The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Was talking to this fat cuck named cowgod the other day, & I realized something
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 7th, 2026 3:16 PM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) the best way to test AI's ability at human persuasion is to set up identical tinder (etc.) profiles and have various levels of organic chad compete against chatGPT and claude and see who gets the best nudes, meetups, promises to do depraved sex acts, etc.
What got me thinking about this is how whenever there's a big pro-AI / AI skeptics are deluded thread, it's always ugly short poor losers like cowgod (who's cuck dad died of diabetes!) hanging onto their last strands of hair with daily dutasteride leading the charge, probably because IRL no one would ever follow them.
So I support this rigorous testing so I don't have to hear another 5'8" faggot who makes $172K/yr. and whose wife cheats on him tell me that actually AI writes great briefs. |
Date: June 7th, 2026 7:16 PM Author: cowgod What does any of this have to do with me. This is why no one likes you. Im 5’10,5 btw. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49920922) |
 |
Date: June 7th, 2026 7:51 PM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) You're the fat AI-shilling cuck in the thread title.
And we instituted a bortwide barefoot height-measurement standard in 2023 when desantis was moving from 4-in. to 7-in. lifting footwear in his public appearances. |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 7:53 PM Author: cowgod Ok champ why are you making up a bunch of shit. Literally everything you say is made-up. Including that thead where I wasn’t shilling AI iirc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921002) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 7:19 PM Author: Genius Bear on the loose in Japan an LLM could definitely out-compete human seducers (text-only) if trained on the proper data
it wouldn't even be close actually |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 7:56 PM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) This basically seems like where the AI-shilling crowd is at these days. "Yeah there's no evidence but I assert that it'd do better / is doing better." E.g., ignore the fact that one of the world's tip-top law firms just humiliated itself using AI on a brief; I (a fat poor xo cuck who tops out at 5'9.765", just tall enough to where I can keep my head tipped back and have you not see the full circle of my bald spot) assert that it is actually an elite brief-writer.
(If it had the "proper training data", as if that's some trivial detail and not a major limiting factor for AI's IRL usefulness.) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 7:57 PM Author: The Penis The training data isn't really the main limiting factor. It's the IQ of the user. AI is Augmentation so it's abilities are emergent and relational depending on the knowledge, IQ and creativity of the user. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921007) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:10 PM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) If this were true (it's not, at all, and there actually is strong evidence that AI is more IRL helpful to novices/lower-skill workers... I assume you're referring to prompt quality, but that's far more correlated to experience doing it than IQ), it would suggest that high-IQ workers will continue to command a premium going into an AI-dominated future, which is probably not the case. The next generation will be dominated by physically skilled male workers (a domain where even the very shortest cucks have to concede that AI has achieved no accomplishments whatsoever to date). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921053) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:13 PM Author: Genius Bear on the loose in Japan the highest IQ, most skilled cohort absolutely will continue to command a premium in the AI-dominated future. in fact they will get more and more valuable as time goes on (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921063) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:15 PM Author: The Penis Yeah I agree because once you get to a certain knowledge and IQ level, small amounts of additional working memory and processing power already are making huge differences. If you have augmentation on top of it it can scale to superhuman levels really quickly. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921066) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:30 PM Author: cowgod Are we really talking about “chatbots” as the future deployment of this thing? Why aren’t we assuming it’s being used purely to Engineer things agentically. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921090) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:37 PM Author: The Penis I know agent swarms are already being used heavily in Research and Engineering, but just talking about the main popular way everyone is using it right now. Obviously in future deployments they'll be increasingly agentic. But even there it still requires a skilled user because you have to orchestrate like 100 agents and track what they are doing over a month and whats important and relevant. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921102) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:40 PM Author: cowgod I guess I’m just assuming that the future will yield some new advancement other than “chat bots” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921111) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:43 PM Author: The Penis Yeah of course (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921124) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:22 PM Author: cowgod You are having an existential crisis and exaggerating how much AI sucks imho. If only you knew how much you sucked. If only you knew how bad your phenotype truly is. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921072) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 12:58 AM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) (fat cuck) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921800) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:35 PM Author: The Penis No im not referring to prompt quality and I dont agree that lower intelligence people get more benefit. The actual advantage is upstream and downstream of the prompt. A higher ability user tends to ask better posed questions, notice more relevant connections, bring more background knowledge into the interaction, accurately read and synthesize outputs etc. And the fact that ai is augmentation, it's an extension of the user not something that operates autonomously, and that once you get to the tails of iq small increases in memory and abstraction power are already scaling to extremes means that smarter people get huge benefits from it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921096) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:36 PM Author: cowgod This is also common sense. Dumbs in the workplace use AI incompetently while Nerds use it to Engineer mad contrivances. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921100) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:46 PM Author: The Penis Very true (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921142) |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 1:06 AM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) Even if true (again, it's empirically not), it's short term thinking as these things are clearly becoming autonomous.
But you see it in legal practice: dudes who used to write 2-page, numbered-paragraph briefs that began with COMES NOW and cited only "US. Consti. amendment IV" are now putting together 8-page bangers that cite the seminal case law in the field. Moving their work-product quality from an 8/100 to a 43 on a normalized distribution. There's just no way that a competent brief-writer can possibly extract that level of improvement over baseline from AI.
... Or are you literally just making the point that "a smart person will get better results, in an absolute sense, than a dumb person," vs. measuring value over non-AI baseline? Because yes I agree that proposition is so obvious even a fat prediabetic cuck like cowgod would understand it. |
|
Date: June 8th, 2026 5:55 AM Author: The Penis You are gesturing at certain narrow bounded studies, mixing estimands, and then acting as if the question is settled "empirically". I don't doubt that AI can produce larger relative gains for weaker workers on certain bounded tasks especially where the baseline is terrible and the model is supplying them with missing templates. For a weak user AI might replace some deficits that's not my point. My point is that this does not generalize to open ended cognition. When AI allows for cognitive offloading and quick high level synthesis and exploration for an already high IQ knowledgeable user (not for law, not for specific narrow "jobs), their effective intelligence quickly scales into superhuman levels. Notice how we have people at Open AI labs quickly solving Erdos problems, something that took the highest IQ humans a lifetime of learning and research to do? That's an example of high iq humans performing superhuman work with AI as augmentation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921906) |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:10 PM Author: Genius Bear on the loose in Japan i don't see how this is responsive
something like "convincing women to send nudes given a dataset of male picture + bio and female picture + bio" is the exact kind of thing that a neural network would be super good at if you actually trained one for it using the appropriate data
of course the training data is a relevant and important part of the equation. agentic LLM systems will become better and better at different tasks as they're post-trained by specific data sets for different tasks. that's already how they've gotten way better at stuff like coding |
|
Date: June 7th, 2026 8:34 PM Author: fuck her right in the pussy 180. call it the Luring Test (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5871892&forum_id=2...id#49921094) |