The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Why would Trump or anyone think Iran will stop ? Even if he wants to back down
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 9th, 2026 3:49 PM Author: average/ordinary/typical citizen/person (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5843560&forum_id=2...#49729382) |
Date: March 9th, 2026 3:56 PM Author: UhOh there's no way israel is going to stop fucking with them and vice versa. but maybe if we back out they'll leave the gulf states and the strait alone. but how do we really back out if israel is under constant threat of annihilation? you know iran is going full speed ahead on nukes now and the rhetoric isn't going away. it's still death to israel, death to america. so we have to maintain some presence and supervision over them, which gives them the excuse to pot shot at the gulf forever and hold up the strait. hard to see how this ends short of a total take over the country which seems impossible. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5843560&forum_id=2...#49729401) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2026 4:58 PM Author: gibberish (?) How about this... the US would rather the current regime stay in power (or is at best indifferent) so long as they start playing ball and deny China. Dating back to Biden, there used to be a solid Russia/Iran/China backdoor around Eurasia and with Iran falling that's gone. They just completed a rail line from Russia to Iran and on to China. That's gone.
Iran was sucking ass and old guard wasn't cutting it. They were getting blown away by their Arab rivals who were building skyscrapers while they can't even get water to their cities.
Caution point... this is basic neo-neocon activity. It seems smarter and more guided but we've seen how these adventures go. Lots of unintended consequences. But don't be dumb and think party lines really matter beyond who wants a bigger cut of the pie. |
 |
Date: March 9th, 2026 4:59 PM Author: Consuela https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!y0Op!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F1c31b59a-9a2b-4f0c-b09a-07ba5316e7cd_1500x1347.jpeg (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5843560&forum_id=2...#49729633) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2026 5:05 PM Author: gibberish (?) You need more green arrows. Look at the Azerbaijan-Armenian 'peace' deal Trump put through last year. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5843560&forum_id=2...#49729659) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2026 5:09 PM Author: Consuela the point is that the region is being cleared for upcoming Greater Israel, not to benefit America (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5843560&forum_id=2...#49729685) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2026 5:17 PM Author: gibberish (?) I guess. The wahhabi's are already a vassel state and won't concede any actual power. We've moved way past borders on a map mattering. Our game is encircling the Eurasian world island with constant flash points. If Jews want to die for sand we'll accommodate them. It just shows that no matter how many Kissinger's they put out, they're still desert people at heart. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5843560&forum_id=2...#49729709) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2026 5:21 PM Author: things from the 90s/00s so ethereal and dreamlike: they're still desert people at heart tp (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5843560&forum_id=2...#49729719) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2026 5:21 PM Author: Consuela who is "we" and "our" in this context? who do you see at the highest layer of power? preparata believes it's anglo-american secret societies, but he doesn't really get any more specific than that. one may note that white western countries have obliterated demographics while israel's is almost 3.0 and going strong, with closed borders. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5843560&forum_id=2...#49729720) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2026 5:32 PM Author: gibberish (?) I say we as in observers of the game. Preperata is right until I see something that says otherwise. That old chess board still seems to be the one that makes all the pieces make sense. They don't seem to worry about race other than an opportunity to exploit.
I had the same question about how vague this Anglo elite reference is. Like who exactly? It's rarely someone with a figurehead position outside of a few exceptions, and even then they're lesser players usually. Churchill was definitely an example but a Montagu Norman had the real inside line. Those that are dedicated to continuing the current Anglo hegemony are still pulling the levers though. Jews work their way in but they're always on precarious footing. |
|
Date: March 9th, 2026 5:35 PM Author: Consuela i see the rothschilds, warburgs, schiffs in charge and the anglos subservient. rockefellers have a buy-in to the U.S. central bank branch but not globally. this photo sums it up
https://media.gettyimages.com/id/467631086/pt/foto/prince-charles-prince-of-wales-speaks-with-with-sir-evelyn-de-rothschild-during-a-reception-to.jpg?s=612x612&w=gi&k=20&c=xwzuUspuJUiCiahrYxsLQZl61tKA7k5tY7HRTAPQCaw= |
|
Date: March 9th, 2026 5:42 PM Author: gibberish (?) Yeah but the Jews only get there with money and they can't overplay their hand. It seems like a long shot now but whenever the bill gets too big the Jews will always blink because royalty have 'oh my, poisoned wells!' in their back pocket. Its very easy to point out the jews tenuous position as outsider to the general public. That threat is why they're always so dogged about breaking up whites culturally too. Somehow they think this diminishes the chance they get tossed out of the country. It also partially explains why they have this sad yearning for a homeland. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5843560&forum_id=2...#49729808) |
|
Date: March 9th, 2026 5:07 PM Author: gibberish (?) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zangezur_corridor#Trump_Route_for_International_Peace_and_Prosperity_(2025)
Lol peace corridor. It's a fucking dagger. |