Has "calories in / calories out" been DEBUNKED?
| Turquoise incel | 12/18/22 | | fantasy-prone national trump supporter | 12/18/22 | | plum vivacious space | 12/21/22 | | cowardly ratface | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | cowardly ratface | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | sapphire trailer park | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | sapphire trailer park | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | sapphire trailer park | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | sapphire trailer park | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/19/22 | | rebellious theater | 12/18/22 | | free-loading stead party of the first part | 12/18/22 | | Stirring library | 12/18/22 | | Ebony Metal Azn | 12/18/22 | | Stirring library | 12/18/22 | | Ebony Metal Azn | 12/18/22 | | Stirring library | 12/18/22 | | Ebony Metal Azn | 12/18/22 | | Stirring library | 12/18/22 | | Ebony Metal Azn | 12/18/22 | | Stirring library | 12/18/22 | | Ebony Metal Azn | 12/18/22 | | Stirring library | 12/18/22 | | Ebony Metal Azn | 12/18/22 | | Dashing nursing home | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | Lake market | 12/18/22 | | vermilion mischievous kitty cat | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | rebellious theater | 12/18/22 | | Kink-friendly fishy field | 12/19/22 | | aqua point | 12/18/22 | | Dashing nursing home | 12/18/22 | | Ebony Metal Azn | 12/18/22 | | sapphire trailer park | 12/18/22 | | Dashing nursing home | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | sapphire trailer park | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | sapphire trailer park | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | sapphire trailer park | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | sapphire trailer park | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/18/22 | | sapphire trailer park | 12/18/22 | | cerebral turdskin bawdyhouse | 12/19/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/19/22 | | cerebral turdskin bawdyhouse | 12/20/22 | | cerebral turdskin bawdyhouse | 12/18/22 | | cerebral turdskin bawdyhouse | 12/18/22 | | Pungent nibblets | 12/18/22 | | Turquoise incel | 12/19/22 | | judgmental deranged temple | 12/18/22 | | judgmental deranged temple | 12/18/22 | | thirsty lemon plaza pervert | 12/19/22 | | Kink-friendly fishy field | 12/19/22 | | Contagious gold cuckoldry | 12/19/22 | | thirsty lemon plaza pervert | 12/19/22 | | Contagious gold cuckoldry | 12/19/22 | | cerebral turdskin bawdyhouse | 12/21/22 | | histrionic garnet prole | 12/21/22 | | Contagious gold cuckoldry | 12/21/22 | | cracking dull people who are hurt | 12/19/22 | | Supple saffron internal respiration | 12/19/22 | | hairraiser cruise ship marketing idea | 12/21/22 | | hairraiser cruise ship marketing idea | 12/21/22 | | slippery affirmative action area | 12/21/22 | | tripping school cafeteria double fault | 07/05/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: December 18th, 2022 9:21 PM Author: sapphire trailer park
Oh come on, man. While I generally agree with your statements about some vegetable/seed oils, the highly processed fats found in industrialized baked goods like Oreos are uniquely bad for you.
Until about 10 years ago, almost all the fats found in Oreos were partially hydrogenated, producing trans fats (which could be labeled as unsaturated fats even though they behaved like saturated fats) via trans-cis isomerism. Since trans fats have been banned, industrial food-oil producers have turned to fat interestification to create triglycerides that would not be found in the sources the oils are derived from. Early looks at interestified fats seem to show they seem to promote inflammation and adipose tissue growth.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30813339/
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2...id#45653145) |
 |
Date: December 18th, 2022 9:26 PM Author: histrionic garnet prole
ctrl + f "mice"
shut the fuck up
show me HUMAN OUTCOME DATA that demonstrates "seed oils" are bad for you
EVERYTHING with human outcome data demonstrates they're health-promoting when consumed in isolation (not wrapped up on junk food) when replacing saturated fat
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2...id#45653156) |
 |
Date: December 18th, 2022 8:16 PM Author: Stirring library
1. It doesn’t mean that as the term is used, otherwise it would be a useless term.
2. No they aren’t, as I just explained. Controlled trials where subjects were fed different diets assigned to them.
The study shows the impact on weight gain that different diets have even if the calories are the exact same. This means that determining whether a diet is advantageous based purely on its caloric content is faulty.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2...id#45652850) |
Date: December 18th, 2022 8:30 PM Author: sapphire trailer park
As a broad approximation CICO is correct, but it ignores things like the thermic effect of food, insulin response, meal timing, and the impact of a whole slew of other hormones on body composition.
CICO will keep you in a normal BMI, but you’ll never really get cut with it unless you get lucky
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2...id#45652911) |
Date: December 18th, 2022 11:03 PM Author: judgmental deranged temple
The calories in, calories out argument is pretty stupid.
Yeah, obviously the more of something you eat, the more calories you consume, the more likely you are to gain weight.
But it should be even more obvious that it can't *only* be calories in calories out. It should be evident to even a 5 year old that your body isn't going to process eating ice cream every day vs gorging yourself in one sitting, or drinking sugar water vs celery, in the same way. Plus, everyone shits and everyone shits differently.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2...id#45653663) |
 |
Date: December 21st, 2022 4:27 PM Author: cerebral turdskin bawdyhouse
This is because corn is highly bio-unavailable, due to how dense the cellulose is.
"100 calories" of corn will not be metabolized the same as 100 calories of sweet potatoes, despite both being complex carbs, due to bioavailability. Moreover, 100 calories of simple carbs will not be digested the same as 100 calories of fats; depending on insulin levels at time of consuming either, you will have radically different rates of metabolism (or fat storage).
Running a caloric deficit is a necessary but insufficient condition for optimal fat loss.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2...id#45670256) |
Date: December 19th, 2022 3:14 PM Author: Supple saffron internal respiration
thermodynamics has been debunked!
of course it's not so simple as "calories in, calories out" as different calories are processed differently by different people. but it is physically impossible to run at a caloric deficit and gain weight.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2...id#45657025) |
|
|