Ninety percent of the editors are men. And it shows. There are fewer articles on female poets than on porno actresses.

http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2013/apr/29/wikipedia-women-problem/

lmfao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23272002)

- MAF shrew

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23272027)

Washcloth in the sink

Dirt and grime on my hands

"Clean the kitchen too you beaner" says the boss

Alone with my nine children at night

We're sad

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23272043)

fuck me hard, white boi

by vicki chia (victoria chia)

http://www.linkedin.com/in/vchia

It hurts to be used as a vessel, a pocket, a wall, a tight

and soft and pristine little orifice against and into which

a man can push and force his cock and fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck,

pound, pound, pound, POUND until he comes in a shuddering,

explosive, quivering minute in which all you feel is invaded

and all he feels is damn fucking good.

He sighs, or gasps… make some sort of audible but unintelligible

grunt that expresses the brutality of his orgasm. His strength

leaves him along with the cum and he drops his head onto your

shoulder and his weight onto your body. You hold him as he

trembles inside of you, sweaty, exhausted, his ultimate man

duty fulfilled. His face is buried in the pillow behind you,

not seeing you, only feeling the walls of your pussy around

him. What I’m saying is that in this moment you feel like

you could be any other girl, any other pussy, and he’d be

feeling just as damn fucking good.

The trembling stops, he finally pulls back, looks down at

you expecting… what? bliss? You muster a smile. Was it good

for you?

When a man gives himself to a woman in bed he can feel

like a true man flexing his sexual muscle, eliciting the

moans and sighs of womanly pleasure that he tells himself

only he has the power to do. When a woman is raped all she

is is a warm, tight, moist hole that is fucked and fucked

and fucked and fucked and fucked and fucked….

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#26781396)

*crosses arms*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23272317)

Evidence?

Remember, you can't compare the "value" of different professions. The only way an assessment of under or overpayment can be made is if there is a discrepancy between that wage and the market-clearing wage, say, because of gov't wage controls. Going beyond that is baseless and indicates a fundamental misunderstanding as to how wage prices are formed on the market.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23272427)

Please, explain to me more about this concept that you can't compare the value of a profession except as a function of the labor market. Would you say it has to do with "supply and demand." I hunger for more knowledge-milk from the CGM teat.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23272446)

For example, nursing has always been a female-dominated field. But as nursing has become more and more specialized, more men have entered nursing because specialist nurses are well-compensated. Now there is a wage gap in nursing, despite the fact that less than 10% of nurses are men, they make up about 70% of specialist nurses, and have masters degrees instead of associates degrees. They are also substantially more likely to work full time than part time. Here is a link if you are interested:

http://nursinglink.monster.com/benefits/articles/11915-are-male-nurses-paid-more

The point is, a profession is male dominated specifically because it has greater financial rewards. Men compete for those rewards, and therefore begin to dominate that profession. Women, on the other hand, are prone to taking jobs that allow them a greater quality of life, over one that focuses entirely on acquisition of wealth, at least in part because they can depend on men to support them financially.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23272458)

As for police, I think that's another good example of this principle in action. Yes, cops are overpaid. But police departments around the country are under massive political pressure to recruit and promote women. Nevertheless, despite the financial rewards, women refuse to enter the field, primarily, in my opinion, because it requires irregular hours, lots of overtime, some danger, a good bit of discomfort, and does not provide much work-life flexibility.

If women wanted to compete for money, they would be running to precincts to sign up. But they value other things over money (probably rightly so), therefore it should be no surprise that men, who compete for money, end up making more money on average.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23272571)

I already explicitly stated a caveat that discrepancy in wages can exist insofar as government is involved in price-setting (which is obviously the case with cops). You claim my posts are just basic economics dressed up, thats fine, but then the least I would expect is for you to have the intellectual capacity to fucking read and interpret them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23272981)

most menial male jobs (e.g. auto workers) have higher wages because of the high bargaining power they historically had through unions. secretaries have never had that kind of bargaining power because women haven't been as motivated to bargain for wages increases because they're usually the secondary income earner. this gap will take a long time to fully correct.

I don't know why I'm bothering to point this out because it's all readily apparent to anyone who doesn't live in econ 101 fantasy land.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23273659)

it's also why you're so hung up on the idea of a "coherent" thought, as if what matters to a thought is its "coherence" rather than its connection to the real world, which is not "coherent."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23274310)

maleness is the default. it's MANkind - not womankind.

females are a deviation. they are rightly relegated to a Women's "ghetto" whenever possible. their point of view is a fringe point of view.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23272544)

OPPRESSSION! PATRIARCHY! CISPRIVILEGE! OTHERKIN!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23272577)

See something wrong with wikipedia? THEN DO IT YOURSELF. Don't whine about it until someone else does.

They can't stand being uncomfortable.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2266020&forum_id=2...id#23273059)