Date: September 10th, 2025 4:25 PM
Author: Talented Onyx Base
I don't follow cultural warriors (who you love), but here's ChatGPT:
"Here’s an overview of Charlie Kirk’s views on Israel, based on his public statements and actions documented in recent sources:
Strongly Pro-Israel and Evangelical Support
Charlie Kirk frequently expresses unequivocal support for Israel’s right to exist and defend itself:
He has said, “Israel has a right to exist and Israel has a right to defend itself,” emphasizing it as a civilized country standing against threats like Hamas
Human Events
.
In a similar vein, he declared, “I unequivocally stand with Israel and its right to defend itself,” particularly while defending Israel amid backlash over military operations
Media Matters
.
Moral Commitment & Strategic Ally
Kirk frames U.S. support for Israel as both strategic and deeply moral:
He’s said, “Israel is not like any other nation … there’s something special about Israel, … we have a moral commitment to that land,” pointing to both practical and values-based reasons for close ties
United with Israel
.
Criticism of Media and Academia
During a fact-finding visit to Israel, Kirk challenged media narratives and academy criticisms:
He described himself as “programmed by the Western media” to hold negative beliefs about Israel and spoke out against what he saw as unfair moral equivalencies between the IDF and extremist groups
Cleveland Jewish News
The Jewish Link
.
He also criticized campus activism, including “Israel Apartheid Week” and BDS movements, labeling them as forms of anti-Semitism, particularly when selective in their advocacy
Cleveland Jewish News
The Jewish Link
.
Disputes Over Gaza Humanitarian Narratives
In July 2025, Kirk challenged prevailing reports about the humanitarian situation in Gaza:
He publicly stated, “No, Israel is not starving Gazans.” He attributed humanitarian shortfalls to Hamas interference—such as aid looting or mismanagement—not Israeli intentions
Newsrael
JFeed
.
Comparison of Israel vs. Ukraine
Kirk offers a distinct contrast between Israel’s war with Hamas and Ukraine’s conflict with Russia:
He argued that “the war in Ukraine is an endless war” while asserting Israel’s objective—destroying Hamas and installing a more responsible government in Gaza—is clear, finite, and winnable
Breitbart
.
He highlights Israel as a “real democracy,” “protecting the Holy Land,” and a critical U.S. ally in the Middle East
Breitbart
.
Criticism of Israeli Leadership
Kirk hasn’t shied away from questioning Israeli leadership when he sees missteps:
After a church was damaged in Israeli military activity, he expressed disappointment in the lack of a full accounting or contrition from the Israeli authorities, urging clarity and accountability
Newsweek
.
Previously, he even floated a controversial theory—on a podcast—that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu might have allowed the Hamas attack to occur to consolidate power, though this was framed as speculative
The Washington Times
.
U.S. Foreign Policy & “America First”
Amid broader Middle East tensions, Kirk has weighed in on U.S. policy, reflecting his “America First” leanings:
In June 2025, he joined other MAGA-aligned voices warning former President Trump against increasing U.S. military entanglement in regional conflicts, concerned it might fracture his populist coalition
AP News
.
However, following Trump’s decision to strike nuclear sites in Iran, Kirk ultimately praised the move as prudent and necessary—a shift illustrating his flexibility amid realpolitik considerations
AP News
."
you are utterly schizophrenic, lmao
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5771792&forum_id=2...id#49251348)