I have enough money to just hire someone and not worry about it.

Zurich would likely get subpoenaed though.

Am inclined to do it. At this point I could aim a nerf gun at gunner’s head and ask him to stop and he would say fuck you you’ll have to suspend me in cryonite first.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548302)

Happy to do it. Just let me know where and when, Christopher Spinelli.

Oh and I'm several orders of magnitude more preftigious as an attorney than you. The guys at C&F will be pleased to hear from me.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548545)

I'm pretty sure truth is a defense to defamation

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49549020)

Yes.

Please don't forget to name me as a co-defendant in the suit, btw.

I'm literally begging you to do this. I will clear out my schedule just to make sure that we can complete thorough discovery on both sides and take this to trial ASAP.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49558587)

Please reconsider before you file, I really want to be a full-blown defendant. I deserve nothing less.

BTW did I mention that you fuck children, call your black clients "niggers," break attorney client privilege, and are an incredibly stupid person and a shitty lawyer?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49558634)

imagine the shame, disgust and betrayal ur son will feel when they grow up and learn u did nothing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548341)

Or incoukd just go now and be done with it. Everyone “outted”

Personally I’m tired of it and already got the green light from work and home.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548385)

ive offered to call you. we could conference in your bosses too. i would *LOVE* to explain to them the background of your purported harassment in the hopes of settling this presuit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548429)

maybe lay off the drugs for a little while.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548431)

this guy is just endless fucking comedy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548436)

i really like it here, hanging out with so many morally righteous bros who wouldn't hesitate to go to bat to save a helpless trafficked asian child from more squanching

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548428)

Lmao imagine being the judge presiding over a case where on one side of the aisle, you have dozens of barred attorneys (some undoubtedly preftifiouf) from all across the country who are willing to swear under penalty of perjury that the plaintiff has publicly called his black clients "niggers," broken attorney client privilege for shits and giggles on countless occasions, and made lewd and sexually suggestive comments about his own adopted son.

And on the other side of the aisle, you have a bizarre looking genetic freak 50 year old shitlaw associate with a goofy haircut who inexplicably thinks that he's a genius but obviously can't litigate his way out of a paper bag.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49558618)

i cant wait for oral args. it'll be just like the car honk case when you sputtered 0L arguments about how an intentional act is negligence. can't wait to hear you argue how spamming your burner email soliciting information about me equals *you* being harassed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548405)

it would be SO DIFFICULT for you to be identified if you ever stepped foot here!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548409)

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548442)

his victim complex is stunning. also he's just seeking negative attention, i wasn't even poasting about him when he created this bizarre thread. he saw the grok thread was being redirected toward nyuug so now he's pulling his pants down and begging for his "bullies" to redirect their attention back to him.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548456)

he'll certainly need some rehabilitation when his true feelings about his black clients comes out, right?

i dunno, i could be wrong - i'm not a high six-figure earning big deal partner, but i always assumed that referring to them as niggers on forums where my identity and place of employment was known would be a bad thing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548535)

Bottom line is I can easily take judgments indefinitely even after you’ve come into your inheritances as applicable. It’s literally evergreen.

I could take judgment against tsinah and then Two years later take judgment again dateless dog and hegemon’s trust fund and go again and again.

Crazy how the law works. Am currently inclined to pursue. Eventually it will start paying for itself.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548516)

You’ll never stop so I might as well take judgments.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548549)

-------

Yes, child abuse is generally considered a matter of public interest under anti-SLAPP statutes, as these laws are designed to protect speech related to issues that affect the community and public welfare. Reporting suspected child abuse can be seen as exercising the right to free speech and petition regarding a significant societal concern.

Wikipedia medicalmalpracticelawyers.com

Child Abuse and Public Interest in Anti-SLAPP Statutes

Definition of Public Interest

In the context of anti-SLAPP statutes, public interest refers to issues that affect the community or society at large. This includes topics that provoke public debate or concern, such as child abuse.

Child Abuse as a Public Issue

Child abuse is widely recognized as a serious societal problem. Reporting suspected child abuse often involves public interest because it relates to the welfare of children and community safety.

Legal Context

Many anti-SLAPP statutes protect individuals who speak out on matters of public concern, including child abuse. For instance, if someone reports suspected abuse to authorities, this action is typically considered protected speech under anti-SLAPP laws.

Court Interpretations

Courts have generally upheld that allegations or discussions surrounding child abuse fall within the realm of public interest. This means that lawsuits aimed at silencing individuals who report or discuss such issues may be subject to dismissal under anti-SLAPP provisions.

Conclusion

Child abuse is indeed considered a matter of public interest under anti-SLAPP statutes, providing protections for those who speak out against it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548553)

you haven't hired anyone but a doordash driver in your life

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548593)

I thought you'd said you were an experienced lolyer?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548901)

would you consider it harassment if i called your firm now that you've asserted you've looped in your bosses? is this is a legitimate threat of litigation or just internet banter? because i would be happy to speak to you or anyone else about this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548636)

Same, unironically. LFG.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49558710)

But I'll probably be pretty busy on dates with Tinder WOCs for the two nights I'm there.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548932)

If people here were as vicious and defamatory to me as they are to him, I'd definitely go after them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548940)

if he went after you irl like he's done to me and countless others you would have already filed suit. ive never even poasted his widely known real name here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49549011)

also, i've tried to leave him alone many times. when he came back from his dormant phase this time i made some long compassionate poast encouraging him to stop taking online banter so seriously, or stop coming here if he can't. inevitably he starts acting in such ridiculous ways that i can't resist ridiculing. for example, he's tried to out lex out of no where (lex wasn't even mocking him) by accusing him of being some completely random person.

is it puerile to mock someone behaving like an idiot online? sure, mea culpa. but it's not illegal and it's not even immoral when you do it because he's maliciously targeting innocent people.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49550182)

But I don't think either side of that is defamatory, and not as mean as what you guys post about SP.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49550203)

you're right, it is a matter of degree. and spaceporn deserves all the mockery he's received and then some.

as xo's GC you should be ringing the CEO to ban all of his accounts. last year when he was seeking information about me he literally started outing somebody thinking irl physical harm would happen to him. he breaks the LOTL by outing and attempting to out poasters 100x more than any other permabanned poaster. the only reason he hasn't made xo famous again is because he's too stupid to be effective.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49550226)

First focus is rakeokc@gmail.com and then we go from there fwiw.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49550164)

however, if you file suit against john doe aka gunneratttt and poast it here i will voluntarily appear and ruin you. so please poast the complaint when you file it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49550199)

the bort wasn't affected at all from epah v. zzz and rt aside from all the 180 content in generated. this would be even more hilarious because spaceporn is far dumber than rt.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49550257)

Wow, that's crazy! The law sounds wild!

We normie retards sure are lucky to have a bona fide real-life barred attorney-at-law like you on this message board to explain all of these complicated things to us!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49558691)

Happy to do it. Just let me know where and when.

Oh and I'm several orders of magnitude more preftigious as an attorney than you. The guys at C&F will be pleased to hear from me.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548540)

jfc lmao.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5815299&forum_id=2...id#49548613)