The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
 66 posters qualify.
You have 0 points. Copying this list does not send funds. Paste it on Disperse, then connect your wallet there. |
Fill me in on the EARLIEST days of XOXO history.
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:40 PM Author: clear godawful black woman new version I know the general outline, but I am missing much because I wasn't there at the time.
I'm talking before the 2006-2007 build-up to the lawsuit.
What was pensive like in the earliest days? Was J. posting as a Macalester student? Was MadCat posting before she was in legal aid? Who exactly was Madame Cunt Who was Skeletor? How did GTO become Chief Education Director? What was rachmiel, an entrepreneur, doing posting on the PR board? |
 |
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:41 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation It was one, giant, extremely entertaining clusterfuck of individuals. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048194) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:50 PM Author: clear godawful black woman new version You were on in the earliest days? What did you post as? You seem very much a later-nyuug-period poster. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048278) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:52 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation loismustdie (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048293) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:54 PM Author: Dashing Abode Oh no shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048316) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:56 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation yep (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048341) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:03 PM Author: buff balding range wow (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048427) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:05 PM Author: Stirring bbw Huh. Did not know this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048444) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:17 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation Yeah, I started posting under that moniker with some not so true things about me to hide my identity in case of an outing (i worked at a firm at the time).
I started posting under the GP moniker when I stopped working at the firm. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:11 PM Author: heady newt whoa (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049015) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 2:58 AM Author: Hideous Church Codepig holy shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11055640) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2009 3:49 PM Author: Painfully honest lay Who the fuck is that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11843751) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 12:43 PM Author: Geriatric Costumed Half-breed Lodge (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#15938723) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:52 PM Author: Arousing sanctuary Poster salaries and bonuses were through the goddam roof.
I raked in so much in those first few months that I was able to take a leave of absence from law school and travel the world, posting on my laptop from the finest hotels money could buy. I would order bottles of Cristal from room service and literally just pour them down the toilet.
Don barzini and I got up to some shit in Thailand that should have put both of us away for life. Luckily, rachmiel pulled some strings for us and we were on the private xoxo jet back to Allentown by the next morning.
When Leiter discovered how much money this site was bringing in through shady investments of Google Ad money and questionable overseas deals (primarily with groups linked to Islamic terrorism), he got the Feds involved (The details of this fiasco used to be posted prominently on this website above the thread listing). It was all pretty much downhill from there.
I suppose it all had to end sometime, though. It was quite a ride. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:59 PM Author: Dashing Abode Solid post. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048386) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:01 PM Author: clear godawful black woman new version 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048410) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:04 PM Author: Zombie-like boyish temple ty (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048437) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:05 PM Author: Vivacious Rusted Electric Furnace "I would order bottles of Cristal from room service and literally just pour them down the toilet."
remember the photo thread you made? as i recall, you weren't even the one doing the dumping - you hired a trio of high-class whores and made them shoot off the bottlenecks with your pistol before dumping the contents right down the shitter.
those were very good times. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:14 PM Author: Arousing sanctuary Do I remember the photo thread? Please.
The photo I snapped of Thea hiding in the closet trying to jam two bottles up his ass at once remains my wallpaper to this day.
My personal crowning achievement from those heady days was the time I spent four full weeks trying to track down Tubgirl in the seediest back alleys in Tokyo, armed with nothing more than a Japanese phrasebook and a tattered printout of her sprawled out in her shit tub.
It was wild; but it was all worth it when I came on here and posted a picture of the two of us recreating her famous scene in the bathroom of a five-star Tokyo hotel, "XOXOHTH" meticulously scrawled on the wall in shit. Sometimes I miss that crazy gal. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:20 PM Author: Dashing Abode Ahhh yes, this was during the summer when Stabby came barrelling down the hall with a wheelbarrow full of blow and a bum he found and paid to dress up like Duff Man for a week. bosoxgirl and ILG ended up doing rails off those Thea ass bottles and getting involved in some of the craziest lesbo shit I've seen since Sapphic Erotica. All the while, don sat in a corner blushing, staring, and giggling. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048565) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:42 PM Author: Arousing sanctuary It's been far too long since I visited don's grave. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048729) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:56 PM Author: Dashing Abode I've been thinking of setting up a charitable foundation for upkeep of his mausoleum. The funds the board set aside have apparently dried up and the last time I visited the grass was overgrown and I think there was a possum inside. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048872) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:00 PM Author: Arousing sanctuary Well, when your "mausoleum" consists of an old refrigerator box put up on cinder blocks in his mom's backyard (per his will), you're going to get possums. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048913) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:05 PM Author: Dashing Abode Still, this one fucker was pwning what was left of him pretty hard. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048962) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 7:20 PM Author: translucent depressive I love this exchange *so much* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11050901) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 12:01 PM Author: Arousing sanctuary Remind me to show you my photo albums someday when you come over to my house to trade baseball cards. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11056774) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 2:50 AM Author: adventurous nubile regret To be fair,
180 Billion |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 2:53 AM Author: Zombie-like boyish temple a trillion (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11055629) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 8:10 PM Author: spectacular dragon theatre 6'20" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11060771) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2009 12:00 AM Author: stimulating ceo one-hundred eighty
i'm sad i missed this |
|
Date: September 30th, 2009 2:23 AM Author: heady newt 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#12871617) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2009 2:28 AM Author: Chest-beating national sneaky criminal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#12871637) |
|
Date: November 24th, 2009 4:28 AM Author: Chest-beating national sneaky criminal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#13355257) |
|
Date: August 3rd, 2010 2:11 AM Author: Geriatric Costumed Half-breed Lodge (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#15688112) |
|
Date: August 3rd, 2010 2:15 AM Author: 180 shrine (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#15688126) |
|
Date: December 3rd, 2010 5:40 PM Author: Zombie-like boyish temple (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#16713139) |
|
Date: March 18th, 2011 2:42 PM Author: naked candlestick maker (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#17542681) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 5:37 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo that's right, a possum (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11059728) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:40 PM Author: Titillating institution tcr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048705) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2009 3:01 AM Author: Wonderful Forum 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#12871723) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:04 PM Author: buff balding range basically it's the offshoot of a department of defense think tank. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048439) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:22 PM Author: Soul-stirring pistol pervert i just spent 5 minutes trying to find that post. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048582) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:24 PM Author: Arousing sanctuary 5 year olds with dog's blood ice dildos, awwww yeah (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048594) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:14 PM Author: heady newt butchered it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049027) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2009 2:26 AM Author: heady newt XO is a breakaway faction of an old Department of the Interior think-tank message board. The original board was a discussion forum started in 1997, and was used at the time to discuss agriculture, forest management, etc. Over time, it started pulling in people interested in college and law school admissions, because of scholarships offered by the think tank.
Then it got wild.
In-thread image and audio posts were allowed. This was done at first to share visuals on forest projects and things like that. Lots of photos and charts and graphs. But then people started posting pr0n, horse pr0n, tentacle pr0n, reams of r@ygold, 88, and all kinds of shit. It was like every time you opened a link, you were going to get a bunch of 10-year-old naked girls being assfucked with icicles made from the blood of puppies they were forced to strangle. And they were laying on top of the pile of dead puppies.
The moderator, Jeff Adams, wanted to get the board back to its orginal mission, so he banned 90% of the accounts and switched the board to a different format. There was an FBI crackdown, and about 10 regulars were arrested for r@ygold, including :D, but the charges didn't stick.
So, XO was started with the goal of getting back the freedom of the old board, but without all the sick r@ygold.
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:50 PM Author: Cobalt cuckoldry Out of the abyss came Winner who coined terms like "TTT" and "I hope this helps." He personified the elitist attitude that has come to characterize this board ever since. Then there was Sforza who was a big anti-affirmative action advocate. Posts about AA, which would without exception deteriorate into racist garbage completely dominated the board for a long time. Winner left and Bateman came along. He kind of merged the two. He was elitist and racist.
Edit: This is PR history, pre-XOXO. Edit of Edit: This belongs at the end. Not sure why I posted this in the middle.
In general, the board was a lot more racist and a lot more elitist. Few admitted they went to a non-T14 school, and those who did were ridiculed. At any given moment, at least half the active threads were racist in some way. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:53 PM Author: Arousing sanctuary Oh, how things have changed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048302) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:55 PM Author: Cobalt cuckoldry It was MUCH different. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048337) |
|
Date: September 13th, 2011 10:28 PM Author: Aquamarine kitty cat it was great brother. nostalgia is a bitch though (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#18965618) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:56 PM Author: irradiated dull hall i thought NYCFan coined "TTT" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048350) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:57 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo he always claimed to have coined the term though the consensus seemed to be that he was full of shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048368) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:01 PM Author: Cobalt cuckoldry I have never heard of NYCFan. I haven't posted consistently or followed the PR/XOXO saga since 2002 so I've never heard of most of you. However, I believe the consensus is that Winner coined the term and by consensus I mean the contemporaneous opinion at the time the term started to appear. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048408) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:06 PM Author: embarrassed to the bone hospital cuck NYCFan was a Harvard troll on the college board. Don't think he posts anymore. He was 70-something years old; he may be dead. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048458) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 12:50 PM Author: Infuriating Associate Let's hope. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#15938767) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:07 PM Author: Stirring bbw The only other possible poster I could see with a claim would be Handsome Houston Hall. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048462) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:09 PM Author: Cobalt cuckoldry He never took credit for it though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048480) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:10 PM Author: Stirring bbw No, and if I had to make a guess it would definitely be Winner. But HHH was one of the early and enthusiastic adopters. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048491) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:17 PM Author: Cobalt cuckoldry Do you agree that the three I chose were the defining early posters? I thought about adding HHH. He was a very good poster, but I don't think he brought anything really new. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048548) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:24 PM Author: Stirring bbw Sforza and Winner for sure. I think Bateman was really from a later era than those two. I thought he was a bit gimmicky at first but really wound up defining the american psycho rich guy schtick better than anybody.
HHH was one of the first pure flaming trolls. Sforza and Winner had some substance and discussed other things.
Hoyalawya, Loretta, Atticus, and John Malin are other defining early posters. But I would list the third defining early poster as "anon." It used to be just a handful of recognizable people (and impostors) and legions of anon. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:41 PM Author: Cobalt cuckoldry Anon was good and Atticus was important. But Bateman was polarizing and a prolific poster. I think his contribution was the idea of a PR personality. People didn't like or dislike the poster, they liked or disliked the person. I think in today's climate he would have been outed and had his life destroyed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048709) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:06 PM Author: Stirring bbw NYC fan did nothing of any note other than being bothersome on the college board for a few years.
TTT was definitely Winner and it was definitely on the PR board. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:10 PM Author: irradiated dull hall yes, i remember TTT being used on the PR board as far back as ca. 2001 or so. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048498) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 9:18 PM Author: laughsome public bath main people I first heard the term on PR in early or mid 2001.
PR was only about 75% anonymous posters, and while there were impolite discussion of AA, IQ and race, etc, they were not spammed in unrelated threads or 100's of new threads.
Other posters were not anon but would disclose plenty of personal details sufficient to out them.
Lots for admissions questions too. 3/4 of the board was probably 3.6/170 where to apply. |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 10:45 PM Author: Comical cruise ship Sforza roasted everyone, and posted some hilarious stories. A truly gifted writer. Lots of Affirmative Action-type discussions in those days. I go back to 1998-1999. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 9:46 PM Author: ivory persian "bothersome on the college board"
LOL, the college board remains bothered to this day. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:57 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop I miss those days. We was truly elitist and racist back then. Now these fucking niggers are taking over and everyone is being all politically correct. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048357) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 2:52 AM Author: adventurous nubile regret To be fair,
TCR |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:59 PM Author: bossy cerebral sweet tailpipe hey Winner (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048390) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:41 PM Author: Titillating institution TCR (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048713) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 12:55 PM Author: Cobalt cuckoldry Another classic and timeless post. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#15938815) |
|
Date: September 13th, 2011 10:30 PM Author: twisted athletic conference hairy legs I remember that guy for sure.
98% of the posts then were about rankings and which school was better, endless fucking minutae of why Boalt was better than Duke, Chicago was better than Michigan, etc. etc. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:53 PM Author: Dashing Abode When the PR board switched formats there was a massive outreach via email and AIM to let people know about this place, and for the first few months the two boards were combined. It was pretty chaotic at first, with more than a few internet tough guy fights, though eventually things settled down. I think j. was out of school by then, though MadCat was still a LS student. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048303) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:54 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo rachmiel began posting on the PR board, mainly on the college side, in the fall of '03 or thereabouts. he was ALWAYS on the board. he began xo with boondocks a bit before the PR board became unusable in march '04, and that's where everyone migrated.
i think that rach was thinking about going to st. john's college at the time. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:58 PM Author: Hilarious low-t people who are hurt dingle berry I thought he enrolled at PSU for a semester? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048373) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:59 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo yeah, i remember he mentioned that he was at psu for a bit. i don't think he posted here as a psu student though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048387) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:55 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop The EARLIEST days of XOXO could mean the PR days, or the actual XOXO founding days.
XOXO circa 2004 was fucking amazing. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:56 PM Author: sickened blood rage explain (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048346) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:59 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop Truly elitist, no TTT circle jerking. Truly racist, not overrun by niggers. Good flame. Great schticks.
basically everything that the current XOXO tries to be but fails. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:57 PM Author: frum tripping elastic band box office it's amazing seeing stuff like "blackpeoplelikeporkchopsbecausetheylooklikeafrica" and the follow-up comments being like "omg, that's so racist, but funny at the same time"
Then the flood of N-words came out.
But hey, the mods have seriously clamped down. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:58 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop Honestly, it's not the mods fault. There are no quality schticks anymore. That's why people resort to retarded repetitive mumblings. If people were running good racist schticks mods wouldn't give a fuck. I think. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048379) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:59 PM Author: frum tripping elastic band box office I'm HAPPY the mods have clamped down. The N-threads made this board fucking unusable, and it really fucks with your head too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048391) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:01 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop That's only true because "nigger" is overused and not cleverly used.
I wish the funny nigger threads would come back.
By over saturating the board with mindless nigger threads the racists have ruined their own cause. It's a fucking shame. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:05 PM Author: frum tripping elastic band box office Some were actually funny, and I probably wouldn't mind seeing one in a blue fucking moon, but the signal to noise ratio was at times like 20/100 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048441) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:07 PM Author: clear godawful black woman new version "Are you there God? It's me, niggerthread" was this year or late last year, no? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048463) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:13 PM Author: frum tripping elastic band box office the funniest one went like
"in mandarin chinese, 'ni gur ju' = you are a pig" |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 6:13 PM Author: underhanded idea he suggested ticket booth lol
This title is too much ROFL |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 5:10 AM Author: sienna narrow-minded resort hunting ground ROFL.
i saw a title saying "Are you there mods?" which i think is funnier |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:57 PM Author: Trip theater stage hominid It was a lot funnier, that's for sure.
less chicken shit anonymous .,.,.,,,,.... trolls. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 2:58 PM Author: Dashing Abode Yeah, punctuation monikers are an annoying development. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048383) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:07 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop most punctuation monikers started the day after the lawsuit was filed.
I was AMAZED that I wasn't named a defendant in the initial complaint (yes, with this exact account). So I didn't want to push my luck.
I think if I didn't change my account I could quite possibly have been added. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:08 PM Author: Stirring bbw Why do you think the punctuation monikers protect you from a lawsuit? It's not like they are non-unique monikers. It would take like 5 minutes to cut and paste and figure out the sequence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048474) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:11 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop I think they get fucked up on display so multiple unique monikers end up looking the same.
Look at my moniker, do you see 40+ dots? There are supposed to be that many (50 characters in total).
|
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:19 PM Author: Stirring bbw I count 46 dots in a cut and paste into word. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048560) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:21 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop I know, I just tired that too. It's still not my full moniker, but fuck, I'm disappearing. New account for me.
EDIT: Actually, never mind. A big reason was also that it's MUCH harder for others to google for posts that you wrote, so harder to find evidence for DEFAMEPWN. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:31 PM Author: Stirring bbw Wait, you are making a new account because somebody cut and paste your name into word with moderate success?
You, my friend, may be a bit too risk averse. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:35 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop You weren't part of this conversation since the beginning so I'll paste it for you:
"most punctuation monikers started the day after the lawsuit was filed.
I was AMAZED that I wasn't named a defendant in the initial complaint (yes, with this exact account). So I didn't want to push my luck.
I think if I didn't change my account I could quite possibly have been added."
Trust me, if you were around for over 2 years, you'd definitely know the original moniker associated with this account. I've done some fucked up shit. I don't even know why I still use it. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:44 PM Author: Stirring bbw This still makes no sense to me. If they wanted to sue you, they could have still made the punctuation moniker a defendant and tried to track down information. It's not like it's much easier to figure out who some random guy called "The Ayatolla of RocknRollah" is versus some random guy called "...;;;;,,,....". And if you are concerned about association with an old nic, why not just abandon that nic, change it to punctuation, and then start up a new punctuation free nic? That to me seems like substantially less of a risk if that is your concern.
I guess in the end the punctuation is annoying to people who are just trying to follow a conversation thread, i.e. people who wouldn't be bothered to do any more work on figuring out which is which, but not fool-proof in disguising the link to past posts under that nic. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:48 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop Well, this was done the minute I found out about the lawsuit. I didn't have time to delete all my old threads (or even find out where they were).
Our hope was that if we ALL change into dots, it'd be hard to track us down or separate us or search for threads that we wrote.
For example, even when you pasted my moniker into word, that's still not my full moniker. So if I'm named I'd just say that's not my moniker.
Besides, I was hoping (and I still think it's true) that when they ask Rachmiel for the IP of "... ......... .... . . ................. ....." he'd say he can't see such an account because my moniker is not actually displayed fully (even when pasted into word).
Anyway, that's all over with now. I don't see many dots monikers nowadays (and I don't post often anymore anyway). |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:34 PM Author: Painfully honest lay Have you ever heard of "quotes"? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048657) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:37 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop ?
Try googling threads written by me and see if you come up with anything then. I have used this account for years so all those posts would have this moniker as author.
My guess is that you won't find anything, even with "quotes". |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:05 PM Author: Painfully honest lay okurritesry (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048955) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:28 PM Author: heady newt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049178) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:06 PM Author: Lime histrionic point faggotry You were guaranteed at least 2 or 3 times a day to bust out laughing in class, in the library, whatever. Now I have my own office but almost never laugh at what's posted here. Lord knows why I come here at all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048453) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:08 PM Author: Dashing Abode As low as this place has sunk (and I think it's gotten better) it still beats working. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048467) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:12 PM Author: Zombie-like boyish temple it's gotten shitloads better. before the big wipe, it was awful. now, if it's not always lol funny, at least there's a good number of cool, recognizable posters to talk about random shit with. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048508) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:13 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop But it's much less funny. The 2004 XOXO was fucking hilarious. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048512) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:14 PM Author: Vivacious Rusted Electric Furnace i miss mr. jinx. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048519) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:15 PM Author: Zombie-like boyish temple i mean it's gotten better in the past few months -- since rach came back, and a bunch of old posters followed, and more posters started using monikers with words -- not since 2004. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048525) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:15 PM Author: Dashing Abode 2004 was great, but there was a lot more talent (a lot more people in general), not to mention the constant tension between the college and law boards. Also, less trolling and more OC. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048528) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:17 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop great schticks in general. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048545) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:08 PM Author: odious canary dilemma I also wonder why you come here at all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048468) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:08 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop titcr.
I come just in case an old poster would come back with a new schtick or there is some new talent. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:08 PM Author: clear godawful black woman new version You never laugh at Watchmen threads? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048476) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:13 PM Author: Snowy Nudist Fanboi No, I never laugh at Watchmen threads. He's awful. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048509) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:13 PM Author: cerise mexican ya, whenever i see a thread of his i avoid it like the plague (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048515) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 6:15 PM Author: slap-happy bateful meetinghouse He's an acquired taste, but give him time. He's fucking brilliant. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11059980) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:16 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop Watchmen is fucking pathetic. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048538) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:10 PM Author: buff balding range because you wait for early august, when the "FIGHTER JETS SCRAMBLED OVER DOWNTOWN CHICAGO" prophecy comes true again. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048489) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:25 PM Author: Lime histrionic point faggotry lolz. i love that thread although it is one of the most depressing measures of how long i've been at this goddamn place. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048597) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:11 PM Author: cerise mexican lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048505) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:19 PM Author: motley church building macaca This is true. If C+C ever leaves, I'm fucking gone. Fuck this place. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048556) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:26 PM Author: Zombie-like boyish temple you're a sweetheart (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048601) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:44 PM Author: Titillating institution tcr. i would always be laughing - often to tears. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048747) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:10 PM Author: very tactful electric rigor chapel Well nowadays the internets are SERIOUS BUSINESS.
|
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:14 PM Author: Maroon Headpube Center fucking old geezers. the modern xoxohth is just as funny as the old xoxo/pr days. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048520) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:15 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop That's because you have no fucking sense of humor. We all know that when you try to be funny. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048534) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:17 PM Author: Snowy Nudist Fanboi Credited. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048541) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:23 PM Author: Maroon Headpube Center awww rowan, you are too self-centered for your own good. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048587) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:20 PM Author: Maroon Headpube Center sup? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048566) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:17 PM Author: buff balding range kinda true, but it's less often. brilliant stuff like the "leaning to brownstone" thread was still like almost 2 years ago. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048544) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:22 PM Author: Maroon Headpube Center every generation says their previous generation is a lot better than the current one.
my grandpa always said that "people don't know the value of work." back in the day "I had to walk 5 miles to school." and etc.
|
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:23 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop Advocate you've been here for a while. I can't believe you actually think this is true.
Are there ANY funny threads on the XOXO front page right now? |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:29 PM Author: Maroon Headpube Center most of the good materials are probably in the garbage. Blame the mods for moving them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048617) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:33 PM Author: Maroon Headpube Center you don't get a laugh from c+c food threads? or five alive! talking about her "vaggy." or solzy's belting out wrap lyrics? how about watchmen's insightful threads?
|
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:38 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop ?
I find those pretty boring or retarded. They are neither clever nor hilarious.
I want some good flame or schticks. Not a bunch of dudes yapping away. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:16 PM Author: Maroon Headpube Center there's a lot of people who are flame and schticks. It's just that they are too good to ever be outed as flame or schtick. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049052) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:24 PM Author: cerise mexican xoxo is going through a great Friendliness Era right now (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048592) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:28 PM Author: Maroon Headpube Center everytime i say something that is slightly critical, I get a deluge of attacks. i.e. rowan, volinger, bluesmoke, and etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048612) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 7:24 PM Author: translucent depressive the preferred term is Kindness Era. (tm) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11050939) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:20 PM Author: cerise mexican the 'search' function actually worked (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048569) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:25 PM Author: Arousing sanctuary Number of OP's questions even vaguely answered thusfar: 2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048599) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:27 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation I believe the OP edited and added the specific Qs.
HTH |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:27 PM Author: Lime histrionic point faggotry Here, an example of a hilarious story that still cracks me up when I read it. You can't get shit like this here anymore. Hell, i'd kill for another Breaking Point.
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=161789&forum_id=2
Date: April 7th, 2005 11:29 AM Author: ƒjackie
This is a note to all of you admits who will have to fill out your medical forms this summer. Be careful what little boxes you check off.
Last summer when I was getting my checkup, I was going through the endless checklist of symptoms, and for some reason I was feeling very thorough. When I got to "blood in stool," I thought hey, a couple times I think I've had a little blood on the TP, or something like that. So I checked the box. This became the subject of a 30 minute discussion with my GP. Once I realized that he was concerned I tried to do damage control, but it was too late. No amount of "it only happened once or twice that I can remember" and "it wasn't very much" made a difference. I walked out of the office with an appointment to see a proctologist and receive something called a flexible sigmoidoscopy.
I received the information on the procedure a week or two before the proctology appointment. It was scheduled for a morning. The last solid food or colored liquid I was allowed to consume was the night before the day before the appointment--no food for 36 hours. In the afternoon the day before, I had to drink an entire bottle of magnesium citrate laxative. It tasted vile, but I figure, what the hell, a good shit wouldn't hurt me. Little did I know the demons of hell that would be shooting out of my ass an hour later. It started with gurgling, then churning, then all out projectile ass-spewing. The walls of the toilet were painted brown. My eyes watered. It lasted for almost two hours. I crawled into bed and went to sleep. The next morning, before the appointment, I had to administer two fleet enemas to myself. If you've never done this, it's quite gay. The instructions on the box have you lay on the floor of your bathroom in the fetal position, then reach around and jam the thing up your ass, then slowly squeeze all the liquid into your rectum. Let it sit for a while, then stand up and "evacuate" in the crapper. I thought the sensation of the liquid entering my anus was upsetting and uncomfortable, and the resulting watery discharge somewhat horrifying. But I had no idea what was coming later that morning.
I arrived at the office and they quickly had me in a gown and in the room where the proceedure would occur. Doctor? Chick. Nurses? Two. Both chicks. I had to lie down on my side, again in the fetal position, facing a television screen. The one nurse then put a massive quantity of KY all over and into my ass. All the while they are telling me something that I can barely hear because my brain is shutting down from the humiliation. Something about bloating or air being injected into my lower GI. Suddenly the doctor approaches and I am violated. It's a tube, probably a half an inch thick, but it felt like fucking King Dong. It has to be thick because the way it works is the end of the tube has a camera, a little jaw for taking tissue samples, a light, a water nozzle, suction, and an air nozzle. The air expands your intestine and then the light makes it all nice and visible, and then the camera puts the image of my insides on the TV four inches from my nose. Wow. Unfortunately, for whatever reason my laxative-enema combination was not administered very well, and the doctor lectured me for about five minutes on this topic while she used the water nozzle and suction to wash away residual poop from my insides. That was quite a show. And you've never had your ego bruised until you've been told that you can't even poop yourself empty right. Once I was nice and clean, she ran the tube up and down, all the while injecting more and more air into me. Eventually the gas pains were getting terrible, but I couldn't fart because she had the works plugged up. I felt like I'd eaten 40 pounds of beans. Finally, after finding nothing other than leftover shit, after 15 minutes of probing, she calls it quits. The second she pulls the tube out, I let out a gigantic fart like you have never fucking heard right at the doctor and the nurses. To their credit they didn't blink an eye. The doctor even said that was normal, and that I could go the adjoining bathroom to clean up and "get comfortable." No amount of time in that bathroom was going to make anything about this situation comfortable.
A few minutes later I had my clothes on and I was in the doctor's office. She again reminded me that I didn't do a good job of preparing (thanks), but thought that this was consistent with the symptom of blood on TP, and it was probably all due to chronic constipation. I said "I poop just fine, thanks," but she wasn't interested. She loaded me up with an armful of papers on what foods have fiber and what foods don't and she kicked me out the door.
It wasn't over. At this point I was starving. I went home and ate a huge pile of leftover pot roast from earlier in the week. I ate and ate and ate. Probably 3 pounds of the stuff, including vegetables and gravy. Turns out, something went wrong in the pot roast cooling and storage. Or maybe my body dind't react well. My body totally rejected it. I crapped and crapped for days after that, and it took almost a week before my guts were working right again.
So... all of you admits--be very very careful about what boxes you check when you get your physicals. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:31 PM Author: cerise mexican that was FUCKING hilarious (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048635) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:37 PM Author: sickened blood rage wow i just laughed very hard reading that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048677) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:35 PM Author: heady newt 180 million (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049228) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 5:24 PM Author: Talented Chocolate Gaping 180 x a million (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049694) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 12:19 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo this is a pretty classic post from that era. i feel like every other post at that time was exactly like this.
"The doctor even said that was normal, and that I could go the adjoining bathroom to clean up and "get comfortable." No amount of time in that bathroom was going to make anything about this situation comfortable. " |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 12:24 PM Author: motley church building macaca amazing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11056924) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 12:25 PM Author: floppy business firm I remembered this post when I was scheduled for a colonoscopy, and being very, very scared. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11056930) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 1:17 PM Author: violent theater jewess Yeah, that poster had some really good self-deprecatory posts. Something about how his socks wouldn't stay up seriously made me cry laughing.
"The next morning, before the appointment, I had to administer two fleet enemas to myself. If you've never done this, it's quite gay."
Ha, ha. I love the tone of the whole story. |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 1:51 PM Author: pungent locus I feel like if this same post was made today it wouldn't be appreciated. Instead, half of the comments would be from people like le chic saying "what is wrong with you? this isn't postworthy. i hate you." way too many people now who get butthurt over everything. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11057700) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 6:22 PM Author: slap-happy bateful meetinghouse No fucking way. This is gold, and anyone who said otherwise would be chastised. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11060012) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2009 3:46 PM Author: Alcoholic big cumskin 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11843707) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:29 PM Author: irradiated dull hall Subject: a brief history of the PR era: princeton review ran an admissions discussion board in the late '90s, early '00s. there was a college board, law board, and a parents' board (incidentally, the parents were the most depraved, socially bankrupt motherfuckers of all).
the board was moderated by a guy named Jeff Adams, a gay website administrator working for PR in NYC (www.jeffandwill.com, if you're interested in learning more about our former fearless leader). classic posters of the era on the college board included homeschooled, NYCFan (yes, even back then), kevinx, drumnark (who was a true math wizard), stokedteacozy, Joe Caltech, king stu, huggable snugglebunny, Stork Simmons (he previously posted under JHU05), plus a bunch more, and later included emmanuel kant, quaggsy, Harvard Hopeful, and a bunch of others.
highlights included the Emmanuel Kant Columbia saga, where NYCFan tried in vain to get Kant into his dream school, Columbia. Kant used to write poems about Columbia and was generally a huge prestige whore who was obsessed with civil war reenactments. he ended up getting deferred/dinged from columbia and WL'd at Harvard. went to Hopkins for a year before transferring to columbia general studies.
KevinX was a douchebag who went to vanderbilt and was generally an ass to people. he had a "girlfriend" who posted under the moniker Michelle and who claimed to be a softball player at stanford but was ultimately outted as some random chick from east LA who never went to college and had deceived KevinX for a number of years on the board. thus died the poster KevinX.
there were a couple of posters from the south (one from FL and one from GA, i think) who "met" on the board and had a LTR IRL. don't remember much more about that story.
quaggsy was a pissed-off brandeis student who once got into an epic 1,500+ post argument with King Stu over whether berkeley or stanford was the better school.
Harvard Hopeful was a self-described UES rich kid who ultimately did not get into Harvard and ended up picking Cornell over Stanford because he wanted the ivy pedigree.
There arose for awhile the "GAY HOPKINS TROLL," who had names like GUCCI GUY and PRADA GIRL and used to start threads with titles like, "HARVARD*OXFORD*YALE*JOHNS HOPKINS*PRINCETON" and posts like, "my daughter choosing between these schools for a bachelor's in 16th century spanish literature. i hear that hopkins is teh best in this specialty." from this arose the famous "THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY IN BALTIMORE, MASSACHUSETTS" and "JOHNS HOPKINS RICH BEAUTIFUL PEOPLE CLIQUE" memes.
soon, terroristX figured out how to hack the board and once actually made GOATSE the board background. he also started editing people's posts and generally causing havoc. Jeff Adams got pissed off and started banning people, but he still tried to salvage the growing board community. he even made a separate board on PR for the PR board presidential election and annual PR board prom.
before long, however, teh lulz became too epic for poor Jeff Adams, and he changed to format to the equivalent of an online prison, kind of like college confidential, only worse. gone was the tree format and easy-to-read red and blue text (for college and law, respectively).
enter heroes rachmiel and GTO (posters who arrived in the last couple of years of the PR era), who took the code from the old PR board and resurrected the format on xoxohth. Jeff Adams was livid and tried to unsuccessfully to get xoxo shut down. both PR and college confidential would ban anyone who mentioned xoxohth on their boards.
nonetheless, an underground recruitment push was launched (during which posters went to PR and college confidential and implored users to visit "ehks oh ehks oh eighch tee eighch dot com"). word soon spread across the realm that the old PR format had been resurrected, and xoxo slowly sprang to life.
i'm too lazy to post the rest of the story, but this is more or less how the transition went down from the perspective of the college board. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:33 PM Author: Stirring bbw This is a pretty good summary of the gayrod college board. Also, Josh Lewis' iron fist preceded Jeff Adams'. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048644) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:02 PM Author: charismatic topaz organic girlfriend heaven How do you people even remember this shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#15938852) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:33 PM Author: odious canary dilemma *knocks on door* *door slowly opens* Hello sir, may I interest you in a life? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048648) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:39 PM Author: irradiated dull hall no, thanks. overrated. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048689) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:34 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation I forgot about quaggsy. Didn't he get outed as a Brandeis student or something? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048652) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:36 PM Author: irradiated dull hall yeah, i have that in the post. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048663) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:38 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation Yeah, but didn't he claim to go to Harvard or something, which made the outing particularly hilarious? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048686) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:39 PM Author: irradiated dull hall oh yeah, i think that may have been part of the story. things from that era are beginning to slip from my memory. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048698) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:44 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo there was a poster known as "quagsasaurus" or something who posted and claimed to tbe the original quaggsy although that seemed doubtful to most people. he claimed to be from wellesley, MA even though the original quaggs was from newton.
his schtick would be to say that anyone who went to a private HS was a loser because prestigious towns like wellesley had public high schools better than most privates. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:48 PM Author: irradiated dull hall yeah, that's right. he posted under a number of variations of the quaggsy moniker: quaggs, quaggsy, quaggsy waggsy, quaggsasaurus, and a ton of others. my theory was always that the original quaggs flamed out rather quickly and that what most of us remember as "quaggsy" was actually just a bunch of regulars keeping the schtick going under different monikers. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048783) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:49 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo i'm not sure exactly how he was outed, though his personal brandeis.edu page was well known to everyone. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048796) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 10:18 AM Author: apoplectic brunch immigrant he posted on usnews forums before he came to pr. and he outted himself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11056138) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 5:10 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo yeah i think he and boondocks used to butt heads on the usnews forum a lot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11059425) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:34 PM Author: cerise mexican interesting (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048659) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:39 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo has there ever been any proof that kant transferred to columbia? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048697) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:42 PM Author: irradiated dull hall kant's real name disappeared from the hopkins directory and appeared in the columbia directory just about simultaneously. could be a different person with the same name, though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048721) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:45 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo hmmm, i never knew that his name showed up in the directory. interesting. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048751) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:40 PM Author: Maroon Headpube Center (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048704) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:50 PM Author: Vivacious Rusted Electric Furnace michelle? was that the same as the infamous michelle mamula? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048815) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:56 PM Author: irradiated dull hall not sure about that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048870) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:16 PM Author: floppy business firm I believe KevinX dated Portia as well. I think they lived together IRL. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049051) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:18 PM Author: irradiated dull hall oh, portia--i forgot about her. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049064) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 3:08 AM Author: Hideous Church Codepig haha really? that dude was fucked up/hilarious (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11055647) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 9:51 AM Author: avocado aphrodisiac spot useless brakes he used to refer to himself seriously as "a beloved reg" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11056080) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:23 PM Author: Ebony hell telephone "there were a couple of posters from the south (one from FL and one from GA, i think) who "met" on the board and had a LTR IRL. don't remember much more about that story. "
Cassanova and Akari. I think they're getting married, iirc |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:34 PM Author: Vivacious Rusted Electric Furnace didn't a poster named "ryan from GA" murder his GF by dragging her out into the cold on a horsecart while she was already sick? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049219) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 9:54 PM Author: pea-brained site Eventually.
Who were you on the college board? |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:39 PM Author: concupiscible hyperventilating striped hyena stag film I thought Michelle was created by KevinX (he was just posting on two screen names to make it look like he had a gf). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049266) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 5:23 PM Author: sticky lascivious market trust fund Great summary. Brings back a lot of memories. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049692) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 2:26 PM Author: Beady-eyed Navy International Law Enforcement Agency Michelle Mammula claimed to be Mike Mamula's younger sister. She claimed to have really rich parents (dad owned new era or something). Claimed she lived in buffalo, which actually was one of the few things about her life that was true.
I don't know if J. will remember this, but I definitely expressed my thoughts that she was full of shit. Several things just didnt add up to me. I have a pretty good memory, and she definitely contradicted herself a couple times.
Some other forgotten regs: Huskergirl, Cherie, MattDCarolinian (who i also thought was fake, but he could have been lying to protect his identity. he didnt really make any grandiose claims about himself), useatoothbrush, TulaneWill, headfones. there are definitely more, but im forgetting them at the time. |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2009 10:39 PM Author: magical vigorous death wish they started before the format changed. maybe january of the year PR changed.
Also, other fun like the thread title changing script..
You can still find the link for it. |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2009 11:27 PM Author: nighttime yellow ladyboy this is about as i remember it
however, you neglected to mention the PR Prom
also there was a website where everyone posted their stats... |
|
Date: June 8th, 2011 8:03 AM Author: cream deranged french chef senate prstats.com (not there anymore) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#18196049) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2011 8:11 AM Author: clear godawful black woman new version Nice find. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#18196058) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2011 8:21 AM Author: cream deranged french chef senate yeah, i miss the old college board days on pr/early xoxo like an old man in a rocking chair. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#18196067) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:39 PM Author: Arousing sanctuary It's also important to note that there was an ENORMOUS emphasis on scatological humor; which manifested itself primarily in exquisitely-written, lengthy screeds about shitting your pants and the superior method of wiping one's ass. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048690) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:41 PM Author: carmine confused gaming laptop rofl. titcr. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048714) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:45 PM Author: Lime histrionic point faggotry I compiled those posts in the XOXO Crap Turd Poop Reader which was EASILY SEARCHABLE when search existed but I can't find through google :( (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048754) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:53 PM Author: Lime histrionic point faggotry I found a few of them. http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=23417&mc=46&forum_id=2#388260 http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=23163&mc=52&forum_id=2 http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=31909&mc=46&forum_id=2#500970 |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:44 PM Author: Excitant partner chad http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/10/xoxohth_civilit_1.html
http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/11/xoxohth_11_the_1.html
http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/12/xoxohth_12_the.html |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:46 PM Author: Titillating institution Ned Flanders and RWA trolled as neo-cons for about 3 years after 9/11. A shame no one remembers the Konservative Korner. Mr. Plow and Clam formed the whiny liberal side. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048762) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:50 PM Author: Maroon Headpube Center what about the saga of pudsmack vs RWC (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048802) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:55 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo i don't know if it was a saga. they were always going back and forth on each other though would often be friendly. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048860) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2009 11:34 PM Author: adulterous tank Wrong, wrong, wrong. Ned Flanders was NEVER a neo-con. He was a racist paleoconservative like Pat Buchanan.
RWA was a neocon, as was Lawyerbird and a few other notables. Some mainstream conservatives like Theateaus also trolled heavily for the war initially but once the WMD proved a hoax (yes this was actually a big deal), they dropped off the bandwagon. Stabby McLawyer was actually a Republican in those days.
Mr. Plow was always a marginal figure. The important liberals of the era were fiver, glorfindel, and Euphonious. I gradually insinuated myself into that group by sheer volume of posting and irrational liberal exuberance.
|
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:49 PM Author: Razzmatazz house legal warrant spring/summer 2004 was as an XOXO golden age. A huge number of regulars matriculated that fall and it went into a slow decline but still had moments of brilliance and beauty.
2005-2006 were the debauched years when the board was unusuable at times. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 3:59 PM Author: bossy cerebral sweet tailpipe "A huge number of regulars matriculated at TTTs that fall"
Rude. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:01 PM Author: Arousing sanctuary Yeah, I bristled slightly at that as well. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11048923) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:10 PM Author: floppy business firm I was posting as a high school student, but my memory isn't too great. I remember Josh Lewis as the moderator on PR, and later gay hockey player Jeff Adams. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049004) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:11 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation I've actually met Jeff. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049014) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:13 PM Author: irradiated dull hall i heard he was a pretty nice guy IRL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049020) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:15 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation I didn't realize it was him when I met him. I went home and a day or two later it all gelled together.
|
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:23 PM Author: irradiated dull hall haha, that must have blown your mind (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049113) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:13 PM Author: floppy business firm He wasn't as cool as Josh was, and he appointed that asshole classic as his mini-me. So he can go fuck himself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049026) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:15 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation Who was that douche, anyway? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049038) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:20 PM Author: floppy business firm I don't remember exactly...some racist Russian, if I recall.
Posters on the college board used to joke that a christian Cornell student named RyanfromGA had a red button to summon a moderator to his aid. It was later discovered after posters guessed Ryan's email password that Ryan was emailing classic and telling him to ban certain posters and delete certain posts...and thus it was discovered that classic was a mod and that Ryan did have some form of the little red button afterall. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:22 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation Ah, Ryan, yes. He was the virgin with the long term girlfriend who had some medical issues, no? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049099) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:24 PM Author: irradiated dull hall he was a really nice guy, despite the problems with the board. his first g/f died, and people used to post some pretty disturbing shit about it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049126) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:25 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation That sucks that people can be so cruel. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049135) |
|
↗ Patreon
https://www.patreon.com/iamgay Date: March 4th, 2009 4:26 PM Author: rachmiel The kid was a disaster. Separately, he killed another person in a car accident. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049148) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:27 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation Holy shit! Really? How the hell did I miss that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049158) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:27 PM Author: irradiated dull hall no way, d00d. from what i remember, his girlfriend died of a prolonged illness, and a bunch of board douchebags created the rumor that he killed her in a car accident, which was completely false. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049161) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:29 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo i think it was pretty legit - remember when people found his posts on that grieving website and his lj? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049183) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:30 PM Author: irradiated dull hall vaguely, and i thought that those confirmed that she died of natural causes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049190) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:31 PM Author: Dashing Abode I thought they were complications that arose from the accident. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049200) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:31 PM Author: floppy business firm No, the story went that he had a girlfriend named Alexa who died from a prolonged illness (he blamed himself because they went horseback riding the day before she died and he thought the increased physical activity may have contributed to her death).
He later heavily hinted he was involved in a car accident in which some one was killed.
I did not and do not believe either of the stories and think they were culled from an idiot brain that watched too many Party of Five episodes. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:32 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation You really should be a political commentator. I'm not joking. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049210) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:42 PM Author: floppy business firm Ty, but I don't like politics. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049294) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:44 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation That's the point!!!
You would give both sides hell with your honest sound bites. Both sides of the aisle would be out for blood and the entertainment would be refreshing for the viewers.
Imagine a political talk show where the interviewer is the one being argued with instead of the two sides going at it with each other. You wouldn't be a moderator, you'd be the shit disturber.
It'd be brilliant. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 5:31 PM Author: Talented Chocolate Gaping kind of like a non-funny version of The Daily Show? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049778) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 5:32 PM Author: Offensive galvanic mediation Exactly. Like an Ann Coulter that everyone can hate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049783) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 2:29 PM Author: Beady-eyed Navy International Law Enforcement Agency too many rachel maddow similarities (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11058057) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:32 PM Author: irradiated dull hall ha, fair enough, but this is more consistent with how i remember it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049212) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 5:30 AM Author: sienna narrow-minded resort hunting ground why the fuck would someone mention this on a message board? maybe that's the diff between then and now -- less idiots now. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11055905) |
|
↗ Patreon
https://www.patreon.com/iamgay Date: March 4th, 2009 4:32 PM Author: rachmiel No. They were two separate incidents. His girlfriend died following a horseback riding accident. He encouraged her to go horseback riding.
I know, because I was the one who got into his e-mail in the first place. I considered him an enemy of the community because I suspected he was causing threads to be deleted and people to be banned. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:34 PM Author: irradiated dull hall btw, i remember that you once had to warn me via e-mail about spamming xoxo with some manner of really bad bathroom humor. good times all around. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049223) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 10:27 AM Author: apoplectic brunch immigrant you are a really creepy jew (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11056170) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:32 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo remember when he passed out while taking a science final as a cornell senior? he was awake for 48 hours and taking adderall or something and completely conked out on his desk. the prof yelled at him for being an idiot and let him take the test later that day.
i think that this was after the infamous rats incident, when he thought he saw hordes of rats everywhere after staying up for too long.
in other posts he said that he worked on about 4 hours of sleep a night and needed to take sleeping pills to fall asleep. yeah, definitely some issues. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:35 PM Author: irradiated dull hall all of that studying paid off, though. he ended up going to a top-5 or -6 med school, i think. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049232) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:41 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo he was rumored to be going to duke, i think.
he had really crazy EC engagements like community service, bible study, etc. which he could have cut pretty easily, i think. |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 5:28 AM Author: sienna narrow-minded resort hunting ground haha (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11055904) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:28 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo tpr droid (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049170) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2009 11:36 PM Author: adulterous tank yes!!! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#12080179) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 5:26 PM Author: sticky lascivious market trust fund (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049726) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 9:04 PM Author: cracking area lol Josh Lewis! he was an assclown! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11061211) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:41 PM Author: Copper filthy gay wizard In the beginning rachmiel created the heavens and the eart. 2 And the eart was waste and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep: and the Spirit of rachmiel moved upon the face of the waters. 3 And rachmiel said, Let there be a board: and there was a board. 4 And rachmiel saw the board, that it was good: and rachmiel divided the college board from the law board. 5 And rachmiel called the college board The most prestigious college discussion board in the world, and the law board he called The most prestigious law school discussion board in the world. And there was a grad board and there was search, one day. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 5:12 PM Author: cocaine farts (WWAD?) 170 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049586) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:44 PM Author: floppy business firm By the way, am I the only one who still doesn't believe Ryan's Alexa story, and believe it was a story concocted across several message boards? Did anyone ever get any confirmation beyond the consistency? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049309) |
|
↗ Patreon
https://www.patreon.com/iamgay Date: March 4th, 2009 4:44 PM Author: rachmiel I have saved evidence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049311) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:48 PM Author: floppy business firm What is it?
Though honestly I think you could provide me with Alexa's corpse and I'm not sure I'd believe it. The story was just so ridiculous and played like a Very Special Episode. He also intermittently brought it up, was unable or unwilling to share any details about her illness despite chattering on about it endlessly in all other respects, and the only picture he provided of her appeared to be cut out of a large group picture. |
|
↗ Patreon
https://www.patreon.com/iamgay Date: March 4th, 2009 4:51 PM Author: rachmiel I have a multitude of e-mails. I saved them all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049357) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:59 PM Author: floppy business firm Yeah, that doesn't convince me though. That just seems like consistency, which i don't think is very hard to do.
I was never able to find an obituary either. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 5:24 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo this seems pretty hard to believe without some sort of smoking gun.
but then again i never would have thought that lt. wallace wynne was a fake, so you never know. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 5:32 PM Author: floppy business firm Why's it so hard to say your girlfriend died and then refuse to divulge details about it or yourself?
Ryan was very secretive about most everything. I don't think any of the Cornell students knew him IRL, though I remember a lot of them spotting Harvard Hopeful running around in his fur coat.
I tend to assume most things on the internet are fake until proven true. I didn't believe Hopeful had cancer (though I'm a lot less skeptical about that than I am about Ryan's story) and I didn't believe that girl who was stringing Leo along for ages. The latter was confirmed false, at least. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 9:56 PM Author: pea-brained site You didn't find anything to corroborate this lifestory in his email mailbox?
Why would his password be cornell1 if he didn't actually go to Cornell? |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 9:58 AM Author: floppy business firm I remember emails to PR regulars about Alexa, but that doesn't really convince me. I still think it's part of some elaborate backstory that he concocted for himself. I just don't understand the secrecy and lack of evidence otherwise.
I had issues with the Cornell thing just because he was so stupid. I'm willing to believe he went there, though if I recall correctly, some one traced his IP address to Mountainview, CA.
|
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 2:35 PM Author: Beady-eyed Navy International Law Enforcement Agency i remember that too, but if he used a proxy i wouldnt be surprised if it were located in silicon valley (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11058118) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 2:33 PM Author: Beady-eyed Navy International Law Enforcement Agency I totally forgot about hopeful. She seemed legit to me, but had a lot of things about her that were really fucking weird.
Also, another old forgotten CB regs: Assmaster. Then there was the girl whose handle i'm forgetting, but went to that small liberal arts school in the northeast. totally forgetting her name, but she was really cool. |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 3:12 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo oh man assmaster was a cool dood, i wonder what happened to him.
you might be thinking of scheisse_adc who went to bowdoin. |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 5:35 PM Author: Beady-eyed Navy International Law Enforcement Agency assmaster was female and was hilarious. i think she went to utoronto and stopped posting. i'm not thinking of scheisse, but someone a year older. the person i'm thinking of went to connecticut college, i think.
another one i just remembered: elizabethtx |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 5:38 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo hmmm i'm thinking of someone else (he went to drake college in IA). i don't remember anyone from conn coll.
elizabeth was cool b/c of the free usnews pass. |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 6:04 PM Author: Beady-eyed Navy International Law Enforcement Agency it may have been hamilton. either way, it's likely both were not advertised over the board. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11059912) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2009 11:31 PM Author: nighttime yellow ladyboy wow i totally forgot about this
|
|
Date: November 23rd, 2009 10:35 PM Author: magical vigorous death wish lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#13352102) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2009 10:37 PM Author: judgmental crackhouse genital piercing Can someone summarize it? He killed her or something? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#13352129) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:50 PM Author: Chrome razzle-dazzle sound barrier XO is a breakaway faction of an old Department of the Interior think-tank message board. The original board was a discussion forum started in 1997, and was used at the time to discuss agriculture, forest management, etc. Over time, it started pulling in people interested in college and law school admissions, because of scholarships offered by the think tank.
Then it got wild.
In-thread image and audio posts were allowed. This was done at first to share visuals on forest projects and things like that. Lots of photos and charts and graphs. But then people started posting pr0n, horse pr0n, tentacle pr0n, reams of r@ygold, 88, and all kinds of shit. It was like every time you opened a link, you were going to get a bunch of 10-year-old naked girls being assfucked with icicles made from the blood of puppies they were forced to strangle. And they were laying on top of the pile of dead puppies.
The moderator, Jeff Adams, wanted to get the board back to its orginal mission, so he banned 90% of the accounts and switched the board to a different format. There was an FBI crackdown, and about 10 regulars were arrested for r@ygold, including :D, but the charges didn't stick.
So, XO was started with the goal of getting back the freedom of the old board, but without all the sick r@ygold. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 5:14 PM Author: cocaine farts (WWAD?) tyft (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049596) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 5:34 PM Author: razzle emerald base twinkling uncleanness fucking credited. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049805) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 11:58 AM Author: Arousing sanctuary TH A ANK Y OU |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 6:32 PM Author: slap-happy bateful meetinghouse Where was this from again? I remember it being posted awhile back, but I don't remember the source. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11060068) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 7:16 PM Author: Arousing sanctuary Petro (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11060338) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 8:14 PM Author: slap-happy bateful meetinghouse ty. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11060818) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:05 PM Author: Infuriating Associate SWEET (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#15938875) |
|
Date: March 12th, 2011 5:13 PM Author: Deep Violet Parlour Round Eye (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#17492231) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:50 PM Author: opaque glittery keepsake machete Does anyone remember Roger Luo getting lost and disoriented when the board made the shift from PR to XOXO? Classic stuff right there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049353) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 5:34 AM Author: sienna narrow-minded resort hunting ground this sounds pretty funny (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11055907) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2009 11:57 PM Author: primrose ungodly gunner boistinker lolz (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#12080429) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 4:51 PM Author: vibrant charcoal travel guidebook He's been mentioned above, but Sforza (the first one) was a massively-informed individual with (obviously) a lot of time on his hands.
In a break with tradition (on all the incarnations of this board), he actually adduced evidence/links to support the positions he took on various topics. He changed my mind on one or two things (e.g. previously I had thought that all racial groups had similar average IQs).
There were also some helpful people whose monikers I can't even remember now. One ended up at Penn, I think: a veteran who got a 175 LSAT (back when a 170 was still considered an exceptional score--so I've got to be remembering the PR days). Anyway, he had great advice on LSAT prep. And somebody else mentioned the vibrating wwristwatch, which I actually used on my LSAT re-take and one or two other situations (I know I used it for my Kaplan audition).
Anyway, thanks to all for bringing back some memories. Where did Barzini (aka Francis) end up--he decided against the law after getting dinged everywhere, right?
Oh, and a word that will probably stay with me for a few more decades: "turdodynamic." |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 5:06 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo i think barzini got admission pwned in the 04-05 admissions cycle. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049532) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 9:56 PM Author: Exhilarant silver menage turdskin wait barzini's name is francis? why does this board attract so many guys with that name who end up getting outed & leaving? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11052673) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 6:24 PM Author: Hideous Church Codepig kant + barzini... who else? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11060027) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 6:34 PM Author: slap-happy bateful meetinghouse Barzini got rejection pwn3d by all of the T14. His LSN used to be around, but I can't find the link now. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11060084) |
|
Date: June 25th, 2009 12:04 AM Author: primrose ungodly gunner boistinker Barzini pined about getting laid. In Spring of 2006 a series of posts about pwning the cunnus of a jewess (including one applying economic analysis to determine whether pursuit of said jewess was more efficient than paying for a prostitute instead) included facebook pictures of the girl. Someone contacted her and sent the xo threads her way and that's the last I heard of Barzini. His LSAT blog was pretty helpful. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#12080522) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 5:35 PM Author: razzle emerald base twinkling uncleanness I just remember the first day when it was all one board and college posters were disgusted by the law posters. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11049815) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 6:15 PM Author: henna rebellious karate degenerate there was a great battle between hizzla and 174. I've already revealed too much. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11050199) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2009 6:17 PM Author: greedy plaza Nigger threads roamed free and unharmed by the clutches of treacherous mods. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11050234) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 12:25 PM Author: pungent locus Some of you have already said too much. You know not what you reveal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11056931) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 12:40 PM Author: sinister lake queen of the night i can't remember if it was before the switch but a bunch of posters (like 20) shared their pics and someone obviously posted them to imageshack for everyone to see. that was a scandal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11057061) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 12:41 PM Author: Cobalt cuckoldry I remember that. I am sure they are still there if someone has the link. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11057073) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 1:12 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo yeah i still have all of those pics saved. the plan was that that they would all post their pics on webshots and the link would be sent around only to people who sent a pic. tpr droid hater managed impersonate someone in the thread where this discussion was going on and get the link. J. saved all the pics in an account called "lawboardpwned;" not sure if it's still active or not. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11057338) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 1:36 PM Author: Razzmatazz house legal warrant Killuminati was jacked. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11057557) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 1:38 PM Author: Arousing sanctuary his left bicep STANFORD tattoo and right bicep YALE tattoo made me pop an insta-boner. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11057578) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2009 11:38 PM Author: magical vigorous death wish a few people managed to do the same thing, j did the deed though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#13352894) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 5:12 PM Author: Racy juggernaut trailer park It was J. and she posted them to Webshots. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11059436) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 2:52 PM Author: Beady-eyed Navy International Law Enforcement Agency also, mountaineer or whatever used to post a lot. i thought he and the OP were the same person for the past couple weeks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11058249) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 5:31 PM Author: hairraiser feces state People posted stuff like this... Actually these are from PR:
College/SAT/ACT | Business/GMAT | Law/LSAT | Medical/MCAT/USMLE Graduate/GRE | Career | Parents BackRefreshOptions
anyone compile a list of oct lsat ?s also, does anyone remember the autistic children ?... inimp 10/06/03 yes i rember that one. its a 2n question. the right asnwer i... shinotenshi 10/06/03 no i think the right answer is the one that says that medica... card02 10/06/03 Yes, this is correct. The alternate answer might be importa... Voop 10/06/03 The right answer was medication that gives false positives c... jdiddy62 10/06/03 agreed.... The Invisible Hand XX 10/06/03 replace medication with "test" Andrew from LI 10/06/03 that answer choice says, test that give false positive can ... shinotenshi 10/07/03 can someone please just tell me the main conclusion of this ... porkbun 10/07/03 No, I'm 100% sure that that was not the correct answer. Tha... dottie 10/07/03 I agree. If I remember correctly the stimulus said that the... madigana 10/07/03 YES! THAT'S IT! Exactly. I was really starting to doubt m... dottie 10/07/03 that's what I put, too... jeffspicoli 10/07/03 I agree with your statement that the argument deals with tre... Kahlua Girl 10/07/03 The conclusion of the argument was about whether or not the ... dottie 10/07/03 Hmmm. I bet you're right. My reasoning in ruling out the a... Kahlua Girl 10/07/03 I also picked the "earlier treatment" asnwer, for what it's ... rolific* 10/07/03 the wording of that was something along the lines of can you... Bokemon58 10/07/03 An even more simpler explanation, but its freakin trademarke... shinotenshi 10/07/03 i can't understand any of your above post. Which one was co... Beareater2 10/07/03 That is what I put--are you sure it is correct? What did ... ronny 10/07/03 There's a whole other thread about the smog question. You c... dottie 10/07/03 i put that tests that give false positives can still be effe... Agalon 10/07/03 This would, of course, be a primary consideration in real li... Voop 10/07/03 perceptions and beliefs ldoru 10/07/03 yes, it was the 3rd to last q in the LR section. flawed rea... retrospection 10/07/03 NUTRITION / VIOLENT TEEN QUESTION! dottie 10/07/03 Agreed Kahlua Girl 10/07/03 Yeah, thanks to Testmaster's from me, too.... dottie 10/07/03 Anyone with only 2 LR sections? Kahlua Girl 10/07/03 Oh, yeah, that was a real one. That was the very first LR q... dottie 10/07/03 I chose that answer as well because a gray rabbit is still a... Kahlua Girl 10/07/03 This is one confusing thread. So was the answer to the me... mrlucky 10/07/03 I put that too, but the most recent poster said that's wrong... Andrew from LI 10/07/03 autistic children iwantmyscore 10/07/03 That's the closest to the real answer choice I've seen on th... nycactor 10/07/03 yes! see my post below ldoru 10/07/03 The answer to the autism question was the assumption that th... dottie 10/07/03 don't be so sure.. ldoru 10/07/03 I don't remember details of this test too well, but I'm almo... dottie 10/07/03 i just remembered! ldoru 10/07/03 See Madigana's post above in the thread. She explains exact... dottie 10/07/03 I put the same answer that you put. I am 100% sure that it i... bluebell 10/07/03 answer to autism iwantmyscore 10/07/03 I don't think the benefit was that it was more accurate, it ... dottie 10/07/03 conclusion ldoru 10/07/03 I cant remember all the answer choices but i put the same a... Maui Jim 10/07/03 The answer was something like tests (not treatments...this i... Voop 10/07/03 Dottie, why would that have been the answer? I am starting ... anku 10/07/03 rc iwantmyscore 10/07/03 i do... ldoru 10/07/03 Ldoru I'm actually drawing a blank on her name. Do you reme... iwantmyscore 10/07/03 woman? that must have been experimental. mexican photographe... ldoru 10/07/03 I only had the real rc. For the cullens one, which ones can... iwantmyscore 10/07/03 ok i've got some for ya.. ldoru 10/07/03 Hey thanks. "what is the purpose of the specific referenc... iwantmyscore 10/07/03 Ldoru, regarding the question in the Countee Cullen section ... nycactor 10/07/03 i found the one you chose seductive as well but in the end d... ldoru 10/07/03 I picked the answer that nycactor picked because in that par... Kahlua Girl 10/07/03 i could very well stand corrected because i read through tha... ldoru 10/07/03 regarding the victorian philanthropy passage, i didn't think... Agalon 10/07/03 oops..meant to post this here ldoru 10/07/03 I don't know; now I'm starting to doubt myself. EDIT: No... dottie 10/07/03 We need someone with a photographic memory.... iwantmyscore 10/07/03 There were only 2 RC ?s that gave me trouble, and I can reca... mrlucky 10/07/03 I think I remember choosing an answer saying that the govern... nycactor 10/07/03 nycactor, I put that also.... iwantmyscore 10/07/03 That's right.... dottie 10/07/03 sorry.. ldoru 10/07/03 shit. not what i needed to hear. maybe i need to revisit t... mrlucky 10/07/03 ok let's remember something here.. ldoru 10/07/03 thanks but i'm already well into the double digits on misses... mrlucky 10/07/03 which game was experimental? washdc 10/07/03 Yeah. I only had one games section (my first). It was: dr... dottie 10/07/03 ... CoolDogM 10/07/03 If I'm not getting mixed up, wasn't it "cynical skepticism,"... nycactor 10/07/03 cynical skepticism does ring a bell.... I still chose it ove... CoolDogM 10/07/03 I think you are right Andrew from LI 10/07/03 The correct answer (100% sure) is strong disagreement.... bluebell 10/07/03 strong opposition ldoru 10/07/03 well chalk up another wrong answer for me....... CoolDogM 10/07/03 I put strong opposition. Pretty sure this is right. It did... dottie 10/07/03 Strong disagreement?... Voop 10/07/03 ... bolkonski 10/07/03 Didn't the poems mentioned in the 2nd parragraph of the RC p... l-sizzel 10/07/03 That's what I put... bolkonski 10/07/03 Yes, I think only perhaps half of that paragraph dealt with ... nycactor 10/07/03 but, nycactor, the question was not about the 2nd paragraph ... ldoru 10/07/03 Well, you may be right, ldoru, but I am positive that there ... nycactor 10/07/03 Ditto. There was, indeed, a supportive critic at the begi... .zarathustra. 10/07/03 ok i remember that the wording of the critic answer choice j... ldoru 10/07/03 sorry i honestly think that was the sucker choice...... ldoru 10/07/03 It was. ... .zarathustra. 10/07/03 hey zara are you on im? if so, can you msg me? sn: Ldoru... ldoru 10/07/03 Yeah, critics' objections. ... dottie 10/07/03 So what about the third or fourth question in the LR section... CoolDogM 10/07/03 Weren't these seperate questions?... iwantmyscore 10/07/03 Does anyone remember the question about military buildup com... bolkonski 10/07/03 Yeah and I think the answer I put said just because somethin... iwantmyscore 10/07/03 What about it? Conclusion: prevent military build-up, ke... .zarathustra. 10/07/03 Was the answer written in kinda vauge terms? Something like ... bolkonski 10/07/03 Yeah, that's the one.... dottie 10/07/03 Was my answer relating to your assumption or did i get this ... iwantmyscore 10/07/03 I just remember the way my answer choice sounded. It could ... bolkonski 10/07/03 exactly ldoru 10/07/03 ldoru, what was the wording of your military buildup answer?... iwantmyscore 10/07/03 i'm sorry..i don't really remember the wording. ... ldoru 10/07/03 Easy question just checking iwantmyscore 10/07/03 I remember the answer that I picked saying something about t... Kahlua Girl 10/07/03 me too... The Invisible Hand XX 10/07/03 I put the choice that dealt with .... something like that th... CoolDogM 10/07/03 yup. it was about bristles getting worn out which affected t... ldoru 10/07/03 # of games Q's Tuxpan 10/07/03 the real section had 24 questions. How can you guys not f... The Invisible Hand XX 10/07/03 In the Victorian passage, does anyone remember b as an answe... iwantmyscore 10/07/03 steak restaurant question tia 10/07/03 I put something like they may be reducing their red meat int... bolkonski 10/07/03 Right. I think the answer choice was something to the effec... Kahlua Girl 10/07/03 Yup.... dottie 10/07/03 i think this was a weaken question. i remember the argument ... ldoru 10/07/03 oh one more thing tia 10/07/03 unemployment/inflation tia 10/07/03 In regards to the autism question, I dont believe it is ... new commenter.... reader before 10/07/03 Indeed. It does not destroy the conclusion. See my threa... .zarathustra. 10/07/03 other questions new commenter.... reader before 10/07/03 This is the last time I'll post about it, I promise. But I ... dottie 10/07/03 very much agreed tia 10/07/03 But who said that the answer choice only applied to kids wit... .zarathustra. 10/07/03 cullen new commenter.... reader before 10/07/03 I remember this one, but I don't remember exactly what I put... dottie 10/07/03 A test cannot be benifical. do you understand that. I know i... shinotenshi 10/07/03 exactly. The researchers KNOW the test has false positive... ronny 10/07/03 You need to read more carfully next time. The researchers on... shinotenshi 10/07/03 Dude, whatever. It doesn't really matter now. But don't ta... dottie 10/07/03 This kid a fucking moron. You'd be well-advised to ignore... .zarathustra. 10/07/03 name calling. please i work in a lab, not that you need to a... shinotenshi 10/07/03 Did you ever read the directions to the LSAT? Something a... .zarathustra. 10/07/03 none of your lab experience has anything to do with the lsat... Agalon 10/07/03 i think an answer choice was something about technology and ... tia 10/07/03 hehe. this is hilarious new commenter.... reader before 10/07/03 Few questions: Games #24 - Min distance? A: 2 African... Voop 10/07/03 Voop, we agree on all. Do you rememberthe two letters for... .zarathustra. 10/07/03 I believe the two letters were H and K. Then again, I am th... Voop 10/07/03 If you give me the answer choices, I will remember. I was p... .zarathustra. 10/07/03 F and G were the two that had to sit directly across from ea... nycactor 10/07/03 its not outside knowledge. this question comes up every time... shinotenshi 10/07/03 grouping game ldoru 10/07/03 I'm hoping the answer was 5, but I didn't have time to exhau... nycactor 10/07/03 I believe it was 4.... Voop 10/07/03 A NEW ARG QUESTION rolific* 10/07/03 Some graduate students are over-worked. I think choice (C).... .zarathustra. 10/07/03 i dont remember which was which but here's how it went: m... ldoru 10/07/03 Concerning the graduate, overworked, happy question. I be... Voop 10/07/03
Post new message in this thread
TopPrevious
NextPrintReply
Date: October 06, 2003 05:15 PM Author: inimp
also, does anyone remember the autistic children ?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5773286)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 06, 2003 11:44 PM Author: shinotenshi (cmyco@bellatlantic.net)
yes i rember that one. its a 2n question. the right asnwer is that the author assumes that those children that get the false positive arent hurt by the treatment.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5776316)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 06, 2003 11:46 PM Author: card02
no i think the right answer is the one that says that medication that gives false positives can still be beneficial
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5776334)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 06, 2003 11:54 PM Author: Voop
Yes, this is correct. The alternate answer might be important to consider, but is beyond the scope of the conclusion, which dealt only with genuinely autistic children.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5776432)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 06, 2003 11:50 PM Author: jdiddy62
The right answer was medication that gives false positives can still be beneficial.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5776406)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 06, 2003 11:51 PM Author: The Invisible Hand XX (caught masturbating during the Enron scandal but still #1)
agreed.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5776410)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 06, 2003 11:56 PM Author: Andrew from LI Subject: replace medication with "test"
but yeah, I had the same answer as you guys, I'm pretty sure.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5776460)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 01:12 AM Author: shinotenshi (cmyco@bellatlantic.net)
that answer choice says, test that give false positive can be benifical but im sorry that choice is incorrect.. the unstated premise that the argument depends on is that children arent who test falsely test positive arent hurt. the author would like all childeren to have this test, but this arguement can only work if the children who have false positve arent harmed. otherwise the entire arguement falls apart. if the tests results in some children being hurt and some being helped, how could he possible reccomend it for all children. remember there was no way to tell wether the test was false until after treatment. the whole point of the test was the early treatment. if the treatment hurts some children then the test is pointless and his entire arguement becomes mute. to put it another way, the test being benifcial even if you have false positives depends upon those false positives not being hurt by the treatment. the arguement is not about the test its about the to treating all babies who are postive after taking the test.i know people think these lr's were easy but they are wrong. thanks to testmasters ive seen every lr ever given on an actual exams, and these were the hardest sections ive seen on a single exam. the questions were very tricky.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777110)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 02:10 AM Author: porkbun
can someone please just tell me the main conclusion of this autistic kid argument? like as closely as you can possibly remember.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777382)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:14 AM Author: dottie
No, I'm 100% sure that that was not the correct answer. That was out of the scope of the argument. The conclusion dealt only with whether or not the test would help *autistic* children. The children with false positives are on their own.
EDIT: The answer, I just remembered, was the assumption that there was no test already developed that detected autism as early.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778000)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:30 AM Author: madigana
I agree. If I remember correctly the stimulus said that there was a new way to diagnose autism at an ealy age and concluded that now children could be diagnosed earlier and have a better chance of successful treatmet. The stimulus said nothing of prior forms of diagnoses of that this new form allowed docs to diagnose children at a younger age that existing methods of diagnosis. I said the argument rested on the fact that there weren't exisitng forms of diagnosis that allowed docs to effectives detect autism early....
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778070)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:07 AM Author: dottie
YES! THAT'S IT! Exactly. I was really starting to doubt myself, but that's it. Whew. Thanks.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778214)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 02:39 PM Author: jeffspicoli
that's what I put, too
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5779346)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:14 AM Author: Kahlua Girl
I agree with your statement that the argument deals with treatment after the test. However, I think that the correct answer is that false positives can yield beneficial treatment. If you negate that by saying that false positives cannot yield beneficial treatment, then the argument falls apart because the test is then useless, as the test results in false positives.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778003)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:19 AM Author: dottie
The conclusion of the argument was about whether or not the test is beneficial to young children with autism. Its benefit is based on the fact that it detects it earlier. But if a test had already been developed that detected autism in children that young, then the new test is not in fact beneficial. It's all in the way they word the conclusion of the argument.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778018)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:26 AM Author: Kahlua Girl
Hmmm. I bet you're right. My reasoning in ruling out the answer you picked was that even if there was another test that applied to children so young (e.g. negating the answer choice), the new test could still be beneficial in and of itself. That's why I went for the false positives answer. It seemed that if you negated it, the argument would then fall apart.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778054)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 02:56 PM Author: rolific* (rolific@yahoo.co.uk)
I also picked the "earlier treatment" asnwer, for what it's worth. Definitely a very trickly question!
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5779454)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 09:34 AM Author: Bokemon58
the wording of that was something along the lines of can you make reasonable treatment decisions if you have false positives, or something close right?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777916)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 01:48 AM Author: shinotenshi (cmyco@bellatlantic.net)
An even more simpler explanation, but its freakin trademarked, but trust me, its that the treatment doesnt cause harm to normal babies, you can show that the test being benifiacal is pretty irrelevant.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777263)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 01:51 AM Author: Beareater2
i can't understand any of your above post. Which one was correct?
EDIT: nevermind
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777273)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 09:29 AM Author: ronny
That is what I put--are you sure it is correct?
What did you get for the wind/smog question?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777906)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:10 AM Author: dottie
There's a whole other thread about the smog question. You can do a search. Basically, it was the set answer.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778223)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:20 PM Author: Agalon
i put that tests that give false positives can still be effective. if tests that give false positives aren't effective, then the test is ineffective and will not benefit children from early diagnosis.
the answer was definately not 'there was no test that could detect autism this early before', because the question specifically qualifies the test as being an 'effective new test'. that means there could have been ineffective or less effective tests before this new test was released.
i have no idea what answer you actually put, but it is pretty clear that if you negate the false positive assumption the argument falls apart.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778468)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:46 PM Author: Voop
This would, of course, be a primary consideration in real life. However, the conclusion of the argument dealt only with autistic children. Don't confuse what the argument said with what it should have said.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778601)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 02:06 AM Author: ldoru Subject: perceptions and beliefs
does anyone remember this q? i think it was a parallel reasoning
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777346)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 04:35 AM Author: retrospection
yes, it was the 3rd to last q in the LR section. flawed reasoning. choice A was art. choice E was physics. i put e but not sure if that was right.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777819)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 09:14 AM Author: dottie Subject: NUTRITION / VIOLENT TEEN QUESTION!
I just remembered this guy; he really pissed me off. I was trying to decide between --the other prisoners who didn't get more nutrients did not also become less violent and some other one. I picked the first. That's the right answer, right? Because if the prisoners who didn't change their diets also became less violent during those months, then there would have been a cause other than nutrients. Anyone remember?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777880)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 09:18 AM Author: Kahlua Girl Subject: Agreed
I'm not sure if this was the right answer, but I picked the same one that you did because it strengthens the causal relationship that the stimulus was trying to get at by ruling out an alternate cause. (Thanks, Testmaster's!)
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777888)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:06 AM Author: dottie
Yeah, thanks to Testmaster's from me, too.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777981)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 09:15 AM Author: Kahlua Girl Subject: Anyone with only 2 LR sections?
Did you have the gray rabbits/suspected criminals question? In other words, was that question on an experimental section or on a real section?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777883)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:09 AM Author: dottie
Oh, yeah, that was a real one. That was the very first LR question I got (my third section). What was that answer? I think I got the right one, but it was confusing (not the flaw, but how they worded the answer choices). I think I put that the relationship between being a gray rabbit and being a rabbit is not the same as the relationship between being a suspected criminal and being a criminal. Sounds right to me.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777989)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:18 AM Author: Kahlua Girl
I chose that answer as well because a gray rabbit is still a rabbit, whereas a suspected criminal is not necessarily a criminal.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778011)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 09:19 AM Author: mrlucky
This is one confusing thread.
So was the answer to the medication question that treatments that sometimes yield inaccurate diagnoses can still be beneficial? That's what I put.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777891)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:08 AM Author: Andrew from LI
I put that too, but the most recent poster said that's wrong.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5777983)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:19 AM Author: iwantmyscore Subject: autistic children
I could have sworn the final conclusion of this argument was talking about all autistic children not all children but could be wrong.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778016)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:55 AM Author: nycactor
That's the closest to the real answer choice I've seen on this thread, and I'm almost positive it's correct. It is an assumption that is REQUIRED for the conclusion to be valid. If a test that sometimes results in a false positive cannot be beneficial, then the conclusion falls apart.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778179)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:12 AM Author: ldoru Subject: yes! see my post below
i wish i could remember the wording better though..
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778226)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:17 AM Author: dottie
The answer to the autism question was the assumption that there was no test already developed that detected autism as early. I'm sure of this.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778008)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:33 AM Author: ldoru Subject: don't be so sure..
sorry dottie but negating that (there is an already existing test that detects autism as early) would by no means have broken down the argument. i really don't think thats the answer.
can someone please remember the other answer choices???
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778091)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:54 AM Author: dottie
I don't remember details of this test too well, but I'm almost positive that there was something in the argument that specifically tied the benefit of the new test to the fact that it could detect autism so early and that the conclusion somehow made that correlation again, in a way that made it necessary.
I could be wrong though, of course.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778178)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:09 AM Author: ldoru Subject: i just remembered!
ok so the conclusion was something along the lines of "So, this new method of early detection proves to be beneficial to all austic children" does that sound right? i know it definitely had to do w/ austic children and not all children. ok now i think that i did in fact but the test that produces false positives can result in beneficial treatment ..because if it is negated it would be "a test that produces false positives cannot result in beneficial treatment" and that would break down the conclusion that this new method of testing is beneficial to autistic children...
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778220)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:12 AM Author: dottie
See Madigana's post above in the thread. She explains exactly what I was trying to say.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778228)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 02:18 PM Author: bluebell
I put the same answer that you put. I am 100% sure that it is right.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5779198)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:34 AM Author: iwantmyscore Subject: answer to autism
Although I can't remember what I put for an answer, I don't think it was the answer relating to no test existing to detect autism as early. I think the argument was talking about a new test that is more accurate with detecting autism. They could have had earlier tests that tested positively but were not as accurate. Again, I'm having trouble remembering everything but I think this was my reasoning when I crossed that choice out.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778092)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:42 AM Author: dottie
I don't think the benefit was that it was more accurate, it just detected it early (albeit accurately, at least for those who actually had it). Since it detected the disease early, they could start treatment early. That was the benefit.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778332)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:52 AM Author: ldoru Subject: conclusion
i am pretty sure that the conclusion referred to autistic children as well, and i remember picking an answer choice that when negated, casted doubt on that conclusion but i honestly cannot remember which one it is. i dont think it was test that yields negative results one though..
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778162)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 01:48 PM Author: Maui Jim
I cant remember all the answer choices but i put the same as dottie! it took me a while to understand that question
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778999)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:44 PM Author: Voop
The answer was something like tests (not treatments...this is important) that sometimes yield inaccurate diagnoses can still be beneficial. The conclusion of the argument concerned only genuinely autistic children.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778584)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:28 AM Author: anku
Dottie, why would that have been the answer? I am starting to feel really bad abt this test...ugh
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778063)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:51 AM Author: iwantmyscore Subject: rc
Anyone remember any of the rc questions?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778159)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:02 AM Author: ldoru Subject: i do...
which passage? i remember quite a few..
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778202)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:18 AM Author: iwantmyscore
Ldoru I'm actually drawing a blank on her name. Do you remember any questions on the passage about that woman?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778249)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:25 AM Author: ldoru
woman? that must have been experimental. mexican photographer? i had that as experimental. to refresh, the real rc was copyright, cullens, renewable energy sources, and victorian philanthropy
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778272)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:40 AM Author: iwantmyscore
I only had the real rc. For the cullens one, which ones can you recall? My memory is hazy on this one.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778324)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:39 AM Author: ldoru Subject: ok i've got some for ya..
on the copyright passage.. main point. i think i put c, which summarized the result of the trial and not d, which said something like and it will discourage publishers from pursuing legal cases (which was not discussed in the passage)
which one is most analogous to a prof making coursepacks? choir director taking segments of songs of other choir and making a compilation tape.
on the cullens passage..which one of the following most represents his ideas on form? writing a poem within a particular form relating to death
what is the purpose of the specific references to his poems in the 2nd paragraph? i put that something like that it detailed the scope of racial themes in his poems.
which one of the following is the organization of the passage i think i put e, one that didnt start with "giving biographical data"
on the victorian philanthropy passage what do the two modern theories have in common? i think i may have put that they look at victorian philanthropists in a negative light
what was the organization of the passage, last one on rc
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778316)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:45 AM Author: iwantmyscore
Hey thanks.
"what is the purpose of the specific references to his poems in the 2nd paragraph? i put that something like that it detailed the scope of racial themes in his poems"
For this one above, Did the answer or passage for this one use the word range?
Also I didn't get to the philanthropy one but do you remember the letter b for any answers?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778346)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:46 AM Author: nycactor
Ldoru, regarding the question in the Countee Cullen section that asked about the reference to particular poems in the second paragraph, I think I put a different answer than yours, although I found the choice you made seductive. I'm hoping the right answer had to do with providing specific examples relating to the various points of view of the critics referenced in the paragraph. I can't remember the exact wording at all, and I'm not sure I'm right.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778349)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:52 AM Author: ldoru
i found the one you chose seductive as well but in the end decided that it wasn't the purpose of the specific reference to the poems. i think it said something like to affirm the critics' claims or something..
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778375)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:58 AM Author: Kahlua Girl
I picked the answer that nycactor picked because in that paragraph it talked about what the critics had to say and the poems mentioned were examples of what the critics saw as flaws in Cullen's work.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778398)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:34 PM Author: ldoru
i could very well stand corrected because i read through that passage fairly quickly, but i think there were three groups of theorists: the older theory, which is the one you outlined, and the two modern theories, the control theorists and the people who assumed that the state was necessarily the major source of philanthropy. i also specifically remember that the question asked what the two *modern* theories had in common..
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778527)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:24 PM Author: Agalon
regarding the victorian philanthropy passage, i didn't think that the first theory regarded victorian philanthropists themselves in a negative light. the first theory generally thought that they were well intentioned, but that their actions had unintended consequeences that were negative.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778484)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:37 PM Author: ldoru Subject: oops..meant to post this here
i could very well stand corrected because i read through that passage fairly quickly, but i think there were three groups of theorists: the older theory, which is the one you outlined, and the two modern theories, the control theorists and the people who assumed that the state was necessarily the major source of philanthropy. i also specifically remember that the question asked what the two *modern* theories had in common..
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778540)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:57 AM Author: dottie
I don't know; now I'm starting to doubt myself.
EDIT: No, I don't doubt myself anymore. See Madigana's explanation above. She explained it very well.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778187)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 10:53 AM Author: iwantmyscore
We need someone with a photographic memory.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778173)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:17 AM Author: mrlucky
There were only 2 RC ?s that gave me trouble, and I can recall only one of them. It was in the passage about renewable energy sources, and it was the last question (I think) which asked something like which of the following would cast doubt on the claims made by the Dutch company.
I put "the Dutch comp. invested more in the India project than the U.S. company did in the Brazil project."
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778246)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:22 AM Author: nycactor
I think I remember choosing an answer saying that the government of India was heavily subsidizing the program on a temporary basis, an answer which calls into question the claim that the Dutch program will be successful on a long-term basis.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778260)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:24 AM Author: iwantmyscore
nycactor, I put that also.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778267)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:37 AM Author: dottie
That's right.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778312)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:23 AM Author: ldoru Subject: sorry..
but i'm fairly positive that the answer to that one was about the indian government subsidizing the project and therefore it was able to make a profit. the argument was that a profitable renewable energy source could be developed, as in the danish case (not dutch), and could most likely remain so in the long run. if, however, the project required government funding to do so it casts doubts on its long term sustainability
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778266)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:49 AM Author: mrlucky
shit. not what i needed to hear. maybe i need to revisit the cancellation possbility. *sigh*
i thought that was a hard question. i had it narrowed down to the one i put and the correct one. but, as %^&*ing usual, i put the wrong one. my rationale was if the Dutch pumped in lots of money, then there's less local initiative being taken as opposed to brazil.
i have to stay off this board b/c every one of the questions that gets discussed depresses me more and more
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778362)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:59 AM Author: ldoru Subject: ok let's remember something here..
you can get *two* questions wrong and still get a 180! plus, the questions we tend to remember are those that we had trouble with, so most of the questions discussed on the board were the harder ones on the test. just because you got one question wrong doesn't mean you should cancel. don't forget all those questions you potentially got right that we aren't even bothering to discuss!
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778403)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:42 PM Author: mrlucky
thanks but i'm already well into the double digits on misses.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778573)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:15 AM Author: washdc (janee_andersen@hotmail.com) Subject: which game was experimental?
I had two games...one experimental. If you only had one game, what were your problems? Did you have one with a circle?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778235)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:39 AM Author: dottie
Yeah. I only had one games section (my first). It was: dresses, committees, songs, and the picnic table.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778315)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:47 AM Author: CoolDogM Subject: ...
Do you guys remember the question about the philanthopy passage regarding the author's opinion? (At least I think it was that passage) Anyways, the I remember the first choice being something like "strong opposition" and the second choice being something like "cautious skepticism" and I think I ruled out the other three so I don't remember them, but I put B, the one about skepticism because A seemed too strong. Anyone remember this question more in detail?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778357)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:51 AM Author: nycactor
If I'm not getting mixed up, wasn't it "cynical skepticism," instead of "cautious skepticism?" I thought the use of the word cynical was a little extreme, so I chose the strong disagreement answer (though I have to admit, I'd have been more comfortable with a cautious skepticism answer choice).
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778371)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:53 AM Author: CoolDogM
cynical skepticism does ring a bell.... I still chose it over A however because it seemed the lesser of two extremes, I wasn't sure though
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778377)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:54 AM Author: Andrew from LI Subject: I think you are right
I am 97% sure the correct answer was "strong disagreement", as the author was not just skeptical of the Whig argument/theory, he strongly disagreed with it.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778385)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 02:21 PM Author: bluebell
The correct answer (100% sure) is strong disagreement.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5779215)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:56 AM Author: ldoru Subject: strong opposition
the author's point was to refute the assumption that the state must necessarily the provider of philanthropy (welfare state type theory) so i was pretty comfortable w/ the strong opposition one
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778390)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:58 AM Author: CoolDogM
well chalk up another wrong answer for me....
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778399)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 01:26 PM Author: dottie
I put strong opposition. Pretty sure this is right. It did seem a bit too strong, but overall accurate, and all the others could be eliminated.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778845)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 02:37 PM Author: Voop
Strong disagreement?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5779330)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:00 PM Author: bolkonski
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778408)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:56 AM Author: l-sizzel
Didn't the poems mentioned in the 2nd parragraph of the RC passage discribe critics objections to the poet. rather than provide example of the scope of racial themes?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778391)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 11:57 AM Author: bolkonski
That's what I put
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778396)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:03 PM Author: nycactor
Yes, I think only perhaps half of that paragraph dealt with Cullen's dealing with racial themes...the first part of the paragraph dealt with how he was adept at using the European style...something about the mood of a Romantic English poem? and an example was referenced that dealt with that idea, as opposed to racial issues. That's why I think the "scope of racial issues in Cullen's poetry" choice was wrong.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778418)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:08 PM Author: ldoru
but, nycactor, the question was not about the 2nd paragraph itself, it was about the specific references to the poems in the 2nd paragraph! they all dealt with racial themes as did the criticism of his work. i remember finding something in the passage that alluded to his describing the scope to which he incorporated this theme.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778433)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:14 PM Author: nycactor
Well, you may be right, ldoru, but I am positive that there was a supportive critic at the top of the paragraph that liked cullen's use of the European style, and there was definitely a poem referenced that was an example of that. That poem may or may not, I don't remember, have dealt with race thematically, but regardless, that was not the reason the poem was cited as an example. So I still think (but could be wrong) that the "scope of racial issues" answer was a red herring.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778456)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:45 PM Author: .zarathustra.
Ditto.
There was, indeed, a supportive critic at the beginning of that paragraph.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778597)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:24 PM Author: ldoru
ok i remember that the wording of the critic answer choice just didn't seem to fit. i think it said something like "in order to further the claims of the critics" if that were the case, he didn't use the specific poem reference to further the claims of the critics. i think that is what made it wrong to me. i'm not denying the poem references had some relation to his response to the critics, though.
oh and i'm fairly positive all the poems referred to had racial themes. at the end of the paragraph he also quoted cullens or something about the use of racial themes in his poetry. then in the last paragraph he said that while he shifted more towards relgious themes, he had not fully abandoned the use of raced-related themes in his poetry.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778486)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:05 PM Author: ldoru
sorry i honestly think that was the sucker choice...
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778423)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:41 PM Author: .zarathustra.
It was.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778570)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:48 PM Author: ldoru
hey zara are you on im? if so, can you msg me? sn: Ldoru
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778613)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 01:27 PM Author: dottie
Yeah, critics' objections.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778857)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:00 PM Author: CoolDogM
So what about the third or fourth question in the LR section that started with the rabbits and criminals. The one with treatment X causes disease Y or something of that nature. I just remember putting that the argument had not established a conclusion between X and Y. Thoughts?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778407)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:14 PM Author: iwantmyscore
Weren't these seperate questions?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778458)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:09 PM Author: bolkonski
Does anyone remember the question about military buildup coming before wars?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778437)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:13 PM Author: iwantmyscore
Yeah and I think the answer I put said just because something has happened in a few instances in the past does not mean it will happen again
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778449)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:14 PM Author: .zarathustra.
What about it?
Conclusion: prevent military build-up, keep the peace.
Assumption: military build-ups are the only things that could cause wars.
I hope this helps.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778454)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:17 PM Author: bolkonski
Was the answer written in kinda vauge terms? Something like an event preceeding and occurance
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778463)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 01:31 PM Author: dottie
Yeah, that's the one.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778891)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:19 PM Author: iwantmyscore
Was my answer relating to your assumption or did i get this wrong?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778466)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:21 PM Author: bolkonski
I just remember the way my answer choice sounded. It could have pointed out the assumption.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778474)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:20 PM Author: ldoru Subject: exactly
it was the contrapositive of the incorrect reversal...
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778470)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:23 PM Author: iwantmyscore
ldoru, what was the wording of your military buildup answer? Was it the one we are mentioning?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778480)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:35 PM Author: ldoru
i'm sorry..i don't really remember the wording.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778531)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:21 PM Author: iwantmyscore Subject: Easy question just checking
For the toothbrush study, I answered this question when I started freaking out in the args section. Was the answer that the third group only brushed 1/day?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778473)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:24 PM Author: Kahlua Girl
I remember the answer that I picked saying something about the hardness of the toothbrush bristles.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778482)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:37 PM Author: The Invisible Hand XX (caught masturbating during the Enron scandal but still #1)
me too
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778541)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:25 PM Author: CoolDogM
I put the choice that dealt with .... something like that the bristles on the brush break down after a month (or something like that) because that would explain why plaque levels would be higher in the groups that got one toothbrush, or the group that had the same brush, but it was just sterilized each month.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778491)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:27 PM Author: ldoru
yup. it was about bristles getting worn out which affected the effectiveness of toothbrushes even if they were sterilzed once a month.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778495)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:29 PM Author: Tuxpan Subject: # of games Q's
On Oct test how many questions were there in the Games section? And how many for each of the games?
I do believe there were seven for the first/hangers game?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778503)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:39 PM Author: The Invisible Hand XX (caught masturbating during the Enron scandal but still #1)
the real section had 24 questions.
How can you guys not figure this out? If the 22-question games counted, the test would have had only 99 questions.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778552)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:38 PM Author: iwantmyscore
In the Victorian passage, does anyone remember b as an answer since I never got to this passage?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778546) TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:52 PM Author: tia Subject: steak restaurant question
something about decrease in beef consumption but increase in steak restaurants. conclusion was that people r ignoring dr. recommendations. flaw in reasoning ? maybe... answers?
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778638)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 12:54 PM Author: bolkonski
I put something like they may be reducing their red meat intake while still eating at steak restaurants.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778658)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 01:09 PM Author: Kahlua Girl
Right. I think the answer choice was something to the effect of: It ignores the possibility that people may be following the strict dietary recommendations at home.
(http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=6&Message_ID=5778749)
TopPreviousNextPrintReply
Date: October 07, 2003 01:34 PM Author: dottie
Yup.
(http://discuss.princetonreview |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 6:00 PM Author: Racy juggernaut trailer park No shit. One of my old monikers is in there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11059886) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2009 4:15 PM Author: Razzmatazz house legal warrant good god. this is from the LSAT i took.
*shudders*
I remember immediately going home and getting on PR to get the scoop, thus setting off a vicious and self-perpetuating cycle. |
|
Date: May 28th, 2009 4:38 PM Author: marvelous rose stage national security agency So PR sucked? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11844250) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:22 PM Author: bossy cerebral sweet tailpipe Dottie was cute and had this total "come hither and crack my cervix with your dick" look on her face in her photo. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#15939000) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 7:50 PM Author: hot dead parlor ape Bateman remains the most entertaining poster in pr/xoxo history by a wide margin. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11060589) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2009 11:06 PM Author: bright pit I concur; wish he still posted here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#12079823) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2009 9:02 PM Author: cracking area those were the days! I have been here since the PR days and am happy to answer any questions (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11061193) |
|
Date: March 10th, 2009 8:24 AM Author: Arousing sanctuary Poetic Dreamer posted for like 14 hours straight the first time he came on here and changed his moniker to Captain Hook after describing his curved dong to Rowan, who was quite into it at the time, as I recall. He then became obsessed with Rowan and wrote her poetry and shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11101602) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2009 3:59 PM Author: Black pozpig Whatever happened to Andrew? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#11843871) |
|
Date: June 24th, 2009 10:54 PM Author: lavender whorehouse no props to whokebe?!
this thread was interesting but is fatally flawed. htfh |
|
Date: June 25th, 2009 9:53 PM Author: lavender whorehouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#12089319) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2009 11:45 AM Author: sienna narrow-minded resort hunting ground (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#12222212) |
|
Date: September 30th, 2009 2:58 AM Author: Mauve harsh home Xo is basically the same as it always has been. Those of us who have been around forever are fucking old now. Xo hasn't changed; we've changed. I don't expect to be amused by Xo forever any more than I would have expected my child-self to be amused by Fraggle Rock forever. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#12871718) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2009 10:33 PM Author: judgmental crackhouse genital piercing Epic fail (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#13352090) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2009 10:40 PM Author: impressive gas station everyone was way smarter and funnier. I was 21 or so and probably a sophomore in college. i found this through princeton review when i was researching back when thats all i did. i used to be really intimidated to post anything because people would make you feel stupid and they were REALLY GOOD AT IT, not like now. i felt like everyone was way sharper and better than me. i only posted here to ask school-related and career related questions and i still felt stupid even though i never talked any shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#13352159) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2009 11:43 PM Author: Garnet Stage Laser Beams what was your original moniker? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#13352935) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2009 11:06 PM Author: khaki thirsty school cafeteria water buffalo Subject: here's a classic j. / ryan thread from back in the day: Date: February 12, 2004 11:59 PM Author: Ryan from GA (Born Again) i don't think it has anything to do with homosexuality either, but making a doll with AIDS is extremely insensitive and how would you portray the HIV virus anyway?..i just don't believe the whole thing.
Date: February 13, 2004 12:01 AM Author: J. (I walk like Jayne Mansfield) You're a moron, Ryan. How is it insensitive? It's teaching South African kids to be accepting of sick children. (http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=3&Message_ID=6703082)
Date: February 13, 2004 12:07 AM Author: Ryan from GA (Born Again) they should read a book about it how the heck do you how a doll with AIDS? do they draw their blood and check for the AIDS virus? otherwise how do you decipher it from other illnesses that is prevalent in South Africa?
Date: February 13, 2004 12:10 AM Author: J. (I walk like Jayne Mansfield) "they should read a book about it how the heck do you how a doll with AIDS? do they draw their blood and check for the AIDS virus? otherwise how do you decipher it from other illnesses that is prevalent in South Africa?" It's a puppet, you fucking idiot. There's no drawing involved. And they just talk about him having AIDs, he doesn't actually bleed. Like if Oscar the Grouch has a sore throat, they don't actually take fucking swabs to his tonsils and run around performing tests for strep. Goddamn, you are stupid.
Date: February 13, 2004 12:12 AM Author: Ryan from GA (Born Again) well i thought we were talking about dolls like Barbie dolls. so if the puppet talked about it and explained it in a kind way (not the way you would talk about infirmaries and tragedies) and told them to be compassionate, then i can see it as being a positive ** and if you scroll up, no where in this sequence of posts were we referring to a puppet so don't call me an idiot..you went off on a tangent
Date: February 13, 2004 12:14 AM Author: radiohed (Sell your soul to Satan) (www.jeffandwillandradiohed.com) Can the puppet talk because it is possessed? (http://discuss.princetonreview.com/forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=3&Message_ID=6703184)
Date: February 13, 2004 12:15 AM Author: J. (I walk like Jayne Mansfield) We have already established that this is Sesame Street, idiot.
Date: February 13, 2004 12:17 AM Author: J. (I walk like Jayne Mansfield) "Sesame Street of South Africa recently introduced a character infected with HIV." A sesame Street character is either a muppet or a real person interacting with said muppets. And if you went to the BBC link, I assume they show a picture of this particularly HIV-infected muppet. Of course, you presumably live on Planet Earth, you are presumably familiar with Sesame Street. Own up, moron.
Date: February 13, 2004 12:20 AM Author: Ryan from GA (Born Again) sesame street inc also makes dolls i did not check out the link and make yourself clear i've had enough of you for one day...good nite
Date: February 13, 2004 12:22 AM Author: J. (I walk like Jayne Mansfield) Oh christ. You keep digging yourself deeper and deeper.
|
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:11 PM Author: Infuriating Associate hahaha, i miss those. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#15938905) |
|
Date: November 23rd, 2009 11:42 PM Author: magenta exciting party of the first part I heard during the hottest in the T14 contest, the site traffic was so high that you couldn't even get through. We need to dosomething like that again. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#13352931) |
|
Date: September 1st, 2010 1:12 PM Author: charismatic topaz organic girlfriend heaven xo now is better than PR at any point. If you think it's gotten worse, it hasn't. You've gotten older and your tastes have changed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#15938913) |
|
Date: March 18th, 2011 6:09 PM Author: Diverse Tanning Salon Lettuce i agree with this generally -- the only exception being that it has become less elitist/has fewer brilliant poasters. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#17544331) |
|
Date: September 13th, 2011 10:37 PM Author: twisted athletic conference hairy legs I remember that I originally posted on the board in about 2001 -- that was 10 fucking years ago. Holy shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#18965675) |
|
Date: September 13th, 2011 10:39 PM Author: out-of-control preventive strike set Back then, white people pretended to be asian and it was amusing. Then asians pretended to be black and it was disturbing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=944630&forum_id=2#18965689) |