i can barely imagine how they used the vids from Epstein Island.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750016&forum_id=2...id.#49098886)

Try again.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750016&forum_id=2...id.#49103230)

"Ok but the video shows you brutally fucking the underage crying girl in the ass"

"Yes but I was invited"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750016&forum_id=2...id.#49103924)

I'm not even saying it wouldn't be effective. I'm saying it would only be effective once, like the pager bombs. If Bill Clinton tapes get leaked to the media, Bill Clinton will say "ok I admit I got tempted by this guy who works for MOSSAD," because Bill Clinton has nothing to lose at that point. At that point it ceases to be an effective Mossad operation because the whole world knows about it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750016&forum_id=2...id.#49103941)

speaking of bill clinton, how the fuck did the secret service allow this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750016&forum_id=2...id.#49103960)

The more likely outcome is VIPs get friendlier with Russia and China. "They never doxed us, they give us privacy." Now all your ex-presidents and CEOs fuck whores from Russia.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750016&forum_id=2...id.#49103977)

However, the trial did highlight the constitutionally questionable practice of allowing self-described “victims” to testify pseudonymously. Maxwell’s appellate brief, now pending before the US Supreme Court, convincingly argues that this “transformed the trial into a form of Kabuki theater designed to remind the jury at every turn that these adult women were being protected because their privacy interests, and not Maxwell’s constitutional right to a public trial, were paramount.” The brief continues:

Immediately after Epstein’s death, complainants’ civil attorneys representing Epstein victims, including those who testified at trial, began to assist in the creation of the Epstein Victims Compensation Program (VCP), a non-adversarial and confidential claims resolution program set up to compensate self-identified victims of Epstein, even as they were actively involved in the Government’s investigation. On June 25, 2020, the Program began accepting claims. An attorney for one complainant encouraged her to cooperate with the Government in its case against Maxwell because it would improve her prospects for receiving a larger sum of money from the VCP. Tr. 2731-32. It did. “Jane” received $5,000,000.

Excluded from the popular mythology is any cognizance that persistent Epstein hysteria, like other hysterias, has tended to erode civil liberties and injure due process. It authorizes the casual proliferation of abject lies—such as those made ceaselessly against Alan Dershowitz, whose eventual attainment of an admission from Guiffre that she had falsely accused him of depraved sexual acts for eight years straight is diligently ignored by the mythology’s adherents. It accepts as perfectly sensible that a “self-identified victim” can be enticed by attorneys to cooperate with federal prosecutors because this would improve her chances of obtaining a bigger payout from an adjudicative process that is both “non-adversarial” and “confidential,” meaning there is no downside risk to maximally dramatizing one’s purported victimhood—and the upside can be $5 million.

https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-idiocy-of-the-epstein-mythology/

LOL @ are legal "system"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5750016&forum_id=2...id.#49103976)