggery ground. In concert with GTO seixing every opportunity to be an advocate for the "responsibility" attendant to free speech and presenting obvious examples of unprotected speech as if they are trenchant first amendment analysis makes this a fairly puke-inducing thread. when people start talking about their "duty" it's generally going to go badly. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:34 AM Author: Contagious cyan pocket flask locale Was the dude who reported it a Hastings student? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960767) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:51 AM Author: pearl well-lubricated parlor roommate Guy who reported this is a huge fag. It was obviously a flame thread, he just wanted to ruin someones life. Miserable piece of shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960872) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:53 AM Author: Sick pervert You willing to take that chance? Do you realize that Cho posted on some forum that he was going to "kill some people at VT today?" Obviously it was a flame thread. Obviously. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960886) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:58 AM Author: Spectacular Temple Idea He Suggested http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/04/chos_last_inter.html (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960908) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:02 AM Author: Sick pervert "I'm a loner."
Wow. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:02 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Well, that certainly puts everything into perspective.
Oh wait, no it doesn't. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:09 AM Author: aromatic maize market bbw This thread takes it to the next level. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7960997) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 9:42 AM Author: cerebral crackhouse friendly grandma As the founder of the next level, I'm about to pull the plug. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962161) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:30 AM Author: rough-skinned school good for you.
How do you know that other people reported it? Did the school tell you? |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:55 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre No, but scared1L said he contacted campus security in this thread:
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616224&mc=7&forum_id=2#7956409 |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:51 AM Author: Sick pervert http://thisplayisgaylol.ytmnsfw.com/
Richard McBeef gets its first airplay. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 2:47 AM Author: Ebony Laughsome Address How is that any different from what is posted here every other day of the week?
|
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 10:44 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Links? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962350) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 7:55 AM Author: floppy site fat ankles You = Brian Lieter (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962021) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 9:30 AM Author: Grizzly Kink-friendly Fanboi Boltzmann LOL, why do you imbeciles give a fuck about this dipshit at BoalTTT? Someone was going to call that in based on the tread title alone, and this guy is likely the dumbest fucker alive to post what he did. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962120) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 9:36 AM Author: Marvelous iridescent dog poop tanning salon Someone summarize this drama for me. tyia (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962146) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 10:49 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre -Guy posts ominious threat, which I read in its entirity. -Guy edits his original post, I preserve it with a copy and paste. -The authorities are notified. -I catch a lot of shit for being alarmist. -I address their criticisms in this thread. -I catch a lot of shit for being an alarmist and for being "smug" about it. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 10:20 AM Author: comical stag film I just wanted to pop in and put my vote in for the OP. I read this board regularly for laughs in class, but the OT was way over the line and fucking stupid. Let 'em burn.
Your idea of "obvious flame" is not the same as other people's. Even if there was only a 1/10000 chance it wasn't flame, it was worth the call. The OTer deserves to get investigated in light of the heightened scrutiny since Monday.
In Summary: TOO FUCKING SOON, DOUCHEBAG. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 10:45 AM Author: razzle orchestra pit Too soon? back to lurking with you n00b. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962360) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 10:52 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Your retarded troll opinion has been expressed 80,000 times.
Please return to obscurity now, thx. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:03 AM Author: razzle orchestra pit "Please return to obscurity now, thx."
This is why you dont understand how the board works, n00b.
Amyway I have had enough of this, but I wonder if you are also going to testify against the joker if anything comes of it, since you are the only one who has obvious personal knowledge of the "threat" and since you alerted Hastings or the authorities or whoever. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:08 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Oh, is that what you wonder? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962451) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:10 AM Author: razzle orchestra pit yes I do. Since some people seem to think real charges will come of it. You and I are the basically the only people who saw the original post before it was edited. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962464) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:22 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Date: April 19th, 2007 11:10 AM Author: Seung-hui Cho's Prestigious Aimbot (earl)
yes I do. Since some people seem to think real charges will come of it. You and I are the basically the only people who saw the original post before it was edited.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962464)
You saw the original post before it was edited? And you dispute the accuracy of my copy and paste? |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:41 AM Author: razzle orchestra pit I dont dispute the accuracy. I say that it is meaningless to a third party observer because its so easy to change to whatever you want. Which is why reposting is pointless. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962660) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:59 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Date: April 19th, 2007 11:41 AM Author: Seung-hui Cho\'s Prestigious Aimbot(earl)
I dont dispute the accuracy. I say that it is meaningless to a third party observer because its so easy to change to whatever you want. Which is why reposting is pointless.
(http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=#)
OMG NOW YOU WILL GET SUBPEONAED TOO!!!!11 |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:03 PM Author: razzle orchestra pit this would almost be funny except for your comment at the end. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962827) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:09 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Yeah, must suck to know that you're just as eligible as me to be subpeonaed, huh?
Look at it this way: you might get a free trip to California! |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:38 PM Author: razzle orchestra pit jesus christ it was almost funny because in context it was an ironic post about your idiotic reposting.
I never said I saw anything or even remember anything. I am just not disputing the content of your repost. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:40 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre "You and I are the basically the only people who saw the original post before it was edited."
SELF-PWND |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:42 PM Author: razzle orchestra pit whoops I guess I did. you are still missing the point. anyway once you get over yourself, hopefully you'll go back to being a mediocre poster about your poor undergrad problems. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7963072) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:15 AM Author: wonderful maroon hospital blah blah blah
it would have been easy to figure out if it was a joke by talking to the guy
This is the internet. Grow up a little. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:00 PM Author: comical stag film The OT needs to grow up a little, not me. Actions have consequences. You don't joke about having a bomb in the airport anymore, do you? I admit this situation isn't quite as obvious, because this board is known for flames, but its still the same sort of common sense line.
To me, the threshold is pretty clearly: IF THE FBI WERE TO FIND OUT WHO I AM, WOULD THE COMMENT I JUST MADE GET ME INTO A LOT OF TROUBLE? If the answer is yes, DON'T MAKE THAT COMMENT.
All the nigger and fag jokes in the world don't amount to threatening to kill 32 people in a similar fashion as just happened a couple days ago. Tough shit, deal with the consequences, moron. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 10:58 AM Author: twinkling submissive garrison Did you alert the police/fbi or the school? It seems like if the police/fbi were alerted first, they could have sorted out the credibility of the threat without contacting the school and causing Hastings to shut down. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962418) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:05 AM Author: cracking aqua area I hope you enjoyed the attention-whoring, OP. You've shut down a school & fucked with someone's life by pretending to be scurrrred. You're a douche-and-a-half. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962445) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:26 AM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre "You've shut down a school & fucked with someone's life"
Yep. It's all my fucking fault.
The guilt is so utterly oppressing, let me tell you. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:15 PM Author: cracking aqua area I don't expect you to feel bad. You're too busy soaking up the attention. Not only do you rat someone out, but you start a thread b/c you want all of the acknowledgement, good & bad. You were eager to get to argue w/ people in this thread & proclaim your pious nature. You're as much of an attention-whore as Cho. Maybe you can make a video & mail it to NBC explaining your desire to save world by reporting people on message boards to the FBI. The guy you reported was clearly just making a distasteful joke, but you had to take it to the next level b/c of your own need for attention. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962911) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:22 PM Author: self-centered candlestick maker electric furnace ty
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=616879&mc=7&forum_id=2 |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:25 AM Author: carnelian hell I love how all you brilliant people that don't go to Hastings sit and condemn this guy for reporting this. So brave and courageous. It makes perfect sense to stick up for the idiot that thought it was funny to joke about shooting up a law school two days after a fucking school shooting. I'm so positive that all of you would be perfectly willing to just assume that post was flame if it named your school. None of you would have hesitated to go to school today, care free. Fucking idiots. A guy got shot right behind Hastings on Friday. The Dean sent out a security alert earlier yesterday morning. About an hour after that, this fucking idiot posts his thread. Geez, why would that worry anyone, I mean it's obvious flame. Grow the fuck up. Get over your self importance. Your actions have consequence (even on XO). HTFH. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962556) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:42 AM Author: razzle orchestra pit pussy.
that guy who got shot was a drug dealing 16 year old. Thats what you get for rolling in the 'loin. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:51 AM Author: carnelian hell I never said the dude who got shot was a Hastings student. The point is it happened 50 feet from one of the school entrances, dick. The point is that people are already edgy, especially at Hastings. It was an incredibly stupid thing to post, and only an idiot that would think that your moniker is funny would bash this OP for re-posting the thread and notifying the school. Fucking douche. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962728) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:59 AM Author: razzle orchestra pit Again you've come to the wrong place apparently. And my brother is at Hastings and thinks the whole thing is hilarious. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962782) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:04 PM Author: carnelian hell I bet he does. Douchery is genetic. A lot of the sociopathic behavior on this board is funny. Some isn't. Maybe if someone posted/joked about shooting up your school, you would learn that. Btw, I don't go to Hastings, thankfully. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962833) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 11:59 AM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort What the fuck is wrong with you people who are ragging on the guy who reported this? You call yourselves students of law? Did it occur to you to perhaps... oh I don't know... consult the LAW? You know, those rule thingies that our collective society has decided in a somewhat organized fashion will guide us in deciding what is right and what is wrong?
You may be shocked to learn that the question of whether a dumb motherfucker with too much time on his hands has a right to yell "Fire!" in a crowded theatre has actually been asked before in our country. We've thought about it. We've argued about it. And we've decided he does not.
As far as I know, no one's been arrested and no one's going to do time in the federal pen. The FBI has the right to react to such a situation by finding out who wrote the post and investigating him before probably concluding that it was, indeed, a stupid joke. My instinct is that he will not be charged with anything. If you don't want people to ask questions, don't say stupid things. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:30 PM Author: Slate bateful crotch Well, if the dumb motherfucker yells 'fire' and you are sitting right next to him, know there is no fire, could find out if he was serious by asking him or looking it up online, and really don't believe him, then are you a douchebag for running to the authorities and reporting him for doing something 'illegal', even though you knew or should have known that he was harmless? While I understand what the OP did and don't really fault him, the people who do have a problem with him have plenty of valid criticisms. Everyone should know that law without discretion (as you seem to be arguing) results in more far more problems than it prevents. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:42 PM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort Yeah I have seen a lot of criticism of the OP. Not one is valid. A post doesn't have to be "illegal" in order to cause a reasonable thinking person to report it to authorities, and frankly I don't think there was anything illegal about it. That doesn't mean it should pass without someone knocking on the author's door and asking him what the hell he's doing.
The critics forget that there were many levels of scrutiny before any of this even became news. When the poster called authorities they could have looked at the situation and just laughed it off. They didn't. When Hastings learned of the situation they too could have ignored it. They didn't. What I'm suggesting to you is that a lot of people with more experience and knowledge than you quite obviously DISAGREE with your judgment about this. A smart person would be humbled by that fact.
If no law was broken, no one will be arrested. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:09 PM Author: Underhanded Casino Sound Barrier To be fair, you go to Hastings. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962877) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:15 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre No. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962904) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:29 PM Author: Underhanded Casino Sound Barrier Yes, you do. Your idiocy and concern illustrate as much. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7962988) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 12:34 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Oh, is my type of "idiocy" and "concern" displayed only by those who have been schooled on the Hastings campus?
Hastings must have a far larger alumni network than I thought. When did you graduate? |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 1:01 PM Author: Wine pungent sneaky criminal To sum up this thread: The many who play quasi-sociopaths on this board are angry with someone who threatens their existence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7963209) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 3:06 PM Author: sadistic ticket booth Also, the people who enjoy the fiction writing are angry with someone who threatens the existence of good fiction in order to attention-whore. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7963915) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 3:36 PM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort Methinks all these angry people should try picking up a real book once in a while if this is their definition of "good" fiction. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964057) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 4:12 PM Author: Chest-beating twinkling uncleanness bottom line: the OP is the one who yelled "FIRE." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964223) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 4:55 PM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort Um, not really. If anything he yelled "Fire!" in response to someone else first yelling "Fire!" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964451) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:19 PM Author: Chest-beating twinkling uncleanness um, not really. if anything he yelled "FIRE!" in response to somebody saying "fire" in a sing-songy voice and immediately saying "just kidding" afterwards. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964576) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:25 PM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort what i dont get is how much energy you fuckers are putting into disagreeing with FBI agents and law school administrators. do you really think you know better than they do?
if you were RIGHT, they wouldnt have REACTED. get over it and move on. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:27 PM Author: Chest-beating twinkling uncleanness what i don't get is why you can't read well. 100+ posts in this thread calling the OP a dumbass, nobody saying shit about the FBI or hastings. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964635) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 4:20 PM Author: sadistic ticket booth Many people come here to read the shit people come up with. Most, in fact. Most do NOT come here for law school advice.
A messageboard is a different medium than a book. There is interaction here, both between people who get the joke, and feed into it, and those who do not, and react to it. A book is not interactive in this way. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:11 PM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort A messageboard is also a public forum that any person can freely read. Anyone who posts here should know that 100% of people are not going to interpret a post the precise way you want them to. There's a difference between yelling Fire! in a car full of my college buddies during a night out, and yelling Fire! in a crowded theatre. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964520) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:16 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Oh snap. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964549) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:22 PM Author: sadistic ticket booth Quite right. Obviously people will interpret it differently, that's part of the fun I was alluding to earlier. And could it be expected that someone might take it seriously and report it. Certainly it could. I just don't like that it was partially reported for attention-whoring. This threatens how much good fiction will be on the board because in addition to worrying about the sensibilities of others (whether they may take a joke seriously) which is something posters should legitimately worry about and consider, LEGEND WGWAG made it clear that posters also have to worry about attention whores. This broadens the attack on good fiction to a degree that I don't like. But yeah, I guess it should have been expected. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964593) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:38 PM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort it should have been expected, it would have been expected at all times in the past, and it will always be expected in the future.
im not buying into the chilling effect sob story. it is not that hard to use common fucking sense when you're freely posting jokes and "good fiction" on a message board. if you issue threats to hurt people, there is a risk that law enforcement will want to knock on your door to make sure that you're not joking around. always been true, always will be true. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:22 PM Author: doobsian business firm op's reaction to the Hastings thread may have been reasonable (though I think it wasn't). op's starting this thread was pure, 100%, uncut attention whoring. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964596) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:30 PM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort op's starting this thread may have been attention whoring (though I think it wasnt). but (a) what's wrong with attention whoring? and (b) I still dont get why you're so mad at him when the FBI agreed with him. are you smarter than the FBI? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964658) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:37 PM Author: doobsian business firm (a) i'm not going to explain this. if you don't understand what's wrong with it now you never will. (b) this is a non sequitur.
i'm not "mad" at him. i think his reaction was unjustified, given what he knows about this ridiculous, awful place. i think posting this thread was toolish attention whoring and makes me skeptical of the truth of his justifications for his initial response.
above all, what trustafarian did showed an incredible lack of judgment. the response of the authorities was completely predictable and probably necessary under the circumstances. cf. what happens if you joke about bombs at an airport. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:24 PM Author: Titillating house ENOUGH WITH THE SHITTY FIRE ANALOGY (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964606) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:24 PM Author: Chest-beating twinkling uncleanness you're absolutely correct, and the sane innocent bystander in your scenario would not have a WGWAG moniker, would not be an attention whore, and would not have known that the thread was a joke, as the OP so clearly did. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964608) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:27 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Except I didn't know it was a joke. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964633) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:30 PM Author: Chest-beating twinkling uncleanness yes you did asshole. i watched the thread as it was posted and he edited mere minutes later to wgwag. after that you went on your little "woe is me i mustn't let this happen" diatribe with an admonishing "you never should have posted that anyway" tone. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964660) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:32 PM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort i think its really funny that you guys are so mad. do you seriously disagree that posting such a message on a public form is a really stupid idea? where did you learn that you could possibly get away with such antics? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964679) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:37 PM Author: Chest-beating twinkling uncleanness who's mad? i'm only interested in portraying the truth. just because i disagree with the OP doesn't mean i condone the original thread either. i think it's funny that you assume that someone who has the instinct to immediately copy+paste and leave it up in spite of the threat effectively being clarified as a joke only minutes later is such a heroic individual. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964702) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:39 PM Author: doobsian business firm i agree with all your points completely, but i think the authorities would have shut the school down based only on the thread's title anyway. (assuming someone brought it to their attention.) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964719) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:43 PM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort well, as i see it, the guy reported the post and immediately preserved it. the calls of him being a douchebag came pretty quickly after that, so he got defensive about it and posted a thread as a way to tell his detractors to fuck off. how do YOU handle people who call you a douchebag? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964740) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:56 PM Author: doobsian business firm ignore them, b/c i'm not 13 years old. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964828) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 6:19 PM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort do you seriously think that anyone who's ever posted in any one of the many threads on this topic appears to be more than 13 years old? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964989) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:58 PM Author: sadistic ticket booth you can tell them to fuck off without saying, fuck off, fuck off, i am a hero, i am a legend, fuck off, he had it coming anyway, fuck off, i WGWAG XOXO legend, and then coming back here again and again. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964848) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:38 PM Author: sadistic ticket booth It boils down to:
people are mad because he is attention whoring now and because now it is reasonable to suspect that he did it in the first place to attentionwhore.
I am mad because in a discussion with me he loudly proclaimed himself a legend and then edited it out. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:45 PM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort you gotta admit that he is a legend, and he will probably make millions by writing a book about all this while the rest of you toil away selling your souls to the biglaw devil. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964749) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:51 PM Author: sadistic ticket booth He's a coward for editing that portion out, even if he is an XOXO legend. Look, I like the board, a lot, but even I don't think that's something to be proud of and proclaim loudly. And, if he does feel the need to assert his LEGENDARY status in order to somehow prove a point to me, he shouldn't edit it out, and then AFTER editing it out, pretend he never said it and act confused about me making fun of him for calling himself a legend.
The fact is, he edited it out because it showcased that his legendary status is important to him, adding fuel to the speculation that he did the whole thing to attention whore. I NEVER had an issue with the reporting of the thread UNTIL i saw that he was attention whoring and suspected that he did it for that purpose.
Also, the XOXO community is important to a few users, but obviously he's not going to be writing any book, or making any money off of it if he does. |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:47 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre You're a fucking liar. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964759) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:54 PM Author: sadistic ticket booth My posts, which are unedited, preserve the truth of my claim. I'm sure others saw douchiness of the posts for the brief time they were up.
How does it feel to be an attention-whoring douche who craves his Legendary status on XOXO? |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 6:03 PM Author: Useless native Except for the fact that it was IN YOUR POST BEFORE YOU EDITED IT, douchebag (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964895) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:49 PM Author: Dashing Property Yes, xoxo is JUST LIKE a crowded theatre! Especially since everyone in the theatre is also in on the joke, including the one that calls the cops! Fantastic analogy! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964776) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 6:08 PM Author: Fuchsia Vigorous Community Account Resort if the fire-yeller was so sure everyone would understand it was a joke, why did he edit it within 10 minutes? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964922) |
|
Date: April 19th, 2007 5:41 PM Author: Dun abode OH YEAH DROPPING FUCKING LOADS ALL OVER YOUR TATTLE TALE (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7964728) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2007 11:19 AM Author: Big-titted toilet seat I am glad that he tattled. All of you haters should go back to playing WoW and stop whining like bitches. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#7975028) |
|
Date: April 21st, 2007 11:45 AM Author: overrated pontificating chapel Trustafarian = Pensive tattle-tale rat snitch = Pensive |
|
Date: April 27th, 2007 5:23 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Bump for notice of name-change. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#8018472) |
|
Date: April 27th, 2007 5:32 PM Author: Histrionic milky codepig rigor From what I have seen of you so far, you are a completely worthless human being. Boalt students may have had cause for concern but as an xo poster, you knew damn well this was flame, reported it to get some attention for yourself, and caused potentially irreparable harm to other people's lives. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#8018536) |
|
Date: April 27th, 2007 5:47 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre 180 for originality (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#8018664) |
|
Date: April 27th, 2007 5:54 PM Author: primrose coldplay fan goal in life Get attention for himself? Neither you nor I nor anyone else has any clue who the hell he is.
And if you don't think joking about shooting up a law school in any forum is inviting autopwnage, then you are too stupid to live.
Trustafarian desrves it. I am certain this helps. |
|
Date: April 27th, 2007 5:55 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre Bump for notice of name change. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#8018745) |
|
Date: April 27th, 2007 7:02 PM Author: Haunting smoky whorehouse What's so hard about all of this?
Did trustafarian make a mistake? We all know the answer is yes.
Did the snitch do the right thing? Yes, IF he legitimately viewed it as a threat. He might have some legitimate vigilante justification if he wanted to be a true hero.
But no, he didn't want to be a true hero. He wanted autoadmit notoriety. That's why we're all labeling him a douchebag. There's other ways of gaining xoxo norotiety/legend status other than fucking someone over. |
|
Date: April 27th, 2007 7:17 PM Author: Razzmatazz spruce theatre "There's other ways of gaining xoxo norotiety/legend status other than fucking someone over."
Which ones are those?
|
|
Date: April 27th, 2007 8:27 PM Author: Haunting smoky whorehouse Needing to ask that question shows exactly why you're a huge douche (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#8019832) |
|
Date: April 27th, 2007 8:40 PM Author: garnet circlehead cruise ship STFU PENSIVE (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=616591&forum_id=2#8019889) |