Hope all the shits and giggle of nominating a guy who "talks like me" was worth it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3259749&forum_id=2...id.#30740177)

They dun goofed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3259749&forum_id=2...id.#30741119)

A shame.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3259749&forum_id=2...id.#36396251)

be serious for a moment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3259749&forum_id=2...id.#30741131)

*plays footage of Kasich's face-stuffing press conferences and him grabbing a microphone out of a reporter's hand*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3259749&forum_id=2...id.#30741219)

1. the GOP congress blocked a ton of Obama's initiatives. but there's a limit to what you can do without the White House.

2. if you think the media is more important than controlling SCOTUS, then you need to get your heads examined.

3. the notion that Trump (a lifelong shitlib NYCer who donated money to democrats and praised the Clintons fairly recently and supported amnesty for illegals as late as 2013 and favored a global wealth tax and single payer health care) is an outsider rebel who will reform the system and renew American greatness is one of the most delusional fantasies in history.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3259749&forum_id=2...id.#30741105)

trump never thought he would be the nominee. nor did anyone else, frankly, until poof it fucking happened. now he has no ground game, no fundraising, few meaningful surrogates, and a big fucking clock ticking away. the convention will be a disaster and it will only get worse from there.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3259749&forum_id=2...id.#30743469)

We've seen Mexico. We know what it's like. We don't need the US turning into a bigger version of it. A white-minority US will not be a stable place.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3259749&forum_id=2...id.#30741415)

in no version of reality is Kasich becoming the nominee. If Trump never entered the race it would have been Jeb or Rubio or Cruz

Cruz would be crushed even more than Trump. he was the worst for the general election

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3259749&forum_id=2...id.#30742481)

The next "Trump" will be a Sessions-type who doesn't fake tan, wear a toupee, suggest he's attracted to his daughter, and clumsily give shitlibs ammunition to call him a rathist every other day.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3259749&forum_id=2...id.#30742528)

Would you welcome them if U.S. 2070 is 40% Muslim? 20%? If you and 5000 of your like minded peers were picked up and dropped off in Saudi Arabia would you suddenly luck around you and go "yup, this Islamic law thing sure is swell. Let's get to punishing the gays." or would you keep your culture? Do you think people would act similarly or differently in the reverse situation?

Higher Muslim% = higher tail risk of terrorism. If they reach a critical mass they will impose their culture and beliefs upon their host nation. No nation seems particularly great at integrating (see: scrubbing away the beliefs and behaviors of their home culture) Muslims. Until a nation is as good at integrating Muslims as America is at integrating say, any white people, it's abject stupidity to let them into your country in large numbers.

The integrity of the West depends on the demographic integrity of the West. You're welcome to call it racist if you'd like, I don't care. If you can call it illogical or unreasonable i'd like an explanation.

You can be wrong about the tax rate or trade policy and fix it in five years or ten or twenty. If you're wrong about demographics you can never fix the problem you've created.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3259749&forum_id=2...id.#30742913)

Are you aware that he is totally controlled by special interests, in favor of amnesty, and likely in favor of open borders?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3259749&forum_id=2...id.#31619152)