The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Autistic therapy base | 01/06/26 | | razzmatazz patrolman step-uncle's house | 01/06/26 | | spruce church building | 01/06/26 | | razzmatazz patrolman step-uncle's house | 01/06/26 | | spruce church building | 01/06/26 | | razzmatazz patrolman step-uncle's house | 01/06/26 | | Autistic therapy base | 01/06/26 | | razzmatazz patrolman step-uncle's house | 01/06/26 | | Autistic therapy base | 01/06/26 | | Provocative sanctuary | 01/07/26 | | angry lodge | 01/06/26 | | gold excitant site | 01/06/26 | | spruce church building | 01/06/26 | | razzle-dazzle brunch | 01/06/26 | | spruce church building | 01/06/26 | | Insecure Temple | 01/06/26 | | Spectacular copper faggot firefighter corner | 01/06/26 | | burgundy very tactful rigpig | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: razzmatazz patrolman step-uncle's house
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2...id.#49568134) |
|
|