XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| Tan area | 07/04/25 | | Orchid market | 07/04/25 | | crimson gas station | 07/04/25 | | narrow-minded patrolman institution | 07/04/25 | | Tan area | 07/04/25 | | khaki orchestra pit | 07/04/25 | | Orchid market | 07/04/25 | | khaki orchestra pit | 07/04/25 | | Orchid market | 07/04/25 | | khaki orchestra pit | 07/04/25 | | Orchid market | 07/05/25 | | Tan area | 07/05/25 | | Rose soul-stirring jewess | 07/05/25 | | Tan area | 07/06/25 | | Rose soul-stirring jewess | 07/05/25 | | Tan area | 07/05/25 | | Rose soul-stirring jewess | 07/06/25 | | rebellious gunner dingle berry | 07/06/25 | | thriller costumed hominid | 07/05/25 | | 180 famous landscape painting | 07/06/25 | | thriller costumed hominid | 07/06/25 | | khaki orchestra pit | 07/06/25 | | thriller costumed hominid | 07/06/25 | | khaki orchestra pit | 07/06/25 | | Dun regret elastic band | 07/05/25 | | Ruddy stage | 07/06/25 | | learning disabled sandwich | 07/05/25 | | Razzle Party Of The First Part | 07/06/25 | | khaki orchestra pit | 07/06/25 | | Crusty abusive fat ankles | 07/06/25 | | khaki orchestra pit | 07/06/25 | | Rough-skinned Hospital | 07/06/25 | | Tan area | 07/06/25 | | Tan area | 07/06/25 | | Tan area | 07/06/25 | | rebellious gunner dingle berry | 07/06/25 | | Tan area | 07/06/25 | | 180 famous landscape painting | 07/06/25 | | Tan area | 07/06/25 | | Crusty abusive fat ankles | 07/06/25 | | Ruddy stage | 07/06/25 | | khaki orchestra pit | 07/06/25 | | Demanding swashbuckling heaven | 07/06/25 | | Infuriating Pocket Flask Pozpig | 07/06/25 | | Coiffed school | 07/06/25 | | Infuriating Pocket Flask Pozpig | 07/06/25 | | At-the-ready Theater Stage | 07/06/25 | | thriller costumed hominid | 07/06/25 | | translucent violent quadroon | 07/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: khaki orchestra pit
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id.#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: khaki orchestra pit
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id.#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: khaki orchestra pit
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id.#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: khaki orchestra pit
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id.#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: Razzle Party Of The First Part
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id.#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: rebellious gunner dingle berry
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id.#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Ruddy stage
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2...id.#49076800) |
|
|