Chatgpt pro ($200/month) is 100% worth it in LAW
| pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | high-end jade toilet seat | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | pearly electric dingle berry milk | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | black boltzmann | 08/13/25 | | up-to-no-good stead boiling water | 08/13/25 | | aggressive state pocket flask | 08/13/25 | | sienna kitty rehab | 08/13/25 | | pearly electric dingle berry milk | 08/13/25 | | violet stimulating point really tough guy | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | Hairraiser hall fortuitous meteor | 08/13/25 | | aggressive state pocket flask | 08/13/25 | | sienna kitty rehab | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | aggressive state pocket flask | 08/13/25 | | Appetizing carnelian indian lodge | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | Lemon double fault tattoo | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | Lemon double fault tattoo | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | aggressive state pocket flask | 08/13/25 | | Laughsome university | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | thriller range | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | thriller range | 08/13/25 | | Fluffy Low-t Hospital | 08/13/25 | | vengeful heady chapel | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | Fluffy Low-t Hospital | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | Fluffy Low-t Hospital | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | Fluffy Low-t Hospital | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | arrogant floppy menage | 08/13/25 | | high-end jade toilet seat | 08/13/25 | | vengeful heady chapel | 08/13/25 | | Fluffy Low-t Hospital | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | Laughsome university | 08/13/25 | | disgusting market roommate | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | Fluffy Low-t Hospital | 08/13/25 | | thriller range | 08/13/25 | | Fluffy Low-t Hospital | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | Fluffy Low-t Hospital | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | Marvelous Ladyboy | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | Marvelous Ladyboy | 08/13/25 | | thriller range | 08/13/25 | | beta vigorous place of business | 08/13/25 | | comical twisted dilemma | 08/13/25 | | iridescent frisky meetinghouse generalized bond | 08/13/25 | | arrogant floppy menage | 08/13/25 | | thriller range | 08/13/25 | | beta vigorous place of business | 08/14/25 | | high-end jade toilet seat | 08/14/25 | | rose razzle den idiot | 08/14/25 | | Glittery son of senegal space | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | sienna kitty rehab | 08/13/25 | | Glittery son of senegal space | 08/13/25 | | boyish haunted graveyard | 08/14/25 | | Fluffy Low-t Hospital | 08/13/25 | | Glittery son of senegal space | 08/13/25 | | beta vigorous place of business | 08/13/25 | | Bateful Electric Furnace | 08/13/25 | | sienna kitty rehab | 08/13/25 | | Glittery son of senegal space | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | Orchid death wish | 08/13/25 | | pearl indirect expression | 08/13/25 | | Glittery son of senegal space | 08/13/25 | | comical twisted dilemma | 08/13/25 | | thriller range | 08/13/25 | | comical twisted dilemma | 08/13/25 | | arrogant floppy menage | 08/13/25 | | thriller range | 08/13/25 | | arrogant floppy menage | 08/13/25 | | high-end jade toilet seat | 08/13/25 | | Orchid death wish | 08/14/25 | | black boltzmann | 08/14/25 | | Mind-boggling Wine Church Building | 08/13/25 | | Big Ebony Sneaky Criminal Stain | 08/13/25 | | sienna kitty rehab | 08/13/25 | | thriller range | 08/13/25 | | Misanthropic crotch | 08/14/25 | | beta vigorous place of business | 08/14/25 | | Bull Headed Personal Credit Line Field | 08/14/25 | | beta vigorous place of business | 08/14/25 | | Aphrodisiac brindle knife | 08/14/25 | | Abusive jew | 08/13/25 | | passionate garnet hominid | 08/13/25 | | 180 insanely creepy public bath wrinkle | 08/13/25 | | Scarlet internal respiration house | 08/14/25 | | Unholy Beady-eyed Stage Alpha | 08/14/25 | | Fiercely-loyal theater stage | 08/14/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 13th, 2025 4:23 PM Author: pearl indirect expression
All bluebook citations are accurate, filing is crisp, 40+ page startlingly intricate and accurate law. Prompt was three/four long paragraphs detailing precisely what I wanted--not some offhand find it shit from a partner, PLEASE note. I had a lot of familiarity with the subject.
But wow. Wow wow wow. 30 mins and it generated a masterpiece. Litigators who naysay it are either 1) poor prompt engineers (likely) 2) too cheap/poor to afford pro
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762076&forum_id=2...id#49182280) |
Date: August 13th, 2025 4:37 PM Author: sienna kitty rehab
yeah if you're doing anything real you gotta use a reasoning model and have it think a long time
you should basically write the prompt like an email instruction to an assistant, too. give it as much context as possible. you can just ask it how to best prompt it btw. in general the best way to figure out the best way to get what you want from AI is to ask the AI
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762076&forum_id=2...id#49182321) |
Date: August 13th, 2025 5:00 PM Author: Fluffy Low-t Hospital
I've found the opposite; the vast majority of its current utility is in the standard searches that you can get for $20/mo. (To be clear: (a) no fucking lawyer is too poor to pay $200/mo. version; and (b) everyone should in fact get pro, for several reasons, probably first among them that you'll develop the best user skills that keep you most abreast of the tech as it advances.) Pro still 100% does not find magic-bullet fact-to-fact cases that you still need to do 3 hours of drudge work for. It is still maddeningly lazy about refusing -- outright refusing! -- to pull **every** federal districts' jury plan to look for certain language and categorize certain commonalities ("here's a table showing 8 plans! let me know if you want me to keep looking!").
The REAL turning point on AI in law will be when openAI finally integrates chatgpt into your discovery file to crawl around and look for shit. (Facts win cases, not law.) I'm hoping to see this within a year. Right now you can feed it bite-sized pieces, and the results, honestly, are not very impressive (but mostly because the inputs are not very large). But when it starts being able to watch and transcribe 773 hours of video and read 1.2M pages of text and tell me where are the places where subordinates raised concerns about possible MRSA outbreaks, where do you start to see the beginning signs of an outbreak, and for each decedent, create a timeline of their symptoms and reporting -- THAT will be useful. THAT will allow me to let go some of my entitled spoiled rich-kid shitlib associates from CLS.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762076&forum_id=2...id#49182371) |
 |
Date: August 13th, 2025 5:04 PM Author: vengeful heady chapel
the laziness is so fucking niggerish and weird
does it have good memory features compared to stadnard? like it will remeber al the past shit i put in well or i have to keep reminding it?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762076&forum_id=2...id#49182386)
|
 |
Date: August 13th, 2025 5:11 PM Author: Fluffy Low-t Hospital
I am actually really pro-AI; it's only in environments like xo -- with oodles of mid- to high-160s lsat scorers who believe strongly in futurism because people of their intellectual capacity were really supposed to be religious, but religion is dead -- where I'm constantly having to be like "lol there partner, let's not spaz your Emory hat off your head, or pee through your Michigan Law sweatpants over this."
No, to be honest I'm extremely unimpressed at the model's long-term memory. I tend to delete most of my threads after I'm done with them, but I also don't expect it to remember stuff from those threads; I don't know if this practice contributes to this issue. I have no idea why this happens and I do not view it as a 'core' criticism of AI (it also doesn't really bother me that much).
The laziness is so fucking bizarre it makes me want to snap sam altmans twiggy little fag arms off. Like half of what I want you to do is give me links to all ~50 fucking PDFs, goddamnit.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762076&forum_id=2...id#49182410) |
 |
Date: August 13th, 2025 5:27 PM Author: pearl indirect expression
Westlaw ai was better than lexis but is miles behind o3 pro and 5 research grade now, even with specific bluebook cites. There are no longer hallucinations using the $200 month model
I have no idea how openai coded it now but it's scary af.
Obviously I'm violating a million and one client confidentiality rules but if you dare to try it will be completely fucking shocked and convinced your career will soon be caput
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762076&forum_id=2...id#49182464) |
 |
Date: August 13th, 2025 5:38 PM Author: pearl indirect expression
Thank you dude, my thoughts too
While it is admittedly giving a lot of info to gpt, do you know how troublesome that discovery request would be for the other party to sit and wade through without AI? Oh wait then you could just send them a discovery request for THEIR gpt history. So there's an impasse, no?
I think gpt will quickly become like westlaw or lexis w/r/t discovery or bullshit like that. Just not realistic
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762076&forum_id=2...id#49182512) |
 |
Date: August 13th, 2025 5:19 PM Author: thriller range
"The REAL turning point on AI in law will be when openAI finally integrates chatgpt into your discovery file to crawl around and look for shit"
They turned this on like 2 weeks ago
I made a huge thread about it and have been using it daily to do doc reviews in the background
It went through 1,000 pages of discovery the other day while I was doing other stuff and sifted out 5 key docs for my mediation brief that would've taken me 10-20 hours to find
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762076&forum_id=2...id#49182430) |
 |
Date: August 13th, 2025 9:02 PM Author: thriller range
90%+ of practicing attorneys like epah will never be capable of sophisticated prompting like the upper 99th percentile of AI shitlaw trailblazers on autoadmit
Their muscle memory and brains are too hard wired into doing rote doc review summaries + pdf tabbing + opening MS word to construct a brief from scratch using the same basic bitch boilerplate shit everyone has seen before
Litigators who don't have all that baggage and also have a knack for sophisticated cross-model prompting with customized backend/github plug ins and built in organic learning and refinement cycles will do better
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762076&forum_id=2...id#49183086) |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:06 AM Author: Orchid death wish
From Grok:
Subject: Don’t Forget, Jose
Hey Jose,
Just a little nudge to remind you that "everyone gets a shot" — yeah, even you. Also, in my four years of dodging insurance company nonsense, your facet syndrome is hands-down the most ridiculous case I’ve ever seen. Try not to make it worse, alright?
Cheers,
[Your Name]
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762076&forum_id=2...id#49183472) |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: Misanthropic crotch
I’m an tranny and our firm has done this.
It’s good but not perfect. I use it as a first cut for drafting specific clauses, to help me think through things, to get me conversant on a certain topic, etc. but I have yet to have it draft me anything that I could send out.
I’ve also used it to double-check my reading of agreements with respect to discrete questions. It’s again good but not great - it misses a lot of nuance.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762076&forum_id=2...id#49183476) |
|
|