Weird that they knew the division of the jury while deliberations were still ong
| the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) | 09/04/26 | | Gay Grandpa | 09/04/26 | | The Penis | 09/04/26 | | .,:,;,..,;.,::,..,:,.::,..,:,.,.: | 09/04/26 | | the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) | 09/04/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 4th, 2026 6:17 PM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.)
oing. In my state and circuit they're specifically told that "under no circumstances" are they to reveal their numeric division to the court.
When there're out a super-long time everyone starts speculating based on body language, but it sounds here like the foreman just ratted out the holdout?
Why did the defense even put a "6 hours a day" gamer who brought up crypto and MMA in voir dire on the jury?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900693&forum_id=2...#50116463) |
Date: September 4th, 2026 6:26 PM
Author: .,:,;,..,;.,::,..,:,.::,..,:,.,.:
CA crim appeals guy here. Happens in CA all the time. I've seen a bunch of times where the judge says "tell me the vote count, but dont tell me what the votes are / which way it is"
It seems highly relevant to the judge's determination if more deliberations would be helpful, etc.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900693&forum_id=2...#50116486) |
|
|