The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
lol at "Quantum Field Theory"
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 5th, 2025 9:32 AM Author: lascivious stead dude nothing is even real everything is just excitations in fields of mysterious ambient energy lmao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49157952) |
Date: August 5th, 2025 12:27 PM Author: hyperactive fragrant garrison pisswyrm let's hear your alternative, champ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49158492) |
 |
Date: August 5th, 2025 12:31 PM Author: lascivious stead "dude lets just divide the elementary particles into Cliques and then give each of them their own wave lol" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49158504) |
|
Date: August 5th, 2025 1:08 PM Author: Bearded mad cow disease space Also the "proof" any of it is physically real and not just math is barely holding it together. background fluctuations are inseparable from the particle zoo. real particles are peaks in correlation functions that stick around long enough to detect. virtual particles never seen but necessary for the math to work at all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49158591) |
|
Date: August 7th, 2025 6:40 PM Author: chill internet user with one static pseudonym it's literally all just made up math. they kept making stuff up so that the math would keep working out (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49165607) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2025 9:02 AM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) 100% it is, like all physics a symbolic system constructed out of math. which is itself a language the ape invented to make sense of quantities patterns and its own panic attacks about the void. but the predictive accuracy of QFT itself is actually one of the most accurate and predictive frameworks the ape has ever conjured in terms of experimental results. Now to what extent is it describing "real" physics? On the one hand it corresponds bautifully with experiment which is physics only real test. but on the other hand we only ever test the universe through our own apparatus, meaning we are jsut describing how the universe behaves when poked by apes using ape built instruments. so basically its not describing "the thing in itself" but the echo of our prodding. sort of like trying to understand "the nature of a cat" by pulling its tail and measuring how loud it yowls. Absolutely made up, but like a myth that builds bridges and splits atoms (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49166954) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2025 7:03 AM Author: Apathetic prepper (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49174081) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2025 7:21 AM Author: Theotokos is based (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49174091) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2025 9:14 AM Author: Theotokos is based Physicists and psychologists are the same level of charlatan (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49166987) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2025 9:18 AM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) psychologists are much worse. physics is ultimately made up but still can be tuned well enough to match sensor data and build things that blow up. psychology the highest IQ researchers are like 145 which isn't even smart enough to become a theoretical physicist these days. although probably will be now with advanced AI (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49166994) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2025 9:21 AM Author: chill internet user with one static pseudonym (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49167002) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2025 7:55 AM Author: Theotokos is based Weak retort imo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49174142) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2025 10:19 AM Author: Not even wrong what about string theory? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49167092) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2025 11:01 AM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) “Look, all the pieces fit… in this 11-dimensional construct we invented! It's prestige wrong. Wrong with a 6 month waiting list for grad students who want to spend their twenties contemplating Calabi-Yau manifolds like monks tracing mandalas that will be ritualistically destroyed next result from CERN (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49167177) |
|
Date: August 8th, 2025 11:04 AM Author: chill internet user with one static pseudonym slam dunk poast (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49167193) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2025 7:22 AM Author: Theotokos is based (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49174094) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2025 7:43 AM Author: Not even wrong surprised how broad the userbase is here. that someone can actually pontificate coherently on Calabi-Yaus. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49174125) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2025 6:43 AM Author: UN peacekeeper lol at the black scholes equation! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5758522&forum_id=2...id#49174078) |