Today was one hell of a strange Monday
| Flushed abnormal lay | 06/01/26 | | big-titted partner | 06/01/26 | | Flushed abnormal lay | 06/01/26 | | deep locale | 06/01/26 | | Flushed abnormal lay | 06/01/26 | | deep locale | 06/01/26 | | chartreuse telephone | 06/01/26 | | deep locale | 06/01/26 | | racy impertinent weed whacker space | 06/01/26 | | Sticky menage wrinkle | 06/01/26 | | chartreuse telephone | 06/01/26 | | chrome police squad multi-billionaire | 06/01/26 | | chartreuse telephone | 06/01/26 | | Flushed abnormal lay | 06/01/26 | | chartreuse telephone | 06/01/26 | | deep locale | 06/01/26 | | chartreuse telephone | 06/01/26 | | deep locale | 06/01/26 | | Flushed abnormal lay | 06/01/26 | | deep locale | 06/01/26 | | Flushed abnormal lay | 06/01/26 | | deep locale | 06/01/26 | | chartreuse telephone | 06/01/26 | | big-titted partner | 06/01/26 | | Flushed abnormal lay | 06/01/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 1st, 2026 10:21 PM Author: Flushed abnormal lay
I had one of the weirdest meetings of my professional career, but it did not result in my termination.
Also, my lawyer didn't call and fire me either, even though I thought he would. Maybe I staved that one off too.
Still, my life is not chill, bros. I'm very stressed out.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870524&forum_id=2...id#49910720) |
 |
Date: June 1st, 2026 10:47 PM Author: Flushed abnormal lay
Meeting was supposed to be about workflow and getting reassigned to some subordinate role where I have less independence and visibility. This was the stated goal.
But we get into the meeting and it immediately becomes clear that nobody is organized or has thought this through and there’s no way to actually implement the subordinate role.
I didn’t say much. I just looked at all the lawyers’ time during the meeting. I had the most hours of anyone on the call but I was somehow the target? Also, I haven’t lost a case since I came to this firm. I’m dunking on the competition.
Also, they said that someone complained that I was a racist, but then they took that back and said, “no, someone implied you had implicit discriminatory bias” or something like that.
Anyway, it’s been a whirlwind of shit.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5870524&forum_id=2...id#49910768) |
|
|