The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Glassy bipolar death wish selfie | 01/06/26 | | Boyish immigrant | 01/06/26 | | galvanic cuckoldry | 01/06/26 | | Boyish immigrant | 01/06/26 | | galvanic cuckoldry | 01/06/26 | | Boyish immigrant | 01/06/26 | | Glassy bipolar death wish selfie | 01/06/26 | | Boyish immigrant | 01/06/26 | | Glassy bipolar death wish selfie | 01/06/26 | | Hairless sienna native | 01/07/26 | | Excitant swollen mediation | 01/06/26 | | laughsome bat shit crazy jap | 01/06/26 | | galvanic cuckoldry | 01/06/26 | | misunderstood police squad | 01/06/26 | | galvanic cuckoldry | 01/06/26 | | gay stage | 01/06/26 | | adventurous theater | 01/06/26 | | cocky lime garrison | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Boyish immigrant
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2...id#49568134) |
|
|