https://x.com/KassyAkiva/status/1928233466627318135

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5731398&forum_id=2...id.#48974033)

Pro Bharat

@probharat8

·

13h

As a Hindu, I apologise.

There are some brainwashed idiot Hindus like her who bring shame.

This idiot doesn’t know herself about the genocide of Hindus by Muslims in last 10 centuries.

We were killed mercilessly over centuries and today she is supporting them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5731398&forum_id=2...id.#48974046)

Both Muslim and Hindu women were targeted for rape.[5] West Pakistani men wanted to cleanse a nation corrupted by the presence of Hindus and believed that the sacrifice of Hindu women was needed; Bengali women were thus viewed as Hindu or Hindu-like.[6] Imams, mullahs, and a fatwa from West Pakistan declared that Bengali women could be handled as gonimoter maal ("war booty" or "public property").[35][36] Susan Brownmiller wrote that 80 percent of raped women were Muslims, matching the demographics of Bangladesh,[37] although Christian Gerlach stated that this "has no clear basis".[38] According to D'Costa, Bengali women were indiscriminately raped by the army, though Muslim women were forcibly impregnated while Hindu women were often killed after being raped.[39] Salil Tripathi wrote that almost all of the rape victims he interviewed were Muslim, contrary to claims that Hindu women were especially targeted.[40] Lisa Sharlach wrote that rape victims were primarily Bengali women "of all castes and religions", but that girls may have been spared if they could recite Muslim prayers.[41] M. Rafiqul Islam described Hindu women and girls as the main targets for rape and sexual violence.[42]

The perpetrators conducted nighttime raids, assaulting women in their villages,[43] often in front of their families, as part of the terror campaign.[44] Victims were also kidnapped and held in special camps where they were repeatedly assaulted. Many of those held in the camps were murdered or committed suicide,[45][46] with some taking their own lives by using their hair to hang themselves; the soldiers responded to these suicides by cutting the women's hair off.[34] Time magazine reported on 563 girls who had been kidnapped and held by the military; all of them were between three and five months pregnant when the military began to release them.[47] Some women were forcibly used as prostitutes.[48] While the Pakistani government estimated the number of rapes in the hundreds,[49] other estimates range between 200,000[50] and 400,000.[51] The Pakistani government had tried to censor reports coming out of the region, but media reports on the atrocities did reach the public worldwide, and gave rise to widespread international public support for the liberation movement.[52]

In what has been described by Jenneke Arens as a deliberate attempt to destroy an ethnic group, many of those assaulted were raped, murdered and then bayoneted in the genitalia.[53] Adam Jones, a political scientist, has said that one of the reasons for the mass rapes was to undermine Bengali society through the "dishonoring" of Bengali women and that some women were raped until they died or were killed following repeated attacks.[54] [55] The International Commission of Jurists concluded that the atrocities carried out by the Pakistan armed forces "were part of a deliberate policy by a disciplined force".[56] The writer Mulk Raj Anand said the rapes were too widespread and systematic to be anything but conscious military policy, "planned by the West Pakistanis in a deliberate effort to create a new race" or to undermine Bengali separatism.[57] Amita Malik, reporting from Bangladesh following the Pakistan armed forces surrender, wrote that one West Pakistani soldier said: "We are going. But we are leaving our seed behind".[58]

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5731398&forum_id=2...id.#48974712)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5731398&forum_id=2...id.#48974586)

the people in MIT's class with the lowest SAT scores, who are not black, are all jewish because jewish people are overrepresented on the committees that decide enrollment.

Most jews at top schools are far less prestigious than their goy counterparts.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5731398&forum_id=2...id.#48974604)

https://x.com/GuyZys/status/1928398578822631509

Today should have been a happy day.

I finally got my PhD from

@MIT

, with my 5-year-old twins, my 2-year-old and my parents (children of Holocaust survivors) traveling halfway around the world just to be there.

Instead, MIT’s student commencement speaker decided it was appropriate to use the moment for hate-filled rhetoric against Israelis and Jews. And it wasn’t just one person; too many in the crowd erupted with cheers and anger. My kids might not have understood every word, but they felt the fear and hostility, and kept asking questions from that point on. It was distressing for them, upsetting for us, and deeply distasteful for everyone else who came to celebrate.

How could

@MIT

let this happen and ruin a special day for hundreds of Jewish graduates and thousands of their family members?

This is even more heartbreaking considering that just last week, a beautiful Jewish American couple was murdered in DC. Shame on MIT for allowing hate and division to overshadow a day meant for celebration and unity.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5731398&forum_id=2...id.#48974621)