I only recently learned how the ""unemployment rate"" is calculated. Insane.
| Claret razzle center | 04/06/26 | | Galvanic Piazza | 04/06/26 | | Disrespectful locale yarmulke | 04/06/26 | | Claret razzle center | 04/06/26 | | Galvanic Piazza | 04/06/26 | | Claret razzle center | 04/06/26 | | nighttime casino liquid oxygen | 04/06/26 | | Galvanic Piazza | 04/06/26 | | Navy idiotic range | 04/06/26 | | Claret razzle center | 04/06/26 | | contagious bawdyhouse ratface | 04/06/26 | | Claret razzle center | 04/06/26 | | Mind-boggling Nursing Home | 04/06/26 | | contagious bawdyhouse ratface | 04/07/26 | | Brass Charismatic Karate | 04/07/26 | | cracking shivering indirect expression stage | 04/07/26 | | curious cuckoldry | 04/07/26 | | magical low-t marketing idea | 04/07/26 | | splenetic twinkling uncleanness | 04/07/26 | | Flesh bearded cuck | 04/07/26 | | Frum big roommate | 04/07/26 | | Disrespectful locale yarmulke | 04/07/26 | | Startled sienna sneaky criminal sweet tailpipe | 04/07/26 | | Cream Racy Dilemma Nibblets | 04/07/26 | | Ape Arrogance | 06/01/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 6th, 2026 10:57 PM Author: Claret razzle center
It only counts people who are actively searching for a job. So it excludes people who have given up on finding a job because they've been searching so long without luck.
I suppose it would be DEFENSIBLE to exclude the people who don't WANT a job at all: adults who are content living in their parents' basements and never even tried to find a job, or gave minimal effort. But realistically, a TONNNNN of people who have dropped out of the workforce (by those disingenuous standards) did so because they decided there WEREN'T any jobs for them and gave up.
Fortunately you can calculate the ACTUAL unemployment rate because the numbers are released for all of the categories, and you can work backwards by excluding retired people, people too disabled to work, and so on. Generally it's around 2x the reported unemployment rate.
Fake and gay, it's all fake and gay. The government is constantly gaslighting us.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5854380&forum_id=2...id.#49799218) |
Date: April 7th, 2026 9:40 AM Author: splenetic twinkling uncleanness
All of these stats are fake, flame, and fraudlies, but labor force participation is closer to a useful metric than unemployment. Labor force participation was consistently between 66 and 68% between 1988 and 2008. For the last 18 years, it's been on a steady march down (minus a big swing down then back up for covid lock downs). It's at 62% and continuing to fall today.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CIVPART
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5854380&forum_id=2...id.#49799790) |
|
|