\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Physicists need to address Zeno's paradox before doing anything else

The arrow one. Don't tell me math solves it.
Federal Brunch Round Eye
  03/05/23
Why do you think math doesn't solve it? Usually people ar...
glittery costumed azn
  03/05/23
Math does "solve" it in the sense that, mathematic...
Federal Brunch Round Eye
  03/05/23
Why only the arrow one?
glittery costumed azn
  03/05/23
It's the one Aristotle discusses, and it gets held out as an...
Federal Brunch Round Eye
  03/06/23
...
glittery costumed azn
  03/07/23
Vibrational motion creates time
Chestnut irradiated mad-dog skullcap public bath
  03/05/23
Hmm
glittery costumed azn
  03/05/23
Creation of time isn't the issue. The issue is how an arrow ...
Federal Brunch Round Eye
  03/06/23
Then how can you have deterministic events like an arrow pen...
Federal Brunch Round Eye
  08/12/24
just google "how does calculus work" on youtube
adventurous telephone
  03/05/23
I understand the math, that's not the problem. We know intui...
Federal Brunch Round Eye
  03/06/23
Maybe write the top physicists a letter to this effect; they...
Olive bearded station ladyboy
  03/06/23
Many of them know, believe me. But this guy thinks Aristotle...
Federal Brunch Round Eye
  03/06/23
...
Federal Brunch Round Eye
  05/09/23
...
Federal Brunch Round Eye
  08/12/24
He has a PhD and a web site! "James went on to study...
Federal Brunch Round Eye
  08/12/24
...
Federal Brunch Round Eye
  03/06/23
Physicists unable to address philosophy 101 problems, but cl...
lavender soul-stirring cuckold elastic band
  03/06/23
Planck solved 100 years ago but white people still cling to ...
Federal Brunch Round Eye
  08/12/24
...
racy school
  03/06/23
...
Federal Brunch Round Eye
  08/12/24
Good luck with that considering we live in a simulation and ...
curious opaque hall
  08/12/24
how are they supposed to solve in when they are literally fr...
puce home jew
  08/12/24
...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  11/15/25
someone solved this a couple years ago
,.,.,:,,:,..,:::,...,:,.,.:...:.,:.::
  11/15/25
PS Planck units seem to exist and they solve the paradox, ki...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  11/15/25
The arrow paradox is only problematic if you assume that tim...
Junko Enoshima
  11/15/25
It's less a 'paradox' about motion than the concept of infin...
UN peacekeeper
  11/16/25
Here's my solution: time is like those iPhone "live pho...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  11/16/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2023 10:44 PM
Author: Federal Brunch Round Eye

The arrow one. Don't tell me math solves it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46014710)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2023 10:46 PM
Author: glittery costumed azn

Why do you think math doesn't solve it?

Usually people are like duh convergent infinite series *hand wave*

I've never found that convincing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46014719)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2023 11:13 PM
Author: Federal Brunch Round Eye

Math does "solve" it in the sense that, mathematically, you can deduce that an infinite series of points in time gets you to a finite result. But that could reflect a failure of mathematics. It's not proof of anything since mathematics is all symbolic.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46014794)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2023 11:14 PM
Author: glittery costumed azn

Why only the arrow one?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46014798)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2023 3:35 PM
Author: Federal Brunch Round Eye

It's the one Aristotle discusses, and it gets held out as an example of his thinking all the time. 2,400 years later Caltech can barely explain this shit better than Aristotle. Many physicists still think Aristotle was right. If time is like like a series of cells in a movie film roll, how can an arrow move between cells? How can you have motion without a mover?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46017034)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 7th, 2023 12:25 PM
Author: glittery costumed azn



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46020356)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2023 10:51 PM
Author: Chestnut irradiated mad-dog skullcap public bath

Vibrational motion creates time

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46014731)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2023 10:55 PM
Author: glittery costumed azn

Hmm

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46014749)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2023 3:41 PM
Author: Federal Brunch Round Eye

Creation of time isn't the issue. The issue is how an arrow can have velocity if time consists of discrete moments, and if at any given moment the arrow is at rest in one place.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46017069)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 12th, 2024 6:36 PM
Author: Federal Brunch Round Eye

Then how can you have deterministic events like an arrow penetrating a target?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#47958167)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 5th, 2023 11:15 PM
Author: adventurous telephone

just google "how does calculus work" on youtube

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46014801)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2023 3:35 PM
Author: Federal Brunch Round Eye

I understand the math, that's not the problem. We know intuitively that arrows penetrate their targets before we even learn the math.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46017038)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2023 3:42 PM
Author: Olive bearded station ladyboy

Maybe write the top physicists a letter to this effect; they probably will welcome input from someone not from what is traditionally called "the field," as they never get this type of idea from outsiders.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46017076)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2023 3:46 PM
Author: Federal Brunch Round Eye

Many of them know, believe me. But this guy thinks Aristotle was right and shows the math. Even though the math checks out he says it makes him very uneasy. It should, because he's wrong.

https://youtu.be/u7Z9UnWOJNY?t=653

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46017090)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 9th, 2023 7:50 PM
Author: Federal Brunch Round Eye



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46291692)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 12th, 2024 5:01 PM
Author: Federal Brunch Round Eye



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#47957867)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 12th, 2024 6:33 PM
Author: Federal Brunch Round Eye

He has a PhD and a web site!

"James went on to study mathematics at Lancaster university. He was attracted by the challenge of the analytical and creative thought required in a maths degree, but it was probably the lack of essays and reading list he found most attractive. Later, James went to York university with the aim of getting a PhD and avoiding the real world for at least another three years. He was successful on both counts.

After working in research in combinatorics and group theory, James joined the Millennium Mathematics Project from the University of Cambridge. On their behalf James ran The Enigma Project, with the aim to bring mathematics to life through the fascinating history and mathematics of codes and code breaking. Spies! Secrets! And secret messages!"

https://www.singingbanana.com/about-2/

Can someone please email this thread to this poor dood?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#47958155)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2023 11:27 PM
Author: Federal Brunch Round Eye



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46018869)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2023 11:34 PM
Author: lavender soul-stirring cuckold elastic band

Physicists unable to address philosophy 101 problems, but claim philosophy is bs

LJL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46018895)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 12th, 2024 6:25 PM
Author: Federal Brunch Round Eye

Planck solved 100 years ago but white people still cling to aristotelian lies.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#47958119)



Reply Favorite

Date: March 6th, 2023 11:46 PM
Author: racy school



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#46018934)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 12th, 2024 4:48 PM
Author: Federal Brunch Round Eye



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#47957806)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 12th, 2024 4:51 PM
Author: curious opaque hall

Good luck with that considering we live in a simulation and cannot access the source code. Boom is right.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#47957818)



Reply Favorite

Date: August 12th, 2024 4:53 PM
Author: puce home jew

how are they supposed to solve in when they are literally frozen in place?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#47957825)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 15th, 2025 10:24 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#49434658)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 15th, 2025 10:24 PM
Author: ,.,.,:,,:,..,:::,...,:,.,.:...:.,:.::


someone solved this a couple years ago

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#49434661)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 15th, 2025 10:26 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


PS Planck units seem to exist and they solve the paradox, kind of. We measured black body radiation and found a Planck unit of difference between theoretical black bodies and real ones

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#49434666)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 15th, 2025 10:28 PM
Author: Junko Enoshima

The arrow paradox is only problematic if you assume that time is equal to the sum of an infinite number of indivisible points, which is what Zeno was attempting to refute. We know from Cantor diagonalization that a continuous collection of points can't be ordered, therefore Zeno's hypothesis is false.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#49434673)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 16th, 2025 1:18 AM
Author: UN peacekeeper

It's less a 'paradox' about motion than the concept of infinity generally. Consider: every rod has infinite length because it can be regarded as the infinite sum of increasingly small pieces! In either case, the conclusion proven by contradiction is that infinity doesn't exist or, at least, is useless as an explanatory concept for everyday reasoning. Oh, and notice that the 'solution' to the 'paradox' requires nothing like 'calculus' or anything fancy.

In other news and words, the 'great thinkers' of the past were actual retards by today's standards and are of limited and overrated utility.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#49434934)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 16th, 2025 1:20 AM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


Here's my solution: time is like those iPhone "live photos" where there a little bit of motion in the photo. It's fallacious to assume there's no motion occurring within discreet units of time because we have no evidence of it and it creates a "paradox" to think of it that way

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5301402&forum_id=2...id#49434939)