The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Long article on WTC 7
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 3rd, 2025 8:50 AM Author: ''"'''"''"' Is this legit? https://internationalfireandsafetyjournal.com/did-world-trade-center-building-7-really-collapse-due-to-an-office-fuel-load-fire/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732833&forum_id=2...id.#48982832) |
Date: June 3rd, 2025 8:53 AM Author: ''"'''"''"' Thus, FEMA hypothesized that diesel fuel stored in the lower levels of the building was somehow pumped and discharged through severed pipes which likely fueled the fires for several hours. The report noted that its best hypothesis had “only a low probability of occurrence” and that further investigation was needed. NIST would later rule out the diesel fuel hypothesis. The lack of video evidence of thick black smoke characteristic of hydrocarbon fires also confirms this fire was not fueled by a flammable or combustible liquid. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732833&forum_id=2...id.#48982841) |
 |
Date: June 3rd, 2025 8:56 AM Author: A Real Life Male Model havent read the link
i fully believe the planes brought down 1 and 2.
seems like there was a decision to bring down 7, the logistics of which really challenges my belief. how were they "ready" to bring down 7? |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2025 8:57 AM Author: ''"'''"''"' It must somehow involve the Israeli government then (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732833&forum_id=2...id.#48982849) |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2025 8:58 AM Author: cowgod (cowgod) If planes brought down 1 & 2, explosives were still planted anyway…. They wouldn’t demolish 7 like that without the same redundancy for 1 & 2. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732833&forum_id=2...id.#48982854) |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2025 9:01 AM Author: A Real Life Male Model teams involving dozens of men planted explosives in 1 and 2, undetected by thousands of people who spend 40+ hrs per week in the same rooms, much less a million passerby?
and then remained silent until death about this work?
possible, but begins to stretch credibility |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2025 9:07 AM Author: cowgod (cowgod) Everyone seems to think that that’s what happened in 7 so why not 1 & 2. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732833&forum_id=2...id.#48982870) |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2025 2:47 PM Author: internet g0y (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732833&forum_id=2...id.#48983968) |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2025 8:56 AM Author: cowgod (cowgod) Yeah they fuckin did it. That’s how power works. Do shit and lie about it. Pwn anyone who questions you. Then, next time you do something, everyone is Afraid to fuck with you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732833&forum_id=2...id.#48982847) |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2025 9:14 AM Author: disco fries (his own flesh as well as all space was still a cage) I didn't read the article, but I have long thought that all of the buildings were brought down intentionally and the whole thing was completely planned and all of those people were murdered with the collusion of the U.S. Government. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732833&forum_id=2...id.#48982885) |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2025 2:49 PM Author: .......,,.,.,.,.,,,,,,.,.,..,.,. the us govt is nowhere near competent enough to pull all of that off. they barely were able to fake the moon landing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732833&forum_id=2...id.#48983977) |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2025 9:43 AM Author: ''"'''"''"' We all know what we are looking at in the videos, at least in qualitative terms, yet NIST initially denied WTC 7 underwent a freefall collapse. When challenged about the freefall collapse by David Chandler, during an August 2008 technical briefing conference for members of the science and engineering community prior to the release of its final report, Dr. Shyam Sunder, director of the WTC 7 investigation, responded by stating, “A freefall time would be an object that has no structural components below it.” But in the case of WTC 7, he claimed that their collapse analysis showed (according to their computer modeling) that the downward acceleration was 40% slower than freefall. “There was structural resistance that was provided in this particular case, and you had a sequence of structural failures that had to take place, and everything was not instantaneous.” Another question asked by American physics professor Steven Jones Ph.D. called into question the wording used in the preliminary report “assuming constant speed,” whereas it was clear that the building was accelerating. In answering Dr. Jones’ objection, NIST committed to revise the wording in its final report. The final report went beyond changing the word “speed” to “acceleration” by introducing a new analysis that included a graph that confirmed a 2.25- second period of freefall collapse (Image 26). On page 45 of the final report, NIST states, “The north face descended at gravitational acceleration, as the buckled columns provided negligible support to the upper portion of the north face. This freefall drop continued for approximately eight stories or 32 meters (105 ft).” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732833&forum_id=2...id.#48982946) |
|
Date: June 3rd, 2025 10:03 AM Author: cowgod (cowgod) Why are you making this about Engineering (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732833&forum_id=2...id.#48982992) |