\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Here is DeepSeek's solution to prevent AI from destroying American jobs

Preventing AI from significantly disrupting the American job...
chilmata
  05/29/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: May 29th, 2025 2:09 PM
Author: chilmata

Preventing AI from significantly disrupting the American job market will require a mix of proactive policies, regulatory frameworks, and economic adaptations. Here are some key legislative and policy approaches that could help mitigate job displacement while harnessing AI's benefits:

### 1. **AI Transparency and Accountability Laws**

- **Algorithmic Impact Assessments (AIAs):** Require companies deploying AI in hiring, firing, or task automation to assess and disclose potential job impacts before implementation.

- **Right-to-Explanation Laws:** Mandate that workers and employers understand how AI-driven decisions (e.g., layoffs, promotions) are made.

### 2. **Job Displacement Mitigation Policies**

- **Automation Tax or Robot Tax:** Levy taxes on companies that replace human labor with AI/automation, with revenue funding retraining programs.

- **Severance and Transition Support:** Require companies displacing workers via AI to provide extended severance, healthcare, and retraining benefits.

### 3. **Workforce Reskilling & Education Reform**

- **Lifelong Learning Accounts (LLAs):** Government-matched savings accounts for workers to upskill (similar to 401(k)s for education).

- **Expanded Pell Grants for Tech Training:** Subsidize certifications in AI-resistant fields (healthcare, trades, creative industries).

- **National AI Apprenticeship Program:** Fund employer partnerships to train workers in AI-augmented roles.

### 4. **Labor Protections & New Worker Rights**

- **Shortened Workweek Incentives:** Tax breaks for companies adopting 4-day weeks (distributing work more evenly).

- **Collective Bargaining for Tech Transitions:** Strengthen unions’ role in negotiating AI integration terms.

- **Job Guarantee Programs:** Public-sector employment as a backstop for displaced workers (e.g., infrastructure, care work).

### 5. **Incentivizing Human-AI Collaboration**

- **Tax Credits for "Augmentation over Automation":** Reward companies using AI to assist (not replace) workers.

- **Small Business AI Grants:** Help SMEs adopt AI tools without reducing headcount.

### 6. **Sector-Specific Safeguards**

- **Healthcare/Education AI Guardrails:** Limit AI’s role in fields requiring human judgment (e.g., ban fully automated teaching/nursing).

- **Creative Industry Protections:** Copyright reforms ensuring artists/writers are compensated when AI trains on their work.

### 7. **Long-Term Structural Reforms**

- **Universal Basic Income (UBI) Pilots:** Test unconditional cash transfers to offset job market volatility.

- **Data Dividend Laws:** Require AI firms to share profits with workers whose data trained their models (e.g., California’s proposed data dividend).

### **Political Challenges & Trade-Offs**

- **Innovation vs. Protection:** Overregulation could stifle AI’s productivity gains, but inaction risks mass unemployment.

- **Global Competition:** U.S. policies must balance worker protections with maintaining competitiveness against less-regulated nations.

### **Key Precedents**

- The **WORKER Act** (proposed in 2021) aimed to tax automation and fund retraining.

- The **EU AI Act** includes risk assessments for high-impact AI, a model for U.S. rules.

Would you prioritize certain sectors (e.g., manufacturing, white-collar jobs) for protection, or focus on economy-wide solutions?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5731076&forum_id=2...id.#48971192)