Why are the goyim buying gold and silver?
| sadistic lime set queen of the night | 01/29/26 | | sadistic lime set queen of the night | 01/29/26 | | Autistic Spot | 01/29/26 | | sadistic lime set queen of the night | 01/29/26 | | House-broken den | 01/29/26 | | Autistic Spot | 01/29/26 | | embarrassed to the bone crackhouse idiot | 01/29/26 | | sadistic lime set queen of the night | 01/29/26 | | Autistic Spot | 01/29/26 | | House-broken den | 01/29/26 | | Autistic Spot | 01/29/26 | | House-broken den | 01/29/26 | | Autistic Spot | 01/29/26 | | House-broken den | 01/29/26 | | Autistic Spot | 01/29/26 | | House-broken den | 01/29/26 | | Autistic Spot | 01/29/26 | | House-broken den | 01/29/26 | | sadistic lime set queen of the night | 01/29/26 | | Amber Very Tactful Principal's Office Macaca | 01/29/26 | | Passionate Orchestra Pit | 01/29/26 | | sadistic lime set queen of the night | 01/30/26 | | embarrassed to the bone crackhouse idiot | 01/30/26 | | Passionate Orchestra Pit | 01/30/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 29th, 2026 5:02 PM Author: House-broken den
this is also irrelevant.
if i said "if a stock is going to collapse, shorting as much of it as you can is a good idea" would it be intelligent to respond "yes, but you must know when it'll collapse"? well no shit! in the long run we're all dead and the sun goes supernova. it is certain that one day the dollar will be worth nothing and cease to exist, i can guarantee that!
none of that changes that fact that borrowing something that losses value in real terms it is a good for the borrower as an ironclad principle.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828364&forum_id=2...id.#49631364) |
 |
Date: January 29th, 2026 5:12 PM Author: House-broken den
*IF* the dollar is going to collapse, having debt would be tcr.
but what if it doesn't collapse?
then it's *NOT* tcr!
if i said "if something is going to appreciate it's a good to own it" you wouldn't quibble with these obvious variables. that's a just a true statement. yes, if owning it required you to take out debt that accrued faster than the asset appreciated, then it wouldn't be good! that doesn't make the statement any less true. likewise, "if something is going to depreciate it it's a good thing to have borrowed it", pointing out that if the cost of the borrowing exceeds the depreciation doesn't make that statement untrue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828364&forum_id=2...id.#49631383) |
 |
Date: January 29th, 2026 5:23 PM Author: House-broken den
yes i did, which is essentially "no shit but that doesn't change the principle."
"buying something that goes up in value is a good for the buyer."
"but what if he borrowed money to buy it that accrued interest faster than it appreciated."
"then it would be bad, but that doesn't change the general principle, you're talking about other costs."
***
"borrowing something that goes down in value is good for the borrower."
"but what if the cost of borrowing exceeds the favorable debt to value gains?"
"then it would be bad, but that doesn't change the general principle, you're talking about other costs."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828364&forum_id=2...id.#49631400) |
|
|