The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Why aren't there any scifi movies where humans become anaerobic again?
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 01/06/26 |
| No Paye No Gain | 01/06/26 |
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 6th, 2026 6:58 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK Like our microbial ancestors. The backstory would be that oxygen levels plummeted and we had to adapt to survive, but we already had this capability leftover from 3 billion years ago. Among other things it would be very hard to start fires in this environment but there'd also be much less risk of electrical fire. Pretty safe to assume all fuel-burning engines just wouldn't work without supplemental oxygen (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818112&forum_id=2...#49567646) |
Date: January 6th, 2026 7:12 PM Author: No Paye No Gain Waterworld (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818112&forum_id=2...#49567666) |
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 7:14 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK Those folks became aquatic but they were still aerobic. Anaerobic life is more likely to live off thermal vents and not have gills IMO. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818112&forum_id=2...#49567669) |