The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Lindsey = legit war target by Russia and Iran, right?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 12th, 2026 1:06 PM Author: disrespectful deer antler If the US supports via intel and financial means the killing of political leaders/supporters in Russia and Iran, then its fair game that they can do the same to US leaders who support those right? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994420) |
Date: July 12th, 2026 1:07 PM Author: disrespectful deer antler 2022 🇷🇺: “Somebody in Russia [should] take [Putin] out.”
2023 🇷🇺:“Russians are dying… best money we’ve ever spent.”
2023 🇵🇸: “Gaza should be flattened.”
2024 🇵🇸: “This is Hiroshima & Nagasaki on steroids.” “If I were Israel, I’d do the same.” “Do whatever you have to do.” “Pull the Palestinian school system up by its roots and destroy it.”
2025 🇵🇸: “We’re killing all the right people.”
2026 🇮🇷: “We will obliterate them” over Strait of Hormuz.
https://x.com/i/status/2076303478574428461 |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 1:07 PM Author: Vigorous mewling codepig Not Russia but yes Iran for sure we killed all their leadership (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994426) |
 |
Date: July 12th, 2026 1:11 PM Author: disrespectful deer antler So giving money and intel to kill people and them killing you back... doesn't count as fair? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994434) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 1:44 PM Author: Vigorous mewling codepig That’s correct there has always been that distinction even in true proxy wars unless you really want to open yourself up to a direct attack (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994504) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 2:27 PM Author: disrespectful deer antler So then its ok as long as Russia got a proxy in Ukraine to kill him? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994585) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 2:46 PM Author: Vigorous mewling codepig no its only okay for any country we are in direct conflict with and have gone after their civilian leadership, i.e., iran (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994619) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 2:55 PM Author: disrespectful deer antler so its ok for US to use proxy's to kill Russian leaders... but Russia cannot use a proxy against USA because USA is not directly engaged with Russia?
oy |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 3:00 PM Author: Vigorous mewling codepig idgi. when did usa do that (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994641) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 3:36 PM Author: disrespectful deer antler lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994713) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 3:37 PM Author: Vigorous mewling codepig whats so funny (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994719) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 1:18 PM Author: doobsian volcanic crater chapel This is a grey area but the gentlemanly practice has historically said no but we lost legitimacy on the issue with Iran in particular (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994449) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 1:19 PM Author: disrespectful deer antler So only the US gets to do it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994450) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 1:21 PM Author: doobsian volcanic crater chapel We shouldn't but we got dragged down into the gutter by our greatest ally so not much to say by us (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994454) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 1:23 PM Author: disrespectful deer antler This isnt a "well if the go into the past we shouldnt have done that." The facts are that we did. Therefore, fair for them to target the same in the US as we support the targeting in Russia/Iran? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994458) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 1:33 PM Author: doobsian volcanic crater chapel There's no direct evidence that I know of that we targeted civilian leadership in Russia. I think everyone knows there's no question we/NATO assisted Ukraine in their military brass assassinations. As far as Iran goes, or really broadly there's not really any set practice in IHL that says civilian leadership can't be attacked in conflict it just generally isn't done. So it's not a question of we did it so they can do it. I'm also pretty sure Israel is the ones that actually took the dirt for whacking the leadership, on paper it wasn't us. I don't know at this point really anything is fair game. I think without a doubt Trump, JD and entire cabinet are lawfully open to get hit by Iran. Russia is another question. I'm just worried about chemical weapon use.
Should add the distinction between executive leadership and parliamentary leadership. Obviously the argument gets weaker for non-chain of command elected officials but in our current it for tat seems like Iran can do what it wants |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 2:26 PM Author: disrespectful deer antler ur a fag. i clearly made the assumption that we helped Ukraine do attacks on Russian (which any non fag retard would admit). instead of the discussion, u just fight the hypo. what a fag (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994580) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 2:42 PM Author: doobsian volcanic crater chapel What am I fighting? I said there's nothing stopping targeting elected officials during conflict except non-binding state practice. But we are very much not in a conflict with Russia. If that's what you're saying then you're a faggy idiot.
But then the bigger question and your faggy idiot OP is about just targeted killings in general. And that's not a question for international law or our domestic law, that's up the law of the targeted country to just treat it like murder. Some will disagree but our state executive, any state executive, per that state's domestic law can arbitrarily kill anyone in the world it wants to if not in a conflict situation and the person isn't subject to jurisdiction or whatever domestic due process rights that state offers. |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 1:27 PM Author: topaz infuriating dopamine It's against the law of war! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994466) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 1:59 PM Author: claret parlor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994531) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 3:37 PM Author: scarlet turdskin are international rules-based order (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994718) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 2:01 PM Author: Boyish snowy step-uncle's house patrolman He was such a piece of shit that no one cares, we are all just happy he died. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994534) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 2:02 PM Author: claret parlor "fair game", are an ICC judge lol, on the other hand if your point is that the US would in fact (not "should") refrain from retaliating then lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994536) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 2:27 PM Author: disrespectful deer antler i make no such point. But I think Trump is too scared to do anything. That faggot would worry Putin would get him next (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882027&forum_id=2...id.#49994582) |