The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
That Casey Anthony thread got me thinking....did she do it?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 16th, 2026 10:08 AM Author: Razzmatazz Insecure Party Of The First Part Lodge I didn't follow the case.
Bottom line it for me. Did the evidence show she did it?
Did she have any help?
How did the state fuck the case up so bad if it's clear she did it? |
Date: January 16th, 2026 10:09 AM Author: out-of-control saffron shrine yes she did it. No she didn’t have help she was just a trashy Orlando bar slut frustrated that having a kid kept her from going out and slutting it up
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/1d/1b/77/1d1b776479adb7792403c482920a2e31.jpg
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-RSDEMaNkGZ4/TnYiB7BiqHI/AAAAAAAAAI4/jZ945e-wQ80/s320/casey-anthony-making-out-woman-4.jpg |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 10:11 AM Author: ocher doobsian boltzmann giraffe Of course she did it. She didn’t even tell the police her daughter was missing. She is an evil Scumbagette imo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49593506) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 11:00 AM Author: federal beady-eyed chapel circlehead i think the only real question is did she tape up her kid and suffocate her on purpose so she could go party or if she taped up her kid and is so dumb/negligent she let her suffocate by accident so she could go party. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49593621) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 11:04 AM Author: Wonderful institution haunted graveyard https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3546146&mc=93&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49593634) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 12:11 PM Author: Copper very tactful address I know people inside the defense team, she didnt do it.
There was also weird shit going on with the investigation and evidence.
The state couldn't even say how the kid died. Hard to get BRD that way. |
 |
Date: January 16th, 2026 12:35 PM Author: federal beady-eyed chapel circlehead yeah i mean they found her kid's bones near her house with duct tape around the skull and she never reported the kid was gone for a month while she partied, but when her mom found out and contacted the police she made up an imaginary babysitter kidnapping then took the cops on a tour of her imaginary workplace. really, anything could have happened. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49593907) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 12:42 PM Author: Exciting double fault Her mother also lied for her on the stand. She claimed to be the one who was using Casey's computer when those damning searches were done (she claimed they were pop-up ads about with a skateboarder) even though there was clear evidence that she was logged into her work terminal at the time. They also argued some bogus molestation thing in the opening and closing statements and presented ZERO evidence of it during trial. The prosecution failed in understanding how they needed to frame all of that for the jury. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49593919) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 12:46 PM Author: federal beady-eyed chapel circlehead yeah she obviously killed her kid and i'm assuming the guy above is flame. the only real question is was it an accident bc she was purposely taping/drugging her kid (don't know if that would be felony murder in florida?) or she killed her on purpose. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49593924) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 1:39 PM Author: Copper very tactful address how did the kid die? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594113) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 1:43 PM Author: federal beady-eyed chapel circlehead suffocation and or chloroform poisoning as indicated in casey's internet searches and the duct tape wrapped around kid's skull (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594137) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 1:44 PM Author: Copper very tactful address you should probably be sure if youre gonna try and give somebody the needle (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594140) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 1:50 PM Author: federal beady-eyed chapel circlehead dude, you said she didn't do it. if you're just saying you don't think prosecution got to BRD for 1st degree capital murder, then fine. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594164) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 1:55 PM Author: Adulterous carmine cuck reading party (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594190) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 2:33 PM Author: Copper very tactful address yeah, I wasn't lying about that.
I dont think you can get brd with the state's case at trial, but aside from that, I literally spoke to a person on the team who told me she didnt murder the kid. Not that the evidence was weak or that they would be able to create doubt. Specifically that she didnt do it.
I got a Copland vibe from the whole thing. It's clear from the recordings that the mom wasn't involved, but the dad's law enforcement background is crucial. |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 2:42 PM Author: federal beady-eyed chapel circlehead if this is not flame then whoever you talked to is either an idiot or drank the defense kool aid. the evidence is overwhelming that she caused her kid's death either on purpose or by accident so she could go party. if the defense had any actual evidence against the dad they would have presented it instead of bullshitting about it during openings and not following up. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594326) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 2:46 PM Author: iridescent tanning salon mood (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594345) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 2:47 PM Author: Copper very tactful address I dunno, seems like it worked out as planned. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594350) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 3:00 PM Author: federal beady-eyed chapel circlehead i'm sure jose sat on evidence on the assumption it would work out anyway. always easier on appeal if she was convicted. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594382) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 4:03 PM Author: crimson ladyboy spot This is mentally retarded (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594545) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 5:17 PM Author: transparent big-titted voyeur Loved the story of the imaginary workplace tour. I still think about an xo poast re her frame of mind while walking down that hallway, imagining that a Tall Man would come out and say "what is the meaning of this?! Can't you see this woman is pretty? Right this way." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594805) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 2:33 PM Author: iridescent tanning salon mood (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594299) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 3:25 PM Author: Splenetic yarmulke school How did the state flub the prosecution so badly? The jury didn't even convict on manslaughter and child abuse charges. Casey was not a sympathetic defendant. And the victim was a toddler. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594450) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 3:43 PM Author: Misanthropic jap the fix was in (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594488) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 3:54 PM Author: Splenetic yarmulke school For some random 22 year old? Losing was a big embarrassment for the state. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594518) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 4:06 PM Author: crimson ladyboy spot Pros making 45k a year:
Multi million dollar crimdef attorney doing pro bono work to set themselves up for the rest of their lives:
If you watched the trial in real time the defense did a spectacular job. It's totally obvious that her kid went missing, she never told anyone, and was found murdered. Should be open shut. But prosbros didn't have any evidence linking her directly to the crime. Sometimes it be that way. And yes yuge embarrassment for the state. Should have called Georgia Cappleman.
You think it was would be easy to tie Casey to the kid's death. But it wasn't somehow. There was no timeline. There was no procuring of tools. It does remain somewhat mysterious other than obviously the mom was involved. |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 4:23 PM Author: Splenetic yarmulke school There was plenty linking her to the crime:
No one who isn't guilty waits 31 days to report a missing toddler.
Casey's car was found abandoned, the trunk smelled like a corpse, and there was testimony that her daughter's hair was in the trunk with signs that it had come off her daughter's head post-mortem.
There were all kinds of incriminating searches on her computer.
The body was dumped near Casey's house. |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 4:30 PM Author: rambunctious maniacal legend Maybe I didn't follow it closely enough, but this whole thing felt like one of those situations where a jury took "reasonable doubt" to mean "any conceivable doubt." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5822763&forum_id=2...id#49594623) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 4:50 PM Author: crimson ladyboy spot It's all circumstantial and all the defense has to do is poke holes in a couple of these. Who said her car smelled like death? Who found the hair? What car doesn't have some of their kid's hair in it.
Look I obviously think she was involved and likely did it. I'm just saying there's all sorts of doubt a competent lawyer could poke in this the state's case.
No murder weapon? No timeline? Nothing to link her to the scene on a specific date and time? Yeah her kid went missing and she didn't report it. Was she at the scene of the crime with the weapon?
The defense sewed enough doubt in a weak circumstantial case to where the jury wasn't swayed. Everything you asserted may or may not have ever been established. Depends on witness credibility. A lot of case come down to who a jury believes on the stand. Unless you were in the courtroom and shown what the jury was shown then you don't know. |