RATE this LEGAL tweet re: AI conversations being privileged
| histrionic white center | 02/14/26 | | histrionic white center | 02/14/26 | | razzle-dazzle property | 02/14/26 | | histrionic white center | 02/14/26 | | brindle liquid oxygen | 02/14/26 | | high-end stimulating wagecucks | 02/14/26 | | histrionic white center | 02/14/26 | | pale idiotic old irish cottage regret | 02/14/26 | | 180 pit | 02/14/26 | | Chrome stag film milk | 02/14/26 | | 180 pit | 02/14/26 | | Alcoholic startled lay | 02/14/26 | | histrionic white center | 02/14/26 | | histrionic white center | 02/14/26 | | histrionic white center | 02/14/26 | | curious resort | 02/14/26 | | Smoky library | 02/14/26 | | curious resort | 02/14/26 | | dark magical gas station | 02/14/26 | | Pea-brained house famous landscape painting | 02/14/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 14th, 2026 9:21 PM Author: Smoky library
why would any random person's notes or search history become privileged?
now the attorney's chatgpt and google history certainly should but because he is a lawyer with work product and client privilege
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5834938&forum_id=2...id.#49671481) |
 |
Date: February 14th, 2026 10:26 PM Author: curious resort
work product surprises me because it has protection in many situations even for unrepresented clients.
for privilege.. this has always struck me as slightly odd about it. the privilege belongs to the client, not to the attorney. and it developed to protect his right to fair legal process. why a similar principle never developed for the notes and research material of self-represented individuals is a bit of a puzzle.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5834938&forum_id=2...id.#49671600)
|
|
|