Golf bros anyone like lower compression balls for chipping?
| stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker | 08/11/25 | | Rebellious Garrison | 08/12/25 | | Shivering Lime Skinny Woman | 08/12/25 | | Rebellious Garrison | 08/12/25 | | stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker | 08/12/25 | | Rebellious Garrison | 08/12/25 | | Shivering Lime Skinny Woman | 08/12/25 | | Learning Disabled Razzle Mother | 08/12/25 | | Rebellious Garrison | 08/12/25 | | Learning Disabled Razzle Mother | 08/12/25 | | stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker | 08/12/25 | | Rebellious Garrison | 08/12/25 | | stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker | 08/12/25 | | Rebellious Garrison | 08/13/25 | | stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker | 08/13/25 | | Rebellious Garrison | 08/18/25 | | Learning Disabled Razzle Mother | 08/12/25 | | Shivering Lime Skinny Woman | 08/12/25 | | stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker | 08/12/25 | | Shivering Lime Skinny Woman | 08/12/25 | | ungodly office | 08/12/25 | | stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker | 08/13/25 | | Rebellious Garrison | 08/13/25 | | ungodly office | 08/13/25 | | razzle-dazzle half-breed | 08/13/25 | | Rebellious Garrison | 08/13/25 | | Shivering Lime Skinny Woman | 08/13/25 | | Rebellious Garrison | 08/13/25 | | Shivering Lime Skinny Woman | 08/13/25 | | stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker | 08/13/25 | | Shivering Lime Skinny Woman | 08/13/25 | | Rebellious Garrison | 08/13/25 | | Irradiated Water Buffalo Pit | 08/19/25 | | stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker | 08/18/25 | | At-the-ready school | 08/18/25 | | stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker | 08/18/25 | | Learning Disabled Razzle Mother | 08/19/25 | | Dave Prole | 08/19/25 | | Rebellious Garrison | 08/19/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 11th, 2025 8:51 PM Author: stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker
I spent the last month testing out every major urethane 3-piece golf ball. For drives, putts and most full swing shots, I could barely tell any difference.
Then when I got to chipping, all of the balls I thought were best became clearly the worst for me (Titleist AVX and prov1, TP5, Z-star, Chrome Soft) even though they are supposed to have more spin?
Best balls for me BY FAR are Qstar Tour, Vice Pro Air and Bridgestone Tour B RX
They feel AMAZING on chips and the same on every other shot.
I bet a lot of guys mindlessly use higher compression titleist balls and have NO IDEA about these
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5761315&forum_id=2...id#49176471) |
 |
Date: August 12th, 2025 9:43 PM Author: stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker
Only if they're Vice Pro, Pro Plus or Pro Soft/Air
They sell a lot of cheap 2-piece balls too
I wouldn't buy their clubs yet but any of the Pro balls are fine
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5761315&forum_id=2...id#49180422) |
Date: August 12th, 2025 2:18 PM Author: Shivering Lime Skinny Woman
not any of the current ones but i used the old precept mc lady when they came out like 25 years ago. they were great during the summer when fairways were dry but greens watered a ton
but i do prefer a prov1 over an x for example because it feels softer. idk if its in my head but it always seemed easier to control a softer ball greenside even if it's supposed to spin less
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5761315&forum_id=2...id#49178588) |
 |
Date: August 12th, 2025 2:45 PM Author: stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker
That's what I'm saying
It seems much easier to control chips with the softer balls but it's counterintuitive because they're supposed to have lower spin
I can see the qstar spin like crazy because of the divide colors. The zstar doesn't do that
I'm guessing it's because swing speed drops like 30 mph on chips
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5761315&forum_id=2...id#49178688) |
 |
Date: August 13th, 2025 10:20 AM Author: Shivering Lime Skinny Woman
did tiger ever play a balata? iirc even in '97 he used the titleist professional 90 which was wound but urethane covered.
but he switched to the multilayer nike ball in may 2000 right before he won the first major of the "tiger slam"
weird thing about nicklaus is the macgregor balls he played for most of his career were supposedly sps compared to what most other guys were using.
ive heard its possible that by 1980 he finally gave up on them and was playing "macgregors" that were actually titleists
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5761315&forum_id=2...id#49181368) |
Date: August 18th, 2025 4:22 PM Author: stimulating elite party of the first part candlestick maker
Anyone tried the PXG xtreme balls (regular tour or tour X)?
Golf Balls Addict ranked them #1 and 2 out of like 200 balls and they're cheap as fuck vs titleist
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5761315&forum_id=2...id#49194919) |
Date: August 18th, 2025 7:48 PM Author: At-the-ready school
When evaluating the relationship between compression rating and short-game performance, particularly with respect to chipping, one must consider the interaction between the ball’s core elasticity, cover hardness, and spin-generation capacity under conditions of low clubhead speed. Lower compression golf balls are engineered with softer cores, which deform more readily at impact, thereby requiring less force to achieve energy transfer. In the context of chipping, however, the ball is typically struck at low velocity with a descending blow designed to impart loft and controlled spin rather than maximize distance. Because the deformation of a lower compression ball under such minimal force is negligible relative to a full swing, the net difference in tactile feedback and launch dynamics between a low-compression ball and a higher-compression ball is minimal to nonexistent at the chip shot scale. The governing determinant of spin and control in the short game lies instead in the urethane or ionomer cover material and the dimple geometry, as these features dictate the degree of frictional engagement with the clubface grooves, moisture and grass interaction, and the resultant coefficient of restitution during glancing impact. Empirical testing consistently demonstrates that urethane-covered balls—regardless of compression—generate higher spin rates and greater stopping power than ionomer-covered alternatives, a fact attributable to their viscoelastic surface properties. Thus, while a player may perceive a subjective softness when chipping with a lower compression model, such perception is more likely a matter of acoustic feedback and feel than any material change in ball behavior under the applicable physical conditions. In legal-style reasoning, the proposition that lower compression balls confer a performance advantage in chipping is unsupported by substantial evidence, as the causal nexus between compression rating and short-game spin/trajectory is too attenuated; rather, it is the cover composition and surface interaction that constitute the proximate cause of performance variance.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5761315&forum_id=2...id#49195423) |
|
|