The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
How did you like my Chi vs NYU FLAME? (Renattta)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:03 PM Author: emerald vibrant persian dragon Subject: HAHAHA FLAME First, results of vote: NYU 39 (44.3%) vs Chicago 49 (55.7%) Take solace Chicago trolls you guys WIN (like winning the special olympics)!!!
From the selection of my moniker (Renattta Deshittta) to the high turn out of both Chicago and NYU trolls - don't know if my flame could've gone better. I certainly got enough of you douchebag trolls riled up. Enjoy your TTTs! I'm off to CAMBRIDGE mofos. :P |
 |
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:59 PM Author: abnormal angry theatre Half the posts in that thread were you, that is really sad. You could have done so much more by making some false report about their clerkship numbers, or faculty moving. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039470) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2007 12:07 AM Author: tantric deep field clown Exactly. Here's how a quality flamer would have done it:
First, take me up on my offer to answer questions; begin with some innocuous ones to get me on the hook. Then ask a question that requires some amount of quantitative analysis ("I get that Chicago grads do lots of clerkships, but isn't most of that done a year or two out of school? Basically no one gets a clerkship straight out.") After I make a spreadsheet, look up the data, carefully analyze the numbers, and post the results, the flame finishing move would have been to grossly misinterpret them in an incompetent but earnest way. I easily could have been lured into spending at least an hour arguing. |
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:21 PM Author: ruby sanctuary affirmative action Care? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039180) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:24 PM Author: emerald vibrant persian dragon You should ask the shitton of ppl posting in those threads. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039203) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:39 PM Author: ruby sanctuary affirmative action You got people to discuss a valid topic, albeit under false pretenses. Other people thinking about the same or similar choices were most likely aided by the lively debate you initiated. Future generations of prospective students will avail themselves of the treasure trove of opinions.
My hat is off to you sir. Always adding value. |
|
Date: May 1st, 2007 12:03 AM Author: emerald vibrant persian dragon tytytyty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039508) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2007 12:47 AM Author: sadistic ticket booth yeah! all those posters telling you to stfu and go away. brilliant, brilliant flame in the mold of other fine flamers like AK47 and superstudyazn. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039873) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:32 PM Author: drab juggernaut pervert cambridge best in BIGROYALTYLAW (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039268) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:35 PM Author: lascivious crystalline spot immigrant Subject: what about... ... the dozen or so posters who said "this must be flame" and then voted for chicago bc they are tired of chicago trolls, falme or not (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039294) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:40 PM Author: emerald vibrant persian dragon The one failure I will admit: I was unable to draw Rowan into the fire. She is without a doubt one of the calmest posters on xo. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039332) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:47 PM Author: tantric deep field clown Basically, in terms of flame, it was a complete failure. A successful flame gets a ton of people involved and engaged and really riled up. The only thing that happened to you was a few people stopped by and made a handful of posts. The only people who got riled up were the ones insulting you and calling you flame. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039397) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:49 PM Author: amber philosopher-king people who are hurt Credited, it wasn't good flame at all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039402) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:51 PM Author: tantric deep field clown Seriously, if you have a 90-post Chicago thread stretched out over 4 days, and you can only lure me into posting twice? Kill yourself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039420) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2007 12:03 AM Author: emerald vibrant persian dragon What about the 320 post ASW thread? You posted a shitton there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039495) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2007 12:08 AM Author: tantric deep field clown That was all a discussion about the property prof. Your efforts, beyond starting the thread, didn't really contribute anything to the argument. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039540) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2007 12:19 AM Author: emerald vibrant persian dragon Just don't wanna admit you were PWN3D (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039634) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:41 PM Author: amber philosopher-king people who are hurt Yeah, you got us good! Oh noes!!! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039338) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:49 PM Author: Electric fishy cumskin internal respiration ok, see you at chicago (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039403) |
|
Date: April 30th, 2007 11:49 PM Author: amber philosopher-king people who are hurt I hope he enjoys WUSTL. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039405) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2007 12:03 AM Author: emerald vibrant persian dragon Wanna fight? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039503) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2007 12:04 AM Author: Comical corner Given the massive amount of effort necessarily invested into the purported "flame" posts, and given the relatively small effort required to characterize them all as "flames" ITT, I find it more likely that *this* thread is itself the flame, and not the other threads. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039515) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2007 12:18 AM Author: emerald vibrant persian dragon Just don't wanna admit you were PWN3D (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039627) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2007 12:40 AM Author: Comical corner Take an objective look at what we've been presented and tell me I'm wrong.
Look, either way, you lose. Either this thread is weak flame or those other threads were a colossal, multi-week, subtly-crafted flame. I'm sorry, but if you're so absorbed with XOXO that you think such a thing is something to be proud of, you have rather substantially lost at life and should probably killself. |
|
Date: May 1st, 2007 12:50 AM Author: emerald vibrant persian dragon Better than 174 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039890) |
|
Date: May 1st, 2007 12:05 AM Author: low-t chapel It was pretty pointless. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=624190&forum_id=2#8039521) |